Maritime spatial planning: Germany as a forerunner in ecosystem-based management?

References

• Ansong, J., Gissi, E., & Calado, H. (2017) An approach to ecosystem-based management in maritime spatial planning process, Ocean & Coastal Management, 141, pp. 65–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BfN (Federal Agency for Nature Conservation). (2020) Naturschutzfachlicher Planungsbeitrag des Bundesamtes für Naturschutz zur Fortschreibung der Raumordnungspläne für die deutsche Ausschließliche Wirtschaftszone in der Nord- und Ostsee. Available at https://www.bfn.de/fileadmin/BfN/meeresundkuestenschutz/Dokumente/2020-08-14_Naturschutzfachlicher-Planungbeitrag-Fortschreibung.pdf (assessed 13 February 2021).
   Google Scholar
• BMI. (2017) Offshore Wind Energy Act (WindSeeG 2017). Available at https://www.bmwi.de/Redaktion/DE/Downloads/E/windseeg-gesetz-en.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=9 (assessed 4 October 2021).
   Google Scholar
• BMU. (2009) Position Paper of the Division of the Federal Ministry for the Environment on the Cumulative Assessment of Loon Habitat Loss Due to Offshore Wind Farms in the German EEZ of the North Sea and Baltic Sea as a Basis for an Agreement Between BfN and BSH - Introduction of a New Technically Justified Assessment Procedure (Berlin, Germany).
   Google Scholar
• BMUB (Federal Ministry of the Environment, Nature Conservation, Construction and Nuclear Safety). (n.d.) English Summary - MSFD Programme of Measures for Marine Protection in the German Parts of the North Sea and the Baltic Sea. Report pursuant to Article 45h(1) of the Federal Water Act. Available at https://www.meeresschutz.info (assessed 30 March 2022).
   Google Scholar
• BMU (Federal Ministry of the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety). (2013) Concept for the Protection of Harbour Porpoises from Sound Exposures During the Construction of Offshore Wind Farms in the German North Sea (Sound Protection Concept) (Berlin, Germany).
   Google Scholar
• BSH. (2020a) Site Development Plan. Available at https://www.bsh.de/EN/TOPICS/Offshore/Sectoral_planning/Site_development_plan/site_development_plan_node.html;jsessionid=D92FFD7BB29F3F4B7BA34DD175EA5046.live21302 (assessed 17 December 2020a).
   Google Scholar
• BSH. (2020b) Status Report on the Update of the Spatial Planning Plans for the German Exclusive Economic Zone in the North Sea and Baltic Sea (Hamburg, Germany: BSH).
   Google Scholar
• BSH (Bundesamt für Seeschifffahrt und Hydrographie). (2021) Maritime Spatial Plan 2021. Available at https://www.bsh.de/EN/TOPICS/Offshore/Maritime_spatial_planning/Maritime_Spatial_Plan_2021/maritime-spatial-plan-2021_node.html;jsessionid=BFC6872EE8050B719D1BD154A24691C8.live11312 (assessed 4 January 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Bund-Länder, M. (2012) Implementation of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive 2008/56/EC: Establishing a Framework for Community Action in the Field of Marine Environmental Policy (Marine Strategy Framework Directive) - Establishment of Environmental Targets for the German Baltic Sea According to Art. 10 Marine Strategy Framework Directive, BMU (ed) (Bonn, Germany: Die Bundesregierung).
   Google Scholar
• BWO (Federal Association of Offshore Wind Farm Operators e.V.). (2021) Supplementary statement of the BWO on the draft spatial plan for the German EEZ in the North Sea and Baltic Sea of the Federal Maritime and Hydrographic Agency as a follow-up to the hearing on 24/25.11.2020 - Status: 11.01.2021. Available at https://www.bsh.de/DE/THEMEN/Offshore/Meeresraumplanung/Fortschreibung/_Anlagen/Downloads/Stellungnahmen_BWO_nach_Eroerterungstermin.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=2 (assessed 18 February 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Dähne, M., Peschko, V., Gilles, A., Lucke, K., Adler, S., Ronnenberg, K., & Siebert, U. (2014) Marine mammals and windfarms: Effects of alpha ventus on harbour porpoises, in: Federal Maritime and Hydrographic Agency, Federal Ministry for the Environment Nature Conservation and Nulear Safety (Eds) Ecological Research at the Offshore Windfarm Alpha Ventus. doi:10.1007/978-3-658-02462-8_13.
   Google Scholar
• Dyndo, H., Wiśniewska, D. M., Rojano-Doñate, L., & Madsen, P. T. (2015) Harbour porpoises react to low levels of high frequency vessel noise, Scientific Reports, 5(1), pp. 11083. doi:10.1038/srep11083.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2017) Shipping density maps from AIS signals. Available at https://webgate.ec.europa.eu/maritimeforum/en/node/4098 (assessed 31 March 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Garthe, S., Schwemmer, P., Sonntag, N., & Dierschke, V. (2007) Estimation of seabird numbers in the German North Sea throughout the annual cycle and their biogeographic importance, Vogelwelt, 128, pp. 163–178.
   Google Scholar
• Gilles, A., Viquerat, S., Becker, E. A., Forney, K. A., Geelhoed, S. C. V., Haelters, J., Nabe-Nielsen, J., Scheidat, M., Siebert, U., Sveegaard, S., van Beest, F. M., van Bemmelen, R., & Aarts, G. (2016) Seasonal habitat-based density models for a marine top predator, the harbour porpoise, in a dynamic environment, Ecosph, 7(6), pp. e01367. doi:10.1002/ecs2.1367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HELCOM. (2019) 13th Meeting of HELCOM Expert Group on Marine Mammals, 24-26 September 2019 (Helsinki, Finland).
   Google Scholar
• Hüppop, K., Dierschke, J., Dierschke, V., Hill, R., Jachmann, K. F., & Hüppop, O. (2010) Phenology of the “visible bird migration”across the German bight, Vogelwarte, 48, pp. 181–267.
   Google Scholar
• Krone, R., Gutow, L., Joschko, T. J., & Schröder, A. (2013) Epifauna dynamics at an offshore foundation – implications of future wind power farming in the North Sea, Marine Environmental Research, 85, pp. 1–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markus, T., & Salomon, M. (2012) The law and policy behind the upcoming reform of the common fisheries policy, Journal for European Environmental and Planning Law, 9(3–4), pp. S. 257–284.
   Google Scholar
• Mendel, B., Kotzerka, J., Sommerfeld, J., Schwemmer, H., Sonntag, N., & Garthe, S. (2014) Effects of the alpha ventus offshore test site on distribution patterns, behaviour and flight heights of seabirds, in: Federal Maritime and Hydrographic Agency, Federal Ministry for the Environment Nature Conservation and Nulear Safety (Eds) Ecological Research at the Offshore Windfarm Alpha Ventus: Challenges, Results and Perspectives, pp. 95–110. (Berlin, Gemany: Springer).
   Google Scholar
• Mendel, B., Schwemmer, P., Peschko, V., Müller, S., Schwemmer, H., Mercker, M., & Garthe, S. (2019) Operational offshore wind farms and associated ship traffic cause profound changes in distribution patterns of loons (Gavia spp), Journal of Environmental Management, 231, pp. 429–438.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, A., Juretzek, C., & Boethling, M. (2019) Monitoring and assessment of the effectiveness of noise mitigation measures to reduce impact by percussive pile driving in German waters. Part one: Noise abatement strategy, thresholds, standards, legislative and administrative actions, in: Federal maritime and hydrographic agency (BSH), Technical Report, R&D “Assessment approaches for underwater sound monitoring associated with offshore approval procedures, maritime spatial planning and the marine strategy framework directive - BeMo”, Order No. 10036955, Hamburg, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Nabu, D. U., & Greenpeace, W. 2. (2020) Joint statement by German nature conservation associations on the draft spatial plan for the German EEZ of the North Sea and Baltic Sea. Available at https://www.nabu.de/imperia/md/content/nabude/naturschutz/meeresschutz/20201105-mro_gemeinsame_stellungnahme_ngos.pdf (assessed 30 January 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Nachtsheim, D. A., Viquerat, S., Ramírez-Martínez, N. C., Unger, B., Siebert, U., & Gilles, A. (2021) Small cetacean in a human high-use area: Trends in harbour porpoise abundance in the North sea over two decades, Frontiers in Marine Science, 7, pp. 606609. doi:10.3389/fmars.2020.606609.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nehls, G., Rose, A., Diederichs, A., Bellmann, M., & Pehlke, H. (2016). Noise mitigation during pile driving efficiently reduces disturbance of marine mammals. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, 875, pp. 755–762. doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-2981-8_92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reichenbach, M., & Grunkorn, T. (2011) A multi-method approach to determine the impact of existing wind power plants on bird and bat migration on the Island of fehmarn, Germany [presentation]. Presented at Conference on Wind Energy and Wildlife Impacts (CWW 2011), Trondheim, Norway.
   Google Scholar
• Reichetseder, P., & Reinicke, K. M. (2018) Erste Eignungsbewertung des Feldes A6/B4 Für Die Kohlendioxid‐speicherung (Clausthal-Zellerfeld, Germany: TU Clausthal).
   Google Scholar
• Salomon, M., & Dross, M. (2013) Challenges in cross-sectoral marine protection in Europe, Marine Polllution, 42, pp. 142–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schubert, M. (2018) Marine spatial planning, in: M. Salomon & T. Markus (Eds) Handbook on Marine Environment Protection - Science, Impacts and Sustainable Management, pp. 1013–1024 (Cham: Springer International Publishing).
   Google Scholar
• Simcock, A. (2018) Shipping, in: M. Salomon & T. Markus (Eds) Handbook on Marine Environment Protection - Science, Impacts and Sustainable Management, pp. 115–138 (Cham: Springer International Publishing).
   Google Scholar
• Smith, H. D., Maes, F., Stojanovic, T. A., & Ballinger, R. C. (2011) The integration of land and marine spatial planning, Journal of Coastal Conservation, 15(2), pp. 291–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SRU (German Advisory Council on the Environment). (2012) Environmental Report 2012: Responsibility in a Finite World – Chapter 8: Cross-Sectoral Marine Protection (Berlin, Germany).
   Google Scholar