Self-efficacy outcomes of people with brain injury in cognitive skill training using different types of trainer–trainee interaction

References

• Bandura A, Reese L, Adams NE. Microanalysis of action and fear arousal as a function of differential levels of perceived self-efficacy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1982; 43: 5–21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellus SB, Kost PP, Vergo JG, Dinezza GJ. Improvements in cognitive functioning following intensive behavioural rehabilitation. Brain Injury 1998; 12: 139–145
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cervone D, Peake PK. Anchoring, efficacy, and action: The influence of judgmental heuristics on self-efficacy judgments and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1986; 50: 492–501
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins JL. Self-efficacy and ability in achievement behavior. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association annual meeting, New York, 1982
   Google Scholar
• Tam SF. Self-efficacy as a predictor of computer skills learning outcomes of the persons with physical disability. The Journal of Psychology 1996; 130: 51–58
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maly MR, Costigan PA, Olney SJ. Determinants of self efficacy for physical tasks in people with knee osteoarthritis. Arthritis and Rhematism 2006; 55: 94–101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tam SF. The effects of a computer skill training programme adopting social comparison and self-efficacy enhancement strategies on self-concept and skill outcome in trainees with physical disabilities. Disability and Rehabilitation 2000; 22: 655–664
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaughnessy MR, Macko BM, Richard F. Testing a model of post-stroke exercise behaviour. Rehabilitation Nursing 2006; 31: 15–21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolansky MA, Moore SM. Effects of cardiac rehabilitation on the recovery outcomes of older adults after coronary artery bypass surgery. Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation 2004; 24: 236–244
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hellstrom K, Lindmark B, Wahlberg B, Fugl-Meyer AR. Self-efficacy in relation to impairments and activities of daily living disability in elderly patients with stroke: A prospective investigation. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 2003; 35: 202–207
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raina P, O’Donnell M, Rosenbaum P, Brehaut J, Walter SD, Russell D, Swinton M, Zhu B, Wood E. The health and well-being of caregivers of children with cerebral palsy. Pediatrics 2005; 15: 626–636
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura A. Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs. Prentice-Hall, NJ 1986
   Google Scholar
• Chu LL. The effects of web page design instruction on computer self-efficacy of preservice teachers and correlates. Journal of Educational Computing Research 1003; 28: 127–142
   Google Scholar
• Bandura A. Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioural change. Psychological Review 1977; 84: 191–215
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brockner J. The effects of self-esteem, success-failure, and self-consciousness on task performance: Replications, extensions, and possible explanations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1979; 37: 1732–1741
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frayne CA, Latham GP. Application of social learning theory to self-management of attendance. Journal of Applied Psychology 1987; 72: 387–392
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gist ME, Schwoerer C, Rosen B. Effects of alternative training methods on self-efficacy and performance in computer software training. Journal of Applied Psychology 1989; 74: 884–891
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caplan RD, Vinokur AD, Price RH, Van Ryn M. Job-seeking, reemployment, and mental health: A randomized field experiment in coping with job loss. Journal of Applied Psychology 1989; 74: 759–769
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eden D, Aviram A. Self-efficacy training to speed reemployment: Helping people to help themselves. Journal of Applied Psychology 1993; 78: 352–360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood JV. Theory and research concerning social comparisons of personal attributes. Psychological Bulletin 1989; 106: 231–248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheibe KE. Historical perspectives in the presented self. In: Schenker BR, editor. The self and social life. McGraw-Hill, New York 1985; 33–65
   Google Scholar
• Stryker S. Symbolic interactionism. Benjamin Cummings, Menlo Park, CA 1980
   Google Scholar
• Tam SF. The effects of a computer skill training program adopting social comparison and self-efficacy enhancement strategies on self-concept and skill outcome in trainees with physical disabilities. Disability and Rehabilitation 2000; 22: 655–664
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burdea G, Popescu V, Hentz V, Colbert K. Virtual reality-based orthopedic telerehabilitation. IEEE Transactions on Rehabilitation Engineering 2000; 8: 430–432
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Burns RB, Crislip D, Daviou P, Temkin A, Vesmarovich SH, Anschutz J, et al. Using telerehabilitation to support assistive technology. Assistive Technology 1998; 10: 126–133
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimes GJ, Dubois H, Grimes SJ, Greenleaf WJ, Rothenburg S, Cunningham D. Telerehabilitation services using web-based telecommunication. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 2000; 70: 113–118
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hufford BJ, Glueckauf RL, Webb PM. Home-based, interactive videoconferencing for adolescents with epilepsy and their families. Rehabilitation Psychology 1999; 44: 176–193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palsbo SE, Bauer D. Telerehabilitation: Managed care's new opportunity. Manage Care Quarterly 2000; 8: 56–64
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ricker JH, Rosenthal M, Garay E, DeLuca J, Germain A, Abraham FK, et al. Telerehabilitation needs: A survey of persons with acquired brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 2002; 17: 242–250
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schopp LH, Johnstone BR, Merveille OC. Multidimensional telecare strategies for rural residents with brain injury. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 2000; 6: 146–149
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonassen DH, Kwon HI. Communication patterns in computer mediated versus face-to-face group problem solving. Educational Technology Research and Development 2001; 49: 35–51
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Ginther D, Zelhart P. An exploratory study of the effects of frequency and duration of messaging on impression development in computer-mediated communication. Social Science Computer Review 2002; 20: 73–80
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chidambaram L. Relational development in computer supported groups. MIS Quarterly 1996; 20: 443–470
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott DM, Fowler KL, Gibson JJ. Teaching collaborative problem solving using computer-mediated communications. Paper presented. Annual Meeting of the Association of Education and Communication Technology, New Orleans, 1993, (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No ED 354 869)
   Google Scholar
• Soong WYL, Tam SF, Man WK, Hui-Chan CWY. Evaluating the effect of an on-line computer-assisted cognitive rehabilitation program. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis. The Hong Kong Polytechnic University. 2004
   Google Scholar
• Halpern DF, Hansen C, Riefer D. Analogies as an aid to understanding and memory. Journal of Educational Psychology 1990; 82: 298–305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crump WJ, Caskey JW, Ferrell BG. Effect of a remote facilitator on small-group problem solving: Potential uses of two-way video technology in decentralized medical education. Teaching and Learning in Medicine 1998; 10: 172–177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson SD, Aragon SR, Shaik N, Palma-Rivas N. Comparative analysis of learner satisfaction and learning outcomes in online and face-to-face learning environments. Journal of Interactive Learning Research 2000; 11: 29–49
   Google Scholar
• Marttunen M, Laurinen L. Learning of argumentation skills in networked and face-to-face environments. Instructional Science 2001; 29: 127–153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ocker RJ, Yaverbaum GJ. Asynchronous computer-mediated communication versus face-to-face collaboration: Results on student learning, quality and satisfaction. Group Decision and Negotiation 1999; 8: 427–440
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van-Boxel P, Anderson K, Regnard, C. The effectiveness of palliative care education delivered by videoconferencing compared with face-to-face delivery. Palliative Medicine 2003; 17: 344–358
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abrahamson CE. Issues in interactive communication in distance education. College Student Journal 1998; 32: 33–42
   Google Scholar
• D'Zurilla TJ, Nezu AM. Problem solving therapies. In: Dobson KS, editor. Handbook of cognitive behavioral therapies. Guilford Press, New York 2001; 211–245
   Google Scholar
• Montgomery GK, Kern T, Lund D, Patterson B. Confidence and mood: Critical treatment goals for brain injury rehabilitation. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 1999; 14: 794
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark SC. Judging contingencies accurately: The effects of feedback, practice, and self-efficacy. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B:. The Sciences and Engineering 1997; 58: 2177
   Google Scholar
• Escari A, Guzman JF. Effects of feedback on self-efficacy, performance, and choice in an athletic task. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology 1999; 11: 83–96
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tam SF Man WK. Evaluating computer-assisted memory retraining programs for people with post-head injury amnesia. Brain Injury 2004; 18: 461–470
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson AA. The effects of sociocognitive writing strategy instruction on the writing achievement and writing self-efficacy of students with disabilities and typical achievement in an urban elementary school. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section A:. Humanities and Social Sciences 1998; 58: 4182
   Google Scholar
• Bandura A. Social cognitive theory. Six theories of child development: Revised formulations and current issues, R Vasta. Jessica Kingsley Publishers, London 1992; 1–60
   Google Scholar
• Daniels JA, Larson LM. The impact of performance feedback on counseling self-efficacy and counselor anxiety. Counselor Education and Supervision 2001; 41: 120–130
   Google Scholar
• Schunk DH, Gunn TP. Modeled importance of task strategies and achievement beliefs: Effects on self-efficacy and skill development. Journal of Early Adolescence 1985; 5: 247–258
   Google Scholar
• Miyake M, Matsuda F. Effects of generalized self-efficacy and negative social comparison feedback on specific self-efficacy and performance. Psychological Reports 2002; 91: 301–308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang A, Lu Q. The regulation of self-efficacy and attributional feedback on motivation. Social Behavior and Personality 2002; 30: 281–288
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bong M. Predictive utility of subject-, task-, and problem-specific self-efficacy judgments for immediate and delayed academic performances. Journal of Experimental Education 2002; 70: 133–162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman DP. Effects of computer conferencing on the language use of emotionally disturbed adolescents. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 1987; 19: 224–230
   Google Scholar