Neurophilosophy of Number

References

• Anderson, M. L. 2010. “Neural Reuse: A Fundamental Organizational Principle of the Brain.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33: 245–266. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X10000853
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, M. L., and M. Penner-Wilger. 2013. “Neural Reuse in the Evolution and Development of the Brain.” Developmental Psychobiology 55: 42–51. doi: 10.1002/dev.21055
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barsalou, L. W. 1999. “Perceptions of Perceptual Symbols.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22: 637–660. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X99532147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barsalou, L. W. 2008. “Grounded Cognition.” Annual Review of Psychology 59: 617–645. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benis Sinaceur, H. 2014a. “Facets and Levels of Mathematical Abstraction.” Philosophia Scientiae 18 (1): 81–112. doi: 10.4000/philosophiascientiae.914
   Google Scholar
• Benis Sinaceur, H. 2014b. “Philosophie de la neuropsychologie du nombre.” Intellectica 62: 103–144.
   Google Scholar
• Benis Sinaceur, H. 2016. “Filosofía de la biopsicologia del número.” In El árbol de los números. Cognición, lógica y prática matematica, edited by J. Ferreirós Domínguez and A. Lassalle Casanave, 77–118. Sevilla: Editorial Universidad de Sevilla.
   Google Scholar
• Brannon, E. M. 2002. “The Development of Ordinal Numerical Knowledge in Infancy.” Cognition 83: 223–240. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00005-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burge, T. 2011. “Border Crossings: Perceptual and Post-perceptual Object Representation.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34: 125. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X10002323
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butterworth, B. 1999. The Mathematical Brain. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, J. I. D. 2015. “How Abstract Is Arithmetic?” In The Oxford Handbook of Numerical Cognition, edited by R. Cohen Kadosh and A. Dowker, 140–157. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carey, S. 2009. The Origin of Concepts. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carey, S. 2011. “Précis of The Origin of Concepts.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34: 113–124. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X10000919
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carey, S., and F. Xu. 2001. “Beyond Object-files and Object Tracking: Infants’ Representations of Objects.” Cognition 80: 179–213. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(00)00154-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chinello, A., V. Cattani, C. Bonfiglioli, S. Dehaene, and M. Piazza. 2013. “Objects, Numbers, Fingers, Space: Clustering of Ventral and Dorsal Functions in Young Children and Adults.” Developmental Science 16: 377–393. doi: 10.1111/desc.12028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Church, R. M., and W. H. Meck. 1984. “The Numerical Attribute of Stimuli.” In Animal Cognition, edited by H. L. Roitblat, T. G. Bever, and H. S. Terrace, 445–464. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Cordes, S., and E. M. Brannon. 2008. “The Difficulties of Representing Continuous Extent in Infancy: Using Number Is Just Easier.” Child Development 79: 476–489. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01137.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cordes, S., and E. M. Brannon. 2009. “Crossing the Divide: Infants Discriminate Small from Large Numerosities.” Developmental Psychology 45: 1583–1594. doi: 10.1037/a0015666
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cordes, S., and E. M. Brannon. 2011. “Attending to One of Many: When Infants Are Surprisingly Poor at Discriminating an Item’s Size.” Frontiers in Psychology 2: 65. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00065
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Correia, F., and B. Schnieder, eds. 2012. Metaphysical Grounding: Understanding the Structure of Reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coubart, A., V. Izard, E. S. Spelke, J. Marie, and A. Streri. 2014. “Dissociation Between Small and Large Numerosities in Newborn Infants.” Developmental Science 17: 11–22. doi: 10.1111/desc.12108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dantzig, T. 1954. Number: The Language of Science. 2nd ed. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dehaene, S. 2001. “Précis of The Number Sense.” Mind and Language 16: 16–36. doi: 10.1111/1468-0017.00154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dehaene, S. 2011. The Number Sense: How the Mind Creates Mathematics. Revised ed. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dehaene, S., S. Bossini, and P. Giraux. 1993. “The Mental Representation of Parity and Numerical Magnitude.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 122: 371–396. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.122.3.371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dehaene, S., and E. M. Brannon. 2010. “Space, Time, and Number: A Kantian Research Program.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 14: 517–519. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2010.09.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dehaene, S., and J. P. Changeux. 1993. “Development of Elementary Numerical Abilities: A Neuronal Model.” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 5: 390–407. doi: 10.1162/jocn.1993.5.4.390
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dehaene, S., and L. Cohen. 1991. “Two Mental Calculation Systems: A Case Study of Severe Acalculia with Preserved Approximation.” Neuropsychologia 29: 1045–1074. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(91)90076-K
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dehaene, S., and L. Cohen. 1997. “Cerebral Pathways for Calculation: Double Dissociation Between Rote Verbal and Quantitative Knowledge of Arithmetic.” Cortex 33: 219–250. doi: 10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70002-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Hevia, M. D., and E. S. Spelke. 2010. “Number-space Mapping in Human Infants.” Psychological Science 21: 653–660. doi: 10.1177/0956797610366091
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elman, J. L., E. A. Bates, A. Karmiloff-Smith, M. H. Johnson, D. Parisi, and K. Plunkett. 1996. Rethinking Innateness: Connectionism in a Developmental Framework. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Feigenson, L. 2005. “A Double-dissociation in Infants’ Representations of Object Arrays.” Cognition 95: B37–B48. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2004.07.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feigenson, L., and S. Carey. 2003. “Tracking Individuals via Object-files: Evidence from Infants’ Manual Search.” Developmental Science 6: 568–584. doi: 10.1111/1467-7687.00313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feigenson, L., S. Carey, and M. Hauser. 2002. “The Representations Underlying Infants’ Choice of More: Object Files Versus Analog Magnitudes.” Psychological Science 13: 150–156. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00427
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feigenson, L., S. Carey, and E. S. Spelke. 2002. “Infants’ Discrimination of Number vs. Continuous Extent.” Cognitive Psychology 44: 33–66. doi: 10.1006/cogp.2001.0760
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feigenson, L., S. Dehaene, and E. S. Spelke. 2004. “Core Systems of Number.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8: 307–314. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2004.05.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feigenson, L., and J. Halberda. 2004. “Infants Chunk Object Arrays into Sets of Individuals.” Cognition 91: 173–190. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2003.09.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feigenson, L., and E. S. Spelke. 1998. “Numerical Knowledge in Infancy: The Number/Mass Distinction.” Poster, International Conference on Infant Studies, Atlanta, GA.
   Google Scholar
• Fodor, J. A. 1975. The Language of Thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fodor, J. A., and Z. W. Pylyshyn. 1988. “Connectionism and Cognitive Architecture: A Critical Analysis.” Cognition 28: 3–71. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(88)90031-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frege, G. [1884] 1953. The Foundations of Arithmetic: A Logico-mathematical Enquiry into the Concept of Number. Translated by J. L. Austin. New York: Harper.
   Google Scholar
• Gallistel, C. R., and R. Gelman. 1978. The Child’s Understanding of Number. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gallistel, C. R., and R. Gelman. 2000. “Non-verbal Numerical Cognition: From Reals to Integers.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4: 59–65. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01424-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallistel, C. R., and R. Gelman. 2005. “Mathematical Cognition.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning, edited by K. Holyoak and R. Morrison, 559–588. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gauker, C. 2011. “Concepts Are Not Icons.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34: 127. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X1000213X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelman, S. A. 2003. The Essential Child: Origins of Essentialism in Everyday Thought. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gelman, S. A. 2004. “Psychological Essentialism in Children.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8: 404–409. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2004.07.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelman, R., and C. R. Gallistel. 1978. The Child’s Understanding of Number. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gelman, S. A., and H. Wellman. 1991. “Insides and Essences: Early Understandings of the Non-obvious.” Cognition 38: 213–244. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(91)90007-Q
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giaquinto, M. 2015. “Philosophy of Number.” In The Oxford Handbook of Numerical Cognition, edited by R. Cohen Kadosh and A. Dowker, 17–31. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, B. C. 1993. “La genèse de formes dynamiques. L’organisme et l’esprit.” Intellectica 16: 45–60.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, B. C. 1994. How the Leopard Changed Its Spots: The Evolution of Complexity. New York: Scribner.
   Google Scholar
• Gopnik, A. 2003. “The Theory Theory as an Alternative to the Innateness Hypothesis.” In Chomsky and His Critics, edited by L. M. Antony and N. Hornstein, 238–254. New York: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Halberda, J., and L. Feigenson. 2008. “Set Representations Required for the Acquisition of the ‘Natural Number’ Concept.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31: 655–656. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X08005712
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harnad, S. 1987. “Psychophysical and Cognitive Aspects of Categorical Perception: A Critical Overview.” In Categorical Perception: The Groundwork of Cognition, edited by S. Harnad, 1–25. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, B. M., B. P. Klein, N. Petridou, and S. O. Dumoulin. 2013. “Topographic Representation of Numerosity in the Human Parietal Cortex.” Science 341: 1123–1126. doi: 10.1126/science.1239052
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilbert, D. 1918. “Axiomatisches Denken.” Mathematische Annalen 78: 405–415. doi: 10.1007/BF01457115
   Google Scholar
• Hodes, H. 2008. “On Some Concepts Associated with Finite Cardinal Numbers.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31: 657–658. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X08005736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubbard, E. M., M. Piazza, P. Pinel, and S. Dehaene. 2005. “Interactions Between Number and Space in Parietal Cortex.” Nature Reviews Neuroscience 6: 435–448. doi: 10.1038/nrn1684
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyde, D., and E. S. Spelke. 2009. “All Numbers Are Not Equal: An Electrophysiological Investigation of Small and Large Number Representations.” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 21: 1039–1053. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21090
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyde, D., and E. S. Spelke. 2011. “Neural Signatures of Number Processing in Human Infants: Evidence for Two Core Systems Underlying Numerical Cognition.” Developmental Science 14: 360–371. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2010.00987.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Izard, V., G. Dehaene-Lambertz, and S. Dehaene. 2008. “Distinct Cerebral Pathways for Object Identity and Number in Human Infants.” PLoS Biology 6 (2): e11. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0060011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Izard, V., P. Pica, E. S. Spelke, and S. Dehaene. 2008. “Exact Equality and Successor Function: Two Key Concepts on the Path Towards Understanding Exact Numbers.” Philosophical Psychology 21: 491–505. doi: 10.1080/09515080802285354
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Izard, V., C. Sann, E. S. Spelke, and A. Streri. 2009. “Newborn Infants Perceive Abstract Numbers.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 106: 10382–10385. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0812142106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahnemann, D., A. Treisman, and B. J. Gibbs. 1992. “The Reviewing of Object Files: Object-specific Integration of Information.” Cognitive Psychology 24: 175–219. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(92)90007-O
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kant, I. [1781–1787] 1956. Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Hamburg: Felix Meiner.
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G., and M. Johnson. 1999. Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G., and R. Núñez. 2000. Where Mathematics Comes from: How the Embodied Mind Brings Mathematics into Being. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Lecorre, M., and S. Carey. 2005. “One, Two, Three, Four, Nothing More: An Investigation of the Conceptual Sources of the Verbal Counting Principles.” Cognition 105: 395–438. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2006.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lecorre, M., and S. Carey. 2008. “Why the Verbal Counting Principles Are Constructed out of Representations of Small Sets of Individuals: A Reply to Gallistel.” Cognition 107: 650–662. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.09.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lécuyer, R. 2002. “Introduction: Inné fable?” Intellectica 34: 11–28.
   Google Scholar
• Lécuyer, R., and K. Durand. 2012. “Aux sources de la connaissance. L’état du débat constructivisme/nativisme chez le très jeune enfant.” Devenir 24: 181–214. doi: 10.3917/dev.123.0181
   Google Scholar
• Lourenco, S., and M. R. Longo. 2010. “General Magnitude Representation in Human Infants.” Psychological Science 21: 873–881. doi: 10.1177/0956797610370158
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCrink, K., and W. Birdsall. 2015. “Numerical Abilities and Arithmetic in Infancy.” In The Oxford Handbook of Numerical Cognition, edited by R. Cohen Kadosh and A. Dowker, 258–274. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Medin, D. L. 1989. “Concepts and Conceptual Structure.” American Psychologist 44: 1469–1481. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.44.12.1469
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neisser, U. 1987. Concepts and Conceptual Development: Ecological and Intellectual Factors in Categorization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nieder, A. 2005. “Counting on Neurons: The Neurobiology of Numerical Competence.” Nature Reviews Neuroscience 6: 177–190. doi: 10.1038/nrn1626
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieder, A., and E. K. Miller. 2003. “Coding of Cognitive Magnitude.” Neuron 37: 149–157. doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(02)01144-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieder, A., and E. K. Miller. 2004. “A Parieto-frontal Network for Visual Numerical Information in the Monkey.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 101: 7457–7462. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0402239101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Núñez, R. 2009. “Numbers and Arithmetic: Neither Hard-wired nor Out There.” Biological Theory 4: 68–83. doi: 10.1162/biot.2009.4.1.68
   Google Scholar
• Núñez, R. 2011. “No Innate Number Line in the Human Brain.” Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology 42: 651–668. doi: 10.1177/0022022111406097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Núñez, R., and T. Marghetis. 2015. “Cognitive Linguistics and the Concept(s) of Number.” In The Oxford Handbook of Numerical Cognition, edited by R. Cohen Kadosh and A. Dowker, 377–401. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer, D. C. 2000. “Chomsky’s Nativism: A Critical Review.” Analysis of Verbal Behavior 17: 39–50. doi: 10.1007/BF03392954
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Palmer, D. C. 2002. “Psychological Essentialism: A Review of E. Margolis and S. Laurence (eds.), Concepts: Core Readings.” Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 78: 597–607. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2002.78-597
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer, D. C., and J. W. Donahoe. 1992. “Essentialism and Selectionism in Cognitive Science and Behavior Analysis.” American Psychologist 47: 1344–1358. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.47.11.1344
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piaget, J. [1953] 1973. Introduction à l'épistémologie génétique. Vol. 1, La pensée mathématique. 2nd ed. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
   Google Scholar
• Piazza, M., A. Fumarola, A. Chinello, and D. Melcher. 2011. “Subitizing Reflects Visuo-spatial Object Individuation Capacity.” Cognition 121: 147–153. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2011.05.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Platt, J., and D. M. Johnson. 1971. “Localization of Position within a Homogeneous Behavior Chain: Effects of Error Contingencies.” Learning and Motivation 2: 386–414. doi: 10.1016/0023-9690(71)90020-8
   Google Scholar
• Pylyshyn, Z. W. 1999. “Is Vision Continuous with Cognition? The Case for Cognitive Impenetrability of Visual Perception.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22: 341–423.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pylyshyn, Z. 2002. “Mental Imagery: In Search of a Theory.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25: 157–182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pylyshyn, Z. W. 2003a. Seeing and Visualizing: It’s Not What You Think. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pylyshyn, Z. W. 2003b. “Return of the Mental Image: Are There Really Pictures in the Brain?” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7: 113–118. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00003-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pylyshyn, Z. W., and R. W. Storm. 1998. “Tracking Multiple Independent Targets: Evidence for a Parallel Tracking Mechanism.” Spatial Vision 3: 179–197. doi: 10.1163/156856888X00122
   Google Scholar
• Revkin, S., M. Piazza, V. Izard, L. Cohen, and S. Dehaene. 2008. “Does Subitizing Reflect Numerical Estimation?” Psychological Science 19: 607–614. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02130.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rips, L. J., A. Bloomfield, and J. Asmuth. 2008. “From Numerical Concepts to Concepts of Number.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31: 623–642. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X08005566
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roitman, J. D., E. M. Brannon, and M. L. Platt. 2007. “Monotonic Coding of Numerosity in Macaque Lateral Intraparietal Area.” PLoS Biology 5 (8): e208. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0050208
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roitman, J. D., E. M. Brannon, and M. L. Platt. 2012. “Representation of Numerosity in Posterior Parietal Cortex.” Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience 6, article 25. doi: 10.3389/fnint.2012.00025
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Silver, R. A. 2010. “Neuronal Arithmetic.” Nature Reviews Neuroscience 11: 474–489. doi: 10.1038/nrn2864
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, O., J. F. Mangin, L. Cohen, D. Le Bihan, and S. Dehaene. 2002. “Topographical Layout of Hand, Eye, Calculation, and Language-related Areas in the Human Parietal Lobe.” Neuron 33: 475–487. doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(02)00575-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spelke, E. S. 1983. “Cognition in Infancy.” MIT Occasional Papers in Cognitive Science, no. 23.
   Google Scholar
• Spelke, E. S. 1985. “Perception of Unity, Persistence, and Identity: Thoughts on Infants’ Conceptions of Objects.” In Neonate Cognition: Beyond the Blooming, Buzzing Confusion, edited by J. Mehler and R. Fox, 89–113. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Spelke, E. S. 1990. “Principles of Object Perception.” Cognitive Science 14: 29–56. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog1401_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spelke, E. S. 1993. “Gestalt Relations and Object Perception: A Developmental Study.” Perception 22: 1483–1501. doi: 10.1068/p221483
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spelke, E. S. 1998. “Nativism, Empiricism, and the Origins of Knowledge.” Infant Behavior and Development 21: 181–200. doi: 10.1016/S0163-6383(98)90002-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spelke, E. S., V. Izard, A. Coubart, M. D. de Hevia, and A. Streri. 2014. “Representations of Space, Time, and Number in Neonates.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 111: 4808–4813.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starkey, P., E. S. Spelke, and R. Gelman. 1983. “Detection of Intermodal Numerical Correspondences by Human Infants.” Science 222: 179–181. doi: 10.1126/science.6623069
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starkey, P., E. S. Spelke, and R. Gelman. 1990. “Numerical Abstraction by Human Infants.” Cognition 36: 97–127. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(90)90001-Z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starr, A., M. Libertus, and E. M. Brannon. 2013. “Infants Show Ratio-dependent Number Discrimination Regardless of Set Size.” Infancy 18: 927–941. doi: 10.1111/infa.12008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, J. 1993. “Au-delà de l’inné et de l’acquis.” Intellectica 16: 151–174.
   Google Scholar
• Treisman, A. M., D. Kahneman, and J. Burkell. 1983. “Perceptual Objects and the Cost of Filtering.” Perception and Psychophysics 33: 527–532. doi: 10.3758/BF03202934
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Dijck, J.-P., V. Ginsburg, L. Girelli, and W. Gevers. 2015. “Linking Numbers to Space: From the Mental Number Line Towards a Hybrid Account.” In The Oxford Handbook of Numerical Cognition, edited by R. Cohen Kadosh and A. Dowker, 89–105. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wakeley, A., S. Rivera, and J. Langer. 2000. “Can Young Infants Add and Subtract?” Child Development 71: 1525–1534. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00244
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh, V. 2003. “A Theory of Magnitude: Common Cortical Metrics of Time, Space and Quantity.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7: 483–488. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2003.09.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiskopf, D. 2008. “First Thoughts.” Philosophical Psychology 21: 251–268. doi: 10.1080/09515080801980211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiskopf, D. 2009. “The Plurality of Concepts.” Synthese 169: 145–173. doi: 10.1007/s11229-008-9340-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wynn, K. 1992. “Addition and Subtraction by Human Infants.” Nature 358: 749–750. doi: 10.1038/358749a0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wynn, K. 1996. “Infants’ Individuation and Enumeration of Actions.” Psychological Science 7: 164–169. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1996.tb00350.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wynn, K. 1998. “Psychological Foundations of Number: Numerical Competence in Human Infants.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2: 296–303. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(98)01203-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, F. 2003. “Numerosity Discrimination in Infants: Evidence for Two Systems of Representations.” Cognition 89: B15–B25. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(03)00050-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, F., and S. Carey. 1996. “Infants’ Metaphysics: The Case of Numerical Identity.” Cognitive Psychology 30: 111–153. doi: 10.1006/cogp.1996.0005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, F., S. Carey, and J. Welsh. 1999. “Infants' Ability to Use Object Kind Information for Object Individuation.” Cognition 70: 137–166. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00007-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, F., and E. S. Spelke. 2000. “Large Number Discrimination in 6-month-old Infants.” Cognition 74: B1–B11. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00066-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar