Pessimistic Inductions: Four Varieties

References

• Bishop, M. A. 2003. “The Pessimistic Induction, the Flight to Reference and the Metaphysical Zoo.” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 17: 161–178. doi: 10.1080/0269859031000160621
   Google Scholar
• Boyd, R. N. 1983. “On the Current Status of the Issue of Scientific Realism.” Erkenntnis 19: 45–90. doi: 10.1007/BF00174775
   Google Scholar
• Boyd, R. N. 1985. “Lex orandi est lex credendi.” In Images of Science: Essays on Realism and Empiricism, with a Reply from Bas C. van Fraassen, edited by P. M. Churchland and C. A. Hooker, 3–34. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chakravartty, A. 2007. A Metaphysics for Scientific Realism: Knowing the Unobservable. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chakravartty, A. 2008. “What You Don't Know Can't Hurt You: Realism and the Unconceived.” Philosophical Studies 137: 149–158. doi: 10.1007/s11098-007-9173-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devitt, M. 2011. “Are Unconceived Alternatives a Problem for Scientific Realism?” Journal for General Philosophy of Science 42: 285–293. doi: 10.1007/s10838-011-9166-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doppelt, G. 2007. “Reconstructing Scientific Realism to Rebut the Pessimistic Meta-induction.” Philosophy of Science 74: 96–118. doi: 10.1086/520685
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fahrbach, L. 2011. “How the Growth of Science Ends Theory Change.” Synthese 180: 139–155. doi: 10.1007/s11229-009-9602-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forster, M., and E. Sober. 1994. “How to Tell When Simpler, More Unified, or Less Ad Hoc Theories Will Provide More Accurate Predictions.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 45: 1–35. doi: 10.1093/bjps/45.1.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frost-Arnold, G. 2011. “From the Pessimistic Induction to Semantic Anti-realism.” Philosophy of Science 78: 1131–1142. doi: 10.1086/662265
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hacking, I. 1983. Representing and Intervening: Introductory Topics in the Philosophy of Natural Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. S. 2000. “The Road since Structure.” In The Road since Structure: Philosophical Essays, 1970–1993, with an Autobiographical Interview, edited by J. Conant and J. Haugeland, 90–104. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. S. [1962] 2012. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 4th ed. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lange, M. 2002. “Baseball, Pessimistic Inductions, and the Turnover Fallacy.” Analysis 62: 281–285. doi: 10.1093/analys/62.4.281
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laudan, L. 1981. “A Confutation of Convergent Realism.” Philosophy of Science 48: 19–49. doi: 10.1086/288975
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, P. J. 2001. “Why the Pessimistic Induction Is a Fallacy.” Synthese 129: 371–380. doi: 10.1023/A:1013139410613
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipton, P. 2004. Inference to the Best Explanation. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lyons, T. D. 2002. “Scientific Realism and the Pessimistic Meta-Modus Tollens.” In Recent Themes in the Philosophy of Science, edited by S. Clarke and T. D. Lyons, 63–90. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Magnus, P. D., and C. Callender. 2004. “Realist Ennui and the Base Rate Fallacy.” Philosophy of Science 71: 320–338. doi: 10.1086/421536
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mizrahi, M. 2013. “The Pessimistic Induction: A Bad Argument Gone too Far.” Synthese 190: 3209–3226. doi: 10.1007/s11229-012-0138-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nola, R. 2008. “The Optimistic Meta-induction and Ontological Continuity: The Case of the Electron.” In Rethinking Scientific Change and Theory Comparison: Stabilities, Ruptures, Incommensurabilities, edited by L. Soler, H. Sankey, and P. Hoyningen-Huene, 159–202. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Papineau, D. 1996. “Introduction.” In The Philosophy of Science, edited by D. Papineau, 1–20. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Poincaré, H. [1905] 2001. Science and Hypothesis. Reprinted in H. Poincaré, The Value of Science: Essential Writings of Henri Poincaré, 1–178. New York: Dover.
   Google Scholar
• Poincaré, H. [1914] 2001. The Value of Science. Reprinted in H. Poincaré, The Value of Science: Essential Writings of Henri Poincaré, 181–353. New York: Dover.
   Google Scholar
• Psillos, S. 1996. “Scientific Realism and the ‘Pessimistic Induction’.” Philosophy of Science 63 (Proceedings): S306–S314. doi: 10.1086/289965
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Psillos, S. 1999. Scientific Realism: How Science Tracks Truth. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, H. 1978. Meaning and the Moral Sciences. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rescher, N. 1978. Scientific Progress: A Philosophical Essay on the Economics of Research in Natural Science. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rescher, N. 1987. Scientific Realism: A Critical Reappraisal. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
   Google Scholar
• Roush, S. 2010. “Optimism about the Pessimistic Induction.” In New Waves in Philosophy of Science, edited by P. D. Magnus and J. Busch, 29–58. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Ruhmkorff, S. 2013. “Global and Local Pessimistic Meta-inductions.” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 27: 409–428. doi: 10.1080/02698595.2013.868185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saatsi, J. 2005. “On the Pessimistic Induction and Two Fallacies.” Philosophy of Science 72: 1088–1098. doi: 10.1086/508959
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanford, P. K. 2001. “Refusing the Devil's Bargain: What Kind of Underdetermination Should We take Seriously?” Philosophy of Science 68 (Proceedings): S1–S12. doi: 10.1086/392893
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanford, P. K. 2006. Exceeding Our Grasp: Science, History, and the Problem of Unconceived Alternatives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• van Fraassen, B. C. 2007. “From a View of Science to a New Empiricism.” In Images of Empiricism: Essays on Science and Stances, with a Reply from Bas C. van Fraassen, edited by B. Monton, 337–383. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Worrall, J. 1989. “Structural Realism: The Best of Both Worlds?” Dialectica 43: 99–124. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-8361.1989.tb00933.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wray, K. B. 2011. Kuhn's Evolutionary Social Epistemology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wray, K. B. 2012. “Epistemic Privilege and the Success of Science.” Noûs 46: 375–385. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0068.2010.00793.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wray, K. B. 2013. “Success and Truth in the Realism/Anti-realism Debate.” Synthese 190: 1719–1729. doi: 10.1007/s11229-011-9931-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar