Conceptual Change in Visual Neuroscience: The Receptive Field Concept

References

• Albright, T., and G. Stoner. 2002. “Contextual Influences on Visual Processing.” Annual Review of Neuroscience 25: 339–379.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andoni, S., A. Tan, and N. J. Priebe. 2014. “The Cortical Assembly of Visual Receptive Fields.” In The New Visual Neurosciences, edited by J. S. Werner, and L. M. Chalupa, 367–380. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Angelucci, A., and S. Shushruth. 2014. “Beyond the Classical Receptive Field: Surround Modulation in Primary Visual Cortex.” In The New Visual Neurosciences, edited by J. S. Werner, and L. M. Chalupa, 425–444. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arabatzis, T. 2012. “Experimentation and the Meaning of Scientific Concepts.” In Scientific Concepts and Investigative Practice, edited by U. Feest, and F. Steinle, 149–166. Berlin: De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Bair, W. 2005. “Visual Receptive Field Organization.” Current Opinion in Neurobiology 15: 459–464.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brigandt, I. 2010. “Conceptualizing Evolutionary Novelty: Movind beyond Definitional Debates.” Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B 318: 417–427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brigandt, I. 2010. “The Epistemic Goal of a Concept: Accounting for the Rationality of Semantic Change and Variation.” Synthese 177: 19–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brigandt, I. 2012. “The Dynamics of Scientific Concepts: The Relevance of Epistemic Aims and Values.” In Scientific Concepts and Investigative Practice, edited by U. Feest, and F. Steinle, 75–103. Berlin: De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Burnston, D. C. 2016. “A Contextualist Approach to Functional Localization in the Brain.” Biology & Philosophy 31 (4): 527–550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chirimuuta, M., and I. Gold. 2009. “The Embedded Neuron, the Enactive Field?” In The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy and Neuroscience, edited by J. Bickle, 200–226. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Colaço, D. 2018. “Rip It Up and Start Again. The Rejection of a Characterization of a Phenomenon.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 72: 32–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darden, L., and N. Maull. 1977. “Interfield Theories.” Philosophy of Science 44: 43–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairhall, A. 2014. “The Receptive Field Is Dead. Long Live the Receptive Field?” Current Opinion in Neurobiology 25: ix–xii.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, C., M. Ito, M. Kapadia, and G. Westheimer. 2000. “Interactions Between Attention, Context and Learning in Primary Visual Cortex.” Vision Research 40: 1217–1226.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, C., and W. Li. 2013. “Top-Down Influences on Visual Processing.” Nature Reviews Neuroscience 14: 350–365.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartline, H. K. 1938. “The Response of Single Optic Nerve Fibers of the Vertebrate Eye to Illumination of the Retina.” American Journal of Physiology 121: 400–415.
   Google Scholar
• Haueis, P. 2016. “The Life of the Cortical Column: Opening the Domain of Functional Architecture of the Cortex (1955–1981).” History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 38: 1–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosoya, T., S. Baccus, and M. Meister. 2005. “Dynamic Predictive Coding by the Retina.” Nature 436: 71–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubel, D. 1957. “Tungsten Microelectrode for Recording from Single Units.” Science 125: 549–550.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubel, D., and T. N. Wiesel. 1959. “Receptive Fields of Single Neurons in the Cat’s Striate Cortex.” Journal of Physiology 148: 574–591.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubel, D., and T. N. Wiesel. 1962. “Receptive Fields, Binocular Interaction and Functional Architecture in the Cat’s Visual Cortex.” Journal of Physiology 160: 106–154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubel, D., and T. N. Wiesel. 1968. “Receptive Fields and Functional Architecture of Monkey Striate Cortex.” Journal of Physiology 195: 215–243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kagan, I., and D. Burr. 2017. “Active Vision: Dynamic Reformatting of Visual Information by the Saccade-Drift Cycle.” Current Biology 27: 341–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kandel, E. 2009. “An Introduction to the Work of David Hubel and Torsten Wiesel.” The Journal of Physiology 587: 2733–2741.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kastner, D., and S. Baccus. 2014. “Insights from the Retina into the Diverse and General Computations of Adaptation, Detection, and Prediction.” Current Opinion in Neurobiology 25: 63–69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, W., and C. Gilbert. 2014. “Perceptual Learning and Plasticity in Primary Visual Cortex.” In The New Visual Neurosciences, edited by J. S. Werner, and L. M. Chalupa, 1001–1012. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Love, A. 2008. “Explaining Evolutionary Innovations and Novelties: Criteria of Explanatory Adequacy and Epistemological Prerequisites.” Philosophy of Science 75: 874–886.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olshausen, B. 2014. “Perception as an Inference Problem.” In The Cognitive Neurosciences V, edited by M. Gazzaniga, and G. Mangun, 295–304. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Olshausen, B., and M. Lewicki. 2014. “What Natural Scene Statistics Can Tell Us about Cortical Representation.” In The New Visual Neurosciences, edited by J. S. Werner, and L. M. Chalupa, 1247–1262. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peschard, I., and B. van Fraassen. 2014. “Making the Abstract Concrete: The Role of Norms and Values in Experimental Modeling.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 46: 3–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, A., B. R. Payne, and J. Budd. 1994. “A Numerical Analysis of the Geniculocortical Input to Striate Cortex in the Monkey.” Cerebral Cortex 4: 215–229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao, P. N., and D. H. Ballard. 1999. “Predictive Coding in the Visual Cortex: A Functional Interpretation of Some Extra-Classical Receptive Fields.” Nature Neuroscience 2: 79–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riesenhuber, M., and T. Poggio. 2003. “How the Visual Cortex Recognizes Objects: The Tale of the Standard Model.” In The Visual Neurosciences, vol. 2, edited by L. M. Chalupa, and J. S. Werner, 1640–1653. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ringach, D. 2004. “Mapping Receptive Fields in Primary Visual Cortex.” The Journal of Physiology 558: 717–728.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simoncelli, E., and B. Olshausen. 2001. “Natural Image Statistics and Neural Representation.” Annual Review of Neuroscience 24: 1193–1216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spillmann, L. 2014. “Receptive Fields of Visual Neurons: The Early Years.” Perception 43: 1145–1176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spillmann, L., B. Dresp-Langley, and C. Tseng. 2015. “Beyond the Classical Receptive Field: The Effect of Contextual Stimuli.” Journal of Vision 15: 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spratling, M. W. 2010. “Predictive Coding as a Model of Response Properties in Cortical Area V1.” Journal of Neuroscience 30: 3531–3543.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinle, F. 1997. “Entering New Fields: Exploratory Uses of Experimentation.” Philosophy of Science 64: S65–S74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan, J. 2016. “Construct Stabilization and the Unity of the Mind-Brain Sciences.” Philosophy of Science 83: 662–673.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venturelli, A. N. 2021. “The Exploratory Dimension of fMRI Experiments.” Manuscrito 44 (1): 1–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagemans, J., F. A. Wichmann, and H. Op de Beeck. 2005. “Visual Perception: Basic Principles.” In Handbook of Cognition, edited by K. Lamberts, and R. Goldstone, 24–68. London: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Y. V., and J. B. Demb. 2014. “Postreceptoral Mechanisms for Adaptation in the Retina.” In The New Visual Neurosciences, edited by J. S. Werner, and L. M. Chalupa, 197–213. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wiesel, T. N. 1960. “Receptive Fields of Ganglion Cells in the Retina.” The Journal of Physiology 153: 583–594.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wurtz, R. H. 2009. “Recounting the Impact of Hubel and Wiesel.” The Journal of Physiology 587: 2817–2823.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuste, R. 2015. “From the Neuron Doctrine to Neural Networks.” Nature Reviews Neuroscience 16: 487–497.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar