Global and Local Pessimistic Meta-inductions

References

• Balk, Ethan M., Peter A. L. Bonis, Harry Moskowitz, Christopher H. Schmid, John P. A. Ioannidis, Chenchen Wang, and Joseph Lau. 2002. “Correlation of Quality Measures with Estimates of Treatment Effect in Meta-analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials.” Journal of the American Medical Association 287: 2973–2982. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.22.2973
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishop, Michael A. 2003. “The Pessimistic Induction, the Flight to Reference and the Metaphysical Zoo.” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 17: 161–178. doi: 10.1080/0269859031000160621
   Google Scholar
• Chakravartty, Anjan. 2004. “Structuralism as a Form of Scientific Realism.” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 18: 151–171. doi: 10.1080/0269859042000296503
   Google Scholar
• Chang, Hasok. 2003. “Preservative Realism and Its Discontents: Revisiting Caloric.” Philosophy of Science 70: 902–912. doi: 10.1086/377376
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devitt, Michael. 2011. “Are Unconceived Alternatives a Problem for Scientific Realism?” Journal for General Philosophy of Science 42: 285–293. doi: 10.1007/s10838-011-9166-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doppelt, Gerald. 2007. “Reconstructing Scientific Realism to Rebut the Pessimistic Meta-induction.” Philosophy of Science 74: 96–118. doi: 10.1086/520685
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Earman, John. 1992. Bayes or Bust? A Critical Examination of Bayesian Confirmation Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elsamahi, Mohamed. 2005. “A Critique of Localized Realism.” Philosophy of Science 72: 1350–1360. doi: 10.1086/508973
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enfield, Patrick. 2008. “Review of P. Kyle Stanford, Exceeding Our Grasp.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 59: 881–895. doi: 10.1093/bjps/axn042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fahrbach, Ludwig. 2011a. “How the Growth of Science Ends Theory Change.” Synthese 180: 139–155. doi: 10.1007/s11229-009-9602-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fahrbach, Ludwig. 2011b. “Theory Change and Degree of Success.” Philosophy of Science 78: 1283–1292. doi: 10.1086/662280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faust, David, and Paul E. Meehl. 2002. “Using Meta-scientific Studies to Clarify or Resolve Questions in the Philosophy and History of Science.” Philosophy of Science 69 (Proceedings): S185–S196. doi: 10.1086/341845
   Google Scholar
• Forber, Patrick. 2008. “Forever Beyond Our Grasp? Review of P. Kyle Stanford (2006), Exceeding Our Grasp: Science, History, and the Problem of Unconceived Alternatives.” Biology and Philosophy 23: 135–141. doi: 10.1007/s10539-007-9074-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forber, Patrick. 2011. “Reconceiving Eliminative Inference.” Philosophy of Science 78: 185–208. doi: 10.1086/659232
   Google Scholar
• Godfrey-Smith, Peter. 2003. Theory and Reality: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Godfrey-Smith, Peter. 2008. “Recurrent Transient Underdetermination and the Glass Half Full.” Philosophical Studies 137: 141–148. doi: 10.1007/s11098-007-9172-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman, Steven, and Sander Greenland. 2007. “Assessing the Unreliability of the Medical Literature: A Response to ‘Most Published Research Findings are False’.” Johns Hopkins University, Department of Biostatistics Working Papers. Working Paper 135. http://biostats.bepress.com/jhubiostat/paper135. Accessed 5 July 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Hardin, Clyde L., and Alexander Rosenberg. 1982. “In Defense of Convergent Realism.” Philosophy of Science 49: 604–615. doi: 10.1086/289080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobbs, Jesse. 1994. “A Limited Defense of the Pessimistic Induction.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 45: 171–191. doi: 10.1093/bjps/45.1.171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosmer, David W., Jr., and Stanley Lemeshow. 1999. Applied Survival Analysis: Regression Modeling of Time to Event Data. New York: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Ioannidis, John P. A. 2005a. “Contradicted and Clinically Stronger Effects in Highly Cited Clinical Research.” Journal of the American Medical Association 294: 218–228. doi: 10.1001/jama.294.2.218
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ioannidis, John P. A. 2005b. “Why Most Published Research Findings Are False.” PLoS Medicine 2: 696–701.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ioannidis, John P. A., Anna-Bettina Haidich, Maroudia Pappa, Nikos Pantazis, Styliani I. Kokori, Maria G. Tektonidou, Despina G. Contopoulos-Ioannidis, and Joseph Lau. 2001. “Comparison of Evidence of Treatment Effects in Randomized and Nonrandomized Studies.” Journal of the American Medical Association 286: 821–830. doi: 10.1001/jama.286.7.821
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitcher, Philip. 1993. The Advancement of Science: Science Without Legend, Objectivity Without Illusion. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lange, Marc. 2002. “Baseball, Pessimistic Inductions, and the Turnover Fallacy.” Analysis 62: 281–285. doi: 10.1093/analys/62.4.281
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laudan, Larry. 1981. “A Confutation of Convergent Realism.” Philosophy of Science 48: 19–49. doi: 10.1086/288975
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leplin, Jarrett. 1997. A Novel Defense of Scientific Realism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, Peter J. 2001. “Why the Pessimistic Induction Is a Fallacy.” Synthese 129: 371–380. doi: 10.1023/A:1013139410613
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipton, Peter. 1993. “Is the Best Good Enough?” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 93: 89–104.
   Google Scholar
• Lipton, Peter, and John Worrall. 2000. “Tracking Track Records.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 74: 179–235. doi: 10.1111/1467-8349.00069
   Google Scholar
• Lyons, Timothy D. 2006. “Scientific Realism and the Stratagema de Divide et Impera.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 57: 537–560. doi: 10.1093/bjps/axl021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magnus, P. D. 2010. “Inductions, Red Herrings, and the Best Explanation for the Mixed Record of Science.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 61: 803–819. doi: 10.1093/bjps/axq004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magnus, P. D., and Craig Callender. 2004. “Realist Ennui and the Base Rate Fallacy.” Philosophy of Science 71: 320–338. doi: 10.1086/421536
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mizrahi, Moti. 2013. “The Pessimistic Induction: A Bad Argument Gone Too Far.” Synthese 190: 3209–3226. doi: 10.1007/s11229-012-0138-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, Mark. 2005. “Ramsey Sentence Realism as an Answer to the Pessimistic Meta-induction.” Philosophy of Science 72: 1373–1384. doi: 10.1086/508975
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norton, John D. 2003. “A Material Theory of Induction.” Philosophy of Science 70: 647–670. doi: 10.1086/378858
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, Seungbae. 2011. “A Confutation of the Pessimistic Induction.” Journal for General Philosophy of Science 42: 75–84. doi: 10.1007/s10838-010-9130-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Psillos, Stathis. 1999. Scientific Realism: How Science Tracks Truth. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, Hilary. 1978. Meaning and the Moral Sciences. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Ritchie, Jack. 2008. “Structural Realism and Davidson.” Synthese 162: 85–100. doi: 10.1007/s11229-007-9171-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruhmkorff, Samuel. 2011. “Some Difficulties for the Problem of Unconceived Alternatives.” Philosophy of Science 78: 875–886. doi: 10.1086/662273
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saatsi, Juha T. 2005. “On the Pessimistic Induction and Two Fallacies.” Philosophy of Science 72: 1088–1098. doi: 10.1086/508959
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shimony, Abner. 1970. “Scientific Inference.” In The Nature and Function of Scientific Theories: Essays in Contemporary Science and Philosophy, edited by Robert G. Colodny, 79–172. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stanford, P. Kyle. 2001. “Refusing the Devil's Bargain: What Kind of Underdetermination Should We Take Seriously?” Philosophy of Science 68 (Proceedings): S1–S12. doi: 10.1086/392893
   Google Scholar
• Stanford, P. Kyle. 2006. Exceeding Our Grasp: Science, History, and the Problem of Unconceived Alternatives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stephens, Nigel G., Ann Parsons, Peter M. Schofield, Frank Kelly, Kevin Cheeseman, Malcolm J. Mitchinson, and Morris J. Brown. 1996. “Randomised Controlled Trial of Vitamin E in Patients with Coronary Disease: Cambridge Heart Antioxidant Study (CHAOS).” Lancet 347: 781–786. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)90866-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tatsioni, Athina, Nikolaos G. Bonitsis, and John P. A. Ioannidis. 2007. “Persistence of Contradicted Claims in the Literature.” Journal of the American Medical Association 298: 2517–2526. doi: 10.1001/jama.298.21.2517
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, Derek. 2004. “Local Underdetermination in Historical Science.” Philosophy of Science 72: 209–230. doi: 10.1086/426851
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worrall, John. 1994. “How to Remain (Reasonably) Optimistic: Scientific Realism and the ‘Luminiferous Ether’.” In PSA 1994: Proceedings of the 1994 Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, edited by David Hull, Micky Forbes, and Richard M. Burian, vol. 1, 334–342. East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association.
   Google Scholar
• Wray, K. Brad. 2013. “Success and Truth in the Realism/Anti-realism Debate.” Synthese 190: 1719–1729. doi: 10.1007/s11229-011-9931-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar