1,403
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Planning for Natural Gas Pipelines in Ohio: Governance and Other Complexities

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008) Collaborative governance in theory and practice, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), pp. 543–571. doi:10.1093/jopart/mum032
  • Berke, P., & Smith, G. (2009) Hazard mitigation, planning, and disaster resiliency: Challenges and strategic choices for the 21st century, in: U. F. Paleo (Ed) Building Safer Communities. Risk Governance, Spatial Planning and Responses to Natural Hazards, pp. 1–20. (Amsterdam: IOS Press). doi:10.3233/978-1-60750-046-9-1)
  • City of Green, Ohio (2018a) NEXUS pipeline information. Available at https://www.cityofgreen.org/nexus-pipeline-information (accessed 2 February 2019).
  • City of Green, Ohio (9 February 2018b) NEXUS settlement agreement fact sheet. Available at https://www.cityofgreen.org/DocumentCenter/View/409/Settlement-Agreement-Fact-Sheet-PDF.
  • Conroy, M. M., & Jun, H.-J. (2016) Planning process influences on sustainability in Ohio township plans, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 59(11), pp. 2007–2023. doi:10.1080/09640568.2015.1103709
  • Davis, C. (2014) Substate federalism and fracking policies: Does state regulatory authority trump local land use autonomy?, Environmental Science & Technology, 48(15), pp. 8397–8403. doi:10.1021/es405095y
  • Earle, C. (2017) Survey Says …? An argument for more frontloaded FERC public use provider determinations as a means of streamlining the Commission’s regulatory role over interstate natural gas pipeline operators, William & Mary Environmental Law and Policy Review, 41(3), pp. 711–749. Article 8.
  • Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) (2001) Ideas for better stakeholder involvement in the interstate natural gas pipeline planning pre-filing process: industry, agencies, citizens, and FERC staff. Office of Energy Projects Gas Outreach Team. Available at https://www.ferc.gov/sites/default/files/2020-05/stakeholder.pdf (accessed 28 August 2017).
  • Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC). (2016) Final Environmental Impact Statement: NEXUS as Transmission Project and Texas Eastern Appalachian Lease Project (Washington, DC: Office of Energy Projects FERC/FEIS-270F).
  • Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) (2017) Declaratory Order Finding Waiver Under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. 160 FERC 61,065 (issued 15 September 2017).
  • Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) (2018) Order on rehearing. 160 FERC 61,065. (issued 25 July 2018).
  • Hoover, S. (6 December 2018) Lawsuits allege damage from NEXUS pipeline. Akron Beacon Journal. Available at https://www.ohio.com/news/20181206/lawsuits-allege-damage-from-nexus-pipeline (accessed 19 January 2019).
  • Jacquet, J. B. (2015) The rise of “private participation” in the planning of energy projects in the rural United States, Society & Natural Resources, 28(2), pp. 231–245. doi:10.1080/08941920.2014.945056
  • Kaza, N., & Curtis, M. P. (2014) The land use energy connection, Journal of Planning Literature, 29(4), pp. 355–369. doi:10.1177/0885412214542049
  • Kim, J. H., & Jurey, N. (2013) Local and regional governance structures: Fiscal, economic, equity, and environmental outcomes, Journal of Planning Literature, 28(2), pp. 111–123. doi:10.1177/0885412213477135
  • Kooistra, R. (2015) How FERC confuses the role of state and local authorities in regulating certified natural gas pipelines, The George Washington University Journal of Energy and Environmental Law, 6(1), pp. 59–68.
  • Loh, C. G., & Osland, A. C. (2016) Local land use planning responses to hydraulic fracturing, Journal of the American Planning Association, 82(3), pp. 222–235. doi:10.1080/01944363.2016.1176535
  • Lyles, L. W., Berke, P., & Smith, G. (2013) Do planners matter? Examining factors driving incorporation of land use approaches into hazard mitigation plans, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 57(5), pp. 792–811. doi:10.1080/09640568.2013.768973
  • Murrill, B. (2016) Pipeline transportation of natural gas and crude oil: Federal and state regulatory – authority. Congressional Research Service. R44432. Available at http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R44432.pdf (accessed 28 August 2017)
  • Nunn, S., & Rosentraub, M. S. (1997) Dimensions of interjurisdictional cooperation, Journal of the American Planning Association, 63(2), pp. 205–219. doi:10.1080/01944369708975915
  • Ohio Environmental Protection Agency (Ohio EPA) (2017)Ohio EPA issues water quality certification for NEXUS pipeline: Requires additional ‘contingency and storm water planning’ from NEXUS [Press Release]. Available at www.epa.ohio.gov/News/OnlineNewsRoom/NewsReleases/TabId/6596/ArticleId/1210/language/en-US/tag/401-certification/ohio-epa-issues-water-quality-certification-for-nexus-pipeline.aspx (accessed 20 September 2017)
  • Ohio Environmental Protection Agency (Ohio EPA) (2018) Director’s final findings and orders NEXUS gas transmission, LLC (issued on 28 December 2018).
  • Osland, A. C. (2013) Using land-use planning tools to mitigate hazards: Hazardous liquid and natural Gas transmission pipelines, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 33(2), pp. 141–159. doi:10.1177/0739456X12472372
  • Osland, A. C. (2015) Building hazard resilience through collaboration: The role of technical partnerships in areas with hazardous liquid and natural gas transmission pipelines, Environment and Planning A, 47(5), pp. 1063–1080. doi:10.1177/0308518X15592307
  • Pipelines and Informed Planning Alliance (November 2010) U.S. Department of Transportation, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, Office of Pipeline Safety. Partnering to Further Enhance Pipeline Safety in Communities Through Risk-Informed Land Use Planning. Final Report of Recommended Practices. Available at https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/comm/publications/PIPA/PIPA-Report-Final-20101117.pdf
  • Retzlaff, R. C. (2009) The use of LEED in planning and development: An exploratory analysis, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 29(1), pp. 67–77. doi:10.1177/0739456X09340578
  • Rudder, C. (2008) Private governance as public policy: A paradigmatic shift, The Journal of Politics, 70(4), pp. 899–913. doi:10.1017/S002238160808095X
  • Rudder, C. E., Fritschler, A. L., & Choi, Y. J. (2016) Public Policymaking by Private Organizations: Challenges to Democratic Governance (Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press).
  • Scott, R. P., & Scott, T. A. (2019) Investing in collaboration for safety: Assessing grants to states for oil and gas distribution pipeline safety program enhancement, Energy Policy, 124, pp. 332–345. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2018.10.007
  • Smith, G., & Birkland, T. (2012) Building a theory of recovery: Institutional dimensions, International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 30(2), pp. 147–170.
  • Späth, L., & Scolobig, A. (2017) Stakeholder empowerment through participatory planning practices: The case of electricity transmission lines in France and Norway, Energy Research & Social Science, 23, pp. 189–198 doi:10.1016/j.erss.2016.10.002
  • State ex rel. Morrison v. Beck Energy Corp. (2015) 143 Ohio St.3d 271, 2015-Ohio-485.
  • State ex rel. Walker v. Husted. (2015) 144 Ohio St.3d 361, 2015-Ohio-3749.
  • U.S. Department of Transportation (15 March 2018) PHMSA’s mission. Available at https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/about-phmsa/phmsas-mission (accessed 19 January 2019).
  • Warner, B., & Shapiro, J. (2013) Fractured, fragmented federalism: A study in fracking regulatory policy, Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 43(3), pp. 474–496. doi:10.1093/publius/pjt014