A Reconsideration of the Relation Between Kuhnian Incommensurability and Translation

References

• Bacon, F. 2000. The New Organon. Edited by L. Jardine and M. Silverthorne. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benjamin, W. 1969. Illuminations: Essays and Reflections. Translated by H. Zohn. New York: Schocken.
   Google Scholar
• Benjamin, W. 2012. “The Translator’s Task.” In The Translation Studies Reader, translated by S. Rendall, edited by L. Venuti, 2nd ed., 75–83. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, Κ. 2011. “The Scientific Revolution and Its Repercussions on the Translation of Technical Discourse.” Translator 17: 189–210. doi: 10.1080/13556509.2011.10799486
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkeley, G. 1965. Principles, Dialogues, and Philosophical Correspondence. Edited by C. Murray Turbayne. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, C. [1947] 1960. The Well Wrought Urn. London: Dennis Dobson.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, P., and R. Po-Chia Hsia, eds. 2007. Cultural Translation in Early Modern Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carnap, R. [1932–1933] 1959. “Psychology in Physical Language.” In Logical Positivism, edited by A. J. Ayer, 165–198. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carnap, R. 1967. The Logical Structure of the World. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cassin, B., ed. 2014. Dictionary of Untranslatables: A Philosophical Lexicon. Translated by S. Rendall, C. Hubert, J. Mehlman, N. Stein, and M. Syrotinski. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cavell, S. 1979. The Claim of Reason: Wittgenstein, Skepticism, Morality, and Tragedy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, D. 1984. “On the Very Idea of a Conceptual Scheme.” In Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation, edited by D. Davidson, 183–198. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• de Man, P. 1984. “Conclusions: Walter Benjamin’s ‘The Task of the Translator’.” In The Resistance to Theory, edited by P. de Man, 73–105. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dietz, B., ed. 2016. “Special Issue: Translating and Translations in the History of Science.” Annals of Science 73 (2).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dupré, S., ed. 2018. “Focus: Translating Science Over Time.” Isis 109: 302–345. doi: 10.1086/698234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feigl, H. 1970. “The ‘Orthodox’ View of Theories: Remarks in Defense as Well as Critique.” In Analyses of Theories and Methods of Physics and Psychology, edited by M. Radner and S. Winokur, 3–16. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Feyerabend, P. K. 1962. “Explanation, Reduction, and Empiricism.” In Scientific Explanation, Space and Time, edited by H. Feigl and G. Maxwell, 28–97. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Friedrich, H. 1992. “On the Art of Translation.” In Theories of Translation: An Anthology of Essays From Dryden to Derrida, edited by R. Schulte and J. Biguenet, 11–16. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Galison, P. L. 1995. “Context and Constraints.” In Scientific Practice: Theories and Stories of Doing Physics, edited by J. Z. Buchwald, 13–41. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gasset, J. O. Y. 1992. “The Misery and the Splendor of Translation.” In Theories of Translation: An Anthology of Essays From Dryden to Derrida, edited by R. Schulte and J. Biguenet, 93–112. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hacking, I. 1975. Why Does Language Matter to Philosophy? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hacking, I. 1990. “Two Kinds of ‘New Historicism’ for Philosophers.” New Literary History 21: 343–364. doi: 10.2307/469257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hacking, I. 2002. “Language, Truth and Reason.” In Historical Ontology, edited by I. Hacking, 159–177. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K., and J. R. Martin. 1993. Writing Science: Literacy and Discursive Power. London: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hempel, C. G. 1959. “The Empiricist Criterion of Meaning.” In Logical Positivism, edited by A. J. Ayer, 108–129. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hempel, C. G. 1980. “Comments on Goodman’s Ways of Worldmaking.” Synthese 45: 193–199. doi: 10.1007/BF00413558
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoyningen-Huene, P. 1990. “Kuhn’s Conception of Incommensurability.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 21: 481–492. doi: 10.1016/0039-3681(90)90006-T
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoyningen-Huene, P. 1993. Reconstructing Scientific Revolutions: Thomas S. Kuhn’s Philosophy of Science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hoyningen-Huene, P. 2004. “Three Biographies: Kuhn, Feyerabend and Incommensurability.” In Rhetoric and Incommensurability, edited by R. A. Harris, 150–175. West Lafayette, IN: Parlor Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hoyningen-Huene, P., and H. Sankey, eds. 2001. Incommensurability and Related Matters. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Irzik, G., and T. Grünberg. 1998. “Whorfian Variations on Kantian Themes: Kuhn’s Linguistic Turn.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 29: 207–221. doi: 10.1016/S0039-3681(98)00003-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, W. 1996. Some Problems of Philosophy: A Beginning of an Introduction to Philosophy. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, S. 2009. Selected Writing: A Tercentenary Celebration. Edited by P. Martin. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kindi, V. 2010. “Novelty and Revolution in Art and Science: The Influence of Kuhn on Cavell.” Perspectives on Science 18: 284–310. doi: 10.1162/POSC_a_00011
   Google Scholar
• Kindi, V. 2011. “The Challenge of Scientific Revolutions: Van Fraassen’s and Friedman’s Responses.” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 25: 327–349. doi: 10.1080/02698595.2011.623363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kindi, V. 2012a. “Kuhn’s Paradigms.” In Kuhn’s The Structure of Scientific Revolutions Revisited, edited by V. Kindi and T. Arabatzis, 91–111. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kindi, V. 2012b. “Concept as Vessel and Concept as Rule.” In Scientific Concepts and Investigative Practice, edited by U. Feest and F. Steinle, 23–46. Berlin: De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Knowlson, J. 1975. Universal Language Schemes in England and France, 1600–1800. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. S. 1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 2nd ed. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. S. 1977. “Second Thoughts on Paradigms.” In T. S. Kuhn, The Essential Tension: Selected Studies in Scientific Tradition and Change, 293–319. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. S. 1989. “Possible Worlds in History of Science.” In Possible Worlds in Humanities, Arts and Sciences, edited by S. Allén, 9–32. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. S. 1993. “Afterwords.” In World Changes: Thomas Kuhn and the Nature of Science, edited by P. Horwich, 311–341. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. S. 1999. “Remarks on Incommensurability and Translation.” In Incommensurability and Translation, edited by R. Rossini Favretti, G. Sandri, and R. Scazzieri, 33–37. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. S. 2000a. “Commensurability, Comparability, Communicability.” In The Road Since Structure: Philosophical Essays, 1970–1993, with an Autobiographical Interview, edited by J. Conant and J. Haugeland, 33–57. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. S. 2000b. “The Trouble with the Historical Philosophy of Science.” In The Road Since Structure: Philosophical Essays, 1970–1993, with an Autobiographical Interview, edited by J. Conant and J. Haugeland, 105–120. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• MacIntyre, A. 1980. “Epistemological Crises, Dramatic Narrative, and the Philosophy of Science.” In Paradigms and Revolutions: Applications and Appraisals of Thomas Kuhn's Philosophy of Science, edited by G. Gutting, 54–74. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
   Google Scholar
• MacIntyre, A. 1988. “Tradition and Translation.” In A. MacIntyre, Whose Justice? Which Rationality?, 370–388. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
   Google Scholar
• Montgomery, S. 2000. Science in Translation: Movements of Knowledge Through Cultures and Time. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nietzsche, F. 2001. The Gay Science: With a Prelude in German Rhymes and an Appendix. Edited by B. Wiliams, translated by J. Nauckhoff. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oberheim, E. 2005. “On the Historical Origins of the Contemporary Notion of Incommensurability: Paul Feyerabend’s Assault on Conceptual Conservatism.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 36: 363–390. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2005.04.003
   Google Scholar
• Olohan, M., and M. Salama-Carr, eds. 2011. “Special Issue: Translating Science.” Translator 17 (2). doi: 10.1080/13556509.2011.10799485
   Google Scholar
• Paz, O. 1992. “Translation: Literature and Letters.” In Theories of Translation: An Anthology of Essays From Dryden to Derrida, edited by R. Schulte and J. Biguenet, 152–162. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Polizzotti, M. 2018. Sympathy for the Traitor: A Translation Manifesto. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, H. 1981. Reason, Truth and History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Quine, W. V. O. 1960. Word and Object. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Quine, W. V. O. 1969a. “Speaking of Objects.” In W. V. O. Quine, Ontological Relativity and Other Essays, 1–25. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Quine, W. V. O. 1969b. “Ontological Relativity.” In W. V. O. Quine, Ontological Relativity and Other Essays, 26–68. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rorty, R. 2000. “Response to Habermas.” In Rorty and His Critics, edited by R. B. Brandom, 56–64. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Rossi, P. 2000. Logic and the Art of Memory. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Salmon, V. 1988. The Study of Language in 17th-century England. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Sankey, H. 1993. “Kuhn’s Changing Concept of Incommensurability.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 44: 759–774. doi: 10.1093/bjps/44.4.759
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sankey, H. 1998. “Taxonomic Incommensurability.” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 12: 7–16. doi: 10.1080/02698599808573578
   Google Scholar
• Sarrukai, S. 2002. Translating the World: Science and Language. Langham, MD: University Press of America.
   Google Scholar
• Scheffler, I. 1982. Science and Subjectivity. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.
   Google Scholar
• Swift, J. 2004. Gulliver's Travels. London: Collector's Library.
   Google Scholar
• van Fraassen, B. C. 2002. The Empirical Stance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Venuti, L. 2000. “Translation, Community, Utopia.” In The Translation Studies Reader, edited by L. Venuti, 468–488. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Weinberger, D. 2012. “Shift Happens.” Chronicle of Higher Education, 22 April. Accessed 12 August 2017. http://chronicle.com/article/Shift-Happens/131580.
   Google Scholar
• White, H. 2000. “An Old Question Raised Again: Is Historiography Art or Science? (Response to Iggers).” Rethinking History 4: 391–406. doi: 10.1080/136425200456958a
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wittgenstein, L. 1970. Zettel. Edited by G. E. M. Anscombe and G. H. von Wright. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wittgenstein, L. 1982. Last Writings on the Philosophy of Psychology. Edited by G. E. M. Anscombe, G. H. von Wright, and H. Nyman. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Wittgenstein, L. 1988. Wittgenstein’s Lectures on Philosophical Psychology 1946–47. Edited by P. T. Geach. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester.
   Google Scholar