Management and outcome in patients following head injury admitted to an Irish Regional Hospital

References

• Activity in acute public hospitals in Ireland 1992–2001. Health Policy and Information Division 2006, HIPE + NPRS Unit. ESRI
   Google Scholar
• Kraus JF, Black MA, Hessol N, Ley P, Rokaw W, Sullivan C, Bowers S, Knowlton S, Marshall A. The incidence of acute brain injury and serious impairment in a defined population. American Journal of Epidemiology 1984; 119: 186–201
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masson F, Vecsey J, Salmi LR, Dartigues JF, Erny Ph, Maurette P. Disability and handicap 5 years after a head injury: A population-based study. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 1997; 50: 595–601
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornhill S, Teasdale GM, Murray GD, McEwen J, Roy CW, Penny KI. Disability in young people and adults one year after head injury: Prospective cohort study. BMJ 2000; 320: 1631–1635
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dikmen SS, Machamer JE, Winn HR, Temkin NR. Neuropsychological outcome at one year post head injury. Neuropsychology 1995; 9: 80–90
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tagliaferri F, Compagnone C, Korsic M, Servadei F, Kraus J. A systematic review of brain injury epidemiology in Europe. Acta Neurochirgica (Wien) 2006; 148: 255–268
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Census of Population: Central Statistics Office. 2006
   Google Scholar
• Baker SP, O’Neill B, Haddon W, Jr, Long WB. The Injury Severity Score: A method for describing patients with multiple injuries and evaluating emergency care. Journal of Trauma 1974; 14: 187–196
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jennett B, Bond M. Assessment of outcome after severe brain damage. A practical scale. Lancet 1975; 305: 480–484
   Google Scholar
• Wilson JTL, Pettigrew LEL, Teasdale GM. Structured interviews for the Glasgow outcome scale and extended Glasgow outcome scale: Guidelines for their use. Journal of Neurotrauma 1998; 15: 573–585
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson JTL, Pettigrew LEL, Teasdale GM. Emotional and cognitive consequences of head injury in relation to the Glasgow outcome scale. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 2000; 69: 204–209
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKinlay WW, Brooks DN. Methodological problems in assessing psychosocial recovery following severe head injury. Journal of Clinical Neuropsychology 1984; 6: 87–99, Copy available at: http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/320/7250/1631
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellawell DJ, Signorini DF, Pentland B. Reliability of the relative's questionnaire for assessment of outcome after brain injury. Disability and Rehabilitation 2000; 22: 446–450
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geijerstam JL, Oredsson S, Britton M. Medical outcome after immediate computed tomography or admission for observation in patients with mild head injury: Randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2006; 333: 465
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• O’Brien D, Phillips J. Head injuries in the Republic of Ireland: A neurosurgical audit. Irish Medical Journal 1996; 89: 216–218
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bartlett J, Kett-White R, Mendelow AD, Miller JD, Pickard J, Teasdale G. Guidelines for the initial management of head injuries. Recommendations from the Society of British Neurological Surgeons. Members of the Working Party of the Society of the British Neurological Surgeons. British Journal of Neurosurgery 1998; 12: 349–352
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haydel MJ, Preston CA, Mills TJ, Luber S, Blaudeau E, DeBlieux PMC. Indication for computed tomography in patients with minor head injury. New England Journal of Medicine 2000; 343: 100–105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norlund A, Marké LA, Geijerstam JL, Oredsson S, Britton M. Immediate computed tomography or admission for observation after mild head injury: Cost comparison in randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2006; 333: 469–471
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Miller EC, Derlet RW, Kinser D. Minor head trauma: Is computed tomography always necessary?. Annals of Emergency Medicine 1993; 22: 1148–1155
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jeret JS, Mandell M, Anziska B, et al. Clinical predictors of abnormality disclosed by computed tomography after mild head trauma. Neurosurgery 1993; 32: 9–16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadowski-Cron C, Schneider J, Senn P, Radanov B, Ballinari P, Zimmermann H. Patients with mild traumatic brain injury: Immediate and long term outcome compared to intra-cranial injuries on CT scan. Brain Injury 2006; 20: 1131–1137
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gómez PA, Lobato RD, Ortega JM, de la Cruz J. Mild head injury: Differences in prognosis among patients with a Glasgow Coma Scale score of 13 to 15 and analysis of factors associated with abnormal CT findings. British Journal of Neurosurgery 1996; 10: 453–460
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iverson GL. Complicated vs. uncomplicated mild traumatic brain injury: Acute neuropsychological outcome. Brain Injury 2006; 20: 1335–1344
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dikmen S, McLean A, Temkin N. Neuropsychological and psychosocial consequences of minor head injury. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 1986; 49: 1227–1232
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner-Stokes L, Disler PB, Nair A, Wade DT. Multi-disciplinary rehabilitation for acquired brain injury in adults of working age. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2005, Issue 3, Art. No.: CD004170
   Google Scholar
• Wade DT, King NS, Wenden FJ, Crawford S, Caldwell FE. Routine follow up after head injury: A second randomised control trial. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 1998; 65: 177–183
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar