The consequence of spatial visual processing dysfunction caused by traumatic brain injury (TBI)

References

• National Center of Health Statistics. United States. Public Health Service Hyattasville. [Cited 2001] Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs.
   Google Scholar
• Scott P, Barsan WG. Stroke, transient ischemic attack, and other central focal conditions. In: Tintinalli JE, Kelen, GD, Stapczynsky JS, editors. Emergency medicene: A comprehensive study guide. 5th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Companies; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Center of Disease Control and Protection (CDC). National Center for Injury Prevention and Control. Report to congress on mild traumatic brain injury in the United States: steps to prevent a serious public health problem Atlanta 2003 [ cited 2003] Available from: http://www.cdc.gov.
   Google Scholar
• Langlois JA, Rutland-Brown W, Wald MM. The epidemiology and impact of traumatic brain injury: a brief overview. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2006;21(5):375–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell JW, Barber-Foss KD. Traumatic brain injury in high school athletes. JAMA. 1999;282(10):958–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AOA supports efforts on Capitol Hill highlighting combat-related eye trauma. Am Optometric Assoc News. 2007;46(4):1.
   Google Scholar
• Defense and Veteran Brain Injury Center. Washington, DC Walter Reed Army Medical Center. 2015 [cited 2007] Available from: http://dvbic.org.
   Google Scholar
• Clark G, editor Incidence of neurological vision impairment in patients who suffer from an acquired brain injury. International Congress Series; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Goodrich GL, Kirby J, Cockerham G, Ingalla SP, Lew HL. Visual function in patients of a polytrauma rehabilitation center: A descriptive study. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2007;44(7):929–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Padula W. Neuro-visual processing rehabilitation: An intergrated model of service. Santa Ana, CA: Optometric Extension Program Foundation Press; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Padula WV, Argyris S, Ray J. Visual evoked potentials (VEP) evaluating treatment for post-trauma vision syndrome (PTVS) in patients with traumatic brain injuries (TBI). Brain Inj. 1994;8(2):125–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posner M, Rafal R. Cognitive Theories of attention and the rehabiliation of attentional defects. In: MJ Meier DL, Benton AC, editors. Neurophysiological rehabilitation. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Padula W, Singman E, Magrum M, Munitz R. Evaluating and Treating Visual Dysfunction. In:Zasler N, Katz D, Zafonte R, editors. Brain injury medicine. New York: Demos Medical Publishing; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Hellerstein LF, Fishman B. Vision therapy and occupational therapy, an integrated approach. J Behav Optom. 1990;1:122–6.
   Google Scholar
• Hart C, editor Disturbances of fusion following head injury. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine, London; 1964.
   Google Scholar
• Carrol R. Acute loss of fusional convergence following head trauma. Arch Ophthalmol. 1984;88:57–9.
   Google Scholar
• Stanworth A. Defects of ocular movement and fusion after head injury. Br J Ophthalmol. 1974;58(3):266–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Padula WV, Nelson CA, Padula WV, Benabib R, Yilmaz T, Krevisky S. Modifying postural adaptation following a CVA through prismatic shift of visuo-spatial egocenter. Brain Inj. 2009;23(6):566–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Padula WV, Subramanian P, Spurling A, Jenness J. Risk of fall (RoF) intervention by affecting visual egocenter through gait analysis and yoked prisms. NeuroRehabilitation. 2015;37(2):305–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gesell A, Ilg F, Bullis F. It’s Development in infant and child. Santa Fe, CA: Optometric Extension Program Publishers; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Ogle KN. Research in binocular vision. Philadelphia (PA): Saunders; 1950.
   Google Scholar
• Ciuffreda KJ, Kapoor N, Rutner D, Suchoff IB, Han ME, Craig S. Occurrence of oculomotor dysfunctions in acquired brain injury: a retrospective analysis. Optometry. 2007;78(4):155–61.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ciuffreda KJ, Rutner D, Kapoor N, Suchoff IB, Craig S, Han ME. Vision therapy for oculomotor dysfunctions in acquired brain injury: a retrospective analysis. Optometry. 2008;79(1):18–22.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kapoor N, Ciuffreda KJ. Vision problem. In: Silver JM, Mcallister TW, Yudofsky SC, editors. Textbook of traumatic brain injury. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Lew HL, Poole JH, Vanderploeg RD, Goodrich GL, Dekelboum S, Guillory SB, Sigford B, Cifu DX. Program development and defining characteristics of returning military in a VA Polytrauma Network Site. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2007;44(7):1027–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daum KM. Predicting results in the orthoptic treatment of accommodative dysfunction. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1984;61(3):184–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cooper J, Feldman J, Selenow A, Fair R, Buccerio F, MacDonald D, Levy M. Reduction of asthenopia after accommodative facility training. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1987;64(6):430–6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cooper J, Selenow A, Ciuffreda KJ, Feldman J, Faverty J, Hokoda SC, Silver J. Reduction of asthenopia in patients with convergence insufficiency after fusional vergence training. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1983;60(12):982–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baker RS, Epstein AD. Ocular motor abnormalities from head trauma. Surv Ophthalmol. 1991;35(4):245–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suchoff IB, Gianutsos R. Rehabilitative optometric interventions for the acquired brain injury adult. In: Grabois M, Garrison SJ, Hart KA, editors. Physical medicine and rehabilitation: The complete approach. New York (NY): Blackwell Scientific; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Kafaligonul H, Breitmeyer BG, Ogmen H. Feedforward and feedback processes in vision. Front Psychol. 2015;6:279.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuiffreda K. Accommodation, the pupil, and presbyopia. In: Benjamin WJ, editor. Borish’s clinical refraction. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Ciuffreda KJ, Yadav NK, Ludlam DP. Effect of binasal occlusion (BNO) on the visual-evoked potential (VEP) in mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). Brain Inj. 2013;27(1):41–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarno S, Erasmus LP, Lippert G, Frey M, Lipp B, Schlaegel W. Electrophysiological correlates of visual impairments after traumatic brain injury. Vision Res. 2000;40(21):3029–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett BP, Singman EL. Vision concerns after mild traumatic brain injury. Curr Treat Options Neurol. 2015;17(2):329.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liebowitz HW, Post RB, editor. The two modes of processing concept and some implications. Mahwah, NH: Erlbaum; 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Trevarthen C, Sperry RW. Perceptual unity of the ambient visual field in human commissurotomy patients. Brain. 1973;96(3):547–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borish I. Paralytic strabismus. Clinical refraction. Chicago (IL): The Professional Press, Inc; 2006. p. 1253–82.
   Google Scholar
• Padula W, Wu L, Vicci V, Thomas J, Nelson CA, Gottlieb D, Suter P, Politzer T, Benabib R. Evaluating and treating visual dysfunction. In: Zasler N, Katz D, Zafonte RD, editor. Brain injury medicine. New York: Demos Medical Publishing; 2007. p. 511–28.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson. C. Improving movement and postural control in children with neuromotor dysfunction. Clinician’s View. 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll RP, Seaber JH. Acute loss of fusional convergence following head trauma. Am Orthopt J. 1974;24:57–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Liebowitz H, Post R. The two modes of processing concept and some implications.. Mahwah, HH: Erlbaum; 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Trevarthen CB. Two mechanisms of vision in primates. Psychol Forsch. 1968;31(4):299–348.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lamme VA, Roelfsema PR. The distinct modes of vision offered by feedforward and recurrent processing. Trends Neurosci. 2000;23(11):571–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamme VA, Super H, Spekreijse H. Feedforward, horizontal, and feedback processing in the visual cortex. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1998;8(4):529–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nashold BS, Jr., Seaber JH. Defects of ocular motility after stereotactic midbrain lesions in man. Arch Ophthalmol. 1972;88(3):245–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hart C. Disturbances of fusion following head injury. Paper presented at: Proceeding of the Royal Society of Medicine. 1964. London.
   Google Scholar
• Moore J. Brain Atlas and Functinoal Systems.. Rockville, MD: American Occupational Therapy Association; 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Benabib R, Nelson C. Efficiency in visual skills and postural control: A dynamic interaction. Occup Ther Pract. 1993;3:57–6.
   Google Scholar
• Ketchum C, Natalia V, Dounskaia N. The Role of Vision in the Control of Continuous Multijoint Movements. J Mot Behav. 2006;38(1):29–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casagrande VA. A third parallel visual pathway to primate area V1. Trends Neurosci. 1994;17(7):305–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morand S, Thut G, de Peralta RG, Clarke S, Khateb A, Landis T, Michel CM. Electrophysiological evidence for fast visual processing through the human koniocellular pathway when stimuli move. Cereb Cortex. 2000;10(8):817–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roll R, Velay JL, Roll JP. Eye and neck proprioceptive messages contribute to the spatial coding of retinal input in visually oriented activities. Exp Brain Res. 1991;85(2):423–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulsen L. Neurobiology and treatment of traumatic disassociation. New York, NY: Springer Pub Co; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Previc FH, Beer J, Liotti M, Blakemore C, Fox P. Is “ambient vision” distributed in the brain? Effects of wide-field-view visual yaw motion on PET activation. J Vestib Res. 2000;10(4–5):221–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng K, Fujita H, Kanno I, Miura S, Tanaka K. Human cortical regions activated by wide-field visual motion: an H2(15)O PET study. J Neurophysiol. 1995;74(1):413–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barkhoudarian G, Hovda DA, Giza CC. The molecular pathophysiology of concussive brain injury. Clin Sports Med. 2011;30(1):33–48, vii–iii.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suchoff I, Gianutsos R. Rehabilitative optometric interventions for the acquired brain injury adult. New York, NY: Blackwell Scientific; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Posner M, Raichel M. Images of the mind. New York, NY: Scientific American. New York Library; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Shunk D. Learning theories an educational perspective, 6th ed. Boston, MA: Pearson; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Hommel B. Towar an action comcept model of stimulus-response learning. Theretical issues of stimulus response compatibility. North Holland: Elsevier; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Held R. Dissociation of visual functions by deprivation and rearrangement. Psychol Forsch. 1968;31:338–48.
   Google Scholar
• Holland PC. Cognitive versus stimulus-response theories of learning. Learn Behav. 2008;36(3):227–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackay DM. A mind’s eye view of the brain. Prog Brain Res. 1965;17:321–32.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nelson C. Improving movement and postural control in children with neuromotor dysfunction. Clinician’s View. 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Bach-y-Rita P. Brain mechanisms in sensory substitution. New York (NY): American Press; 1972.
   Google Scholar
• Grandin T. Thinking in pictures: My life with autism. New York, NY: Random House; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Padula WV, Argyris S. Post trauma vision syndrome and visual midline shift syndrome. J Neuro Rehab. 1996;6:165–71.
   Google Scholar
• Bobath B. Abnormal postural reflex activity caused by brain lesions. London: Westworth; 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Nudo R. Neuroscientific bases for occupational and physical therapy interventions. In: Zasler ND, Katz DI, Zafonte RD, editors. Brain injury medicine: Principles and practice. New York, NY: Demos Publisher; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Streff J. Optical effects of plano prism with curved surfaces. J Am Optom Assoc. 1972;44:717–21.
   Google Scholar
• Streff JW. Visual rehabilitation of hemianoptic head trauma patients emphasizing ambient pathways. NeuroRehabilitation. 1996;6(3):173–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I Suchoff KC, N Kapoor. Visual and vestibular consequences of acquired brain injury. Santa Ana, CA: Optometric Extension Publishers; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Perennou D. Postural disorders and spatial neglect in stroke patients: a strong association. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2006;24(4–6):319–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottlieb DD, Fuhr A, Hatch WV, Wright KD. Neuro-optometric facilitation of vision recovery after acquired brain injury. NeuroRehabilitation. 1998;11(3):175–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberson L, Lamb M, Knight R. Effects of lesions of temporal-parietal junction on perceptual and attentional processing in humans. J Neurosci. 1988;10:3757–69.
   Google Scholar
• Kerkhoff G, Rossetti Y. Plasticity in spatial neglect: recovery and rehabilitation. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2006;24(4–6):201–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossetti Y, Rode G, Pisella L, Farne A, Li L, Boisson D, Perenin MT. Prism adaptation to a rightward optical deviation rehabilitates left hemispatial neglect. Nature. 1998;395(6698):166–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar