New planning formats in established settings: a reflection on advice and consultancy, inertia and failure in Luxembourg’s planning practice

References

• Allmendinger, P. (2017) Planning Theory, 3rd ed. (London: Macmillan).
   Google Scholar
• ARL-International. (2022) Luxembourg. Available at www.arl-international.com/https://www.arl-international.com/knowledge/country-profiles/luxembourg (accessed 1 January 2024).
   Google Scholar
• Becker, T., & Hesse, M. (2021) A temporary space where development and planning emergencies meet? Notes on an International Building Exhibition (IBA) in the cross-border territories of France and Luxembourg, Planning Theory & Practice, 22(1), pp. 148–154. doi:10.1080/14649357.2020.1842588
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, I. (2015) Policy mobilities and interdisciplinary engagement, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 39(4), pp. 835–837. doi:10.1111/1468-2427.12256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CSAT. (2023) Avis du Conseil Supérieur de l’Aménagement du Territoire concernant le projet de Programme directeur d’aménagement du territoire 2023. Luxembourg, February 2.
   Google Scholar
• Darchen, S., & Searle, G. (Eds) (2018) Global Planning Innovations for Urban Sustainability (Abingdon/New York: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• DATer. (2003) Programme directeur d’aménagement du territoire. Luxembourg.
   Google Scholar
• DATer. (2004) Integriertes Konzept für Verkehr und Landesentwicklung. Luxembourg.
   Google Scholar
• DATer. (2023) Programme directeur d’aménagement du territoire (PDAT 2023). Luxembourg.
   Google Scholar
• Decoville, A., & Durand, F. (2017) Challenges and obstacles in the production of cross-border territorial strategies: The example of the Greater Region, Transactions of the Association of European Schools of Planning, pp. 65–78. doi:10.24306/TrAESOP.2017.01.005
   Google Scholar
• Decoville, A., & Durand, F. (2021) An empirical approach to cross-border spatial planning initiatives in Europe, Regional Studies, 55(8), pp. 1417–1428. doi:10.1080/00343404.2021.1902492
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durand, F., & Decoville, A. (2018) Establishing cross-border spatial planning, in: E. Medeiros (Ed) European Territorial Cooperation, pp. 229–240 (Cham: Springer). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-74887-0_12
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, S. (2020) Die Internationale Bauausstellung in Basel–Ein bewährtes Format in neuen Grenzen, disP-The Planning Review, 56(3), pp. 10–19. doi:10.1080/02513625.2020.1851896
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox-Rogers, L., & Murphy, E. (2016) Self-perceptions of the role of the planner, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 43(1), pp. 74–92. doi:10.1177/0265813515603860
   Google Scholar
• GECT Alzette Belval. (2022) Les fondements IBA Alzette Belval. Audun-le-Tiche, December 16.
   Google Scholar
• GECT Alzette Belval. (2023) Rapport d’activités 2022. Audun-le-Tiche, February.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (1997) Collaborative Planning. Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies (London: Macmillan).
   Google Scholar
• Hesse, M. (2013) Das «Kirchberg-Syndrom»: grosse Projekte im kleinen Land: Bauen und Planen in Luxemburg, disP-The Planning Review, 49(1), pp. 14–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hesse, M. (2015) Luxembourg, disP-The Planning Review, 51(1), pp. 54–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hesse, M. (2016) On borrowed size, flawed urbanisation and emerging enclave spaces: The exceptional urbanism of Luxembourg, Luxembourg. European urban and regional studies, 23(4), pp. 612–627.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hesse, M., & Peleman, D. (2021) IBA Alzette Belval+. A memorandum, revised version, Esch-sur-Alzette, December 17. Available at https://hdl.handle.net/10993/59321
   Google Scholar
• Hesse, M., & Wong, C. (2020) Cities seen through a relational lens. Geographische Zeitschrift, 108(2), pp. 74–92.
   Google Scholar
• IBA/OIE. (2023) Atypische Grenzgänger in der Großregion 2022 [Reverse commuters in the Greater Region]. Prepared by Frédéric Marsal. Available at https://ww.iba-oie.eu/themen/grenzgaengermobilitaet/grossregion/atypische-grenzgaenger (accessed 26 January 2024).
   Google Scholar
• Inch, A., Slade, J., & Crookes, L. (2023) Exploring planning as a technology of hope, Journal of Planning Education & Research, 43(4), pp. 869–880. doi:10.1177/0739456X20928400
   Google Scholar
• Kunzmann, K. (2011) Die internationale Wirkung der IBA Emscher Park, in: C. Reicher, L. Niemann, & A. Uttke (Eds) Internationale Bauausstellung Emscher Park: Impulse, pp. 168–180 (Essen: Klartext).
   Google Scholar
• LISER (2023) Note 32 : Panorama du foncier constructible au Luxembourg : prix de vente, incidence foncière et structure de la propriété (Esch-sur-Alzette: LISER).
   Google Scholar
• Oliveira, V., & Pinho, P. (2010) Evaluation in urban planning: Advances and prospects, Journal of Planning Literature, 24(4), pp. 343–361. doi:10.1177/0885412210364589
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paccoud, A., Hesse, M., Becker, T., & Górczyńska, M. (2022) Land and the housing affordability crisis: Landowner and developer strategies in Luxembourg’s facilitative planning context, Housing Studies, 37(10), pp. 1782–1799. doi:10.1080/02673037.2021.1950647
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purcell, M. (2009) Resisting neoliberalization: Communicative planning or counter-hegemonic movements? Planning Theory, 8(2), pp. 140–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vigar, G., Cowie, P., & Healey, P. (2020) Innovation in planning: Creating and securing public value, European Planning Studies, 28(3), pp. 521–540. doi:10.1080/09654313.2019.1639400
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar