Expression of masculine identity in individuals with a traumatic brain injury

References

• Ownsworth, T. Neuropsychological rehabilitation: A modular handbook. Self-identity after brain injury. New York, NY: Psychology Press;2014.
   Google Scholar
• Keegan LC, McAdam H. Swearing after traumatic brain injury: A linguistic analysis. J Interact Res Commun Disord 2016;7(1):101–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ylvisaker M, Feeney T. Reconstruction of identity after brain injury. Brain Inj 2000;1:12–28.
   Google Scholar
• Faul M, Xu L, Wald MM, Coronado VG. Traumatic brain injury in the United States: Emergency department visits, hospitalizations and deaths 2002–2006. Atlanta (GA): Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Ilie G, Boak A, Adlaf EM. Revalence and correlated of traumatic brain injuries among adolescents. J Am Med Assoc 2013;309(24):2550–2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feigin VL, Theadom A, Barker-Collo S, Starkey NJ, McPherson K, Kahan M, Dowell A, Brown P, Parag V, Kydd R, et al. Incidence of traumatic brain injury in New Zealand: A population-based study. Lancet Neurol 2013;12(1):53–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• US Department of Defense [Internet]. 2014 demographics profile of the military community. Available from: http://download.militaryonesource.mil/12038/MOS/Reports/2014-Demographics-Report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Shopp LH, Good GE, Barker KB, Mazurek MO, Hathaway SL. Masculine role adherence and outcomes among men with traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj 2006;20(11):1155–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harré R, van Langenhove L. Positioning theory. Oxford, England: Blackwell; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault M. The archeology of knowledge. London: Tavistock; 1972.
   Google Scholar
• Eckert P. Linguistic variation as social practise: The linguistic construction of identity. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Eckert P. Threewaves of variation study: The emergence of meaning in the study of sociolinguistic variation. Annu Rev Anthropol 2012;41:87–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Despins EH, Turkstra LS, Struchen MA, Clark AN. Sex-based differences in perceived pragmatic communication ability of adults with traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2016;97(2 Suppl 1):S26–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palomares NA. Language and gender. In: Berger CR, Roloff ME, Wilson SR, Dillard JP, Caughlin J, Solomon D, editors. The international encyclopedia of interpersonal communication; 2016. p. 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Garnham A, Oakhill J, Von Stochausen, L, Sczesny, S. Editorial: Language cognition and gender. Front Psychol 2016;7:772.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiesling SF. Homosocial desire in men’s talk: Balancing and re-creating cultural discourses of masculinity. Lang Soc 2005;34:695–726.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckert P, McConnell-Ginnet S. New generalizations and explanations in language and gender research. Lang Soc 1999;28:185–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ylvisaker M, McPherson K, Kayes N, Pellet E. Metaphoric identity mapping: Facilitating goal setting and engagement in rehabilitation after traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychol Rehabil 2008;18(5/6):713–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ylvisaker M, Turkstra L, Coehlo C, Yorkston K, Kennedy M, Sohlberg M, Avery J. Behavioural interventions for children and adults with behavior disorders after TBI: A systematic review of the evidence. Brain Inj 2007;21(8):769–805.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ylvisaker M. Self-coaching: A context-sensitive person-centred approach to social communication after traumatic brain injury. Brain Impairm 2006;7(3):246–58.
   Google Scholar
• Tate R, Hodgkinson A, Veerabangsa A, Maggiotto S. Measuring psychosocial recovery after traumatic brain injury: Psychometric properties of a new scale. J Head Trauma Rehabil 1999;14:543–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tate R, Simpson G, Lane-Brown A, Soo C, de Wolf A, Whiting D. Sydney psychosocial reintegration scale (SPRS-2): Meeting the challenge of measuring participation in neurological conditions. Aust Psychol 2012;47(1):20–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas JM, Bracy CA, Snow PC. Measuring perceived communicative ability after traumatic brain injury: Reliability and validity of the La Trobe communication questionnaire. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2007;22(1):31–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacDonald S. Functional assessment of verbal reasoning and executive strategies (FAVRES). Guelph, Ontario: CCD Publishing;2005.
   Google Scholar
• Baines KA, McMartin Heeringa H, Martin AW. Assessment of language-related functional activities. Austin, Texas: Pro-education;1999.
   Google Scholar
• Togher L, Taylor C, Aird V, Grant S. The impact of varied speaker role and communication partner on the communicative interactions of a person with traumatic brain injury: A single case study using systemic functional linguistics. Brain Impairm 2006;7(3):190–201.
   Google Scholar
• Jorgensen M, Togher L. Narrative after traumatic brain injury: A comparison of monologic and jointly produced discourse. Brain Inj 2009;23(9):727–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halliday MAK, Matthiessen CMIM. An introduction to functional grammar. 4th ed. London: Arnold; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Brassel S, Kenny B, Power E, McDonald S, Tate R, MacWhinney B, Turkstra L, Holland A, Togher L. Conversational topics discussed by individuals with severe traumatic brain injury and their communication partners during sub-acute recovery. Brain Inj 2016;30(11):1329–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mentis M, Prutting CA. Analysis of topic as illustrated in a head-injured and a normal adult. J Speech Hear Res 1991;34:583–95.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Martin JR, White PRR. The language of evaluation. New York: Palgrave McMillan; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Togher L. Discourse sampling in the 21st century. J Commun Disord 2001;34:131–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiernan P. Evaluation and identity: Extending appraisal theory to explore positionings of self. Jpn J Syst Funct Linguist 2011;6:1–21.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald S, Togher L, Code C. Social and communication disorders following traumatic brain injury. 2nd edition. New York: Psychology Press; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner SE. We act like girls and we don’t act like men: Ethnicity and local language change in a Philadelphia high school. Lang Soc 2013;42:361–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeates G, Henwood K, Gracey F, Evans J. Awareness of disability after acquired brain injury and the family context. Neuropsychol Rehabil 2007;17(2):151–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keegan LC. The linguistic construction of identity in individuals with traumatic brain injury [dissertation]. Lafayette (LA): University of Louisiana at Lafayette; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Sabat S, Harré R. Positioning and the recovery of social identity. In: Harré R, van Langenhove L, editors. Positioning theory. Oxford, England: Blackwell 1999. p. 87–101.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald S. Impairments in social cognition following severe traumatic brain injury. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 2013;19(3):231–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Togher L, Wiseman-Hakes C, Douglas J, Stergiou-Kita M, Ponsford J, Teasell R, Bayley M, Turkstra LS. INCOG recommendations for management of cognition following traumatic brain injury, part IV: Cognitive communication. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2014;29(4):353–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar