Reenergizing European spatial planning

References

• Abrahams, G. (2014) What ‘is’ territorial cohesion? What does it ‘do’? Essentialist versus pragmatic approaches to using concepts, European Planning Studies, 22(10), 2134–2155. doi:10.1080/09654313.2013.819838
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allmendinger, P., Chilla, T., & Sielker, F. (2014) Europeanizing territoriality – Towards soft spaces? Environment & Planning A, 35, pp. 2703–2717.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barca, F. (2009) An Agenda for A Reformed Cohesion Policy. A Place-based Approach to Meeting European Union Challenges and Expectations. Available at ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/archive/policy/future/pdf/report_barca_v0306.pdf (accessed 30 July 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Bartle, J., Birch, S., & Skirmuntt, M. (2017) The local roots of the participation gap: Inequality and voter turnout, Electoral Studies, 48, pp. 30–44. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2017.05.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Böhme, K., Lüer, C., & Toptsidou, M. (2019) Towards a European geography of future perspectives: A story of urban concentration, in: E. Medeiros (Ed) Territorial Cohesion: The Urban Dimension, pp. 173–191 (Cham: Springer International Publishing).
   Google Scholar
• Böhme, K., Doucet, P., Komornicki, T., Zaucha, J., & Świątek, D. (2011) How to strengthen the territorial dimension of ‘Europe 2020ʹ and EU cohesion policy. Report prepared at the request of the polish EU presidency Warsaw: Polish Ministry of Regional Development. Available at http://www.spatialforesight.eu/tl_files/files/editors/dokumente/Report_Final_110913.pdf (accessed 30 July 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Böhme, K., Holstein, F., & Toptsidou, M. (2015) Report on the assessment of territorial cohesion and the territorial agenda 2020 of the European Union Luxembourg: Luxembourg Ministry of Sustainable Development and Infrastructures on Behalf of the EU Trio Presidency. Available at https://amenagement-territoire.public.lu/dam-assets/fr/eu-presidency/Events/26-27-November-2015_-Luxembourg-City/Background-Reports-_-Studies/Report-on-the-Assessment-of-Territorital-Cohesion-and-the-TA2020-_Spatial-Foresight_.pdf (accessed 30 July 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Böhme, K., & Martin, D. (2019) Territorial fragmentation: A major European challenge, (Territorial Thinkers’ Briefing No. 5), Luxembourg: Territorial Thinkers. Available at https://territorialthinkers.eu/files/territorial_theme/Downloads/TT%20brief%20V-190430Final.pdf (accessed 26 August 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Camagni, R., Capello, R., & Caragliu, A. (2015) The rise of second-rank cities: What role for agglomeration economies? European Planning Studies, 23(6), 1069–1089. doi:10.1080/09654313.2014.904999
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capello, R. (2017) Towards a new conceptualization of innovation in space: Territorial patterns of innovation, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 41(6), 976–996. doi:10.1111/1468-2427.12556
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castells, M. (2010) The Rise of the Network Society, 2nd ed. with a new preface. (Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell).
   Google Scholar
• Conventz, S., Derudder, B., Thierstein, A., & Witlox, F., (Eds). (2014) Hub Cities in the Knowledge Economy: Seaports, Airports, Brainports (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Dabinett, G. (2017) The territorial dimension of EU policies and spatial inequalities, in: E. Medeiros (Ed) Uncovering the Territorial Dimension of European Union Cohesion Policy, pp. 44–60 (Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Dallhammer, E., Gaugitsch, R., Neugebauer, W., & Böhme, K. (2018) Spatial Planning and governance within EU policies and legislation and their relevance to the New Urban Agenda European Committee of the Regions.
   Google Scholar
• Davoudi, S. (2019) From ‘left behind’ to ‘kept behind’ places: Re-imagining territorial cohesion. Keynote speech presented at the ESPON Seminar on the role of functional areas for territorial cohesion, Iași, Romania.
   Google Scholar
• De Bruijn, M. (2017) Supporting territorial cohesion and the Europe 2020 strategy - Tensions in EU cohesion policy, in: E. Medeiros (Ed) Uncovering the Territorial Dimension of European Union Cohesion Policy, pp. 61–78 (Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Deutscher Verband für Wohnungswesen, Städtebau und Raumordnung e.V. (2009) Expertise für den Raumordnungsbericht 2010. Raumrelevante Vorhaben der EU-Kommission.
   Google Scholar
• Dijkstra, L., Garcilazo, E., & McCann, P. (2013) The economic performance of European cities and city regions: Myths and realities, European Planning Studies, 21(3), 334–354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijkstra, L., Garcilazo, E., & McCann, P. (2015) The effects of the global financial crisis on European regions and cities, Journal of Economic Geography, 15(5), 935–949. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbv032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ESPON. (2013) Territorial Dynamics in Europe: Gateway Functions in Cities (Luxembourg: ESPON).
   Google Scholar
• ESPON. (2014) TOWN small and medium sized towns in their functional territorial context. Applied research 2013/ 1/23.Final Report. Version 30 August 2014 Luxembourg: ESPON.
   Google Scholar
• ESPON. (2017a) European Territorial Review. Territorial Cooperation for the Future of Europe (Luxembourg: ESPON).
   Google Scholar
• ESPON. (2017b) Thinking and Planning in Areas of Territorial Cooperation (Luxembourg: ESPON). Available at https://www.espon.eu/actarea (accessed 30 July 2019).
   Google Scholar
• ESPON. (2018a) COMPASS - Comparative analysis of territorial governance and spatial planning systems in Europe - Final Report Luxembourg: ESPON. Available at https://www.espon.eu/planning-systems (accessed 30 July 2019).
   Google Scholar
• ESPON. (2018b) COMPASS - Comparative Analysis of Territorial Governance and Spatial Planning Systems in Europe – Volume 4 – Phase 2 Questionnaires (Luxembourg: ESPON).
   Google Scholar
• ESPON. (2018c) Possible European Territorial Futures (Luxembourg: ESPON). Available at https://www.espon.eu/territorial-futures (accessed 26 August 2020).
   Google Scholar
• ESPON. (2019) Territorial reference framework for europe, (Discussion Paper No. 5 in preparation of the meeting of the Strategic Advisory Forum on 12 March 2019), Version 05/ 03/2019, Unpublished draft.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission, (Ed). (1999) ESDP European Spatial Development Perspective (Potsdam).
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2010) Investing in Europe’s future. Fifth report on economic, social and territorial cohesion Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2014a) Community-led local development factsheet. Available at https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/informat/2014/community_en.pdf (accessed 30 July 2019).
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2014b) Integrated territorial investment factsheet. Available at https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/informat/2014/iti_en.pdf (accessed 30 July 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Evers, D., & Tennekes, J. (2016) The Europeanisation of Spatial Planning in the Netherlands (The Hague: PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency).
   Google Scholar
• Faludi, A. (2010) Cohesion, Coherence, Co-operation: European Spatial Planning Coming of Age? (Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon.; New York: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Faludi, A. (2018) The Poverty of Territorialism: A Neo-Medieval View of Europe and European Planning (Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Pub).
   Google Scholar
• Fardella, E., & Prodi, G. (2017) The belt and road initiative impact on Europe: An Italian perspective, China & World Economy, 25(5), 125–138. doi:10.1111/cwe.12217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferry, M. (2019) Integrated Territorial Investments as an effective tool of the cohesion policy European Parliament - Committee on Budgetary Control.
   Google Scholar
• Frick, S. A., & Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2018) Big or Small cities? On city size and economic growth, Growth and Change, 49(1), 4–32. doi:10.1111/grow.12232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodhart, D. (2017) The Road to Somewhere: The Populist Revolt and the Future of Politics (London: Hurst & Company).
   Google Scholar
• Haughton, G., Allmendinger, P., Counsell, D., & Vigar, G. (2010) The New Spatial Planning: Territorial Management with Soft Spaces and Fuzzy Boundaries (London and New York: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Held, D. (2005) Principles of cosmopolitanism order, in: M. Escamilla & M. Saavedra (Eds) Law and Justice in a Global Society, Vol. 39, pp. 153–169 (Granada,: Spain).
   Google Scholar
• Jones, R., Moisio, S., Weckroth, M., Woods, M., Luukkonen, J., Meyer, F., & Miggelbrink, J. (2019) Re-conceptualising territorial cohesion through the prism of spatial justice: Critical perspectives on academic and policy discourses, in: T. Lang & F. Görmar (Eds) Regional and Local Development in Times of Polarisation - Re-thinking Spatial Policies in Europe, pp. 97–119 (Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan).
   Google Scholar
• Kaźmierczak, A. (2018) Unequal exposure and unequal impacts: Social vulnerability to air pollution, noise and extreme temperatures in Europe EEA Report No. 22, European Environmental Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Loewen, B., & Schulz, S. (2019) Questioning the convergence of cohesion and innovation policies in Central and Eastern Europe, in: T. Lang & F. Görmar (Eds) Regional and Local Development in Times of Polarisation - Re-thinking Spatial Policies in Europe, pp. 121–148 (Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan).
   Google Scholar
• Lüer, C., & Holstein, F. (2016) Functional integration as a tool for urban areas to deliver territorial cohesion EUROCITIES. Making Cities. Visions for an Urban Future, 74–83.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, D., Mehlbye, P., & Schön, K. P. (2018) Towards a European territorial agenda post 2020: What should it consider and include? Conceptual proposals and ideas, (Territorial Thinkers’ Briefing No. 3), Luxembourg: Territorial Thinkers. Available at https://territorialthinkers.eu/files/territorial_theme/Downloads/TT%20brief%20III-181107Final.pdf (accessed 30 July 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Medeiros, E. (2017) The territorial dimension of European Union policies - A conceptual approach, in: E. Medeiros (Ed) Uncovering the Territorial Dimension of European Union Cohesion Policy, pp. 9–22 (Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Mehlbye, P., & Böhme, K. (2017) More territorial cooperation post 2020? - A contribution to the debate of future EU Cohesion Policy, (Spatial Foresight Brief 8), Luxembourg: Spatial Foresight.
   Google Scholar
• Mehlbye, P., Böhme, K., Martin, D., & Schön, K. P. (2019a) The EU territory of tomorrow? Towards an EU territorial reference framework, (Territorial Thinkers’ Briefing No. 4), Luxembourg: Territorial Thinkers.
   Google Scholar
• Mehlbye, P., Böhme, K., Martin, D., & Schön, K. P. (2019b) What EU territory do we want to hand over to the next generations? Available at https://regions.regionalstudies.org/ezine/article/what-eu-territory-do-we-want-to-hand-over-to-the-next-generations/ (accessed 26 August 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Mendez, C., & Bachtler, J. (2015) Prospects for cohesion policy in 2014-20 and beyond: Progress with programming and reflections on the future, (European Policy Research Paper No. 88), Glasgow: European Policies Research Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Monfort, P. (2020) Convergence of EU regions redux – Recent trends in regional disparities, (Working Papers. WP 02/2020). Available at https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/work/022020_convergence_redux.pdf (Accessed 22 July 2020).
   Google Scholar
• MSPTD. (2011) Territorial agenda of the European Union 2020. Towards an inclusive, smart and sustainable Europe of diverse regions. Agreed at the informal ministerial meeting of ministers responsible for spatial planning and territorial development on 19th May 2011 Gödöllő, Hungary.
   Google Scholar
• MUDTCEU. (2007) Territorial agenda of the European Union - Towards a more competitive and sustainable Europe of diverse regions. Agreed on the occasion of the informal ministerial meeting on urban development and territorial cohesion in Leipzig on 24/25 May 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Nosek, S. (2017) Territorial cohesion storylines in 2014-2020 cohesion policy, European Planning Studies, 25(12), 2157–2174. doi:10.1080/09654313.2017.1349079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, Y., & Ensink, S. J. (2015) Differential responsiveness in Europe: The effects of preference difference and electoral participation, West European Politics, 38(3), 577–600. doi:10.1080/01402382.2014.973260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robert, J., Stumm, T., De Vet, J. M., Reincke, K.-J., Hollanders, M., & Figueiredo, M. A. (2001) Spatial Impacts of Community Policies and Costs of Non-co-ordination (Brussels: European Commission).
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, P. J. (2004) World City Network. A Global Urban Analysis (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Tosun, J., & Lang, A. (2017) Policy integration: Mapping the different concepts, Policy Studies, 38(6), 553–570. doi:10.1080/01442872.2017.1339239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations. (2015) Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development, (No. A/RES/70/1). Available at https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/21252030%20Agenda%20for%20Sustainable%20Development%20web.pdf (accessed 30 July 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Van der Zwet, A., Bachtler, J., Ferry, M., McMaster, I., & Miller, S. (2017) Integrated Territorial and Urban Strategies: How are ESIF Adding Value in 2014-2020? (Brussels: European Commission - DG REGIO).
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. (2018a) Growing united. Upgrading Europe’s convergence machine. World Bank Report on the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. (2018b) Rethinking lagging regions. Using cohesion policy to deliver on the potential of Europe’s regions. World Bank Report on the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Zillmer, S., Böhme, K., & Lüer, C. (2015) Territorial scenarios and visions of Europe for 2050, in: Proceedings of the Workshop of the incoming Luxembourg EU Presidency on 23 April 2015, Luxembourg: Luxembourg Ministry of Sustainable Development and Infrastructures on behalf of the EU Trio Presidency. Available at http://amenagement-territoire.public.lu/content/dam/amenagement_territoire/fr/eu-presidency/Events/26-27-November-2015_-Luxembourg-City/Background-Reports-_-Studies/Visions-of-Europe-for-2050-_Spatial-Foresight.pdf (accessed 26 August 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Zillmer, S., Böhme, K., Lüer, C., Sauerborn, K., Maurer, J., & Harder, V. (2012) Territorial cohesion in future EU cohesion policy, (Forschungen No. 156), Berlin: BMVBS. Available at http://www.bbsr.bund.de/BBSR/EN/Publications/BMVBS/Forschungen/2012/DL_156.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=2 (accessed 30 July 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Zillmer, S., Hans, S., Lüer, C., & Montán, A. (2018a) EGTC monitoring report 2017 Brussels: European Committee of the Regions. Available at https://portal.cor.europa.eu/egtc/news/Pages/EGTC-monitoring-report-2017.aspx (accessed 30 July 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Zillmer, S., Hans, S., Lüer, C., Montán, A., Hsiung, C.-H., Le Moglie, P., & Gnetti, V. (2018b) EGTC good practice booklet Brussels: European Committee of the Regions. Available at https://cor.europa.eu/en/engage/brochures/Documents/EGTC%20Good%20Practice%20Booklet/EGTC-book-LR.pdf (accessed 30 July 2019).
   Google Scholar