Increased inattentional blindness in severe traumatic brain injury: Evidence for reduced distractibility?

References

• Schmitter-Edgecombe M, Kibby KY. Visual selective attention after severe closed head injury. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 1998; 4: 144–159
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Zomeren AH. Reaction time and attention after closed head injury. Swets & Zeitlinger BV, Lisse 1981; 163
   Google Scholar
• Simpson A, Schmitter-Edgecombe M. Intactness of inhibitory attentional mechanisms following severe closed-head injury. Neuropsychology 2000; 14: 310–319
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whyte J. The effects of visual distraction following traumatic brain injury. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 1998; 4: 127–136, et al.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whyte J. Frequency and duration of inattentive behavior after traumatic brain injury: Effects of distraction, task, and practice. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 2000; 6: 1–11, et al.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller E, Cruzat A. A note on the effects of irrelevant information on task performance after mild and severe head injury. British Journal of Clinical Psychology 1981; 20: 69–70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinsella GJ. Assessment of attention following traumatic brain injury: A review. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 1998; 8: 351–375
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whyte J. Sustained arousal and attention after traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychologia 1995; 33: 797–813, et al.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ponsford J, Sloan S, Snow P. Traumatic brain injury: Rehabilitation for everyday adaptive living. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, HoveUK 1995
   Google Scholar
• Dimitrov M. Inhibitory attentional control in patients with frontal lobe damage. Brain and Cognition 2003; 52: 258–270, et al.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zoccolotti P. Patterns of attentional impairment following closed head injury: A collaborative European study. Cortex 2000; 36: 93–107, et al.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ponsford J, Kinsella G. Attentional deficits following closed-head injury. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 1992; 14: 822–838
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rios M, Periane JA, Munoz-Cespedes JM. Attentional control and slowness of information processing after severe traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury 2004; 18: 257–272
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stablum F. Attention and control deficits following closed-head injury. Cortex 1994; 30: 603–618, et al.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiffrin RM, Schneider W. Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory. Psychological Review 1977; 84: 127–190
   Google Scholar
• Schneider W, Shiffrin RM. Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search, and attention. Psychological Review 1977; 84: 1–66
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posner MI, Dehaene S. Attentional networks. Trends in Neurosciences 1994; 17: 75–79
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posner MI, Petersen SE. The attention system of the human brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience 1990; 13: 25–42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuss DT. Dissociation of attentional processes in patients with focal frontal and posterior lesions. Neuropsychologia 1999; 37: 1005–1027, et al.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posner MI. Attention as a cognitive and neural system. Current Directions in Psychological Science 1992; 1: 11–14
   Google Scholar
• Lezak MD, Howieson DB, Loring DW. Neuropsychological assessment, 4th ed. Oxford University Press, Oxford 2004
   Google Scholar
• Park NW, Moscovitch M, Robertson IH. Divided attention impairments after traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychologia 1999; 37: 1119–1133
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azouvi P. Divided attention and mental effort after severe traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychologia 2004; 42: 1260–1268, et al.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Zomeren AH, Brouwer WH. Clinical neuropsychology of attention. Oxford University Press, New York 1994
   Google Scholar
• Stuss DT. Reaction-time after head-injury: Fatigue, divided and focused attention, and consistency of performance. Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 1989; 52: 742–748, et al.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simons DJ, Chabris CF. Gorillas in our midst: Sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic events. Perception 1999; 28: 1059–1074
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simons DJ. Current approaches to change blindness. Visual Cognition 2000; 7: 1–15
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simons DJ. Attentional capture and inattentional blindness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2000; 4: 147–155
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mack A. Inattentional blindness: Looking without seeing. Current Directions in Psychological Science 2003; 12: 180–184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson BA, Peterson MA. Inattentional blindness and attentional capture: Evidence for attention-based theories of visual salience. Attraction, distraction and action: Multiple perspectives on attentional capture, CL Folk, BS Gibson. Elsevier Science, New York 2001; 51–76
   Google Scholar
• Most SB. How not to be seen: The contribution of similarity and selective ignoring to sustained inattentional blindness. Psychological Science 2001; 12: 9–17, et al.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newby EA, Rock I. Inattentional blindness as a function of proximity to the focus of attention. Perception 1998; 27: 1025–1040
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mack A, Rock I. Inattentional blindness. MIT Press/Bradford Books series in cognitive psychology, The MIT Press, CambridgeMA, USA 1988; 273
   Google Scholar
• Moore CM, Grosjean M, Lleras A. Using inattentional blindness as an operational definition of unattended: The case of surface completion. Visual Cognition 2003; 10: 299–318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neisser U, Becklen R. Selective looking: Attending to visually specified events. Cognitive Psychology 1975; 7: 480–494
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neisser U. The control of information pickup in selective looking. Perception and its development: A tribute to Eleanor J Gibson, AD Pick. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ 1979; 201–219
   Google Scholar
• Mack A, Rock I. Inattentional blindness: Perception without attention. Visual attention, RD Wright. Oxford University Press, Vancouver studies in cognitive science. London 1998; 55–76
   Google Scholar
• Wolfe JM. Inattentional amnesia. Fleeting memories: Cognition of brief visual stimuli, V Coltheart. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 1999; 71–94
   Google Scholar
• Rees G. Inattentional blindness versus inattentional amnesia for fixated but ignored words. Science 1999; 286: 2504–2507, et al.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond MR. Standardized methods of assessing and predicting outcome. Rehabilitation of the adult and child with traumatic brain injury, M Rosenthal. Davis, Philadelphia 1990; 59–74, et al., editors
   Google Scholar
• Russell WR, Smith A. Post traumatic amnesia in closed head injury. Archives of Neurology 1961; 5: 16–29
   Google Scholar
• Spreen O, Strauss E. A compendium of neuropsychological tests: Administration, norms, and commentary, 2nd ed. Oxford University Press, New York 1998
   Google Scholar
• Trenerry MR. Stroop neuropsychological screening test manual. Psychological Assessment Resources Inc. 1989, et al.
   Google Scholar
• Warrington EK, James M. The visual object and space perception battery: Manual. Thames Valley Test Company, Bury St Edmunds 1991
   Google Scholar
• Stuss DT. The trail making test: A study in focal lesion patients. Psychological Assessment 2001; 13: 230–239, et al.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arbuthnott K, Frank J. Trail making test, part B as a measure of executive control: Validation using a set-switching paradigm. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 2000; 22: 518–528
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felmingham KL, Baguley IJ, Green AM. Effects of diffuse axonal injury on speed of information processing following severe traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychology 2004; 18: 564–571
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batchelor J, Harvey AG, Bryant RA. Stroop Colour Word Test as a measure of attentional deficit following mild head injury. The Clinical Neuropsychologist 1995; 9: 180–186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potter DD. Effect of mild head injury on event-related potential correlates of Stroop task performance. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 2002; 8: 828–837, et al.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown GG. Brain activation and pupil response during covert performance of the Stroop Color Word task. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 1999; 5: 308–319, et al.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neill WT. Inhibitory and facilitatory processes in selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1977; 3: 444–450
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vakil E. The Stroop Color-Word task as a measure of selective attention: Efficiency in the elderly. Developmental Neuropsychology 1996; 12: 313–325, et al.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spikman JM, vanZomeren AH, Deelman BG. Deficits of attention after closed-head injury: Slowness only?. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 1996; 18: 755–767
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azouvi P. Working memory and supervisory control after severe closed-head injury. A study of dual task performance and random generation. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 1996; 18: 317–337, et al.
   Google Scholar
• Spikman JM. Construct validity of concepts of attention in healthy controls and patients with CHI. Brain and Cognition 2001; 47: 446–460, et al.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuss DT. Stroop performance in focal lesion patients: Dissociation of processes and frontal lobe lesion location. Neuropsychologia 2001; 39: 771–786, et al.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tombaugh TN. Trail Making Test A and B: Normative data startified by age and education. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 2004; 19: 203–214
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Donnell JP. Construct validity of neuropsychological tests of conceptual and attentional abilities. Journal of Clinical Psychology 1994; 50: 596–600, et al.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowe SF. The differential contribution of mental tracking, cognitive flexibility, visual search, and motor speed to performance on Parts A and B of the Trail Making Test. Journal of Clinical Psychology 1998; 54: 585–591
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuss DT, Shallice T, Alexander MP. A multidisciplinary approach to anterior attentional functions. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1995; 769: 191–211
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar