The effect of sampling bias on generalizability in intervention trials after brain injury

References

• Baddeley AMT, Newcombe F. Design problems in research on rehabilitation after brain damage. International Rehabilitation Medicine 1980;2:138–142.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carney N, Chesnut RM, Maynard H, Mann NC, Patterson P, Helfand M. Effect of cognitive rehabilitation on outcomes for persons with traumatic brain injury: a systematic review. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 1999;14:277–307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cicerone K, Dahlberg C, Kalmar K, Langenbahn D, Malec J, Bergquist T, Felicetti T, Giacino J, Preston Harley J, Harrington D, et al. Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation: recommendations for clinical practice. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 2000;81:1596–1615.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boutron I, Moher D, Altman D, Schulz K, Ravaud P. Extending the CONSORT statement to randomized trials of nonpharmacologic treatment: explanation and elaboration. Annals of Internal Medicine 2008;148:295–309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulz K, Altman D, Moher D. CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials. Annals of Internal Medicine 2010;152:726–732.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luoto TM, Tenovuo O, Kataja A, Brander A, Ohman J, Iverson GL. Who gets recruited in mild traumatic brain injury research? Journal of Neurotrauma 2013;30:11–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slieker FJA KE, Murray GD, Öhman J, Stocchetti N, Teasdale G, Maas AIR. Importance of screening logs in clinical trials for severe traumatic brain injury Neurosurgery 2008;62:1321–1329.
   Google Scholar
• Bartfai A, Markovic G, Sargenius Landahl K, Schult M. The protocol and design of a randomised controlled study on training of attention within the first year after acquired brain injury. BMC Neurology 2014;14:102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahoney FB, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index. Maryland State Medical Journal 1965;14:61–65.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lezak M, Howieson DB, Bigler ED. Neuropsychological assessment. New York: Oxford University Press; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson B, Cockburn J, Baddeley A. The Rivermead Behavioural Memory Test. Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk, Stockholm: Thames Valley Test Company; Swedish Version: Psykologiförlaget AB; 1991, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 1983;67:361–370.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sohlberg MM, Mateer CA. Effectiveness of an attention-training program. Journal of Clinical & Experimental Neuropsychology 1987;9:117–130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll LJ, Cassidy D, Holm L, Kraus J, Coronado VG; WHO Collaborating Centre Task Force on Mild Traumatic Brain Injury. Methodological issues and research recommendations for mild traumatic brain injury: the WHO Collaborating Centre Task Force on Mild Traumatic Brain Injury. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 2004;43(Suppl):113–125.
   Google Scholar
• Menon DK SK, Wright DW, Maas AI. Demographics and Clinical Assessment Working Group of the International and Interagency Initiative toward Common Data Elements for research on traumatic brain injury and psychological health. Position statement: definition of traumatic brain injury. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 2010;91:1637–1640.
   Google Scholar
• Kristman VL, Borg J, Godbolt AK, Salmi LR, Cancelliere C, Carroll LJ, Holm LW, Nygren-de Boussard C, Hartvigsen J, Abara U, Donovan J, Cassidy JD. Methodological issues and research recommendations for prognosis after mild traumatic brain injury: results of the International Collaboration on Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Prognosis. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 2014;95(Suppl 3):S265–277.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cicerone KD, Langenbahn DM, Braden C, Malec JF, Kalmar K, Fraas M, Felicetti T, Laatsch L, Harley JP, Bergquist T, et al. Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation: updated review of the literature from 2003 through 2008. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 2011;92:519–530.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lustig C, Shah P, Seidler R, Reuter-Lorenz PA. Aging, Training, and the brain: a review and future directions. Neuropsychological Review 2009;19:504–522.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theill N, Schumacher V, Adelsberger R, Martin M, Jäncke L. Effects of simultaneously performed cognitive and physical training in older adult. BMC Neuroscience 2013;14:103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer JF, Murray LL. Measuring working memory deficits in aphasia. Journal of Communication Disorders 2012;45:325–339.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray LL, Keeton RJ, Karcher L. Treating attention in mild aphasia: evaluation of attention process training-II. Journal of Communication Disorders 2006;39:37–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hicks R, Giacino J, Harrison-Felix C, Manley G, Valadka A, Wilde EA Progress in developing common data elements for traumatic brain injury research: version two–the end of the beginning. Neurotrauma 2013;30:1852–1861.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helm-Estabrooks N. Cognition and aphasia: a discussion and a study. Journal of Communication Disorders 2002;35:171–186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gialanella B, Mattioli F, Rocchi S, FerlucciI C. Verbal intelligence in Neglect: the role of anosognosia for hemiplegia. European Journal of Physical & Rehabilitation Medicine 2009;45:363–368.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ponsford J, Cameron P, Fitzgerald M, Grant M, Mikocka-Walus A, Schonberger M. Predictors of postconcussive symptoms 3 months after mild traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychology 2012;26:304–313.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spencer-Smith M, Klingberg T. Benefits of a Working Memory Training Program for inattention in daily life: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 2015;10:1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohling ML, Faust ME, Beverly B, Demakis G. Effectiveness of cognitive rehabilitation following acquired brain injury: a meta-analytic re-examination of Cicerone et al. (2000, 2005) systematic reviews. Neuropsychology 2009;23:20–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuhauser D, Provost L, Bergman B. The meaning of variation to healthcare managers, clinical and health-services researchers, and individual patients. BMJ Quality & Safety 2011(Suppl 1):36–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roozenbeek B, Lingsma HF, Maas AI. New considerations in the design of clinical trials for traumatic brain injury. Clinical Investigation 2012;2:153–162.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Roozenbeek B, Maas AJ, Lingsma HF, Butcher I, Lu J, Marmarou A, McHugh GS, Weir J, Murray GD, Steyerberg EW for the IMPACT study group. Baseline characteristics and statistical power in randomized controlled trials: Selection, prognostic targeting, or covariate adjustment? Critical Care Medicine 2009;37:2683–2690.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blaha RZ, Arnett ABArnett AB, Kirkwood MW, Taylor HG, Stancin T, Brown TM, Wade SL. Factors influencing attrition in a multisite, ramdomized, clinical trial following traumatic brain injury in adolescence. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 2015; 5(3)(May/June 2015):E33–E40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ojha RP OC, Ness KK, Lanctot JQ, Srivastava DK, Robison LL, Hudson MM, Gurney JG. Assessment of potential bias from non-participation in a dynamic clinical cohort of long-term childhood cancer survivors: results from the St. Jude lifetime cohort study. Pediatric Blood & Cancer 2013;60:856–864.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGullagh S, Feinstein A. Outcome after mild traumatic brain injury: an examination of recruitment bias. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry 2003;74:39–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maas AI, Steyerberg EW, Marmarou A, McHugh GS, Lingsma HF, Butcher I, Lu J, Weir J, Roozenbeek, B Murray GD. IMPACT recommendations for improving the design and analysis of clinical trials in moderate to severe traumatic brain injury. Neurotherapeutics: The Journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics 2010;7:127–134.
   Google Scholar