A single error is one too many: Examining alternative cutoffs on Trial 2 of the TOMM

References

• Bigler ED. Neuroimaging as a biomarker in symptom validity and performance validity testing. Brain Imag Behav. 2015;9:421–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bush SS, Heilbronner RL, Ruff, RM. Psychological assessment of symptom and performance validity, response bias, and malingering: Official position of the Association for Scientific Advancement in Psychological Injury and Law. Psychol Inj Law. 2014;7:197–205.
   Google Scholar
• Chafetz MD, Williams MA, Ben-Porath YS, Bianchini KJ, Boone KB, Kirkwood MW, Larrabee GJ, Ord JS. Official position of the American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology Social Security Administration policy on validity testing: Guidance and recommendations for change. Clin Neuropsychol. 2015;29:723–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heilbronner RL, Sweet JJ, Morgan JE, Larrabee GJ, Millis SR, Conference Participants. American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology consensus conference statement on the neuropsychological assessment of effort, response bias, and malingering. Clin Neuropsychol. 2009;23:1093–129.
   Google Scholar
• Armistead-Jehle P, Green P, Gervais RO, Hungerford LD. An examination of the Word Memory Test as a measure of memory. Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2015;22:415–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iverson GL, Binder LM. Detecting exaggeration and malingering in neuropsychological assessment. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2000;15:829–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miele AS, Gunner JH, Lynch JK, McCaffrey RJ. Are embedded validity indices equivalent to free-standing symptom validity tests? Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2012;27:10–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweet JJ, Nelson NW. Validity indicators within executive function measures: Use and limits in detection of malingering. In Boone KB, editor. Assessment of feigned cognitive impairment: A neuropsychological perspective. New York, NY: The Guilford Press; 2007. p. 152–77.
   Google Scholar
• Tombaugh TN. Test of Memory Malingering TOMM. New York, NY: Multi-Health Systems; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Armistead-Jehle P, Gervais RO. Sensitivity of the Test of Memory Malingering and the Nonverbal Medical Symptom Validity Test: A replication study. Appl Neuropsychol. 2011;18:284–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan A. The impact of cognitive and psychiatric impairment of psychotic disorders on the Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM). Assessment. 2005;12:123–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green P. Comparison between the Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM) and the Nonverbal Medical Symptom Validity Test (NV-MSVT) in adults with disability claims. Appl Neuropsychol. 2011;18:18–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greiffenstein MF, Greve KW, Bianchini KJ, Baker WJ. Test of Memory Malingering and Word Memory Test: A new comparison of failure concordance rates. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2008;23:801–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulas JF, Axelrod BN, Rinaldi AR. Cross-validation of supplemental Test of Memory Malingering scores as performance validity measures. Psychol Inj Law. 2014;7:236–44.
   Google Scholar
• Teichner G, Wagner MT. The Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM): Normative data from cognitively intact, cognitively impaired, and elderly patients with dementia. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2004;19:455–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green P. Green’s word memory test user’s manual. Edmonton, Canada: Green’s Publishing; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Green P. Green’s non-verbal medical symptom validity test user’s manual. Edmonton, Canada: Green’s Publishing; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Green P. Green’s medical symptom validity test user’s manual. Edmonton, Canada: Green’s Publishing; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Slick DJ, Sherman EMS, Iverson GL. Diagnostic criteria for malingered neurocognitive dysfunction: Proposed standards for clinical practice and research. Clin Neuropsychol. 1999;13:545–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greve KW, Bianchini KJ, Doane BM. Classification accuracy of the Test of Memory Malingering in traumatic brain injury: Results of a known-groups analysis. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2006;28:1176–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greve KW, Etherton JL, Ord J, Bianchini KJ, Curtis KL. Detecting malingered pain-related disability: Classification accuracy of the Test of Memory Malingering. Clin Neuropsychol. 2009;23:1250–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith K, Boone K, Victor T, Miora D, Cottingham M, Ziegler E, Zeller M, Wright M. Comparison of credible patients of very low intelligence and non-credible patients on neurocognitive performance validity indicators. Clin Neuropsychol. 2014;28:1048–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Love CM, Glassmire DM, Zanolini SJ, Wolf A. Specificity and false positive rates of the Test of Memory Malingering, Rey 15-Item Test, and Rey Word Recognition Test among forensic inpatients with intellectual disabilities. Assessment. 2014;21:618–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boone K. Clinical practice of forensic neuropsychology. Guilford: New York; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Greve, KW, Bianchini KJ, Black FW, Heinly MT, Love JM, Swift DA, Ciota M. Classification accuracy of the Test of Memory Malingering in persons reporting exposure to environmental and industrial toxins: Results of a known-groups analysis. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2006;21:439–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroeder RW, Buddin Jr WH, Hargrave DD, VonDran EJ, Campbell EB, Brockman CJ, Heinrichs RJ, Baade LE. Efficacy of Test of Memory Malingering Trial 1, Trial 2, the Retention Trial, and the Albany Consistency Index in a criterion group forensic neuropsychology sample. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2013;28:21–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slick D, Hopp G, Strauss E, Thompson GB. VSVT: Victoria Symptom Validity Test (Version 1.0). Odessa, Florida: Psychological Assessment Resources; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Jones A. Test of Memory Malingering: Cutoff scores for psychometrically defined malingering groups in a military sample. Clin Neuropsychol. 2013;27:1043–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bigler ED. Effort, symptom validity testing, performance validity testing and traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 28:1623–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdodi LA, Roth RM, Kirsch NL, Lajiness-O’Neill R, Medoff B. Aggregating validity indicators embedded in Conners’ CPT-II outperforms individual cutoffs at separating valid from invalid performance in adults with traumatic brain injury. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2014;29:456–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdodi LA, Tyson BT, Abeare CA, Lichtenstein JD, Pelletier CL, Rai JK, Roth RM. The BDAE Complex Ideational Material – A measure of receptive language or performance validity? Psychol Inj Law. 2016;9:112–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartman DE. The unexamined lie is a lie worth fibbing: Neuropsychological malingering and the Word Memory Test. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2002;17:709–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gervais RO, Rohling ML, Green P, Ford W. A comparison of WMT, CARB, and TOMM failure rates in non-head injury disability claimants. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2004;19:475–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdodi LA, Abeare CA, Lichtenstein JD, Tyson BT, Kucharski B, Zuccato BG, Roth RM. WAIS-IV processing speed scores as measures of non-credible responding – The third generation of embedded performance validity indicators. Psychol Assessm. 2016; Advance online publication. doi: 10.1037/pas0000319
   Google Scholar
• Erdodi LA, Tyson BT, Shahein AG, Lichtenstein JD, Abeare CA, Pelletier CL, Zuccato BG, Kucharski B, Roth RM. The power of timing: Adding a time-to-completion cutoff to the Word Choice Test and Recognition Memory Test improves classification accuracy. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2016; Advance online publication. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2016.1230181
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larrabee GJ. Assessment of malingering. In: Larrabee GJ, editor. Forensic neuropsychology: A scientific approach. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2012. p. 116–59.
   Google Scholar
• Greve KW, Bianchini KJ. Setting empirical cutoffs on psychometric indicators of negative response bias: A methodological commentary with recommendation. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2004;19:533–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Considine C, Weisenbach SL, Walker SJ, McFadden EM, Franti LM, Bieliauskas LA, Maixner DF, Giordani B, Berent S, Langenecker SA. Auditory memory decrements, without dissimulation, among patients with major depressive disorder. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2011;26:445–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rees LM, Tombaugh TN, Boulay L. Depression and the Test of Memory Malingering. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2011;16:501–6.
   Google Scholar
• Lichtenstein JD, Erdodi LA, Linnea KS. Introducing a forced-choice recognition task to the California Verbal Learning Test – Children’s Version. Child Neuropsychol. 2016; Advance online publication. doi: 10.1080/09297049.2015.1135422
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larrabee GJ. Detecting of malingering using atypical performance patterns on standard neuropsychological tests. Clin Neuropsychol. 2003;17:410–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donders J, Strong CA. Clinical utility of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Fourth Edition after traumatic brain injury. Assessment. 2015;22:17–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green P, Flaro L, Courtney J. Examining false positives on the Word Memory Test in adults with mild traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 2009;23:741–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green P, Iverson G, Allen L. Detecting malingering in head injury litigation with the Word Memory Test. Brain Inj. 1999;13:813–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grote C, Kooker EK, Garron DC, Nyenhuis DL, Smith CA, Mattingly ML. Performance of compensation seeking and non-compensation seeking samples on the Victoria Symptom Validity Test: Cross-validation and extension of a standardization study. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2000;22:709–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carone DA. Children with moderate/severe brain damage/dysfunction outperform adults with mild-to-no brain damage on the Medical Symptom Validity Test. Brain Inj. 2008;22:960–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweet JJ, Goldman DJ, Guidotti Breting LM. Traumatic brain injury: Guidance in a forensic context from outcome, dose-response, and response bias research. Behav Sci Law. 2013;31:756–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cappa KA, Conger JC, Conger AJ. Injury severity and outcome: a meta-analysis of prospective studies on TBI outcome. Health Psychol. 2011;30:542–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senathi-Raja D, Ponsford J, Schonberger M. Impact of age on long-term cognitive function after traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychology. 2010;24:336–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohling ML, Binder LM, Demakis GJ, Larrabee GJ, Ploetz DM, Langhinrichsen-Rohling J. A meta-analysis of neuropsychological outcome after mild traumatic brain injury: Re-analyses and reconsiderations of Binder et al. (1997), Frencham et al. (2005), and Pertab et al. (2009). Clin Neuropsychol. 2011;25:608–23.
   Google Scholar
• Bortnik KE, Boone KB, Marion SD, Amano S, Ziegler E, Victor TL, Zeller, MA. Examination of various WMS-III logical memory scores in the assessment of response bias. Clin Neuropsychol. 2010;24:344–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdodi LA, Tyson BT, Abeare CA, Zuccato BG, Rai JK, Seke KR, Sagar S, Roth RM. Utility of critical items within the Recognition Memory Test and Word Choice Test. Appl Neuropsychol.: Adult 2017; Advance online publication. doi: 10.1080/23279095.2017.1298600
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Killgore WD, DellaPietra L. Using the WMS-III to detect malingering: Empirical validation of the Rarely Missed Index (RMI). J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2000;22:761–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babikian T, Boone KB, Lu P, Arnold G. Sensitivity and specificity of various digit span scores in the detection of suspect effort. Clin Neuropsychol. 2006;20:145–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim MS, Boone KB, Victor T, Marion SD, Amanso S, Cottingham ME, Ziegler EA, Zeller MA. The Warrington Recognition Memory Test for words as a measure of response bias: Total score and response time cutoffs developed on ‘real world’ credible and noncredible subjects. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2010;25:60–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greiffenstein MF, Baker WJ, Gola T. Validation of malingered amnesia measures with a large clinical sample. Psychol Assessm. 1994;6:218–24.
   Google Scholar
• Heinly MT, Greve KW, Bianchini K, Love JM, Brennan A. WAIS Digit-Span-based indicators of malingered neurocognitive dysfunction: Classification accuracy in traumatic brain injury. Assessment. 2005;12:429–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greve KW, Heily MT, Bianchini KJ, Love JM. Malingering detection with the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test in mild traumatic brain injury. Clin Neuropsychol. 2009;23:343–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King JH, Sweet JJ, Sherer M, Curtiss G, Vanderploeg RD. Validity indicators within the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test: Application of new and previously researched multivariate procedures in multiple traumatic brain injury samples. Clin Neuropsychol. 2002;16:506–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suhr JA, Boyer D. Use of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test in the detection of malingering in student simulator and patient samples. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1999;21:701–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etherton JL, Bianchini KJ, Heinly MT, Greve KW. Pain, malingering, and performance on the WAIS-III Processing Speed Index. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2006;28:1218–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim N, Boone KB, Victor T, Lu P, Keatinge C, Mitchell C. Sensitivity and specificity of a Digit Symbol recognition trial in the identification of response bias. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2010;25:420–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trueblood W. Qualitative and quantitative characteristics of malingered and other invalid WAIS-R and clinical memory data. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1994;14:697–707.
   Google Scholar
• Iverson GL, Lange RT, Green P, Franzen MD. Detecting exaggeration and malingering with the trail making test. Clin Neuropsychol. 2002;16:398–406.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busse M, Whiteside D. Detecting suboptimal cognitive effort: Classification accuracy of the Conner’s Continuous Performance Test-II, Brief Test of Attention, and Trail Making Test. Clin Neuropsychol. 2012;26:675–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blaskewitz N, Merten T, Brockhaus R. Detection of suboptimal effort with the Rey Complex Figure Test and Recognition Trial. Appl Neuropsychol. 2009;16:54–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reedy SD, Boone KB, Cottingham ME, Glaser DF, Lu PH, Victor TL, Ziegler EA, Zeller MA, Wright MJ. Cross validation of the Lu and colleagues (2003) Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test effort equation in a large known-group sample. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2013;28:30–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugarman MA, Holcomb EM, Axelrod BN, Meyers JE, Liethen PC. Embedded measures of performance validity in the rey complex figure test in a clinical sample of veterans. Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2016;23:105–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar