‘What planners don’t do is plan’: recovering the English strategic spatial planning imagination

References

• Albrechts, L. (2004) Strategic (spatial) planning reexamined, Environment & Planning B, Planning & Design, 31(5), pp. 743–758. doi:10.1068/b3065.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albrechts, L. (2010) More of the same is not enough! How could strategic spatial planning be instrumental in dealing with the challenges ahead? Environment & Planning B, Planning & Design, 37(6), pp. 1115–1127. doi:10.1068/b36068.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albrechts, L., Barbanente, A., & Monno, V. (2019) From stage-managed planning towards a more imaginative and inclusive strategic spatial planning, Environment & Planning C Politics & Space, 37(8), pp. 1489–1506. doi:10.1177/2399654419825655.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albrechts, L., Healey, P., & Kunzmann, K. R. (2003) Strategic spatial planning and regional governance in Europe, Journal of the American Planning Association, 69(2), pp. 113–129. doi:10.1080/01944360308976301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allmendinger, P., & Haughton, G. (2010) Spatial planning, devolution, and new planning spaces, Environment & Planning C, Government & Policy, 28(5), pp. 803–818. doi:10.1068/c09163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, M., & Wong, C. (2013) The delusion of strategic spatial planning: What’s left after the labour government’s English regional experiment? Planning Practice & Research, 28(1), pp. 83–103. doi:10.1080/02697459.2012.694314.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, R. J. (1997) Administrative systems and economic spaces, Regional Studies, 31(3), pp. 323–336. doi:10.1080/00343409750134728.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boddy, M., & Hickman, H. (2013) The demise of strategic planning? The impact of the abolition of regional spatial strategy in a growth region, The Town Planning Review, 84(6), pp. 743–768. doi:10.3828/tpr.2013.38.
   Google Scholar
• CCN/CRA (2020) Planning reforms and the Role of Strategic planning (London: County Councils Network/Catriona Riddell Associates).
   Google Scholar
• CCN/CRA (2021) The Future of Strategic Planning in England (London: County Councils Network/Catriona Riddell Associates).
   Google Scholar
• Colomb, C., & Tomaney, J. (2016) Territorial politics, devolution and spatial planning in the UK: Results, prospects, lessons, Planning Practice & Research, 31(1), pp. 1–22. doi:10.1080/02697459.2015.1081337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cullingworth, B., & Nadin, V. (2006) Town and Country Planning in the UK, 14th ed. (London and New York: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Davis, G. H. (1946) Local Government Boundary Commission: Particulars Submitted to the Assistant Commissioner on 11 and 12 December 1946 on Behalf of The Gloucestershire County Council (Gloucester: Gloucestershire County Council).
   Google Scholar
• Davoudi, S. (2009) Space and place in twentieth century planning: An analytical framework and an historical review, in: S. Davoudi & I. Strange (Eds) Conceptions of Space and Place in Strategic Spatial Planning, pp. 7–42 (Abingdon: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• DCLG (2017) Fixing our broken housing market Department of Communities and Local Government CM9352. Available at: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/590463/Fixing_our_broken_housing_market_-_accessible_version.pdf (accessed 1 April 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Dorling, D. (2020) Slowdown: The End of the Great Acceleration—And Why it’s Good for the Planet, the Economy, and Our Lives (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Dühr, S., Colomb, C., & Nadin, V. (2010) European Spatial Planning and Territorial Cooperation (Abingdon: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Friend, J., & Hickling, A. (2012) Planning Under Pressure (Abingdon: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Garvin, A. (2009) Planners as leaders, in: G. Hack, E. L. Birch, P. H. Sedway, & J. Silver (Eds) Local Planning: Contemporary Problems and Prospects, pp. 25–33 (Washington, DC: ICMA Press).
   Google Scholar
• GCC, (1979) The Structure Plan for Gloucestershire: Report of Survey: General Volume (Gloucester: Gloucestershire County Council).
   Google Scholar
• Geraghty, P. (2020) The Science and art of Strategic Planning, Town and Country Planning Association (TCPA) blog, 4 December 2020. Available at https://tcpa.org.uk/science-and-art-of-strategic-planning/ (accessed 8 March 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Hajer, M. (2003) Policy without policy? Policy analysis and the institutional void, Policy Science, 36(2), pp. 175–195. doi:10.1023/A:1024834510939.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (1997a) An institutionalist approach to spatial planning, In: P. Healey, A. Khakee, A. Motte, & B. Needham (Eds) Making Strategic Spatial Plans: Innovation in Europe, pp. 21–36 (London: UCL Press).
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (1997b) The revival of strategic spatial planning, in: P. Healey, A. Khakee, A. Motte, & B. Needham (Eds) Making Strategic Spatial Plans: Innovation in Europe, pp. 3–20 (London: UCL Press).
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (2006) Relational complexity and the imaginative power of strategic spatial planning, European Planning Studies, 14(4), pp. 525–546. doi:10.1080/09654310500421196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heraud, B. J. (1966) The new towns and London’s housing problem, Urban Studies, 3(1), pp. 8–21. doi:10.1080/00420986620080021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IFS (Institute for Fiscal Studies) (2019) English local government funding: Trends and challenges in 2019 and beyond (London: IFS). https://ifs.org.uk/publications/english-local-governmentfunding-trends-and-challenges-2019-and-beyond-0 (accessed 5 December2019).
   Google Scholar
• Keating, M. (1997) The invention of regions: Political restructuring and territorial government in Western Europe, Environment & Planning C, Government & Policy, 15(4), pp. 383–398. doi:10.1068/c150383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knaap, G. J., Nedović-Budić, Z., & Carbonell, A. (Eds) (2015) Planning for States and Nation-States in the U.S. and Europe (Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy).
   Google Scholar
• Majone, G. (1989) Evidence, Argument and Persuasion in the Policy Process (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Masom, G. (2016) Not fit for humans? Social and economic change in slough 1919–1951, Local Population Studies, 97(1), pp. 44–60. doi:10.35488/lps97.2016.44.
   Google Scholar
• Masser, I., Williams, M. B., & Williams, R. (Eds) (1986) Learning from Other Countries: The Cross-National Dimension in Urban Policy Making (Norwich: GeoBooks).
   Google Scholar
• McGuinness, D., & Mawson, J. (2017) The rescaling of sub-national planning: Can localism resolve England’s spatial planning conundrum? The Town Planning Review, 88(3), pp. 283–303. doi:10.3828/tpr.2017.19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miao, J. T., & Phelps, N. A. (2019) The intrapreneurial state: Singapore’s emergence in the smart and sustainable urban solutions field, Territory, Politics, Governance, 7(3), pp. 316–335. doi:10.1080/21622671.2018.1467787.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills, C. W. (1959) The Sociological Imagination (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Murdoch, J., & Abram, S. (2017) Rationalities of Planning: Development versus Environment in Planning for Housing (Abingdon: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Nadin, V., & Stead, D. (2008) European spatial planning systems, social models and learning, DisP - the Planning Review, 44(172), pp. 35–47. doi:10.1080/02513625.2008.10557001.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, P., & Thornley, A. (1996) Urban Planning in Europe: International Competition, National Systems, and Planning Projects (Abingdon: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Parker, G. (2020) The future of the planning profession: Planning with many changes, and for many challenges, Planning Theory & Practice, 21(3), pp. 1–3. doi:10.1080/14649357.2020.1776014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phelps, N. A. (2012) An Anatomy of Sprawl: Planning and Politics in Britain (Abingdon: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Phelps, N. A. (2017) Interplaces: An Economic Geography of the Inter-Urban and International Economies (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Phelps, N. A. (2021) The Urban Planning Imagination: A Critical International Introduction (Polity: Cambridge).
   Google Scholar
• Phelps, N. A. (2023) Not waving but drowning, Dialogues in Human Geography, 13(1), pp. 30–34. doi:10.1177/20438206221129199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phelps, N. A. (2024) Planning, property and political logics of development compared, Journal of the American Planning Association, pp. 1–13. doi:10.1080/01944363.2024.2325036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phelps, N. A., & Tewdwr-Jones, M. (2000) Scratching the surface of collaborative and associative governance: Identifying the diversity of social action in institutional capacity building, Environment & Planning A, 32(1), pp. 111–130. doi:10.1068/a31175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phelps, N. A., & Valler, D. (2018) Urban development and the politics of dissonance, Territory, Politics, Governance, 6(1), pp. 81–103. doi:10.1080/21622671.2016.1231629.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickvance C. (1982) Physical planning and market forces in urban development, in: C. Paris (Ed) Critical Readings in Planning Theory, pp. 69–94 (Oxford: Pergamon).
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C. (2000) Institutional amnesia: A paradox of the ‘Information age’? Prometheus, 18(1), pp. 5–16.
   Google Scholar
• Reimer, M., Getimis, P., & Blotevogel, H. (Eds) (2014) Spatial Planning Systems and Practices in Europe: A Comparative Perspective on Continuity and Changes (Abingdon: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Rozee, L. (2014) A new vision for planning–there must be a better way? Planning Theory & Practice, 15(1), pp. 124–138. doi:10.1080/14649357.2013.873231.
   Google Scholar
• RTPI (2020) RTPI Response to the MHCLG Consultation on the Planning White Paper, Royal Town Planning Institute, 29 October 2020. Available at: https://www.rtpi.org.uk/media/6805/rtpi-planning-white-paper-consultation-response-october-2020.pdf (accessed 31 October 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Sandercock, L. (2003) Out of the closet: The importance of stories and storytelling in planning practice, Planning Theory & Practice, 4(1), pp. 11–28. doi:10.1080/1464935032000057209.
   Google Scholar
• Sandercock, L. (2004) Towards a planning imagination for the 21st century, Journal of the American Planning Association, 70(2), pp. 133–141. doi:10.1080/01944360408976368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savini, F., Ferreira, A., & von Schönfeld, K. C. (Eds) (2022) Post-Growth Planning: Cities Beyond the Market Economy (Abingdon: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt, P., & Smas, L. (2020) Dissolution rather than consolidation - questioning the existence of the comprehensive-integrative planning model, Planning Practice & Research, 38(5), pp. 678–693. doi:10.1080/02697459.2020.1841973.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorensen, A. (2018) Planning theory and history: Institutions, comparison and temporal processes, in: C. Hein (Ed) The Routledge Handbook of Planning History, pp. 35–45 (Abingdon: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Sturzaker, J., & Hickman, H. (2024) Planning’s value, planners’ values: Defining and redefining for contemporary practice, Planning Practice & Research, 39(2), pp. 157–170. doi:10.1080/02697459.2024.2316988.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutcliffe, A. (1981) Towards the Planned City: Germany, Britain, the United States and France, 1780–1914 (Oxford: Blackwell).
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, J., & Close, A. (2022) Minding the skills gap: A commentary on training needs, recruitment challenges and perceptions of professional planning in the UK, The Town Planning Review, 93(4), pp. 353–371. doi:10.3828/tpr.2021.54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The University of Gloucestershire (2018) Gloucestershire 2050: The Big Conversation Consultation and Engagement Report. Traverse: London.
   Google Scholar
• Valler, D., Allmendinger, P., & Nelles, J. (2023a) The sinking of the Oxford-Cambridge Arc: Strategic planning in England at a nadir? The Town Planning Review, 94(6), pp. 611–633. doi:10.3828/tpr.2023.17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valler, D. C., & Phelps, N. (2016) Delivering growth? Evaluating economic governance in England’s South East subregions, The Town Planning Review, 87(1), pp. 5–30. doi:10.3828/tpr.2016.3.
   Google Scholar
• Valler, D., Jonas, A. E., & Robinson, L. (2023b) Evaluating regional spatial imaginaries: The Oxford–Cambridge Arc, Territory, Politics, Governance, 11(3), pp. 434–455. doi:10.1080/21622671.2020.1851751.
   Google Scholar
• Valler, D., & Phelps, N. A. (2018) Framing the future: On local planning cultures and legacies, Planning Theory & Practice, 19(5), pp. 698–716. doi:10.1080/14649357.2018.1537448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valler, D., Phelps, N. A., & Radford, J. (2014) Soft space, hard bargaining: Planning for high-tech growth in ‘Science Vale UK’, Environment & Planning C, Government & Policy, 32(5), pp. 824–842. doi:10.1068/c1268r.
   Google Scholar
• Valler, D., Phelps, N., & Wood, A. (2012) Planning for growth? The implications of localism for ‘Science Vale’, Oxfordshire, UK, The Town Planning Review, 83(4), pp. 457–489. doi:10.3828/tpr.2012.27.
   Google Scholar
• Vigar, G., Healey, P., Hull, A., & Davoudi, S. (2000) Planning, Governance and Spatial Strategy in Britain (London: Macmillan).
   Google Scholar
• Ward, K. A. (2020) Strategic Spatial Planning in a Devolving Governance Context: A Study of Sheffield City Region, PhD Thesis, The University of Sheffield. (Downloaded 26 May 2024 at https://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/26522/)
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. (1998) Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Ziafati Bafarasat, A., & Baker, M. (2016) Strategic spatial planning under regime governance and localism: Experiences from the North West of England, The Town Planning Review, 87(6), pp. 681–703. doi:10.3828/tpr.2016.43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar