Climate Models: How to Assess Their Reliability

References

• Aswathy, V. N., O. Boucher, M. Quaas, U. Niemeier, H. Muri, J. Mülmenstädt, and J. Quaas. 2015. “Climate Extremes in Multi-Model Simulations of Stratospheric Aerosol and Marine Cloud Brightening Climate Engineering.” Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 15: 9593–9610. doi: 10.5194/acp-15-9593-2015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumberger, Christoph, Reto Knutti, and Gertrude Hirsch-Hadorn. 2017. “Building Confidence in Climate Model Projections: An Analysis of Inferences from Fit.” Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 8: e454. doi:10.1002/wcc.454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behrens, L. K., T. Martin, V. A. Semenov, and M. Latif. 2012. “The Arctic Sea Ice in the CMIP3 Climate Model Ensemble—Variability and Anthropogenic Change.” The Cryosphere Discussions 6: 5317–5344. doi: 10.5194/tcd-6-5317-2012
   Google Scholar
• Bony, Sandrine. 2013. “Carbon Dioxide and Climate: Perspectives on a Scientific Assessment.” In Climate Science for Serving Society. Research, Modeling and Prediction Priorities, edited by G. R. Asrar and J. W. Hurrell, 391–412. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, Paul. 1999. “Global Climate Science, Uncertainty, and Politics: Data-Laden Models, Model-Filtered Data.” Science as Culture 8 (4): 437–472. doi: 10.1080/09505439909526558
   Google Scholar
• Francis, Jennifer A., and Stephen J. Vavrus. 2015. “Evidence for a Wavier Jet Stream in Response to Rapid Arctic Warming.” Environmental Research Letters 10: 014005. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/10/1/014005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frigg, Roman, Leonard A. Smith, and David A. Stainforth. 2013. “The Myopia of Imperfect Climate Models: The Case of UKCP09.” Philosophy of Science 80: 886–897. doi: 10.1086/673892
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frigg, Roman, Erica Thompson, and Charlotte Werndl. 2015. “Philosophy of Climate Science Part II: Modelling Climate Change.” Philosophy Compass 10 (12): 965–977. doi: 10.1111/phc3.12297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frisch, Matthias. 2015. “Predictivism and Old Evidence: A Critical Look at Climate Model Tuning.” European Journal for Philosophy of Science 5: 171–190. doi: 10.1007/s13194-015-0110-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gehrels, Roland W., Daniel F. Belknap, Stuart Black, and Rewi M. Newnham. 2002. “Rapid sea-Level Rise in the Gulf of Maine, USA, Since AD 1800.” The Holocene 12: 383–389. doi: 10.1191/0959683602hl555ft
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González-Rouco, Fidel J., L. Fernández-Donado, C. C. Raible, D. Barriopedro, J. Luterbacher, J. H. Jungclaus, D. Swingedouw, J. Servonnat, et al. 2011. “Medieval Climate Anomaly to Little Ice Age Transition as Simulated by Current Climate Models.” PAGES News 19: 7–8. doi: 10.22498/pages.19.1.7
   Google Scholar
• Gramelsberger, Gabriele. 2011. “What Do Numerical (Climate) Models Really Represent?” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 42: 296–302. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2010.11.037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasse, Hans, and Johannes Lenhard. 2017. “Boon or Bane: On the Role of Adjustable Parameters in Simulation Models.” In Mathematics as a Tool, edited by J. Lenhard and M. Carrier, 93–115. Boston, MA: Boston University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hausfather, Zeke, Kevin Cowtan, David C. Clarke, Peter Jacobs, Mark Richardson, and Robert Rohde. 2017. “Assessing Recent Warming Using Instrumentally Homogeneous Sea Surface Temperature Records.” Science Advances 3 (1): e1601207. doi:10.1126/sciadv.1601207.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haywood, Jim M., Andy Jones, Nicolas Bellouin, and David Stephenson. 2013. “Asymmetric Forcing from Stratospheric Aerosols Impacts Sahelian Rainfall.” Nature Climate Change 3: 660–665. doi: 10.1038/nclimate1857
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houkes, Wybo, and Krist Vaesen. 2012. “Robust! Handle with Care.” Philosophy of Science 79: 345–364. doi: 10.1086/666061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang, Yen-Ting, and Dargan M. W. Frierson. 2013. “Link between the Double-Intertropical Convergence Zone Problem and Cloud Biases over the Southern Ocean.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110: 4935–4940. doi:10.1073/pnas.1213302110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IPCC. 2013. “Summary for Policymakers.” In Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by T. F. Stocker, D. Qin, G.-K. Plattner, M. Tignor, S. K. Allen, J. Boschung, A. Nauels, Y. Xia, V. Bex, and P. M. Midgley. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kalra, Ajay, and Sajjad Ahmad. 2012. “Estimating Annual Precipitation for the Colorado River Basin Using Oceanic-Atmospheric Oscillations.” Water Resources Research 48: W06527. doi:10.1029/2011WR010667.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katzav, Joel. 2013a. “Severe Testing of Climate Change Hypotheses.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 44: 433–441. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsb.2013.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katzav, Joel. 2013b. “Hybrid Models, Climate Models, and Inference to the Best Explanation.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 64: 107–129. doi: 10.1093/bjps/axs002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katzav, Joel. 2014. “The Epistemology of Climate Models and Some of Its Implications for Climate Science and the Philosophy of Science.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 46: 228–238. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsb.2014.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katzav, Joel, Henk A. Dijkstra, and A. T. J. (Jos) de Laat. 2012. “Assessing Climate Model Projections: State of the Art and Philosophical Reflections.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 43: 258–276. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsb.2012.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knutti, Reto. 2008. “Should We Believe Model Predictions of Future Climate Change?” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 366: 4647–4664. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2008.0169
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knutti, Reto. 2010. “The End of Model Democracy? An Editorial Comment.” Climatic Change 102: 395–404. doi: 10.1007/s10584-010-9800-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knutti, Reto, Reinhard Furrer, Claudia Tebaldi, Jan Cermak, and Gerald A. Meehl. 2010. “Challenges in Combining Projections from Multiple Climate Models.” Journal of Climate 23: 2739–2758. doi:10.1175/2009JCLI3361.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koonin, Steven E. 2014. “Climate Science Is Not Settled.” The Wall Street Journal, September 19.
   Google Scholar
• Kusahara, Kazuya. 2016. “Cryosphere. Warming Ocean Erodes Ice Sheets.” Nature Climate Change 6: 22–23. doi: 10.1038/nclimate2900
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakatos, Imre. 1970. “Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes.” In Imre Lakatos. The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes. Philosophical Papers Volume I, edited by J. Worrall and G. Currie, 8–101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Lenhard, Johannes. 2007. “Computer Simulation: The Cooperation between Experimenting and Modeling.” Philosophy of Science 74: 176–194. doi: 10.1086/519029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenhard, Johannes. 2018. “Holism, or the Erosion of Modularity: A Methodological Challenge for Validation.” Philosophy of Science 85 (5): 832–844. doi: 10.1086/699675
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenhard, Johannes, and Martin Carrier. 2017. “Introduction: Mathematics as a Tool.” In Mathematics as a Tool, edited by J. Lenhard and M. Carrier, 1–19. Boston, MA: Boston University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lenhard, Johannes, and Eric Winsberg. 2010. “Holism, Entrenchment, and the Future of Climate Model Pluralism.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 41: 253–262. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsb.2010.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloyd, Elizabeth A. 2010. “Confirmation and Robustness of Climate Models.” Philosophy of Science 77: 971–984. doi: 10.1086/657427
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloyd, Elizabeth A. 2015. “Model Robustness a Confirmatory Virtue: The Case of Climate Science.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 49: 58–68. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2014.12.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann, Michael E., Stefan Rahmstorf, Kai Kornhuber, Byron A. Steinman, Sonya K. Miller, and Dim Coumou. 2017. “Influence of Anthropogenic Climate Change on Planetary Wave Resonance and Extreme Weather Events.” Scientific Reports 7: 45242. doi:10.1038/srep45242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mauritsen, Thorsten, Bjorn Stevens, Erich Roeckner, Traute Crueger, Monika Esch, Marco Giorgetta, and Helmuth Haak, et al. 2012. “Tuning the Climate of a Global Model.” Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems 4: 1–18. M00A01. doi:10.1029/2012MS000154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medhaug, Iselin, Martin B. Stolpe, Erich M. Fischer, and Reto Knutti. 2017. “Reconciling Controversies About the ‘Global Warming Hiatus.’” Nature 545: 41–47. doi: 10.1038/nature22315
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niemeier, Ulrike, H. Schmidt, K. Alterskjær, and J. E. Kristjánsson. 2013. “Solar Irradiance Reduction via Climate Engineering: Impact of Different Techniques on the Energy Balance and the Hydrological Cycle.” Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 118: 11905–11917.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NOAA. 2017. “Drought in the Colorado River Basin.” National Oceanic and Atmospheric Association. Accessed July 5, 2019. https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/monitoring-references/dyk/colorado-basin-drought.
   Google Scholar
• Notz, Dirk, Alexandra Jahn, Marika Holland, Elizabeth Hunke, François Massonnet, Julienne Stroeve, Bruno Tremblay, and Martin Vancoppenolle. 2016. “The CMIP6 Sea-Ice Model Intercomparison Project (SIMIP): Understanding Sea Ice through Climate-Model Simulations.” Geoscientific Model Development 9: 3427–3446. doi: 10.5194/gmd-9-3427-2016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paltridge, Garth W. 2010. The Climate Caper. Facts and Fallacies of Global Warming. Lanham, MD: Taylor Trade Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, Wendy. 2009. “Confirmation and Adequacy-for-Purpose in Climate Modelling.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes 83: 233–249. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8349.2009.00180.x
   Google Scholar
• Parker, Wendy. 2011. “When Climate Models Agree: The Significance of Robust Model Predictions.” Philosophy of Science 78: 579–600. doi: 10.1086/661566
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, Wendy. 2014. “Values and Uncertainties in Climate Prediction, Revisited.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 46: 24–30. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2013.11.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiu, Jane. 2017. “The Threat Beneath Antarctica.” Nature 544: 152–154. doi: 10.1038/544152a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahmstorf, Stefan, Grant Foster, and Niamh Cahill. 2017. “Global Temperature Evolution: Recent Trends and Some Pitfalls.” Environmental Research Letters 12: 054001. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/aa6825.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runge, Michael C., Julienne C. Stroeve, Andrew P. Barrett, and Eve McDonald-Madden. 2016. “Detecting Failure of Climate Predictions.” Nature Climate Change 6: 861–864. doi:10.1038/nclimate3041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, Lynn M., Philip J. Rasch, Georgina M. Mace, Robert B. Jackson, John Shepherd, Peter Liss, Margaret Leinen, David Schimel, et al. 2012. “Ecosystem Impacts of Geoengineering: A Review for Developing a Science Plan.” Ambio 41: 350–369. doi: 10.1007/s13280-012-0258-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, Gavin A., and Steven Sherwood. 2015. “A Practical Philosophy of Complex Climate Modelling.” European Journal for Philosophy of Science 5: 149–169. doi: 10.1007/s13194-014-0102-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, Tapio, João Teixeira, Christopher S. Bretherton, Florent Brient, Kyle G. Pressel, Christoph Schär, and A. Pier Siebesma. 2017. “Climate Goals and Computing the Future of Clouds.” Nature Climate Change 7: 3–5. doi: 10.1038/nclimate3190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seneviratne, Sonia I., Markus G. Donat, Andy J. Pitman, Reto Knutti, and Robert L. Wilby. 2016. “Allowable CO2 Emissions Based on Regional and Impact-Related Climate Targets.” Nature 529: 477–483. doi: 10.1038/nature16542
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silver, Nat. 2012. The Signal and the Noise. Why Most Predictions Fail – But Some Don’t. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Spence, Paul, Ryan M. Holmes, Andrew McC. Hogg, Stephen M. Griffies, Kial D. Stewart, and Matthew H. England. 2017. “Localized Rapid Warming of West Antarctic Subsurface Waters by Remote Winds.” Nature Climate Change 7: 595–603. doi: 10.1038/nclimate3335
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stainforth, D. A., T. Aina, C. Christensen, M. Collins, N. Faull, D. J. Frame, J. A. Kettleborough, S. Knight, et al. 2005. “Uncertainty in Predictions of the Climate Response to Rising Levels of Greenhouse Gases.” Nature 433: 403–406. doi: 10.1038/nature03301
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stainforth, D. A., M. R. Allen, E. R. Tredger, and L. A. Smith. 2007. “Confidence, Uncertainty and Decision-Support Relevance in Climate Predictions.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 365: 2145–2161. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2007.2074
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staley, Kent W. 2004. “Robust Evidence and Secure Evidence Claims.” Philosophy of Science 71: 467–488. doi: 10.1086/423748
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steele, Katie, and Charlotte Werndl. 2013. “Climate Models, Calibration and Confirmation.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 64: 609–635. doi: 10.1093/bjps/axs036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stott, Peter A., D. A. Stone, and M. R. Allen. 2004. “Human Contribution to the European HeatWave of 2003.” Nature 432: 610–614. doi: 10.1038/nature03089
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tal, Eran. 2013. “Old and New Problems in Philosophy of Measurement.” Philosophy Compass 8/12: 1159–1173. doi: 10.1111/phc3.12089
   Google Scholar
• Vial, Jessica, Jean-Louis Dufresne, and Sandrine Bony. 2013. “On the Interpretation of Inter-Model Spread in CMIP5 Climate Sensitivity Estimates.” Climate Dynamics 41 (11–12): 3339–3362. doi: 10.1007/s00382-013-1725-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weisberg, Michael. 2013. Simulation and Similarity. Using Models to Understand the World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weitzman, Martin. 2011. “Fat-Tailed Uncertainty in the Economics of Catastrophic Climate Change.” Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 5 (2): 275–292.
   Google Scholar
• Winsberg, Eric. 2003. “Simulated Experiments: Methodology for a Virtual World.” Philosophy of Science 70: 105–125.
   Google Scholar
• Worrall, John. 1978. “The Ways in Which the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes Improves on Popper’s Methodology.” In Progress and Rationality in Science, edited by G. Radnitzky and G. Andersson, 45–70. Dordrecht: Reidel.
   Google Scholar
• Zahar, Elie. 1973. “Why did Einstein’s Programme Supersede Lorentz’s? (I)” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 24: 95–123. doi: 10.1093/bjps/24.2.95
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar