References
- Becker, G. 1991. A Treatise on the Family. 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Clarke, S., and A. Walsh. 2009. “Scientific Imperialism and the Proper Relations Between the Sciences.” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 23: 195–207. doi: 10.1080/02698590903007170
- Dupré, J. 1996. “Against Scientific Imperialism.” In PSA 1994: Proceedings of the 1994 Biennial Meetings of the Philosophy of Science Association, edited by M. Forbes, D. Hull, and R. M. Burian, vol. 2, 374–381. East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association.
- Dupré, J. 2001. Human Nature and the Limits of Science. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
- Kidd, I. J. 2013. “Historical Contingency and the Impact of Scientific Imperialism.” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 27: 315–324.
- Kuhn, T. S. 1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 2nd ed. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
- Mäki, U. 2013. “Scientific Imperialism: Difficulties in Definition, Identification, and Assessment.” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 27: 325–339.
- Niiniluoto, I. 2011. “Scientific Progress.” In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by E. N. Zalta. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/scientific-progress. Accessed 12 June 2013.
- Sellars, W. 1962. “Philosophy and the Scientific Image of Man.” In Frontiers of Science and Philosophy, edited by R. G. Colodny, 35–78. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
- Tallis, R. 2013. “Philosophy Isn't Dead Yet.” The Guardian (London), 27 May.
![Supercharge Your Next Research Paper: Research and write your next paper with Jenni AI.]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/112447/MPU-L1HU.png"})