Effluvia, Action at a Distance, and the Challenge of the Third Causal Model

References

• Albertus Magnus. 1517. Parva naturalia. Venice: Octaviani Scoti.
   Google Scholar
• al-Kindī. 1974. “De radiis.” Edited by M. T. d’Alverny and F. Hudry. Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du Moyen Age 41: 139–260.
   Google Scholar
• Aristotle. 1965. De generatione animalium, edited by H. J. Drossaart Lulofs. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bacon, F. 1663. Opuscula varia posthuma, philosophica, civilia, et theologica, edited by W. Rawley. Amsterdam: J. Ravesteinius.
   Google Scholar
• Bacon, R. 1897. “Tractatus de multiplicatione specierum.” In R. Bacon, The Opus Maius, edited by J. H. Bridges. 2 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boyle, R. [1772] 1965. The Works of Robert Boyle, edited by T. Birch. 6 vols. Hildesheim: G. Olms.
   Google Scholar
• Browne, T. 1672. Pseudodoxia epidemica. London: N. Ekins.
   Google Scholar
• Cabeo, N. 1629. Philosophia magnetica. Ferrara: F. Succium.
   Google Scholar
• Campanella, T. 1620. De sensu rerum et magia, edited by Tobias Adam. Frankfurt: E. Emmelium.
   Google Scholar
• Chalmers, G. K. 1936. “Three Terms of the Corpuscularian Philosophy.” Modern Philology 33: 243–260. doi: 10.1086/388201
   Google Scholar
• Chalmers, G. K. 1937. “Effluvia, the History of a Metaphor.” Transactions and Proceedings of the Modern Language Association of America 52: 1031–1050. doi: 10.2307/458500
   Google Scholar
• Clericuzio, A. 1988. “Spiritus vitalis. Studio sulle teorie fisiologiche da Fernel a Boyle.” Nouvelles de la République des Lettres 2: 33–84.
   Google Scholar
• Clericuzio, A. 1990. “A Redefinition of Boyle’s Chemistry and Corpuscular Philosophy.” Annals of Science 47: 561–589. doi: 10.1080/00033799000200401
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clericuzio, A. 1994. “The Internal Laboratory: The Chemical Reinterpretation of Medical Spirits in England (1650–1680).” In Alchemy and Chemistry in the 16th and 17th Centuries, edited by P. Rattansi and A. Clericuzio, 51–83. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Clericuzio, A. 2000. Elements, Principles and Corpuscles: A Study of Atomism and Chemistry in the Seventeenth Century. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Cowles, T. 1934. “Dr. Henry Power, Disciple of Sir Thomas Browne.” Isis 20: 344–366. doi: 10.1086/346795
   Google Scholar
• Della Porta, G. 1589. Magiae naturalis libri XX. Naples: Horatium Salvianum.
   Google Scholar
• Digby, K. [1644] 1970. Two Treatises in the One of Which, The Nature of Bodies; in the Other, The Nature of Mans Soule; is Looked into: in Way of Discover, of the Immortality of Reasonable Soules. Stuttgart: Frommann.
   Google Scholar
• Digby, K. 1669. Dissertatio de plantarum vegetatione. Amsterdam: J. Pluymert.
   Google Scholar
• Ficino, M. 1576. De vita. In M. Ficino, Opera omnia. Basel: Henricpetrina.
   Google Scholar
• Findlen, P. 2003. “Scientific Spectacle in Baroque Rome: Athanasius Kircher and the Roman College Museum.” In Jesuit Science and the Republic of Letters, edited by M. Feingold, 223–284. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fracastoro, G. [1546] 1637. De contagionibus, et contagiosis morbis. In G. Fracastoro, Opera philosophica et medica. Geneva: J. Stoer.
   Google Scholar
• Garin, E. 1984. “Relazione introduttiva.” In Spiritus. Atti del IV Colloquio Internazionale del Lessico Intellettuale Europeo, edited by M. Fattori and M. Bianchi, 3–14. Roma: Edizioni dell’Ateneo.
   Google Scholar
• Gassendi, P. 1658. Syntagma philosophicum. In P. Gassendi, Opera omnia. Lyon: L. Anisson et J. B. Devenet.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, W. 1600. De magnete, magneticisque corporibus, et de magno magnete tellure, physiologia nova. London: Petrus Short.
   Google Scholar
• Glanvill, J. 1970. The Vanity of Dogmatizing: The Three “Versions”. Hove: Harvester Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heilbron, J. L. 1982. Elements of Early Modern Physics. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hirai, H. 2005. Le concept de semence dans les théories de la matière à la Renaissance. Turnhout: Brepols.
   Google Scholar
• Hirai, H. 2012. “Living Atoms, Hylomorphism, and Spontaneous Generation in Daniel Sennert.” In Matter and Form in Early Modern Philosophy and Science, edited by G. Manning, 77–98. Leiden: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Hunter, M. 1995. “How Boyle Became a Scientist.” History of Science 33: 59–103. doi: 10.1177/007327539503300103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchison, K. 1982. “What Happened to Occult Qualities in the Scientific Revolution?” Isis 73: 233–253. doi: 10.1086/352971
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jammer, M. 1957. Concepts of Force: A Study in the Foundations of Dynamics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kircher, A. [1641] 1654. Magnes, sive de arte magnetica libri tres. Rome: Vitalis Mascardi.
   Google Scholar
• Lana Terzi, F. 1692. Magisterium naturae et artis. Vol. 3. Parma: H. Rosati.
   Google Scholar
• Lüthy, C. 2005. “Daniel Sennert’s Slow Conversion from Hylomorphism to Atomism.” Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 26: 99–121. doi: 10.5840/gfpj200526222
   Google Scholar
• Nutton, V. 1983. “The Seeds of Disease: An Explanation of Contagion and Infection from the Greeks to the Renaissance.” Medical History 27: 1–34. doi: 10.1017/S0025727300042241
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parigi, S. 1993. “I filosofi e il microscopio: da Descartes a Berkeley.” Rivista di storia della scienza 1: 155–172.
   Google Scholar
• Parigi, S. 1995. Il mondo visibile. George Berkeley e la “perspectiva”. Firenze: Olschki.
   Google Scholar
• Parigi, S. 2009. “Gli effluvi, lo spirito del mondo e le cure magnetiche.” Medicina e storia 9: 179–199.
   Google Scholar
• Parigi, S. 2011. Spiriti, effluvi, attrazioni. Napoli: Istituto Italiano per gli Studi Filosofici.
   Google Scholar
• Pennuto, C. 2008. Simpatia, fantasia e contagio. Il pensiero medico e il pensiero filosofico di Girolamo Fracastoro. Roma: Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura.
   Google Scholar
• Peruzzi, E. 1980. “Antioccultismo e filosofia naturale nel De sympathia et antipathia rerum di Girolamo Fracastoro.” Atti e memorie dell’Accademia Toscana di Scienze e Lettere “La Colombaria” 45: 43–131.
   Google Scholar
• Power, H. 1966. Experimental Philosophy. New York: Johnson Reprint Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Rattansi, P. M. 1972. “Newton’s Alchemical Studies.” In Science, Medicine and Society in the Renaissance, edited by A. G. Debus, vol. 2, 167–182. London: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Rattray, S. 1662. “Aditus novus ad occultas sympathiae et antipathiae causas inveniendas.” In S. Rattray, Theatrum sympatheticum. Nürnberg: J. A. Endterum et W. Junioris Haeredes.
   Google Scholar
• Rossi, P. 1954. “Il metodo induttivo e la polemica anti-occultistica di Girolamo Fracastoro.” Rivista critica di storia della filosofia 9: 485–499.
   Google Scholar
• Schott, C. 1664. Technica curiosa, sive Mirabilia artis. Nürnberg: J. A. Endterum et W. Junioris Haeredes.
   Google Scholar
• Sennert, D. 1650. Opera omnia. Lyon: J. A. Huguetan et M. Ravaud.
   Google Scholar
• Tachau, K. H. 1988. Vision and Certitude in the Age of Ockham. Leiden: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Thorndike, L. 1923–1958. History of Magic and Experimental Science. 8 vols. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vitale, G. 1910. “Ricerche intorno all’elemento filosofico nei poeti del ‘dolce stil novo’.” Giornale dantesco 18: 162–185.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, D. P. 1958. Spiritual and Demonic Magic from Ficino to Campanella. London: Warburg Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Westfall, R. S. 1972. “Newton and the Hermetic Tradition.” In Science, Medicine and Society in the Renaissance, edited by A. G. Debus, vol. 2, 183–198. London: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, C. 1995. The Invisible World: Early Modern Philosophy and the Invention of the Microscope. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, C. 2002. “Corpuscular Effluvia: Between Imagination and Experiment.” In Ideals and Cultures of Knowledge in Early Modern Europe, edited by W. Detel and C. Zittel, 163–184. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.
   Google Scholar