Harmful Research and the Paradox of Credibility

References

• Appiah, Kwame Antony. 2010. The Honor Code: How Moral Revolutions Happen. New York: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Aristotle. 2011. The Eudemian Ethics. Transl. by Anthony Kenny. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Biddle, Justin B., and Anna Leuschner. 2015. “Climate Skepticism and the Manufacture of Doubt: Can Dissent in Science Be Epistemically Detrimental?” European Journal for Philosophy of Science 5 (3): 261–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-014-0101-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biddle, Justin B., Anna Leuschner, and Ian James Kidd. 2017. “Epistemic Corruption and Manufactured Doubt: The Case of Climate Science.” Public Affairs Quarterly 31 (3): 165–187. https://doi.org/10.2307/44732791.
   Google Scholar
• Block, Ned J. 1995. “How Heritability Misleads About Race.” Cognition 56 (2): 99–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(95)00678-R.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bright, Liam Kofi. 2018. “‘Du Bois’ Democratic Defence of the Value Free Ideal.” Synthese 195 (5): 2227–2245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-017-1333-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Büter, Anke. 2015. “The Irreducibility of Value-Freedom to Theory Assessment.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 49: 18–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2014.10.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig, Edward. 1990. Knowledge and the State of Nature: An Essay in Conceptual Synthesis. Oxford: Clarendon.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, Heather E. 2000. “Inductive Risk and Values in Science.” Philosophy of Science 67 (4): 559–579. https://doi.org/10.1086/392855.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, Heather E. 2003. “The Moral Responsibilities of Scientists (Tensions Between Autonomy and Responsibility).” American Philosophical Quarterly 40 (1): 59–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, Heather E. 2009. Science, Policy, and the Value-Free Ideal. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dworkin, Ronald. 1985. A Matter of Principle. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, Kevin C., and Daniel J. McKaughan. 2009. “How Values in Scientific Discovery and Pursuit Alter Theory Appraisal.” Philosophy of Science 76: 598–611. https://doi.org/10.1086/605807.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott, Kevin C., and Ted Richards2017. Exploring Inductive Risk: Case Studies of Values in Science. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fricker, Miranda. 1998. “Rational Authority and Social Power: Towards a Truly Social Epistemology.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 98: 159–178. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9264.00030.
   Google Scholar
• Furman, Katherine. 2020. “Emotions and Distrust in Science.” International Journal of Philosophical Studies 28 (5): 713–730. https://doi.org/10.1080/09672559.2020.1846281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habermas, Jürgen. 1996. “On the Cognitive Content of Morality.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 96 (1): 335–358. https://doi.org/10.1093/aristotelian/96.1.335.
   Google Scholar
• Hempel, Carl. 1965. Aspects of Scientific Explanation and other Essays in the Philosophy of Science. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Irzik, Gürol, and Faik Kurtulmus. 2019. “What is Epistemic Public Trust in Science?” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 70 (4): 1145–1166. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axy007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John, Stephen. 2018. “Epistemic Trust and the Ethics of Science Communication: Against Transparency, Openness, Sincerity and Honesty.” Social Epistemology 32 (2): 75–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2017.1410864.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John, Stephen. 2021. “Science, Politics and Regulation: The Trust-Based Approach to the Demarcation Problem.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 90: 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2021.08.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, Jonathan Michael. 2015. “Race, IQ, and the Search for Statistical Signals Associated with So-called ‘X’-factors: Environments, Racism, and the ‘Hereditarian Hypothesis’.” Biology and Philosophy 30: 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-014-9428-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitcher, Philip. 1993. The Advancement of Science: Science Without Legend, Objectivity Without Illusions. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kitcher, Philip. 2001. Science, Truth, and Democracy. New York: Prometheus.
   Google Scholar
• Kourany, Janet A. 2003. “A Philosophy of Science for the Twenty-First Century.” Philosophy of Science 70: 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1086/367864.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kourany, Janet A. 2016. “Should Some Knowledge Be Forbidden? The Case of Cognitive Differences Research.” Philosophy of Science 83: 779–790. https://doi.org/10.1086/687863.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kourany, Janet A. 2020. “Might Scientific Ignorance Be Virtuous? The Case of Cognitive Differences Research.” In Science and the Production of Ignorance, edited by Janet Kourany, and Martin Carrier, 123–143. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Larmore, Charles. 1987. Patterns of Moral Complexity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mercier, Hugo, and Dan Sperber. 2017. The Enigma of Reason: A New Theory of Human Understanding. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, Boaz. 2021. “When Is Scientific Dissent Epistemically Inappropriate?” Philosophy of Science 88 (5): 918–928. https://doi.org/10.1086/714854.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okruhlik, Kathleen. 1994. “Gender and the Biological Sciences.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 20: 21–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/00455091.1994.10717393.
   Google Scholar
• Oreskes, Naomi, and Erik M. Conway. 2010. Merchants of Doubt. New York: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Plato. 2006. The Republic. Transl. by R. E. Allen. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, John. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, John. 1985. “Justice as Fairness: Political not Metaphysical.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 14 (3): 223–251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rolin, Kristina. 2002. “Gender and Trust in Science.” Hypatia 17 (4): 95–118. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2002.tb01075.x.
   Google Scholar
• Rolin, Kristina. 2020. “Trust in Science.” In The Routledge Handbook of Trust and Philosophy, edited by Judith Simon, 95–118. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2002.tb01075.x.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, Steven. 2009. “Should Scientists Study Race and IQ? No: Science and Society Do Not Benefit.” Nature 457: 786–788. https://doi.org/10.1038/457786a.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudner, Richard. 1953. “The Scientist qua Scientist Makes Value Judgments.” Philosophy of Science 20 (1): 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1086/287231.
   Google Scholar
• Sainsbury, R. Mark. 2009. Paradoxes. 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schroeder, S. Andrew. 2020. “Democratic Values: A Better Foundation for Public Trust in Science.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 72 (2): 545–562. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axz023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegetsleitner, Anne. 2022. “Ethics and Morality in the Vienna Circle.” In The Socio-Ethical Dimension of Knowledge, edited by Christian Damböck, and Adam T. Tuboly, 17–31. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80363-6_2.
   Google Scholar
• Singer, Peter. 1972. “Moral Experts.” Analysis 32 (4): 115–117. https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/32.4.115.
   Google Scholar
• Steel, Daniel. 2016. “Climate Change and Second-Order Uncertainty: Defending a Generalized, Normative, and Structural Argument from Inductive Risk.” Perspectives on Science 24 (6): 696–719. https://doi.org/10.1162/POSC_a_00229.
   Google Scholar
• Steele, Katie. 2012. “The Scientist qua Policy Advisor Makes Value Judgments.” Philosophy of Science 79: 893–904. https://doi.org/10.1086/667842.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Fraassen, Bas. 1980. The Scientific Image. Oxford: Clarendon.
   Google Scholar
• Waldron, Jeremy. 1993. Liberal Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilholt, Torsten. 2009. “Bias and Values in Scientific Research.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 40: 92–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2008.12.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilholt, Torsten. 2013. “Epistemic Trust in Science.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 64: 233–253. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axs007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilholt, Torsten. 2016. “Collaborative Research, Scientific Communities, and the Social Diffusion of Trustworthiness.” In The Epistemic Life of Groups: Essays in the Epistemology of Collectives, edited by Michael S. Brady, and Miranda Fricker, 218–234. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198759645.003.0012.
   Google Scholar
• Wilholt, Torsten. 2020. “On Knowing What One Does Not Know: Ignorance and the Aims of Research.” In Science and the Production of Ignorance, edited by Janet Kourany, and Martin Carrier, 195–218. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilholt, Torsten. 2022. “Epistemic Interests and the Objectivity of Inquiry.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 91: 86–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2021.11.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winsberg, Eric. 2012. “Values and Uncertainties in the Predictions of Global Climate Models.” Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 22: 111–137. https://doi.org/10.1353/ken.2012.0008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar