Planning systems on the move? persistence and change of the German planning system

References

• Akademie für Raumforschung und Landesplanung (ARL) (2011) Grundriss der Raumordnung und Raumentwicklung (Hannover: Verlag der ARL).
   Google Scholar
• Albrechts, L. (1991) Changing roles and positions of planners, Urban Studies, 28(1), pp. 123–137. doi:10.1080/00420989120080081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albrechts, L. (2004) Strategic (Spatial) planning reexamined, Environment and Planning B, Planning & Design, 31, pp. 743–758. doi:10.1068/b3065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albrechts, L., Barbanente, A., & Monno, V. (2019) From stage-managed planning towards a more imaginative and inclusive strategic spatial planning, Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 37(8), pp. 1489–1506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baugesetzbuch: BauGB. In der Fassung der Bekanntmachung vom 23.09.2004(BGBl. I S. 2414) zuletzt geändert durch Gesetz vom 20.07.2017 (BGBl. I S. 2808) m.W.v. 29. 07.2017.
   Google Scholar
• Blotevogel, H. H., Danielzyk, R., & Münter, A. (2014) Spatial planning in Germany: Institutional inertia and new challenges, in: M. Reimer, P. Getimis, & H. H. Blotevogel (Eds) Spatial Planning Systems and Practices in Europe. A Comparative Perspective on Continuity and Changes, pp. 83–108 (New York, NY: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Blotevogel, H. H., & Schelhaas, B. (2011) Geschichte der Raumordnung, in: Akademie für Raumforschung und Landesplanung (ARL) (Ed) Grundriss der Raumordnung und Raumentwicklung, pp. 76–202 (Hannover: Verlag der ARL).
   Google Scholar
• Brenner, N. (2004) New State Spaces. Urban Governance and the Rescaling of Statehood (New York: Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Buitelaar, E., & Bregman, A. (2016) Dutch land development institutions in the face of crisis: Trembling pillars in the planners’ paradise, European Planning Studies, 24(7), pp. 1281–1294. doi:10.1080/09654313.2016.1168785
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bundesministerium des Innern, für Bau und Heimat (BMI) (Ed.) (2019) Unser Plan für Deutschland – Gleichwertige Lebensverhältnisse überall. Gemeinsames Verständnis von gleichwertigen Lebensverhältnissen (Berlin). https://www.bmi.bund.de/SharedDocs/downloads/DE/veroeffentlichungen/themen/heimat-integration/gleichwertige-lebensverhaeltnisse/unser-plan-fuer-deutschland-langversion-kom-gl.pdf;jsessionid=5F287778D8B92B9F2E3F79D94D0B9C48.1_cid287?__blob=publicationFile&v=4
   Google Scholar
• Chilla, T., Kühne, O., & Neufeld, M. (2016) Regionalentwicklung (Stuttgart: UTB).
   Google Scholar
• Commission of the European Communities (CEC) (1997) The EU Compendium of Spatial Planning Systems and Policies (Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities).
   Google Scholar
• Cotella, G., & Janin Rivolin, U. (2015) Europeanizazione del governo del territorio: Un modello analítico, Territorio, 73, pp. 127–134. doi:10.3280/TR2015-073019
   Google Scholar
• Dabrowski, M., & Graziano, P. R. (2016) Cohesion policy and Europeanisation, in: S. Piattoni & L. Polverari (Eds) Handbook on Cohesion Policy, pp. 79–91 (Cheltenham: Elgar).
   Google Scholar
• Danielzyk, R., & Münter, A. (2019) Raumplanung, in: Akademie für Raumforschung und Landesplanung (ARL) (Ed) Handwörterbuch der Stadt- und Raumentwicklung, pp. 1931–1942 (Hannover: Verlag der ARL).
   Google Scholar
• ESPON COMPASS. (2018a). COMPASS – Comparative Analysis of Territorial Governance and Spatial Planning Systems in Europe. Final Report (Luxembourg)
   Google Scholar
• ESPON COMPASS. (2018b). COMPASS – Comparative Analysis of Territorial Governance and Spatial Planning Systems in Europe. Final Report –Supplementary Volume 3 & 4 Questionaires. (Luxembourg)
   Google Scholar
• ESPON COMPASS. (2018c). COMPASS – Comparative Analysis of Territorial Governance and Spatial Planning Systems in Europe. Final Report – Additional Volume 2 Methodology. (Luxembourg)
   Google Scholar
• Evers, D. (2015) Formal institutional change and informal institutional persistence: The case of Dutch provinces implementing the Spatial Planning Act, Environment and Planning. C, Government & Policy, 33, pp. 428–444. doi:10.1068/c1391
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedmann, J. (2005) Planning cultures in transition, in: B. Sanyal (Ed) Comparative Planning Cultures, pp. 29–44 (New York: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Fürst, D. (2010) Raumplanung: Herausforderungen des deutschen Institutionensystems (Detmold: Rohn).
   Google Scholar
• Galland, D., & Elinbaum, P. (2015) Redefining territorial scales and the strategic role of spatial planning. Evidence from Denmark and Catalonia, disP – the Planning Review, 51(4), pp. 66–85. doi:10.1080/02513625.2015.1134963
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (1992) Planning through debate: The communicative turn in planning theory, Town Planning Review, 63(2), pp. 143–162. doi:10.3828/tpr.63.2.422x602303814821
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (1997) Collaborative Planning. Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies (Vancouver: UBC Press).
   Google Scholar
• Hillier, J. (2002) Shadows of Power. An Allegory of Prudence in Land-use Planning (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Innes, J. E., & Booher, D. E. (1999) Consensus building as role playing and bricolage. Toward a theory of collaborative planning, Journal of the American Planning Association, 65(1), pp. 9–26. doi:10.1080/01944369908976031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janin Rivolin, U. (2012) Planning systems as institutional technologies: A proposed conceptualization and the implications for comparison, Planning Practice and Research, 27(1), pp. 63–85. doi:10.1080/02697459.2012.661181
   Google Scholar
• Janin Rivolin, U. (2017) Global crisis and the systems of spatial governance and planning: A European comparison, European Planning Studies, 25(6), pp. 994–1012. doi:10.1080/09654313.2017.1296110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowndes, V. (2005) Something new, something old, something borrowed. How institutions change (and stay the same) in local governance, Policy Studies, 26(3/4), pp. 291–309. doi:10.1080/01442870500198361
   Google Scholar
• Miessner, M. (2020) Spatial planning amid crisis. The deepening of neoliberal logic in Germany, International Planning Studies, 25(1), pp. 52–71. doi:10.1080/13563475.2018.1517038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morais Mourato, J., & Tewdwr-Jones, M. (2012) Europeanisation of domestic spatial planning. Exposing apparent differences or unspoken convergence?, in: W. Zonneveld, J. de Vries, & L. Janssen-Jansen (Eds) European Territorial Governance, pp. 157–174 (Amsterdam: IOS Press).
   Google Scholar
• Nadin, V., & Stead, D. (2008) European spatial planning systems, social models and learning, disP, 172, pp. 35–47.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, P., & Thornley, A. (1996) Urban Planning in Europe: International Competition, National Systems, and Planning Projects (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Priebs, A. (2013) Raumordnung in Deutschland (Braunschweig: Westermann).
   Google Scholar
• Radaelli, C. M. (2003) The Europeanization of public policy, in: K. Featherstone & C. M. Radaelli (Eds) The Politics of Europeanization, pp. 27–56 (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Raumordnungsgesetz: ROG. 22. Dezember 2008 (BGBl. I S. 2986), das zuletzt durch Artikel 9 des Gesetzes vom 31. Juli 2009/BGBl. I S. 2585) geändert worden ist; zuletzt geändert durch Gesetz vom 20.07.2017 (BGBl. I S. 2808) m.W.v. 29. 11.2017
   Google Scholar
• Reimer, M. (2013) Planning cultures in transition: Sustainability management and institutional change in spatial planning, Sustainability, 5(11), pp. 4653–4673. doi:10.3390/su5114653
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reimer, M., & Blotevogel, H. H. (2012) Comparing spatial planning practice in Europe: A plea for cultural sensitization, Planning Practice and Research, 27(1), pp. 7–24. doi:10.1080/02697459.2012.659517
   Google Scholar
• Reimer, M., Getimis, P., & Blotevogel, H. H. (Eds) (2014) Spatial Planning Systems and Practices in Europe. A Comparative Perspective on Continuity and Changes (New York: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, S. (2009) Land use planning tools and institutional change in Germany: Recent developments in local and regional planning, European Planning Studies, 17(12), pp. 1907–1921. doi:10.1080/09654310903322397
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V. A. (2011) Speaking of change: Why discourse is key to the dynamics of policy transformation, Critical Policy Studies, 5(2), pp. 106–126. doi:10.1080/19460171.2011.576520
   Google Scholar
• Schön, K. P. (2019) Europäische Raumentwicklungspolitik, in: Akademie für Raumforschung und Landesplanung (Ed) Handwörterbuch der Stadt- und Raumentwicklung, pp. 577–588 (Hannover: Verlag der ARL).
   Google Scholar
• Sehested, K. (2009) Urban planners as network managers and metagovernors, Planning Theory & Practice, 10(2), pp. 245–263. doi:10.1080/14649350902884516
   Google Scholar
• Servillo, L. (2010) Territorial cohesion discourses: Hegemonic strategic concepts in European spatial planning, Planning Theory & Practice, 11(3), pp. 397–416. doi:10.1080/14649357.2010.500135
   Google Scholar
• Servillo, L., & van den Broeck, P. (2012) The social construction of planning systems: A strategic-relational institutionalist approach, Planning Theory & Practice, 27(1), pp. 41–61. doi:10.1080/02697459.2012.661179
   Google Scholar
• Siebel, W. (2006) Wandel, Rationalität und Dilemmata der Planung, in: K. Selle (Ed) Planung Neu Denken. Band 1, pp. 195–209 (Dortmund: Verlag Dorothea Rohn).
   Google Scholar
• Stead, D. (2013) Convergence, divergence, or constancy of spatial planning? Connecting theoretical concepts with empirical evidence from Europe, Journal of Planning Literature, 28(1), pp. 19–31. doi:10.1177/0885412212471562
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stead, D., & Cotella, G. (2011) Differential Europe: Domestic actors and their role in shaping spatial planning systems, disP, 186, pp. 13–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tulumello, S., Ferreira, C., Colomo, A., Di Giovanni, F., & Allegra, M. (2018) Comparative planning and housing studies beyond taxonomy: A genealogy of the special programme for rehousing (Portugal), Transactions of the Association of European Schools of Planning, 2, pp. 32–46. doi:10.24306/TrAESOP.2018.01.003
   Google Scholar
• Vallée, D., Brandt, T., & Fürst, D. (2012) Modell einer Strategischen Regionalplanung in Deutschland, in: D. Vallée (Ed) Strategische Regionalplanung, pp. 170–190 190 (Hannover: Forschungs- und Sitzungsberichte der ARL, 237).
   Google Scholar
• Waterhout, B., Othengrafen, F., & Sykes, O. (2013) Neo-liberalization processes and spatial planning in France, Germany, and the Netherlands: An exploration, Planning Practice and Research, 28(1), pp. 141–159. doi:10.1080/02697459.2012.699261
   Google Scholar
• ZEIT online. (2019) Darüber spricht der Bundestag. Available at: https://www.zeit.de/politik/deutschland/2019-09/bundestag-jubilaeum-70-jahre-parlament-reden-woerter-sprache-wandel#s=raumordnung%2Craumordnungsgesetz%2Craumordnungspolitik (accessed 10 September 2019)
   Google Scholar
• Ziafati Bafarasat, A. (2015) Reflections on the three schools of thought on strategic spatial planning, Journal of Planning Literature, 30(2), pp. 132–148. doi:10.1177/0885412214562428
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zweigert, K., & Kötz, H. (1987) An Introduction to Comparative Law (Oxford: Clarendon Press).
   Google Scholar