References
- Johnston M, Wilkerson D. Program evaluation and quality improvement systems in brain injury rehabilitation. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 1992; 7: 68–82
- Ylvisaker M, Hanks R, Johnson-Grene D. Perspectives on rehabilitation of individuals with cognitive impairment after brain injury: Rationale for reconsideration of theoretical paradigms. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 2002; 17: 191–209
- Bilbao A, Kennedy C, Chatterji S, Üstün B, Barquero J, Barth J. The ICF: Applications of the WHO model of functioning, disability and health to brain injury rehabilitation. NeuroRehabilitation 2003; 18: 239–250
- Leith K, Phillips L, Sample P. Exploring the service needs and experiences of persons with TBI and their families: The South Carolina experience. Brain Injury 2004; 18: 1191–1208
- Crisp R. Personal responses to traumatic brain injury: A qualitative study. Disability, Handicap, and Society 1993; 8: 393–404
- Persinger M. Personality changes following brain injury as a grief response to the loss of sense of self: Phenomenological themes as indices of local liability and neurocognitive structuring as psychotherapy. Psychological Reports 1993; 72: 1059–1068
- Vickery C, Gontkovsky S, Caroselli J. Self-concept and quality of life following acquired brain injury: A pilot investigation. Brain Injury 2005; 19: 657–665
- Moustakas C. Phenomenological research methods. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA 1994
- Quality Living. Recreating rehab 2004, Available online at: http://www.qliomaha.com/dsl/index2.html, accessed 11 January 2007
- Creswell J. Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Sage Publications, London, New DelhiThousand Oaks 1998
- Miles M, Huberman A. Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA 1984
- Creswell J, Miller D. Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory Into Practice 2000; 39: 124–130
- Boake C. Supervision rating scale: A measure of functional outcome from brain injury. Archives of Physical and Medical Rehabilitation 1996; 77: 765–772
- Schatz P, Hillary F, Moelter S, Chute DL. Retrospective assessment of rehabilitation outcome following traumatic brain injury: Development and utility of the Functional Independence Level (FIL). Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 2002; 17: 510–525
- Rappaport M, Hall KM, Hopkins K, Belleza T, Cope N. Disability Rating Scale for severe head trauma patients: Coma to community. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 1982; 63: 118–123
- Willer B, Rosenthal M, Kreutzer JS, Gordon WA, Rempel R. Assessment of community integration following rehabilitation for traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 1993; 8: 75–87
- Malec JF, Moessner AM, Kragness M, Lezak MD. Refining a measure of brain injury sequelae. The Mayo Portland Adaptability Inventory, N Bezruczko. JAM Press, Maple Grove, MN 2005, Rasch measurement in health sciences
- World Health Organization. International classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). 2001, Available online at: http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2001/9241545429.pdf, accessed 14 May 2007
- Siminski P. Patterns of disability and norms of participation through the life course: Empirical support for a social model of disability. Disability and Society 2003; 18: 707–718
- Oliver M. The individual and social models of disability. Joint Workshop of the Living Options Group and the Research Unit of the Royal College of Physicians on People with Established Locomotor Disability in Hospitals July, 1990
- Seelman K. Rehabilitation science. Technology & Disability 2000; 12: 77–83
- Jordan L. Disability paradigms and models and rehabilitation. Disabilities Studies Organization Conference held at the University of Lancaster 26–28 July, 2004