Assessment of neurobehavioural disability: A review of existing measures and recommendations for a comprehensive assessment tool

References

• Oddy M, Coughlan T, Tyerman A, Jenkins D. Social adjustment after closed head injury: A further follow-up seven years after injury. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry 1985; 48: 564–568
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cicerone KD, Tanenbaum LN. Disturbance of social cognition after traumatic orbitofrontal brain injury. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 1997; 12: 173–188
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald S, Flanagan SM, Rollins JB, Kinch JM. TASIT: A new clinical tool for assessing social perception after traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 2003; 18: 219–238
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood R Ll, Williams C. Neuropsychological correlates of organic alexithymia. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 2007; 13: 471–479
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald S, Flanagan S, Martin I, Saunders C. The ecological validity of the TASIT: A test of social perception. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 2004; 14: 285–302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald S, Saunders JC. Differential impairment in recognition of emotion across different media in people with severe traumatic brain injury. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 2005; 11: 392–399
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood R Ll, Williams C. Inability to empathize following traumatic brain injury. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 2008; 14: 289–296
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starkstein SE, Robinson RG. Mechanisms of disinhibition after brain lesions. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 1997; 185: 108–114
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart JL, Tannock R. Inhibitory control differences following mild head injury. Brain and Cognition 1999; 41: 411–416
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McKinlay WW, Brooks DN, Bond MR, Martinage DP, Marshall MM. The short-term outcome of severe blunt head injury as reported by relatives of the injured person. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 1981; 44: 527–533
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prigatano GP. Personality disturbances associated with traumatic brain injury. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1992; 3: 360–368
   Google Scholar
• Mateer CA. The rehabilitation of executive disorders. Cognitive neurorehabilitation, DT Stuss, G Wincour, IH Robertson. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1999; 314–332
   Google Scholar
• Brewer TL, Metzger BL, Therrien B. Trajectories of cognitive recovery following a minor brain injury. Research in Nursing and Health 2002; 25: 269–281
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eslinger PJ, Grattan LM, Geder L. Impact of frontal lobe lesions on rehabilitation and recovery from acute brain injury. Neurorehabilitation 1995; 5: 161–185
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greve KW, Love J, Sherwin E, Stanford MS, Mathias C, Houston R. Cognitive strategy usage in long term survivors of severe traumatic brain injury with persisting impulsive aggression. Personality and Individual Differences 2002; 32: 639–647
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood RL, Liossi L. Neuropsychological and neurobehavioural correlates of aggression following traumatic brain injury. Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences 2006; 18: 333–341
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eames P, Wood RLl. Episodic disorders of behaviour and affect after acquired brain injury. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 2003; 13: 241–258
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood RL. Behaviour disorders following severe brain injury: Their presentation and psychological management. Closed head injury. Psychological, social, and family consequences, N Brooks. Oxford University Press, Oxford 1984; 195–219
   Google Scholar
• Prigatano GP. Higher cerebral deficits; history of methods of assessment and approaches to rehabilitation. BNI Quarterly 1986; 3: 15–26
   Google Scholar
• Wood R Ll, Yurdakul LK. Change in relationship status following traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury 1997; 11: 491–501
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weddell R, Oddy M, Jenkins D. Social adjustment after rehabilitation: A two year follow-up of patients with severe head injury. Psychological Medicine 1980; 10: 257–263
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood RL. Understanding neurobehavioral disability. Neurobehavioral disability and social handicap after head injury, RL Wood, T McMillan. Psychology Press, Taylor & Francis, HoveUK 2001
   Google Scholar
• Wood RL. Brain injury rehabilitation: A neurobehavioral approach. Croom Helm, London 1987
   Google Scholar
• Wood RL. Neurobehavioral sequelae of traumatic brain injury. Taylor & Francis, New York 1990
   Google Scholar
• Kreutzer JS, Marwitz JH, Seel R, Devany C. Validation of a neurobehavioural functioning inventory for adults with traumatic brain injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1996; 77: 116–124
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson LD, Drebing C, Satz P, Uchiyama C. Personality change in head trauma: A validity study of the Neuropsychology Behaviour and Affect Profile. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 1998; 13: 549–560
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satz P, Holsten SG, Uchiyama CL, Shimahara G, Mitrushina MM, Forney DL, Zaucha K, et al. Development and evaluation of validity scales for the neuropsychology behaviour and affect profile: A dissembling study. Psychological Assessment 1996; 8: 115–124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolitz BP, Vanderploeg RD, Curtiss G. Development of the key behaviours change inventory: A traumatic brain injury behavioural outcome assessment instrument. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2003; 84: 277–284
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson LD, Satz P, Mitushina M, Van Gorp W, Cicchetti D, Lewis R, Van Lacker D. Development and validation of the neuropsychology behaviour and affect profile. Psychological Assessment 1989; 1: 266–272
   Google Scholar
• Tateno A, Jage RE, Robinson RG. Clinical correlates of aggressive behaviour after traumatic brain injury. The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences 2003; 15: 155–160
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baguley IJ, Cooper J, Felmingham KL. Aggressive behaviour following traumatic brain injury: How common is common?. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 2006; 21: 45–57
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alderman N, Knight C, Henman C. Aggressive behaviours observed within a neurobehavioural rehabilitation service: Utility of the OAS-MNR in clinical audit and applied research. Brain Injury 2002; 16: 469–489
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alderman N. Prevalence, characteristics and causes of aggressive behaviour observed within a neurobehavioural rehabilitation service: Predictors and implications for management. Brain Injury 2007; 21: 891–911
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alfano DP, Alan M, Finlayson J, Stearns GM, Neilson PM. The MMPI and neurologic dysfunction: Profile configuration and analysis. The Clinical Neuropsychologist 1990; 4: 69–79
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gass CS. MMPI-2 interpretation and closed-head-trauma: A correction factor. Psychological Assessment 1991; 3: 27–31
   Google Scholar
• Levin HS, High WM, Goethe KE, Sisson RA, Overall JE, Rhoades HM, Eisenberg HM, Kalisky Z, Gary HE. The neurobehavioural rating scale: Assessment of the behavioural sequelae of head injury by the clinician. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry 1987; 50: 183–193
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malloy P, Grace J. A review of rating scales for measuring behaviour change due to frontal systems damage. Cognitive and Behavioural Neurology 2005; 18: 18–27
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Overall JE, Gorham DR. The brief psychiatric rating scale. Psychological Reports 1962; 10: 799–812
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin HS, Mazaux J-M, Vanier M, et al. Evaluation des troubles neurophysiologiques et comportementaux des traumatises craniens per le clinicien: Proposition d’une echelle neurocomportementale et premiers resultas de sa version francaise. Annales de Readaption et de Medicine Physique 1990; 33: 35–40
   Google Scholar
• Vanier M, Mazaux J-M, Lambert J, Dassa C, Levin HS. Assessment of neuropsychologic impairments after head injury: Interrater reliability and factorial and criterion validity of the Neurobehavioural Rating Scale-Revised. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2000; 81: 796–806
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreutzer JS, Leininger BE, Doherty K, Waaland PK. General Health and History Questionnaire. Medical College of Virginia, Rehabilitation Research and Training Center on Severe Brain Injury, Richmond, VA 1987
   Google Scholar
• Kreutzer JS, Devany CW. Towards a composite scoring solution for the neurobehavioural functioning inventory. Quality of Life Research 1999; 8: 17–24, (Unpublished). Cited in: Weinfurt KP, Willke R, Glick HA, Schulman KA
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Weinfurt KP, Willke R, Glick HA, Schulman KA. Towards a composite scoring solution for the neurobehavioural functioning inventory. Quality of Life Research 1999; 8: 17–24
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godfrey HPD, Partridge FM, Knight RG. Course of insight disorder and emotional dysfunction following closed head injury: A controlled cross-sectional follow up study. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 1993; 15: 503–515
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruff RM, Hibbard KM. Ruff Neurobehavioural Inventory (RNBI) professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources, Lutz, FL 2003
   Google Scholar
• Barrett PT, Kline P. The observation to variable ratio in factor analysis. Personality Study and Group Behavior 1981; 1: 23–33
   Google Scholar
• MacCallum RC, Widaman KF, Zhang S, Hong S. Sample size in factor analysis. Psychological Methods 1999; 4: 84–99
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne JW, Costello AB. Sample size and subject to item ratio in principal components analysis. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 9(11), Available online at: http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=9&n=11, accessed 15 March 2008
   Google Scholar
• Corrigan JD, Dickerson J, Fisher E, Meyer P. The Neurobehavioural Rating Scale: Replication in an acute, inpatient rehabilitation setting. Brain Injury 1990; 4: 215–222
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McCauley SR, Levin HS, Vanier M, Mazaux J-M, Boake C, Golfader PR, Rockers D, Butters M, Kareken DA, Lambert J, et al. The neurobehavioural rating scale-revised: Sensitivity and validity in closed head injury assessment. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry 2001; 71: 643–651
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seel RT, Kreutzer JS, Sander AM. Concordance of patients’ and family members ratings of neurobehavioural functioning after traumatic brain injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1997; 78: 1254–1259
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson LD, Mitushina M, Satz P, Sowa M, Cohen S. Cross-validation of the neuropsychology behaviour and affect profile in stroke patients. Psychological Assessment 1993; 5: 374–376
   Google Scholar
• Nunnally JC. Psychometric theory2nd. McGraw-Hill, New York 1978
   Google Scholar
• Howell DC. Statistical methods for psychology4th. Duxbury Press, Belmont, CA 1997
   Google Scholar
• Wood R Ll. Long-term outcome of serious traumatic brain injury. European Journal of Anaesthesiology 2008; 25: 115–122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomsen IV. Late outcome of very severe blunt head trauma: A 10–15 year second follow-up. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 1984; 47: 260–268
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks DN, McKinlay W. Personality and behavioural change after severe blunt head injury—a relatives view. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 1983; 46: 336–344
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. International classification of impairments, disabilities and handicaps. WHO, Geneva 1980
   Google Scholar
• Greenwood R. The consequences of brain injury: Classification and assessment of outcome. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 1999; 9: 231–240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade DT. Social context as a focus for rehabilitation. Clinical Rehabilitation 2001; 15: 459–461
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade DT. Cognitive assessment and neurological rehabilitation. Clinical Rehabilitation 2002; 16: 117–118
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wade DT. Applying the WHO framework to the rehabilitation of patients with cognitive deficits. Effectiveness of rehabilitation for cognitive deficits, PW Halligan, DT Wade. Oxford University Press, Oxford 2005
   Google Scholar
• Wade DT, Halligan P. New wine in old bottles; the WHO ICF as an explanatory model of human behaviour. Clinical Rehabilitation 2003; 17: 349–354
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood RL, Worthington AD. Neurobehavioural rehabilitation in practice. Neurobehavioral disability and social handicap after head injury, RL Wood, T McMillan. Psychology Press, Taylor & Francis, HoveUK 2001
   Google Scholar
• Alderman N, Knight C, Morgan C. Use of a modified version of the Overt Aggression Scale in the measurement and assessment of aggressive behaviours following brain injury. Brain Injury 1997; 11: 503–523
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight C, Alderman N, Johnson C, Green S, Birkett-Swan L, Yorston G. The St Andrew's Sexual Behaviour assessment (SASBA): Development of a standardised recording instrument for the measurement and assessment of challenging sexual behaviour in people with progressive and acquired neurological impairment. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 2008; 18: 129–159
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ezrachi O, Ben-Yishay Y, Kay T, Diller L, Rattock J. Predicting employment in traumatic brain injury following neuropsychological rehabilitation. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 1991; 6: 71–84
   Google Scholar
• Hillier SL, Metzer J. Awareness and perceptions of outcomes after traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury 1997; 11: 525–536
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Port A, Willmott C, Charlton J. Self-awareness following traumatic brain injury and implications for rehabilitation. Brain Injury 2002; 16: 277–289
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prigatano GP, Fordyce DJ. Cognitive dysfunction and psychosocial adjustment after brain injury. Neuropsychological rehabilitation after brain injury, GP Prigatano, DJ Fordyce, HK Zeiner, JR Roueche, M Pepping, BC Wood. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD 1998; 1–17
   Google Scholar
• Sbordone RJ, Seyranian R, Ruff RM. Are the subjective complaints of traumatically brain injured patients reliable?. Brain Injury 1998; 11: 505–515
   Google Scholar
• Cooper-Evans S, Alderman N, Knight C, Oddy M. Self-esteem and self-concept as predictors of mood and behaviour during rehabilitation following severe brain injury: An exploratory study. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 2008; 18: 607–626
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar