The Pessimistic Meta-induction: Obsolete Through Scientific Progress?

References

• Boyd, Richard. 1981. “Scientific Realism and Naturalistic Epistemology.” In PSA 1980: Proceedings of the 1980 Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, edited by Peter D. Asquith and Ronald N. Giere, vol. 2, 613–662. East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd, Richard. 1983. “On the Current Status of the Issue of Scientific Realism.” Erkenntnis 19: 45–90. doi: 10.1007/BF00174775
   Google Scholar
• Chakravartty, Anjan. 2014. “Scientific Realism.” In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2014 Edition), edited by Edward N. Zalta. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2014/entries/scientific-realism.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, H. Floris. 1994. The Scientific Revolution: A Historiographical Inquiry. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Devitt, Michael. 1997. Realism and Truth. 2nd ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Doppelt, Gerald. 2007. “Reconstructing Scientific Realism to Rebut the Pessimistic Meta-induction.” Philosophy of Science 74: 96–118. doi: 10.1086/520685
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fahrbach, Ludwig. 2009. “Pessimistic Meta-induction and the Exponential Growth of Science.” In Reduction, Abstraction, Analysis, edited by Alexander Hieke and Hannes Leitgeb, 95–111. Heusenstamm: Ontos Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Fahrbach, Ludwig. 2011a. “How the Growth of Science Ends Theory Change.” Synthese 180: 139–155. doi: 10.1007/s11229-009-9602-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fahrbach, Ludwig. 2011b. “Theory Change and Degrees of Success.” Philosophy of Science 78: 1283–1292. doi: 10.1086/662280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fahrbach, Ludwig. 2012. “Das Ende der Paradigmenwechsel.” In Proceedings von GAP.7: Nachdenken und Vordenken—Herausforderungen an die Philosophie, edited by Oliver Petersen, Dagmar Borchers, Thomas Spitzley, and Manfred Stückler, 59–75. Duisburg-Essen: Universität Duisburg-Essen.
   Google Scholar
• Kitcher, Philip. 1993. The Advancement of Science: Science without Legend, Objectivity without Illusions. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lange, Marc. 2002. “Baseball, Pessimistic Inductions and the Turnover Fallacy.” Analysis 62: 281–285. doi: 10.1093/analys/62.4.281
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laudan, Larry. 1981. “A Confutation of Convergent Realism.” Philosophy of Science 48: 19–49. doi: 10.1086/288975
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leplin, Jarrett. 1984. “Truth and Scientific Progress.” In Scientific Realism, edited by Jarrett Leplin, 193–217. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, Peter J. 2001. “Why the Pessimistic Induction Is a Fallacy.” Synthese 129: 371–380. doi: 10.1023/A:1013139410613
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magnus, P. D., and Craig Callender. 2004. “Realist Ennui and the Base Rate Fallacy.” Philosophy of Science 71: 320–338. doi: 10.1086/421536
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAllister, James W. 1993. “Scientific Realism and the Criteria for Theory-choice.” Erkenntnis 38: 203–222. doi: 10.1007/BF01128980
   Google Scholar
• Mizrahi, Moti. 2013. “The Pessimistic Induction: A Bad Argument Gone too Far.” Synthese 190: 3209–3226. doi: 10.1007/s11229-012-0138-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nola, Robert. 2008. “The Optimistic Meta-induction and Ontological Continuity: The Case of the Electron.” In Rethinking Scientific Change and Theory Comparison: Stabilities, Ruptures, Incommensurabilities?, edited by Léna Soler, Howard Sankey, and Paul Hoyningen-Huene, 159–202. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Parissien, Steven. 2014. The Life of the Automobile: The Complete History of the Motor Car. New York: Thomas Dunne Books.
   Google Scholar
• Park, Seungbae. 2011. “A Confutation of the Pessimistic Induction.” Journal for General Philosophy of Science 42: 75–84. doi: 10.1007/s10838-010-9130-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Planck, Max. 1943. “Vom Relativen zum Absoluten. Gastvorlesung, gehalten an der Universität München, am 1. Dezember 1924.” In Max Planck, Wege zur physikalischen Erkenntnis. Reden und Vorträge, 102–116. Leipzig: Verlag von S. Hirzel.
   Google Scholar
• Psillos, Stathis. 1996. “Scientific Realism and the ‘Pessimistic Induction’.” Philosophy of Science 63 ( Proceedings): S306–S314. doi: 10.1086/289965
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Psillos, Stathis. 1999. Scientific Realism: How Science Tracks Truth. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, Hilary. 1975. Mathematics, Matter and Method. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, Hilary. 1984. “What is Realism?” In Scientific Realism, edited by Jarrett Leplin, 140–153. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rohrlich, Fritz, and Larry Hardin. 1983. “Established Theories.” Philosophy of Science 50: 603–617. doi: 10.1086/289141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roush, Sherrilyn. 2010. “Optimism about the Pessimistic Induction.” In New Waves in Philosophy of Science, edited by P. D. Magnus and Jacob Busch, 29–58. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Ruhmkorff, Samuel. 2013. “Global and Local Pessimistic Meta-inductions.” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 27: 409–428. doi: 10.1080/02698595.2013.868185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saatsi, Juha. 2005. “On the Pessimistic Induction and Two Fallacies.” Philosophy of Science 72: 1088–1098. doi: 10.1086/508959
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanford, P. Kyle. 2006. Exceeding Our Grasp: Science, History, and the Problem of Unconceived Alternatives. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Worrall, John. 1989. “Structural Realism: The Best of Both Worlds?” Dialectica 43: 99–124. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-8361.1989.tb00933.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wray, K. Brad. 2015. “Pessimistic Inductions: Four Varieties.” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 29: 61–73. doi: 10.1080/02698595.2015.1071551
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar