136
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Tightrope-Walking Rationality in Action: Feyerabendian Insights for the Foundations of Quantum Mechanics

ORCID Icon
Received 30 Dec 2022, Accepted 30 Apr 2024, Published online: 19 Jun 2024

References

  • Auffèves, A., and P. Grangier. 2016. “Contexts, Systems and Modalities: A New Ontology for Quantum Mechanics.” Foundations of Physics 46:121–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-015-9952-z.
  • Bacciagaluppi, G., and A. Valentini. 2009. Quantum Theory at the Crossroads. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Barzegar, A., and D. Oriti. 2022. “Epistemic-Pragmatist Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics: A Comparative Assessment.” ArXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2210.13620.
  • Bitbol, M. 1991. “Perspectival Realism and Quantum Mechanics”.
  • Boole, G. 1862. “On the Theory of Probabilities.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 152:225–252. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstl.1862.0015.
  • Boyd, N. M., and J. Bogen. 2021. “Theory and Observation in Science.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by E. N. Zalta, Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.
  • Brown, M. J. 2009. “Models and Perspectives on Stage: Remarks on Giere's Scientific Perspectivism.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 40:213–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2009.03.001.
  • Brown, M. J. 2009. “Relational Quantum Mechanics and the Determinacy Problem.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 60:679–695. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axp017.
  • Brukner, C., and A. Zeilinger. 2003 “Information and Fundamental Elements of the Structure of Quantum Theory”. In Time, Quantum, Information, edited by L. Castell and O. Ischebeck, Springer.
  • Bschir, K.. 2015. “Feyerabend and Popper on Theory Proliferation and Anomaly Import: On the Compatibility of Theoretical Pluralism and Critical Rationalism.” Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 5:24–55.
  • Bschir, K., and J. Shaw. 2021. Interpreting Feyerabend: Critical Essays. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Cabello, A. 2017. “Interpretations of Quantum Theory: A Map of Madness.” In What is Quantum Information? edited by O. Lombardi, S. Fortin, F. Holik F, and C. López, 138–144. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Chakravartty, A. 2017. “Scientific Realism.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by E. N. Zalta, Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.
  • Crull, E. 2016. “Hermann and the Relative Context of Observation.” In Grete Hermann – Between Physics and Philosophy, edited by E. Crull and G. Bacciagaluppi, 149–169. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
  • Crull, E., and G. Bacciagaluppi. 2017. Grete Hermann – Between Physics and Philosophy. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
  • Cuffaro, M. 2022. Grete Hermann, Quantum Mechanics, and the Evolution of Kantian Philosophy. In Women in the History of Analytic Philosophy, edited by J. Peijnenburg and S. Verhaegh, 114–145. Cham: Springer.
  • Curiel, E. 2019. “Schematizing the Observer and the Epistemic Content of Theories.” ArXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1903.02182.
  • Dardashti, R., Dawid, R., and Thébault, K., eds. 2019. Why Trust a Theory?: Epistemology of Fundamental Physics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Dawid, R., S. Hartmann, and J. Sprenger. 2015. “The No Alternatives Argument.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 66:213–234. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axt045.
  • Dieks, D. 2022. “Perspectival Quantum Realism.” Foundations of Physics 52:1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-022-00611-8.
  • Epperson, M. 2004. Quantum Mechanics and the Philosophy of Alfred North Whitehead. New York: Fordham University Press.
  • Esfeld, M. 2014. “The Primitive Ontology of Quantum Physics: Guidelines for An Assessment of the Proposals.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 47:99–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsb.2014.06.003.
  • Farell, R. P. 2001. “Feyerabend's Metaphysics: Process-Realism, Or Voluntarist-Idealism?.” Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 32:351.
  • Farrell, R. P. 2003. Feyerabend and Scientific Values: Tightrope-Walking Rationality. Dordrecht, Netherland: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Feyerabend, P. 1975. Against Method. London: New Left Books.
  • Feyerabend, P. K. 1981. Realism, Rationalism and Scientific Method: Philosophical Papers. Vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Feyerabend, P. 1987. Farewell to Reason. New York: Verso.
  • Feyerabend, P. K. 1999. Knowledge, Science and Relativism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Fuchs, C. A. 2010. “QBism, the Perimeter of Quantum Bayesianism.” ArXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1003.5209.
  • Fuchs, C. A. 2017. “Notwithstanding Bohr, the Reasons for QBism. Mind and Matter 15:245–300.
  • Giere, R. N. 1985. “Philosophy of Science Naturalized.” Philosophy of Science 52:331–356. https://doi.org/10.1086/289255.
  • Giere, R. N. 1999. Science Without Laws. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Giere, R. 2006. “Perspectival Pluralism.” In ? Itekellersetal:Sp, 26–41.
  • Giere, R. N. 2016. “Feyerabend's Perspectivism.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 57:137–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2015.11.008.
  • Hardy, L. 2011. “Reformulating and Reconstructing Quantum Theory.” ArXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1104.2066.
  • Healey, R.. 2012. “Quantum Theory: A Pragmatist Approach.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 63:729–771. 10.1093/bjps/axr054.
  • Hermann, G. 2016. “Natural-Philosophical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics”.
  • Hoyningen-Huene, P. 2000. “Paul K. Feyerabend: An Obituary.” In 'The Worst Enemy of Science'?: Essays in Memory of Paul Feyerabend, edited by J. Preston, G. Munévar and D. Lamb. Oxford: OUP.
  • Kent, R. 2022. “Paul Feyerabend and the Dialectical Character of Quantum Mechanics: A Lesson in Philosophical Dadaism.” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 35:51–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/02698595.2022.2075687.
  • Kidd, I. J., and M. Brown. 2016. “Reappraising Feyerabend.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 57:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2015.11.009.
  • Kuby, D. 2016. “Feyerabend's the Concept of Intelligibility in Modern Physics? (1948).” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 57:57–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2015.11.004.
  • Kuby, D. 2018. “Carnap, Feyerabend, and the Pragmatic Theory of Observation.” Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 8:432–470.
  • Kuby, D. 2021. “Feyerabend's Reevaluation of Scientific Practice: Quantum Mechanics, Realism and Niels Bohr.” In Interpreting Feyerabend: Critical Essays, edited by K. Bschir and J. Shaw, 132–156. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Kuby, D., and P. Fraser. 2022. “Feyerabend on the Quantum Theory of Measurement: A Reassessment.” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 35:23–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/02698595.2022.2067811.
  • Ladyman, J. 2014. “Structural Realism.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by E. N. Zalta, Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.
  • Leifer, M. S. 2014. “Is the Quantum State Real? An Extended Review of Psi-Ontology Theorems.” Quanta 3:67. https://doi.org/10.12743/quanta.v3i1.22.
  • Lloyd, E. A. 1997. “Feyerabend, Mill, and Pluralism.” Philosophy of Science 64:S396–S407. https://doi.org/10.1086/392617.
  • Manchak, J. 2018. “On Feyerabend, General Relativity, and ‘Unreasonable’ Universes”.
  • Masanes, L., and M. P. Müller. 2011. “A Derivation of Quantum Theory From Physical Requirements.” New Journal of Physics 13:063001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/13/6/063001.
  • Massimi, M. 2022. Perspectival Realism. Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780197555620.001.0001.
  • Miller, A. 2021. “Realism.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by E. N. Zalta, Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.
  • Nickles, T. 1987. “Methodology, Heuristics, and Rationality.” In Rational Changes in Science: Essays on Scientific Reasoning, edited by J. C. Pitt and M. Pera, 103–132. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
  • Oberheim, E. 2006. Feyerabend's Philosophy. Boston: De Gruyter.
  • Oriti, D. 2017. “No Alternative to Proliferation.” ArXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1705.09858.
  • Peres, A. 1995. Quantum Theory: Concepts and Methods. Fundamental Theories of Physics. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
  • Popper, K. R. 1967. “Quantum Mechanics without “the observer”.” In Quantum Theory and Reality, edited by M. Bunge, 7–44. Berlin: Springer.
  • Preston, J. 1997. Feyerabend: Philosophy, Science and Society. Malden, MA: Polity Press.
  • Rovelli, C. 2021. “The Relational Interpretation of Quantum Physics.” ArXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2109.09170.
  • Santo, F. D. 2022. “Beyond Method: The Diatribe Between Feyerabend and Popper Over the Foundations of Quantum Mechanics.” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 35:5–22. 10.1080/02698595.2022.2031430.
  • Schmid, D., J. H. Selby, and R. W. Spekkens. 2020. “Unscrambling the Omelette of Causation and Inference: The Framework of Causal-Inferential Theories.” ArXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2009.03297.
  • Shaw, J. 2017. “Was Feyerabend An Anarchist? The Structure(s) of ‘Anything Goes’.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 64:11–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2017.06.002.
  • Shaw, J. 2020. “The Problem of the Empirical Basis in the Popperian Tradition: Popper, Bartley, and Feyerabend.” Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science10:524–561.
  • Shaw, J. 2020. “The Revolt Against Rationalism: Feyerabend's Critical Philosophy.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 80:110–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2019.05.007.
  • Shaw, J. 2021. “Feyerabend on Naturalism, Pluralism, and the Foundations of Philosophy.” Logique et Analyse 256:467–486.
  • Stanford, P. K. 2006. Exceeding Our Grasp: Science, History, and the Problem of Unconceived Alternatives. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Tsou, J. Y. Forthcoming. “Feyerabend's Realism and Expansion of Pluralism in the 1970s.” In Values, Pluralism, and Pragmatism: Themes from the Work of Matthew J. Brown, edited by J. Y. Tsou, S. Jamie and C. Fehr, Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science. Springer.
  • Vaidman, L. 2021. “Many-Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by E. N. Zalta, Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.
  • van Strien, M. 2020. “Pluralism and Anarchism in Quantum Physics: Paul Feyerabend's Writings on Quantum Physics in Relation to His General Philosophy of Science.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 80:72–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2019.03.006.
  • van Veen, E. 2014. “Quantum Interpretations and World War Two.” PhD thesis, Raboud University Nijmegen.
  • Wray, K. B. 2015. “The Methodological Defense of Realism Scrutinized.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 54:74–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2015.09.001.