Between a Rock and a Hard Place: Investigating Planners’ Learning Experiences in Amsterdam’s Fragmented Governance of Property Development

References

• Adams, D., & Tiesdell, S. (2010) Planners as market actors: rethinking state–market relations in land and property, Planning Theory & Practice, 11(2), pp. 187–207. doi:10.1080/14649351003759631
   Google Scholar
• Adams, D., & Tiesdell, S. (2012) Shaping places: Urbanplanning, design anddevelopment (London: Routledge). doi:10.4324/9780203105665
   Google Scholar
• Adams, D., Watkins, C., & White, M. (2005) Planning, Public Policy & Property Markets (Oxford: Blackwell Publishing).
   Google Scholar
• AFWC (2018) Amsterdamse federatie van woningcorporaties: Information in English. Available at http://www.afwc.nl/information-in-english/(accessed 26 April 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Albrechts, L. (2010) More of the same is not enough! How could strategic spatial planning be instrumental in dealing with the challenges ahead?, Environment and Planning B, 37(6), pp. 1115–1127. doi:10.1068/b36068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albrechts, L. (2016) Strategic planning as governance of long-lasting transformative practices, in: G. Concilio & F. Rizzo (Eds) Human Smart Cities: Rethinking the Interplay between Design and Planning, pp. 3–20 (Cham: Springer International Publishing).
   Google Scholar
• Albrechts, L., Barbanente, A., & Monno, V. (2018) From stage-managed planning towards a more imaginative and inclusive strategic spatial planning, Environment and Planning C, 37(8), pp. 1489–1506.
   Google Scholar
• Armitage, D. (2008) Governance and the commons in a multi-level world., International Journal of the Commons, 2(1), pp. 7–32. doi:10.18352/ijc.28
   Google Scholar
• Blomley, N. (2017) Land use, planning, and the “difficult character of property”, Planning Theory & Practice, 18(3), pp. 351–364. doi:10.1080/14649357.2016.1179336
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buitelaar, E. (2010) Cracks in the myth - challenges to land policy in the Netherlands, Tijdschrift Voor Economische En Sociale Geografie, 101(3), pp. 349–356. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9663.2010.00604.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buitelaar, E., & Bregman, A. (2016) Dutch land development institutions in the face of crisis: Trembling pillars in the planners’ paradise, European Planning Studies, 24(7), pp. 1281–1294. doi:10.1080/09654313.2016.1168785
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buitelaar, E., Galle, M., & Sorel, N. (2011) Plan-led planning systems in development-led practices - an empirical analysis into the (lack of) institutionalisation of planning law, Environment & Planning A, 43(4), pp. 928–941. doi:10.1068/a43400
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, H., Tait, M., & Watkins, C. (2014) Is there space for better planning in a neoliberal world? Implications for planning practice and theory, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 34(1), pp. 45–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• City of Amsterdam (2018a) Woningbouwplan. Available at https://bit.ly/2I3aNHr (accessed 1 April 2019).
   Google Scholar
• City of Amsterdam (2018b) Amsterdam in cijfers 2019: Onderzoek, informatie en statistiek. Available at https://bit.ly/2TKZKol (accessed 1 April 2019).
   Google Scholar
• City of Amsterdam (2019) Projectmanagemementbureau Expertise. Available at https://bit.ly/2CIsQPJ (accessed 1 April 2019).
   Google Scholar
• City of Amsterdam (2020) Affordable apartments. Available at https://bit.ly/39Hb4Kl (accessed 25 March 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Conijn, J. (2005) Woningcorporaties: Naar Een Duidelijke Taakafbakening En Heldere Sturing. [Housing Associations: Towards a Clear Task Description and Governance.] (Amsterdam: RIGO Research en Advies).
   Google Scholar
• Drane, J. (2013) The state of contemporary property development theory. Conference paper 19th Annual Pacific-RIM Real Estate Society Conference, Melbourne, Australia, 13–16 January 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Eraydin, A., & Tasan-Kok, T. (2012) Resilience Thinking in Urban Planning (Dordrecht: Springer Science & Business Media).
   Google Scholar
• Fainstein, S. (1994) The City Builders: Property, Politics, and Planning in London and New York (New York: Blackwell).
