Iconic Representations and Representative Practices

References

• Achinstein, P. 1968. Concepts of Science: A Philosophical Analysis. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anellis, I. H. 1995. “Peirce Rustled, Russell Pierced: How Charles Peirce and Bertrand Russell Viewed Each Other's Work in Logic, and an Assessment of Russell's Accuracy and Role in the Historiography of Logic.” Modern Logic 5: 270–328.
   Google Scholar
• Atkin, A. 2010. “Peirce's Theory of Signs.” In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by E. N. Zalta. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2013/entries/peirce-semiotics. Accessed 10 June 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Bartels, A. 2006. “Defending the Structural Concept of Representation.” Theoria 21: 7–19.
   Google Scholar
• Barwise, J., and E. Hammer. 1996. “Diagrams and the Concept of Logical System.” In Logical Reasoning with Diagrams, edited by G. Allwein and J. Barwise, 49–77. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bergman, M. 2009. Peirce's Philosophy of Communication: The Rhetorical Underpinnings of the Theory of Signs. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Black, M. 1962. Models and Metaphors. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cartwright, N. 1983. How the Laws of Physics Lie. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coopmans, C., J. Vertesi, M. E. Lynch, and S. Woolgar, eds. 2014. Representation in Scientific Practice Revisited. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Da Costa, N. C. A., and S. French. 2003. Science and Partial Truth: A Unitary Approach to Models and Scientific Reasoning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Chadarevian, S., and N. Hopwood, eds. 2004. Models: The Third Dimension of Science. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Waal, C. 2013. Peirce: A Guide for the Perplexed. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Dipert, R. R. 1996. “Reflections on Iconicity, Representation, and Resemblance: Peirce's Theory of Signs, Goodman on Resemblance, and Modern Philosophies of Language and Mind.” Synthese 106: 373–397. doi: 10.1007/BF00413591
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frigg, R., and S. Hartmann. 2006. “Models in Science.” In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by E. N. Zalta. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2009/entries/models-science. Accessed 23 June 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Frigg, R., and M. Hunter, eds. 2010. Beyond Mimesis and Convention: Representation in Art and Science. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Giere, R. N. 1988. Explaining Science: A Cognitive Approach. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giere, R. N. 2004. Scientific Perspectivism. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, N. 1962. Languages of Art. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.
   Google Scholar
• Hacking, I. 1983. Representing and Intervening: Introductory Topics in the Philosophy of Natural Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hesse, M. B. 1963. Models and Analogies in Science. London: Sheed and Ward.
   Google Scholar
• Hookway, C. 2000. Truth, Rationality and Pragmatism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hookway, C. 2002. ‘“ … A Sort of Composite Photograph’: Pragmatism, Ideas, and Schematism.” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 38: 29–45.
   Google Scholar
• Knuuttila, T. 2010. “Not Just Underlying Structures: Towards a Semiotic Approach to Scientific Representation and Modeling.” In Ideas in Action: Proceedings of the Applying Peirce Conference, edited by M. Bergman, S. Paavola, A. V. Pietarinen, and H. Rydenfelt, 163–172. Helsinki: Nordic Pragmatism Network.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, M., and S. Woolgar, eds. 1990. Representation in Scientific Practice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, M., and M. Morrison, eds. 1999. Models as Mediators: Perspectives on Natural and Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Norman, J. A. 1999. “Diagrammatic Reasoning and Propositional Logic.” M.Phil. thesis, University of London.
   Google Scholar
• Peirce, C. S. 1931–1938/1958. Collected Papers, edited by C. Hartshorne, P. Weiss, and A. W. Burks. 8 vols. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peirce, C. S. 1992–1998. The Essential Peirce: Selected Philosophical Writings, edited by N. Houser, C. Kloesel, and The Peirce Edition Project. 2 vols. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pietarinen, A. V. 2006. Signs of Logic: Peircean Themes on the Philosophy of Language, Games, and Communication. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Robin, R. S. 1967. Annotated Catalogue of the Papers of Charles S. Peirce. Worcester: University of Massachusetts Press. http://www.iupui.edu/~peirce/robin/robin_fm/toc_frm.htm. Accessed 30 June 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, B. [1946] 1969. “Foreword.” In An Introduction to the Philosophy of Charles S. Peirce, edited by J. K. Feibleman, xv–xvi. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shin, S. J. 2002. The Iconic Logic of Peirce's Graphs. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Short, T. L. 2007. Peirce's Theory of Signs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sowa, J. F. 2001. “Existential Graphs: MS 514 by Charles Sanders Peirce with Commentary by John F. Sowa.” http://www.jfsowa.com/peirce/ms514.htm. Accessed 30 June 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Suárez, M. 1999. “Theories, Models, and Representations.” In Model-based Reasoning in Scientific Discovery, edited by L. Magnani, N. Nersessian, and P. Thagard, 75–84. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Suárez, M. 2003. “Scientific Representation: Against Similarity and Isomorphism.” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 17: 225–244. doi: 10.1080/0269859032000169442
   Google Scholar
• Suárez, M. 2004. “An Inferential Conception of Scientific Representation.” Philosophy of Science 71: 767–779. doi: 10.1086/421415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suárez, M. 2010. “Scientific Representation.” Philosophy Compass 5: 91–101. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-9991.2009.00261.x
   Google Scholar
• Suppes, P. 1960. “A Comparison of the Meaning and Uses of Models in Mathematics and the Empirical Sciences.” Synthese 12: 287–301. doi: 10.1007/BF00485107
   Google Scholar
• Swoyer, C. 1991. “Structural Representation and Surrogative Reasoning.” Synthese 87: 449–508. doi: 10.1007/BF00499820
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teller, P. 2001. “Twilight of the Perfect Model Model.” Erkenntnis 55: 393–415. doi: 10.1023/A:1013349314515
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Fraassen, B. C. 1980. The Scientific Image. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• van Fraassen, B. C. 2008. Scientific Representation: Paradoxes of Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Viola, T. 2012. “Pragmatism, Bistable Images, and the Serpentine Line: A Chapter in the Prehistory of the Duck–Rabbit.” In Das bildnerische Denken: Charles S. Peirce, edited by F. Engel, M. Queisner, and T. Viola, 115–134. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.
   Google Scholar