Using practice theory to conceptualise balancing and values in urban planning

References

• Barth, F. (1993) Are values real? The enigma of naturalism in the anthropological imputation of values, in: M. Hechter, L. Nadel, & R. E. Michod (Eds) The Origin of Values, pp. 31–46(New York: Aldine de Gruyter).
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, M. P. (2002) Planning Theory for Practitioners (London/New York: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, H. (2002) Planning: An idea of value, The Town Planning Review, 73(3), pp. 271–288. doi:10.3828/tpr.73.3.3
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, H. (2012) Planning to change the world, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 32(2), pp. 135–146. doi:10.1177/0739456X11436347
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, H., & Marshall, R. (1998) Acting on principle: Dilemmas in planning practice, Planning Practice & Research, 13(2), pp. 117–128. doi:10.1080/02697459816139
   Google Scholar
• Davoudi, S. (2015) Planning as practice of knowing, Planning Theory, 14(3), pp. 316–331. doi:10.1177/1473095215575919
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Difu – Deutsches Institut für Urbanistik (2023) OB-Barometer 2023. Available at https://repository.difu.de/items/92d24983-2b1a-4b1e-bf37-3e360371a9c5 (accessed 24 November 2023).
   Google Scholar
• Faludi, A., & Waterhout, B. (2006) Introducing evidence-based planning, DisP - The Planning Review, 42(165), pp. 4–13. doi:10.1080/02513625.2006.10556950
   Google Scholar
• Ferm, J., & Tomaney, J. (2018) Conclusion: Beyond reflective, deliberative practice, in: J. Ferm & J. Tomaney (Eds) Planning Practice. Critical Perspectives from the UK, pp. 281–299 (New York: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Forester, J. (1999) The Deliberative Practitioner: Encouraging Participatory Planning Processes (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
   Google Scholar
• Fox-Rogers, L., & Murphy, E. (2016) Self-perceptions of the role of the planner, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 43(1), pp. 74–92. doi:10.1177/0265813515603860
   Google Scholar
• Gecas, V. (2008) The Ebb and flow of sociological interest in values, Sociological Forum, 23(2), pp. 344–350. doi:10.1111/j.1573-7861.2008.00064.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1984) The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration (Berkeley: University of California Press).
   Google Scholar
• Gierke, H.-G., & Schmidt-Eichstaedt, G. (2018) Die Abwägung in der Bauleitplanung: Gestaltungsspielräume – Grenzen – Direktiven (Stuttgart: Verlag W. Kohlhammer).
   Google Scholar
• Grant, J. L. (2022) A difficult balancing act: What planning involves, Planning Theory & Practice, 23(5), pp. 1–17. doi:10.1080/14649357.2022.2109719
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (1992) Planning through debate: The communicative turn in planning theory, The Town Planning Review, 63(2), pp. 143–162. doi:10.3828/tpr.63.2.422x602303814821
   Google Scholar
• Heinich, N. (2020) A pragmatic redefinition of value(s): Toward a general model of valuation, Theory, Culture & Society, 37(5), pp. 75–94. doi:10.1177/0263276420915993
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoekveld, G., & Needham, B. (2013) Planning practice between ethics and the power game: Making and applying an ethical code for planning agencies, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37(5), pp. 16398–1653. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2427.2012.01146.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howe, E., & Kaufmann, J. (1979) The ethics of contemporary American planners, Journal of the American Planning Association, 45(3), pp. 243–255. doi:10.1080/01944367908976965
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitchen, T. (2007) Skills for Planning Practice (Houndsmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan).
   Google Scholar
• Klosterman, R. E. (1983) Fact and value in planning, Journal of the American Planning Association, 49(2), pp. 216–225. doi:10.1080/01944368308977066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klosterman, R. E. (2013) Lessons learned about planning, Journal of the American Planning Association, 79(2), pp. 161–169. doi:10.1080/01944363.2013.882647
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraatz, M. S., Flores, R., & Chandler, D. (2020) The value of values for institutional analysis, Academy of Management Annals, 14(2), pp. 474–512. doi:10.5465/annals.2018.0074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lauria, M., & Long, M. F. (2019) Ethical dilemmas in professional planning practice in the United States, Journal of the American Planning Association, 85(4), pp. 393–404. doi:10.1080/01944363.2019.1627238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lennon, M., Scott, M., & Russell, P. (2018) Ireland’s new national planning framework: (Re)balancing and (Re)conceiving planning for the twenty-first century? Planning Practice & Research, 33(5), pp. 491–505. doi:10.1080/02697459.2018.1531581
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moroni, S., & Lorini, G. (2017) Graphic rules in planning: A critical exploration of normative drawings starting from zoning maps and form-based codes, Planning Theory, 16(3), pp. 318–338. doi:10.1177/1473095216656389
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reckwitz, A. (2002) Toward a theory of social practices: A development in culturalist theorizing, European Journal of Social Theory, 5(2), pp. 243–263. doi:10.1177/13684310222225432
   Google Scholar
• Rokeach, M. (1973) The Nature of Human Values and Value Systems (New York: Free Press).
   Google Scholar
• Sager, T. (2012) Collective action: Balancing public and particularistic interests, in: R. Weber & R. Crane (Eds) The Oxford Handbook of Urban Planning, pp. 25–45 (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T. (2016) Practice theory as flat ontology, in: G. Spaargaren, D. Weenink, & M. Lamers (Eds) Practice Theory and Research: Exploring the Dynamics of Social Life, pp. 28–42 (Abingdon, New York: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T. R. (1996) Social Practices: A Wittgensteinian Approach to Human Activity and the Social (Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press).
   Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T. R. (2018) On practice theory, or what’s practices got to do (got to do) with it? in: C. Edwards-Groves, P. Grootenboer, & J. Wilkinson (Eds) Education in an Era of Schooling, pp. 151–165 (Singapore: Springer Nature).
   Google Scholar
• Schoneboom, A., Slade, J., Tait, M., & Vigar, G. (2022) What Town Planners Do: Exploring Planning Practices and the Public Interest Through Workplace Ethnographies (Bristol: Policy Press).
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, S. H. (2012) An overview of the Schwartz theory of basic values, Online Readings in Psychology & Culture, 2(1), pp. 3–20. doi:10.9707/2307-0919.1116
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, S. H. (2015) Basic individual values: Sources and consequences, in: T. Brosch & D. Sander (Eds) Handbook of Value, pp. 63–84 (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Shove, E., Pantzar, M., & Watson, M. (2012) The Dynamics of Social Practice: Everyday Life and How It Changes (London: SAGE Publications Ltd).
   Google Scholar
• Solly, A. (2021) Land use challenges, sustainability and the spatial planning balancing act: Insights from Sweden and Switzerland, European Planning Studies, 29(4), pp. 637–653. doi:10.1080/09654313.2020.1765992
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, H. (1994) Values and Planning (Aldershot: Avebury).
   Google Scholar
• Thome, H. (2015) Values, sociology of, in: J. D. Wright (Ed) International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed., pp. 47–53 (Amsterdam: Elsevier).
   Google Scholar
• Zemke, R. (2018) Der Bebauungsplan in der Praxis: Grundlagen, Abwägungs- und Festsetzungstechnik, Kommunikation und Verfahren, Kalkulation nach HOAI (Stuttgart: Verlag W. Kohlhammer).
   Google Scholar
• Zimmermann, K. (2017) Praxisansätze in der planungswissenschaftlichen Diskussion, Nachrichten der ARL, 47(1), pp. 14–16.
   Google Scholar