Hempel’s Dilemma: Not Only for Physicalism*

References

• Badash, Lawrence. 1972. “The Completeness of Nineteenth-Century Science.” Isis 63 (1): 48–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bechler, Zev. 1993. Three Copernican Revolutions. Haifa: University of Haifa Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Menahem, Yemima. 2018. Causation in Science. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bogen, James. 2017. “Theory and Observation in Science.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2020 Edition), edited by Edward N. Zalta. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2020/entries/science-theory-observation/.
   Google Scholar
• Bohm, D. 1952. “A Suggested Interpretation of the Quantum Theory in Terms of ‘Hidden’ Variables, I and II.” Physical Review 85: 166–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bokulich, Peter. 2011. “Hempel’s Dilemma and Domains of Physics.” Analysis 71 (4): 646–651.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callender, Craig. 1999. “Reducing Thermodynamics to Statistical Mechanics: The Case of Entropy.” The Journal of Philosophy XCVI: 348–373.
   Google Scholar
• Chalmers, David. 1996. The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory. New York: Oxford Universtiy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chalmers, J. David. 2013. “How Can we Construct a Science of Consciousness?” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1303/1: 25–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chalmers, J. David, and Kelvin McQueen. Forthcoming. “Consciousness and the Collapse of the Wave Function.” In Consciousness and Quantum Mechanics, edited by S. Gao. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky, Noam. 1968. Language and Mind. New York: Harcourt Brace and World.
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky, Noam. 2000. New Horizons in the Study of Language and Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky, Noam. 2003. “Replies.” In Chomsky and his Critics, edited by L. Antony and N. Hornstein, 255–328. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Churchland, Paul. 1996. The Engine of Reason, the Seat of the Soul. Cambridge, MA: Bradford and MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crane, Tim, and Hugh D Mellor. 1990. “There is no Question of Physicalism.” Mind; A Quarterly Review of Psychology and Philosophy 99: 185–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crook, Seth, and Carl Gillett. 2001. “Why Physics Alone Cannot Define the ‘Physical': Materialism, Metaphysics, and the Formulation of Physicalism.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 31 (3): 333–359. Accessed October 11, 2020. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40232121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson, Donald. 1970. “Mental Events.” In Essays on Actions and Events, edited by Donald Davidson, 207–227. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dennett, Daniel. 2018. Magic, Illusions, and Zombies: An Exchange. New York: The New York Review of Books.
   Google Scholar
• Dennett, Daniel, and Marcel Kinsbourne. 1992. “Time and the Observer: The Where and When of Consciousness in the Brain.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15 (2): 183–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowell, Janice L. 2006a. “Formulating Physicalism.” Philosophical Studies 131/1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowell, Janice L. 2006b. “Formulating the Thesis of Physicalism: An Introduction.” Philosophical Studies 131: 1–23. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-006-6641-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eddington, Arthur S. 1935. The Nature of the Physical World. London: Everyman’s Library. London: J. M. Dent.
   Google Scholar
• Einstein, Albert. 1905a. “On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies.” Annalen der Physik 17 (10): 895–921. English translation in Einstein, The Principle of Relativity. London: Methuen, 1923.
   Google Scholar
• Einstein, Albert. 1905b. “On the Movement of Small Particles Suspended in a Stationary Liquid Demanded by the Molecular-Kinetic Theory of Heat.” Annalen der Physik 17: 549–560. English translation in Einstein, Investigation on the Theory of the Brownian Movement. London: Dover, 1956.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Einstein, Albert. 1905c. “On a Heuristic Viewpoint Concerning the Production and Transformation of Light.” Annalen der Physik 17: 132–148. English translation: https://einsteinpapers.press.princeton.edu/vol2-trans/100.
   Google Scholar
• Einstein, A. 1919. “Time, Space, and Gravitation,” Times London, November 28, 1919, 13–14. Reprinted as “What is the Theory of Relativity?” In Einstein, Ideas and Opinions, 227–232. New York: Bonanza Books, 1954.
   Google Scholar
• Einstein, Albert. 1970. “Autobiographical Notes.” In Albert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist, vol. 2, edited by P. A. Schilpp. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Feigl, Herbert. 1969. “The Origin and Spirit of Logical Positivism.” In The Legacy of Logical Positivism, edited by Peter Achinstein, and Stephen F. Barker, 21–38. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fermi, E. 1936. Thermodynamics. New York: Dove, 1956.
   Google Scholar
• Fine, Arthur I. 1984. “The Natural Ontological Attitude.” In Scientific Realism, edited by J. Leplin, 261–277. Oakland: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fodor, Jerry. 1974. “Special Sciences (or: The Disunity of Science as a Working Hypothesis).” Synthese 28: 97–115.
   Google Scholar
• Fodor, Jerry. 1997. “Special Sciences: Still Autonomous After All These Years.” Nous (detroit, Mich ) 31: 149–163.
   Google Scholar
• Ghirardi, G. C., A. Rimini, and T. Weber. 1986. “Unified Dynamics for Microscopic and Macroscopic Systems.” Physical Review D 34 (2): 470–491.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillett, Carl, and Gene D. Witmer. 2001. “A Physical Need: Physicalism and the via Negativa.” Analysis 61: 302–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giovanelli, Marco. 2020. “‘Like Thermodynamics Before Boltzmann.’ On the Emergence of Einstein's Distinction Between Constructive and Principle Theories.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Moderns Physics 71: 118–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graziano, Michael. 2019. Rethinking Consciousness: A Scientific Theory of Subjective Experience. New York: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Hameroff, S., and R. Penrose. 2014. “Consciousness in the Universe: A Review of the ‘Orch OR’ Theory.” Physicas Life Review 11 (1): 39–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harlow, Daniel. 2018. “TASI Lectures on the Emergence of Bulk Physics in AdS/CFT.” arXiv:1802.01040 [hep-th].
   Google Scholar
• Hawking, Stephen. 1980. “Is the end in sight for theoretical physics?” Inaugural lecture on taking up the Lucasian Professorship of Mathematics in Cambridge University. Printed in: Black Holes and Baby Universes, 42–62.
   Google Scholar
• Hawking, Stephen. 2002. “Godel and the End of Physics.” http://yclept.ucdavis.edu/course/215c.S17/TEX/GodelAndEndOfPhysics.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Hellman, Geoffrey. 1985. “Determination and Logical Truth.” The Journal of Philosophy 82 (11): 607–616. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2026415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemmo, Meir, and Shenker Orly. 2016. “Maxwell’s Demon.” In Oxford Handbooks Online in Philosophy. Oxford University Press. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199935314.013.63.
   Google Scholar
• Hemmo, Meir, and Orly Shenker. 2012. The Road to Maxwell’s Demon: Conceptual Foundations of Statistical Mechanics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hemmo, Meir, and Orly Shenker. 2019. “Two Kinds of High-Level Probability.” The Monist 102 (4): 458–477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemmo, Meir, and Orly Shenker. 2020. “Why Functionalism is ‘Token-Dualism’.” PhiSci Archive: http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/18073/.
   Google Scholar
• Hemmo, Meir, and Orly Shenker. 2021. “A Dilemma for Davidson’s Anomalous Monism”.
   Google Scholar
• Hemmo, Meir, and Orly Shenker. Forthcoming. “Is the Mentaculus the Best System of Our World?” In Rethinking the Concept of Laws of Nature, edited by Yemima Ben Menahem. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hempel, Carl. 1969. “Reduction: Ontological and Linguistic Facets.” In Philosophy, Science, and Method: Essays in Honor of Ernest Nagel, edited by Patrick Suppes, Sidney Morgenbesser, and Morgan White, 179–199. New York: St. Martin’s.
   Google Scholar
• Hempel, Carl. 1980. “Comments on Goodman's Ways of Worldmaking.” Synthese 45: 139–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoefer, Carl. 2018. “Chap. 2: Scientific Realism Without the Quantum.” In Scientific Realism and the Quantum. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hoefer, Carl, and Genoveva Marti. 2020. “Water has a Microstructural Essence After all.” European Journal for Philosophy of Science 10: 38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, Don A., and Marco Giovanelli. 2019. “Einstein’s Philosophy of Science”. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/einstein-philscience/.
   Google Scholar
• Kelvin. 1901. “Nineteenth Century Clouds Over the Dynamical Theory of Heat and Light.” Philosophical Magazine.
   Google Scholar
• Kripke, Saul. 1980. Naming and Necessity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, David. 1986. Philosophical Papers, Volume II. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, David. 1994. “Reduction of Mind.” In A Companion to the Philosophy of Mind, edited by Samuel Guttenplan, 412–431. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Loewer, Barry. Forthcoming. “The Package Deal Account of Laws and Properties (PDA).” Synthese.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maimon, Amber, and Meir Hemmo. Forthcoming. “Does Neuroplasticity Support the Hypothesis of Multiple Realizability.” Philosophy of Science.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melnyk, Andrew. 1997. “How To Keep the ‘Physical’ in Physicalism.” The Journal of Philosophy 94: 622–637.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melnyk, Andrew. 2003. A Physicalist Manifesto: Thoroughly Modern Materialism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Michelson, A. A. 1903. Light Waves and Their Uses. Chicago: University of Chicago Press (quoted in: P.J.E. Peebles “Nineteenth and Twentieth Century Clouds Over the Twenty-First Century Virtual Observatory”).
   Google Scholar
• Montero, Barbara G. 1999. “The Body Problem.” Noûs 33 (2): 183–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montero, Barbara G., and David Papineau. 2005. “A Defense of the Via Negativa Argument for Physicalism.” Analysis 65 (3): 233–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morganti, Matteo. 2020. “Fundamentality in metaphysics and the philosophy of physics. Part I: Metaphysics.” Philosophy Compass 15 (7); Part II: The Philosophy of Physics, Philosophy Compass 15. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12703.
   Google Scholar
• Ney, Alyssa. 2008a. “Defining Physicalism.” Philosophy Compass 3/5: 1033–1048.
   Google Scholar
• Ney, Alyssa. 2008b. “Physicalism as an Attitude.” Philosophical Studies 138: 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Connor, Timothy. 2020. “Emergent Properties.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2020 Edition), edited by Edward N. Zalta. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2020/entries/properties-emergent/.
   Google Scholar
• Peebles, Phillip James Edwin. 2005. “Open Problems in Cosmology.” Nuclear Physics B (Proc. Suppl 138: 5–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pineda, David. 2006. “A Mereological Characterization of Physicalism.” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 20: 243–266.
   Google Scholar
• Poland, Jeffrey. 1994. Physicalism. Oxford: Clarendon.
   Google Scholar
• Poland, Jeffrey. 2003. “Chomsky's Challenge to Physicalism.” In Chomsky and His Critics, edited by L. Antony, and N. Hornstein, 29–48. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Polger, Thomas, W. Shapiro, and A. Lawrence. 2016. The Multiple Realization Book. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Prelević, D. 2018. “Physicalism as a Research Programme.” Grazer Philosophische Studien 95 (1): 15–33. doi:https://doi.org/10.1163/18756735-000023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putnam, Hilary. 1967. “Psychological Predicates.” In Art, Mind and Religion, edited by William H. Capitan, and Daniel D. Merrill, 37–48. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press. Reprinted as “The Nature of Mental States.” In Mind, Language and Reality, edited by H. Putnam, 429–440, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (1975).
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, Howard. 2020. “Dualism.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2020 Edition), edited by Edward N. Zalta. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2020/entries/dualism/.
   Google Scholar
• Searle, John. 1997. The Mystery of Consciousness. New York: The New York Review Books.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, Lawrence. 2018. “Reduction Redux.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 68: 10–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shenker, Orly. 2015. “Davidsonian Descriptions as a Principle Theory.” Iyyun: The Jerusalem Philosophical Quarterly 64: 171–190. [in Hebrew].
   Google Scholar
• Shenker, Orly. 2017. “Flat Physicalism: Some Implications.” Iyyun, the Jerusalem Philosophical Quarterly 6: 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Shenker, Orly. 2020. “Denialism: What do the so-Called ‘Consciousness Deniers’ Deny?” Iyyun: The Jerusalem Philosophical Quarterly 68: 307–337.
   Google Scholar
• Smart, Jack J.C. 1978. “The Content of Physicalism.” The Philosophical Quarterly 28: 339–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smolin, L. 2006. The Trouble with Physics. Boston, MA: Houghton Millfin.
   Google Scholar
• Spurrett, D., and David Papineau. 1999. “A Note on the Completeness of ‘Physics’.” Analysis 59/1: 25–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoljar, Daniel. 2010. Physicalism. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stoljar, Daniel. 2017. “Physicalism.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2017 Edition), edited by Edward N. Zalta. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2017/entries/physicalism/.
   Google Scholar
• Uffink, Jos. 2001. “Bluff Your Way in the Second Law of Thermodynamics.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B - Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 32 (3): 305–394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Fraassen, Bastain C. 2002. The Empirical Stance. New Haven, CT: Yale University.
   Google Scholar
• van Riel, Raphael, and Robert Van Gulick. 2019. “Scientific Reduction.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2019 Edition), edited by Edward N. Zalta. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2019/entries/scientific-reduction/.
   Google Scholar
• van Roojen, Mark. 2018. “Moral Cognitivism vs. Non-Cognitivism.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2018 Edition), edited by Edward N. Zalta. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2018/entries/moral-cognitivism/.
   Google Scholar
• Vintiadis, Elly, and Constantinos Mekios. 2018. Brute Facts. Oxford, UK: Oxford Scholarship Online.
   Google Scholar
• von Neumann, J. 1932. Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics (trans. R. T. Beyer 1955). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wallace, D. M. 2012. The Emergent Multiverse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, Jessica. 2006. “On Characterizing the Physical.” Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition 131 (1): 61–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worley, Sara. 2006. “Physicalism and the Via Negativa.” Philosophical Studies 131 (1): 101–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar