Patterns of early conversational recovery for people with traumatic brain injury and their communication partners

References

• World Health Organisation (WHO). Neurological disorders: public health challenges. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO Publications; 2006. httg//www.who.int/mentalhealth/neurology/neurologicaldisordersreportweb.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA). Knowledge and skills needed by speech- language pathologists providing services to individuals with cognitive-communication disorders; 2005. httg[/www.asha.orgLpolicy/KS2005—OOO78/.
   Google Scholar
• Coelho CA, DeRuyter F, Stein M. Treatment efficacy: cognitive-communicative disorders resulting from traumatic brain injury in adults. J Speech Hear Res. 1996;39(5):S5–S17.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pierce C, Hanks R. Life satisfaction after traumatic brain injury and the World Health Organization model of disability. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;85:889–98. doi:10.1097/01.phm.0000242615.43129.ae.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galski T, Tompkins C, Johnston MV. Competence in discourse as a measure of social integration and quality of life in persons with traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury. 1998;12(9):769–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ylvisaker M Communication outcome following traumatic brain injury. Seminars in Speech and Language; 1992;13:239–50.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks N, McKinlay W, Symington C, Beattie A, Campsie L. Return to work within the first seven years of severe head injury. Brain Injury. 1987;1(1):5–19.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cattelani R, Tanzi F, Lombardi F, Mazzucchi A. Competitive reemployment after severe traumatic brain injury: clinical, cognitive, and behavioural predictive variables. Brain Injury. 2002;16(1):51–64. doi:10.1080/02699050110088821.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knox L, Douglas J. Long-term ability to interpret facial expression after traumatic brain injury and its relation to social integration. Brain Cogn. 2009;69(2):442–49. doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2008.09.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ylvisaker M, Jacobs H, Feeney T. Positive supports for people who experience disability following brain injury: a review. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2003;18(1):7–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuss DT, Levine B. Adult clinical neuropsychology: lessons from studies of the frontal lobes. Annu Rev Psychol. 2002;53(1):401–33. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salmond CH, Sahakian BL. Cognitive outcome in traumatic brain injury survivors. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2005;11(2):111–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller EK. The prefrontal cortex and cognitive control. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2000;1(1):59–65. doi:10.1038/35036228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas JM. Relation of executive functioning to pragmatic outcome following severe traumatic brain injury. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2010;53(2):365–82. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2009/08-0205).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coelho CA, Youse KM, Le KN. Conversational discourse in closed-head-injured and non-brain- injured adults. Aphasiology. 2002;16(4–6):659–72. doi:10.1080/02687030244000275.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald S. Traumatic brain injury and psychosocial function: let’s get social. Brain Impair. 2003;4(1):36–47. doi:10.1375/brim.4.1.36.27032.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald S, Flanagan S. Social perception deficits after traumatic brain injury: interaction between emotion recognition, mentalizing ability, and social communication. Neuropsychology. 2004;18(3):572–79. doi:10.1037/0894-4105.18.3.572.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu B-C, Millis S, Arango-Lasprilla JC, Hanks R, Novack T, Hart T. Measuring recovery in new learning and memory following traumatic brain injury: a mixed-effects modeling approach. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2007;29(6):617–25. doi:10.1080/13803390600878893.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathias JL, Mansfield KM. Prospective and declarative memory problems following moderate and severe traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury. 2005;19(4):271–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mcallister TW, Flashman LA, Sparling MB, Saykin AJ. Working memory deficits after traumatic brain injury: catecholaminergic mechanisms and prospects for treatment — a review. Brain Lnjury. 2004;18(4):331–50. doi:10.1080/02699050310001617370.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stulemeijer M, Vos PE, van der Werf S, van Dijk G, Rijpkema M, Fernandez G. How mild traumatic brain injury may affect declarative memory performance in the post-acute stage. J Neurotrauma. 2010;27(9):1585–95. doi:10.1089/neu.2010.1298.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snow P, Douglas J, Ponsford J. Conversational discourse abilities following severe traumatic brain injury: a follow-up study. Brain Injury. 1998;12(11):911–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snow P, Douglas J, Ponsford J. Conversational assessment following traumatic brain injury: a comparison across two control groups. Brain Injury. 1997;11(6):409–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youse KM, Coelho CA. Treating underlying attention deficits as a means for improving conversational discourse in individuals with closed head injury: a preliminary study. NeuroRehabilitation. 2009;24(4):355.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peach RK. The cognitive basis for sentence planning difficulties in discourse after traumatic brain injury. Am J Speech-Lang Pat. 2013;22(2):S285–S297. doi:10.1044/1058-0360(2013/12-0081).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond F, Godfrey HPD. Conversation with traumatically brain-injured individuals: A controlled study of behavioural changes and their impact. Brain Injury. 1997;11:319–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Togher L, Hand L, Code C. Analysing discourse in the traumatic brain injury population: telephone interactions with different communication partners. Brain Injury. 1997;11(3):169–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ponsford J. Understanding and managing traumatic brain injury. lnPsych; 2012. httgl/www.psychology.org.auLpublications/inpsych/2012@prilLponsford
   Google Scholar
• Corrigan JD, Cuthbert JP, Harrison-Felix C, Whiteneck GG, Bell JM, Miller AC, Coronado VG, Pretz CR. US population estimates of health and social outcomes 5 years after rehabilitation for traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2014;29(6):E1–9. doi:10.1097/HTR.0000000000000020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millar K, Nicoll JAR, Thornhill S, Murray GD, Teasdale GM. Long term neuropsychological outcome after head injury: relation to APOE genotype. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2003;74(8):1047–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eramudugolla R, Bielak AAM, Bunce D, Easteal S, Cherbuin N, Anstey KI. Long-term cognitive correlates of traumatic brain injury across adulthood and interactions with APOE genotype, sex, and age cohorts. J Intl Neuropsycholl Soc. 2014;20(4):444–54. doi:10.1017/S1355617714000174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogler J, Klein A-M, Bender A. Long-term health-related quality-of-life in patients with acquired brain injury and their caregivers. Brain Injury. 2014;28(11):1381–88. doi:10.3109/02699052.2014.919536.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW). Disability in Australia: acquired brain injury. 2007; Bulletin no. 55. Cat no. AUS 96. http://www.aihw.gov.au/WorkArea/DownloadAsset.aspx?id=6442453666.
   Google Scholar
• Snow P, Douglas J, Ponsford J. Procedural discourse following traumatic brain injury. Aphasiology. 1997;11(10):947–67. doi:10.1080/02687039708249421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snow PC, Douglas JM, Ponsford JL. Narrative discourse following severe traumatic brain injury: a longitudinal follow-up. Aphasiology. 1999;13(7):529–51. [50]. doi:10.1080/026870399401993.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Togher L, Power E, Tate R, McDonald S, Rietdijk R. Measuring the social interactions of people with traumatic brain injury and their communication partners: the adapted Kagan scales. Aphasiology. 2010;24(6–8):914–27. doi:10.1080/02687030903422478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tu LV, Togher L, Power E. The impact of communication partner and discourse task on a person with traumatic brain injury: the use of multiple perspectives. Brain Injury. 2011;25(6):560–80. doi:10.3109/02699052.2011.571655.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Togher L, McDonald S, Tate R, Power E, Rietdijk R. Training communication partners of people with severe traumatic brain injury improves everyday conversations: a multicenter single blind clinical trial. J Rehabil Med. 2013;45(7):637–45. doi:10.2340/16501977-1173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Togher L, Hand L, Code C. A new perspective on the relationship between communication impairment and disempowerment following head injury in information exchanges. Disabil Rehabil. 1996;18(11):559–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Togher L, Taylor C, Aird V, Grant S. The impact of varied speaker role and communication partner on the communicative interactions of a person with traumatic brain injury: a single case study using systemic functional linguistics. Brain Impair. 2006;7(3):190–201. doi:10.1375/brim.7.3.190.
   Google Scholar
• Togher L, McDonald S, Code C, Grant S. Training communication partners of people with traumatic brain injury: a randomised controlled trial. Aphasiology. 2004;18(4):313–35. doi:10.1080/02687030344000535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas JM, Bracy CA, Snow PC. Exploring the factor structure of the La Trobe Communication Questionnaire: insights into the nature of communication deficits following traumatic brain injury. Aphasiology. 2007;21(12):1181–94. doi:10.1080/02687030600980950.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherer M, Hart T, Nick TG, Whyte J, Thompson RN, Yablon SA. Early impaired self-awareness after traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;84(2):168–76. doi:10.1053/apmr.2003.50045.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shorland J, Douglas JM. Understanding the role of communication in maintaining and forming friendships following traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury. 2010;24(4):569–80. doi:10.3109/02699051003610441.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kagan A, Winckel J, Black S, Duchan JF, Simmons-Mackie N, Square P. A set of observational measures for rating support and participation in conversation between adults with aphasia and their conversation partners. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2004;11(1):67–83. doi:10.1310/CL3V-A94A-DE5C-CVBE.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Foster AM, Armstrong J, Buckley A, Sherry J, Young T, Foliaki S, James-Hohaia TM, Theadom A, McPherson KM. Encouraging family engagement in the rehabilitation process: a rehabilitation provider’s development of support strategies for family members of people with traumatic brain injury. Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34(22):1855–62. doi:10.3109/09638288.2012.670028.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saldert C, Bergman M, Holstensson J, Jonsson S, Nygren K, Vennman F, Ferm U. Combining methods in the assessment and analysis of communication in aphasia: benefits and shortcomings of different approaches. J Inter Res Comm Disord. 2012;3(2):141. doi:10.1558/jircd.v3i2.141.
   Google Scholar
• Kagan A, Black SE, Duchan JF, Simmons-Mackie N, Square P. Training volunteers as conversation partners using “supported conversation for adults with aphasia” (SCA): A controlled trial. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2001;44(3):624–38. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2001/051).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curyto KJ, Van Haitsma K, Vriesman DK. Direct observation of behavior: a review of current measures for use with older adults with dementia. Res Gerontol Nurs. 2008;1(1):52–76. doi:10.3928/19404921-20080101-02.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IBM Corp. IBM SPSS statistics for Windows. Version 22.0. Armonk (NY): IBM Corp; Released 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Yap BW, Sim CH. Comparisons of various types of normality tests. J Stat Comput Simul. 2011;81(12):2141–55. doi:10.1080/00949655.2010.520163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norman GR, Sloan JA, Wyrwich KW. interpretation of changes in health-related quality of life: the remarkable universality of half a standard deviation. Med Care. 2003;41(5):582–92. doi:10.1097/01.MLR.0000062554.74615.4C.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ylvisaker M, Sellars C, Edelman L. Rehabilitation after traumatic brain injury in preschoolers. In: Ylvisaker M, editor. Traumatic brain injury rehabilitation. Children and adolescents. Newton (MA): Butterworth-Heinemann; 1998. p. 303–29.
   Google Scholar
• Rao V, Lyketsos C. Neuropsychiatric sequelae of traumatic brain injury. Psychosomatics. 2000;41(2):95–103. doi:10.1176/appi.psy.41.2.95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salazar AM, Warden DLSchwab K, et al. Cognitive Rehabilitation for Traumatic Brain Injury: A Randomized Trial. JAMA. 2000;283(23):3075–3081. doi:10.1001/jama.283.23.3075
   Google Scholar
• Fleming JM, Strong J. Self-awareness of deficits following acquired brain injury: considerations for rehabilitation. Br J Occup Ther. 1995;58:55–60. doi:10.1177/030802269505800204.
   Google Scholar
• Klonoff PS, Koberstein E, Talley MC, Dawson LK. A family experiential model of recovery after brain injury. Bull Menninger Clin. 2008;72(2):109–29. doi:10.1521/bumc.2008.72.2.109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maas AIR, Stocchetti N, Bullock R. Moderate and severe traumatic brain injury in adults. Lancet Neurol. 2008;7(1):728–41. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70164-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lois CP. Psychosocial sequelae of closed head injury: effects on the marital relationship. Brain Injury. 1990;4(1):39–47.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brooks N, Campsie L, Symington C, Beattie A, McKinlay W. The five year outcome of severe blunt head injury: a relative’s view. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1986;49(7):764–70. doi:10.1136/jnnp.49.7.764.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks N, Campsie L, Symington C, Beattie A, McKinlay W. The effects of severe head injury on patient and relative within seven years of injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 1987;2(3):1–13. doi:10.1097/00001199-198709000-00003.
   Google Scholar
• McKinlay WW, Brooks DN, Bond MR, Martinage DP, Marshall MM. The short-term outcome of severe blunt head injury as reported by relatives of the injured persons. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1981;44(6):527–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behn N. Evaluating communication training for paid carers of people with traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury. 2012;26(13–14):1702–15. doi:10.3109/02699052.2012.722258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stubbs E, Togher L, Kenny B, Fromm D, Forbes M, Macwhinney B, Power E Procedural discourse performance in severe traumatic brain injury at 3 and 6 months post injury [thesis]. Sydney: University of Sydney; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Eriksson K, Bergstrém S, Carlsson E, Hartelius L, Johansson C, Schwarz A, Saldert C. Aspects of rating communicative interaction: effects on reliability and agreement. J Inter Res Comm Disord. 2014;5(2):245–67. doi:10.1558/jircd.v5i2.245.
   Google Scholar
• Coelho C, Youse K, Le K, Feinn R. Narrative and conversational discourse of adults with closed head injuries and non-brain-injured adults: A discriminant analysis. Aphasiology. 2003;17(5):499–510. doi:10.1080/02687030344000111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coelho CA. Story narratives of adults with closed head injury and non-brain-injured adults: influence of socioeconomic status, elicitation task, and executive functioning. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2002;45(6):1232–48. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2002/099).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartley LL, Jensen PJ. Narrative and procedural discourse after closed head injury. Brain Injury. 1991;5(3):267–85.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jorgensen M, Togher L. Narrative after traumatic brain injury: A comparison of monologic and jointly-produced discourse. Brain Injury. 2009;23(9):727–40. doi:10.1080/02699050903133954.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rousseaux M, Vérigneaux C, Kozlowski O. An analysis of communication in conversation after severe traumatic brain injury. Eur J Neurol. 2010;17(7):922–29. doi:10.1111/j.1468-1331.2009.02945.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKellin WH, Shahin K, Hodgson M, Jamieson J, Pichora-Fuller K. Pragmatics of conversation and communication in noisy settings. J Pragmat. 2007;39(12):2159–84. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2006.11.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boles L, Bombard T. Conversational discourse analysis: appropriate and useful sample sizes. Aphasiology. 1998;12(7–8):547–60. doi:10.1080/02687039808249557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo EY, Togher L. The impact of dysarthria on everyday communication after traumatic brain injury: a pilot study. Brain Injury. 2008;22(1):83–98. doi:10.1080/02699050701824150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halliday MAK. An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Feldman M, Lazzara EH, Vanderbilt AA, DiazGranados D. Rater training to support high-stakes simulation-based assessments. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2012;32(4):279–86. doi:10.1002/chp.21156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enderby PM, John A, Petheram B, NetLibrary I. Therapy outcome measures for the rehabilitation professionals: speech and language therapy; physiotherapy; occupational therapy; rehabilitation nursing; hearing therapists. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley; 2006.
   Google Scholar