   Google Scholar
• Fainstein, S. (2008) Mega-projects in New York, London and Amsterdam, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 32(4), pp. 768–785. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2427.2008.00826.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faludi, A. (2000) The performance of spatial planning, Planning Practice and Research, 15(4), pp. 299–318. doi:10.1080/713691907
   Google Scholar
• Fox-Rogers, L., & Murphy, E. (2016) Self-perceptions of the role of the planner, Environment and Planning. B, Planning & Design, 43(1), pp. 74–92. doi:10.1177/0265813515603860
   Google Scholar
• Friedmann, J. (1971) The future of comprehensive urban planning: A critique, Public Administration Review, 31(3), pp. 315–326. doi:10.2307/974890
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedmann, J. (2017) Planning as a vocation: the journey so far, in: B. Haselsberger (Ed) Encounters in Planning Thought. 16 Autobiographical Essays from Key Thinkers in Spatial Planning,pp. 15–34 (New York and London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Gerrits, L., Rauws, W., & de Roo, G. (2012) Dutch spatial planning policies in transition, Planning Theory & Practice, 13(2), pp. 336–341. doi:10.1080/14649357.2012.669992
   Google Scholar
• Guy, S., & Henneberry, J. (2002) Bridging the divide? Complementary perspectives on property, Urban Studies, 39(8), pp. 1471–1478. doi:10.1080/00420980220142736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (2006) Transforming governance: Challenges of institutional adaptation and a new politics of space, European Planning Studies, 14(3), pp. 299–320. doi:10.1080/09654310500420792
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (2018) Developing a ‘sociological institutionalist’ approach to analysing institutional change in place governance, in: W. Salet (Ed) The Routledge Handbook of Institutions and Planning in Action, pp. 24–42 (New York: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Hendriks, F., & Tops, P. (1999) Between democracy and efficiency: Trends in local government reform in the Netherlands and Germany., Public Administration, 77(1), pp. 133–153. doi:10.1111/1467-9299.00147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoetjes, P., Bertolini, L., & Le Clercq, F. (2006) Towards market-conscious planning in Amsterdam: A portfolio approach, Planning Practice & Research, 21(2), pp. 179–200. doi:10.1080/02697450600956255
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. (2016) Territory, politics, governance and multispatial metagovernance, Territory, Politics, Governance, 4(1), pp. 8–32. doi:10.1080/21622671.2015.1123173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krueckeberg, D. (1995) The difficult character of property: To whom do things belong?, Journal of the American Planning Association, 61(3), pp. 301–309. doi:10.1080/01944369508975644
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Louw, E., van der Krabben, E., & Priemus, H. (2003) Spatial development policy: Changing roles for local and regional authorities in the Netherlands, Land Use Policy, 20(4), pp. 357–366. doi:10.1016/S0264-8377(03)00059-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Needham, B. (2007) Dutch Land Use Planning: The Principles and the Practice (New York: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Needham, B., Segeren, A., & Buitelaar, E. (2011) Institutions in theories of land markets: Illustrated by the Dutch market for agricultural land. Urban Studies, 48(1), pp. 161–176. doi:10.1177/0042098009360682
   Google Scholar
• Nijskens, R., Lohuis, M., Hilbers, P. L. C., & Heeringa, W. (2019) Hot Property: The Housing Market in Major Cities (Dordrecht: Springer).
   Google Scholar
• North, D. (1990) Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Özogul, S. (2019) Transformative Spatial Governance: New Avenues for Comprehensive Planning in Fragmented Urban Development (Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam).
   Google Scholar
• Özogul, S., & Tasan-Kok, T. (2020) One and the same? A systematic literature review of residential property investor types, Journal of Planning Literature, 35(4), pp. 475–494. doi:10.1177/0885412220944919
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pahl-Wostl, C. (2009) A conceptual framework for analysing adaptive capacity and multi- level learning processes in resource governance regimes, Global Environmental Change, 29, pp. 354–365.
   Google Scholar
• Priemus, H. (2014) Is the landlord levy a threat to the rented housing sector? The case of the Netherlands, International Journal of Housing Policy, 14(1), pp. 98–106. doi;10.1080/14616718.2013.876579
   Google Scholar
• Ryan-Collins, J., Lloyd, T., Macfarlane, L., & Muelbauer, J. (2017) Rethinking the Economics of Land and Housing (London: ZED Books).
   Google Scholar
• Savini, F. (2017) Planning, uncertainty and risk: The neoliberal logics of Amsterdam urbanism, Environment & Planning A, 49(4), pp. 857–875. doi:10.1177/0308518X16684520
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt, P., & Wiechmann, T. (2018) Unpacking spatial planning as the governance of place: Extracting potentials for future advancements in planning research, disP – the Planning Review, 54(4), pp. 21–33. doi:10.1080/02513625.2018.1562795
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sehested, K. (2009) Urban planners as network managers and metagovernors, Planning Theory & Practice, 10(2), pp. 245–263. doi:10.1080/14649350902884516
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Netherlands (2019). Rent increase 2.5 percent in 2019. Available at https://bit.ly/2V00hpf (accessed 04 April 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Steele, W. (2011) Strategy-making for Sustainability: An Institutional Learning Approach to Transformative Planning Practice. Planning Theory & Practice, 12(2), pp. 205–221. doi:10.1080/14649357.2011.580158
   Google Scholar
• Tasan-Kok, T. (2010) Entrepreneurial governance: Challenges of large-scale property-led urban regeneration projects, Tijdschrift Voor Economische En Sociale Geografie, 101(2), pp. 126–149. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9663.2009.00521.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tasan-Kok, T., Atkinson, R., & Refinetti Martins, M. L., (2020) Hybrid contractual landscapes of governance: generation of fragmented regimes of public accountability through urban regeneration, Environment and Planning C. doi:10.1177/2399654420932577
   Google Scholar
• Tasan-Kok, T., van den Hurk, M., Özogul, S., & Bittencourt, S. (2019) Changing public accountability mechanisms in the governance of Dutch urban regeneration, European Planning Studies, 27(6), pp. 1107–1128. doi:10.1080/09654313.2019.1598017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theurillat, T., Rerat, P., & Crevoisier, O. (2015) The real estate markets: Players, institutions and territories, Urban Studies, 52(8), pp. 1414–1433. doi:10.1177/0042098014536238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Krabben, E., & Jacobs, H. M. (2013) Public land development as a strategic tool for redevelopment: Reflections on the Dutch experience., Land Use Policy, 30(1), pp. 774–783. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wink, R. (2010) Transregional institutional learning in Europe: Prerequisites, actors and limitations, Regional Studies, 44(4), pp. 499–511. doi:10.1080/00343400802331304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar