What Exactly is Presupposed by Agnotology? The Challenge of Intentions

References

• Anscombe, G. E. M. (1957) 2000. Intention. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Balmer, Brian. 2012. Secrecy and Science: A Historical Sociology of Biological and Chemical Warfare. Burlington: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Biddle, J. B., and A. Leuschner. 2015. “Climate Scepticism and the Manufacture of Doubt: Can Dissent in Science be Epistemically Detrimental?” European Journal for Philosophy of Science 5 (3): 261–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-014-0101-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrier, Martin. 2018. “Identifying Agnotological Ploys: How to Stay Clear of Unjustified Dissent.” In Philosophy of Science: European Studies in Philosophy of Science, edited by A. Christian, D. Hommen, N. Retzlaff, and G. Schurz, 155–169. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Carrier, Martin. 2019. “Agnotological Challenges: How to Capture the Production of Ignorance in Science.” In Science and the Production of Ignorance: When the Quest for Knowledge is Thwarted, edited by Janet A. Kourany, and Martin Carrier, 59–88. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coady, David, ed. 2006. Conspiracy Theories: The Philosophical Debate. Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Croissant, Jennifer L. 2014. “Agnotology: Ignorance and Absence or Towards a Sociology of Things That Aren’t There.” Social Epistemology 28 (1): 4–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2013.862880.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dedieu, François, and J.-N. Jouzel. 2015. “Comment ignorer ce que l’on sait.” Revue Française de Sociologie 56 (1): 105–133. https://doi.org/10.3917/rfs.561.0105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Morgan, Augustus. 1872. A Budget of Paradoxes. London: Longmans, Green, and co.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, Heather. 2000. “Inductive Risk and Values in Science.” Philosophy of Science 67 (4): 559–579. https://doi.org/10.2307/188707.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fogg, B. J. 2003. Persuasive Technology: Using Computers to Change What We Think and Do. Amsterdam/Boston: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Foucart, Stéphane. 2010. Le Populisme climatique: Claude Allègre et Cie, Enquête sur les ennemis de la science. Paris: Denoël.
   Google Scholar
• Frickel, Scott, and Michelle Edwards. 2014. “Untangling Ignorance in Environmental Risk Assessment.” In Powerless Science? The Making of the Toxic World in the 20th Century, edited by Soraya Boudia, and Nathalie Jas, 215–233. London: Berghahn Books.
   Google Scholar
• Galison, Peter. 2004. “Removing Knowledge.” Critical Inquiry 31 (1): 229–243. https://doi.org/10.1086/427309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Girel, Mathias. 2017. Science et territoires de l’ignorance. Versailles: Quae.
   Google Scholar
• Girel, Mathias. 2020. “Five Pragmatist Insights on Scientific Expertise.” Philosophical Inquiries 8 (2): 151–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Girel, Mathias. 2022. “The Pragmatics of Ignorance.” In The Routledge International Handbook of Ignorance Studies, edited by Matthias Gross, and Linsey McGoey, 2nd ed., 61–74. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gross, Matthias, and Linsey McGoey, eds. 2022. Routledge International Handbook of Ignorance Studies. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hempel, C. G. 1965. “Science and Human Values.” In Aspects of Scientific Explanation and Other Essays in the Philosophy of Science, 81–96. New York: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hess, David J. 2017. Undone Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
   Google Scholar
• Horel, Stéphane. 2015. Intoxication. Paris: Éditions La Découverte.
   Google Scholar
• Kitcher, Philip. 2011. Science in a Democratic Society. Amherst/New York: Prometheus Books.
   Google Scholar
• Kourany, Janet A., and Martin Carrier, eds. 2019. Science and the Production of Ignorance: When the Quest for Knowledge is Thwarted. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lakatos, Imre, and Paul Feyerabend. 1999. For and Against Method. Edited by Matteo Motterlini, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Longino, Helen E. 1990. Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Markowitz, Gerald E, and David Rosner. 2002. Deceit and Denial: The Deadly Politics of Industrial Pollution. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• McGarity, Thomas O, and Wendy Wagner. 2008. Bending Science: How Special Interests Corrupt Public Health Research. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Melo-Martín, Inmaculada de, and Kristen Intemann. 2018. The Fight Against Doubt. How to Bridge the Gap Between Scientists and the Public. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Michaels, David. 2008. Doubt is Their Product: How Industry’s Assault on Science Threatens Your Health. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Michaels, David. 2020. The Triumph of Doubt: Dark Money and the Science of Deception. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ong, Elisa K., and Stanton A. Glantz. 2001. “Constructing “Sound Science” and “Good Epidemiology”: Tobacco, Lawyers, and Public Relations Firms.” American Journal of Public Health 91 (11): 1749–1757. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.91.11.1749.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oreskes, Naomi. 2021. Why Trust Science. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oreskes, Naomi, and Erik M Conway. 2010. Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming. 1st U.S. ed. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Popper, Karl R. (1963) 2002. Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Proctor, Robert. 1991. Value-Free Science? Purity and Power in Modern Knowledge. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Proctor, Robert N. 1995. Cancer Wars: How Politics Shapes What We Know and Don’t Know About Cancer. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Proctor, Robert. 2011. Golden Holocaust: Origins of the Cigarette Catastrophe and the Case for Abolition. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Proctor, Robert N., and Londa Schiebinger, eds. 2008. Agnotology: The Making and Unmaking of Ignorance. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schug, Thaddeus T., Anne F. Johnson, Linda S. Birnbaum, Theo Colborn, Louis J. Guillette, David P. Crews, Terry Collins, et al. 2016. “Minireview: Endocrine Disruptors: Past Lessons and Future Directions.” Molecular Endocrinology 30 (8): 833–847. https://doi.org/10.1210/me.2016-1096.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Séralini, Gilles-Eric, Emilie Clair, Robin Mesnage, Steeve Gress, Nicolas Defarge, Manuela Malatesta, Didier Hennequin, and Joël Spiroux de Vendômois. 2012. “Long Term Toxicity of a Roundup Herbicide and a Roundup-Tolerant Genetically Modified Maize (Retracted).” Food and Chemical Toxicology 50 (11): 4221–4231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2012.08.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shamoo, Adil E, and David B Resnik. 2009. Responsible Conduct of Research. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford Academic. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195368246.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Sismondo, Sergio. 2009. “Ghosts in the Machine: Publication Planning in the Medical Sciences.” Social Studies of Science 39 (2): 171–198. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312708101047.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sismondo, Sergio. 2018. Ghost-Managed Medicine: Big Pharma’s Invisible Hands. Manchester: Mattering Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sismondo, Sergio. 2021. “Epistemic Corruption, the Pharmaceutical Industry, and the Body of Medical Science.” Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics 6: 1–5. https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2021.614013.
   Google Scholar
• Thaler, Richard H., and Cass R. Sunstein. 2008. Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar