Characterizing computer-mediated communication, friendship, and social participation in adults with traumatic brain injury

References

• Degeneffe CE, Lee GK. Quality of life after traumatic brain injury perspective of adult siblings. J Rehabil. 2010;76(4):27–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oddy M, Humphrey M, Uttley D. Subjective impairment and social recovery after closed head injury. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1978;41(7):611–16. doi:10.1136/jnnp.41.7.611.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoofien D, Gilboa A, Vakil E, Donovick PJ. Traumatic brain injury (TBI) 10-20 years later: a comprehensive outcome study of psychiatric symptomatology, cognitive abilities and psychosocial functioning. Brain Inj. 2001;15(3):189–209. doi:10.1080/026990501300005659.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dikmen SS, Machamer JE, Powell JM, Temkin NR. Outcome 3 to 5 years after moderate to severe traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;84(10):1449–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seibert PS, Reedy DP, Hash J, Webb A, Stridh-Igo P, Basom J, et al. . Brain injury: quality of life’s greatest challenge. Brain Inj. 2002;16(10):837–48. doi:10.1080/02699050210131939.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engberg AW, Teasdale TW. Psychosocial outcome following traumatic brain injury in adults: a long-term population-based follow-up. Brain Inj. 2004;18(6):533–45. doi:10.1080/02699050310001645829.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jourdan C, Bayen E, Pradat-Diehl P, Ghout I, Darnoux E, Azerad S, et al. A comprehensive picture of 4-year outcome of severe brain injuries. Results from the PariS-TBI Study. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2016;59(2):100–06. doi:10.1016/j.rehab.2015.10.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flynn MA, Mutlu B, Duff MC, Turkstra LS, editors. Friendship quality, friendship quantity, and social participation in adults with traumatic brain injury. Seminars in speech and language. New York, NY: Thieme Medical Publishers; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Proctor CJ, Best LA. Social and psychological influences on satisfaction with life after brain injury. Disabil Health J. 2019. doi:10.1016/j.dhjo.2019.01.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanks RA, Rapport LJ, Wertheimer J, Koviak C. Randomized controlled trial of peer mentoring for individuals with traumatic brain injury and their significant others. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;93(8):1297–304. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2012.04.027.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas JM. Conceptualizing self and maintaining social connection following severe traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 2013;27(1):60–74. doi:10.3109/02699052.2012.722254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DuPertuis LL, Aldwin CM, Bosse R. Does the source of support matter for different health outcomes? Findings from the Normative Aging Study. J Aging Health. 2001;13(4):494–510. doi:10.1177/089826430101300403.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood V, Robertson JF. Friendship and kinship interaction: differential effect on the morale of the elderly. J Marriage Fam. 1978;40(2):367–75. doi:10.2307/350767.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felton BJ, Berry CA. Do the sources of the urban elderly’s social support determine its psychological consequences? Psychol Aging. 1992;7(1):89–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts SGB, Dunbar RIM. The costs of family and friends: an 18-month longitudinal study of relationship maintenance and decay. Evol Hum Behav. 2011;32(3):186–97. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2010.08.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLean AM, Jarus T, Hubley AM, Jongbloed L. Associations between social participation and subjective quality of life for adults with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury. Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36(17):1409–18. doi:10.3109/09638288.2013.834986.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alloway TP, Horton J, Alloway RG, Dawson C. Social networking sites and cognitive abilities: do they make you smarter? Comput Educ. 2013;63:10–16. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rainie L, Wellman B. Networked: the new social operating system. Cambridge: Massachusetts MIT Press; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Kiesler S, Siegel J, McGuire TW. Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication. Am Psychol. 1984;39(10):1123–34. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.39.10.1123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith A, Anderson M. Social media use in 2018. Washington, DC: Pew Reasearch Center; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Kenyon S. Reshaping pattern of mobility and exclusion? The impact of virtual mobility upon accessibility, mobility, and social exclusion. In: Sheller M, Urry J, editors. Mobile technologies of the city. London: Routledge; 2006. p. 102-120.
   Google Scholar
• McKenna KYA, Green AS, Gleason MEJ. Relationship formation on the Internet: what’s the big attraction? J Soc Issues. 2002;58(1):9–31. doi:10.1111/1540-4560.00246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenna KYA, Bargh JA. Plan 9 from cyberspace: the implications of the Internet for personality and social psychology. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2000;4(1):57–75. doi:10.1207/S15327957PSPR0401_6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suler J. The online disinhibition effect. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2004;7(3):321–26. doi:10.1089/1094931041291295.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Feuston JL, Marshall-Fricker CG, Piper AM, editors. The social lives of individuals with traumatic brain injury. New York, NY: ACM; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Walther JB. Computer-mediated communication: impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communic Res. 1996;23(1):3–43. doi:10.1177/009365096023001001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilov AM, Togher L, Power E, Turkstra L. Can teenagers with traumatic brain injury use Internet chatrooms? A systematic review of the literature and the Internet. Brain Inj. 2010;24(10):1135–72. doi:10.3109/02699052.2010.490511.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egan J, Chenoweth L, McAuliffe D. Email-facilitated qualitative interviews with traumatic brain injury survivors: a new and accessible method. Brain Inj. 2006;20(12):1283–94. doi:10.1080/02699050601049692.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim MJ, Stierwalt JA, LaPointe LL. Email intervention following traumatic brain injury: two case reports. Int J Telerehabil. 2010;2(2):19–30. doi:10.5195/ijt.2010.6048.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Narad ME, Bedell G, King JA, Johnson J, Turkstra LS, Haarbauer-Krupa J, Wade SL. Social Participation and Navigation (SPAN): description and usability of app-based coaching intervention for adolescents with TBI. Dev Neurorehabil. 2018; 21(7):439–48. doi:10.1080/17518423.2017.1354092.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suffoletto B, Wagner AK, Arenth PM, Calabria J, Kingsley E, Kristan J, et al. Mobile phone text messaging to assess symptoms after mild traumatic brain injury and provide self-care support: a pilot study. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2013;28(4):302–12. doi:10.1097/HTR.0b013e3182847468.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Todis B, Sohlberg MM, Hood D, Fickas S. Making electronic mail accessible: perspectives of people with acquired cognitive impairments, caregivers and professionals. Brain Inj. 2005;19(6):389–401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu Y, Brown P, Harniss M, Kautz H, Johnson K. Cognitive support technologies for people with TBI: current usage and challenges experienced. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2014;9(4):279–85. doi:10.3109/17483107.2013.823631.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kassberg A-C, Malinowsky C, Jacobsson L, Lund ML. Ability to manage everyday technology after acquired brain injury. Brain Inj. 2013;27(13–14):1583–88. doi:10.3109/02699052.2013.837196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong D, Sinclair K, Seabrook E, McKay A, Ponsford J. Smartphones as assistive technology following traumatic brain injury: a preliminary study of what helps and what hinders. Disabil Rehabil. 2017;39(23):2387–94. doi:10.1080/09638288.2016.1226434.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greig C-A, Harper R, Hirst T, Howe T, Barriers DB. Facilitators to mobile phone use for people with aphasia. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2008;15(4):307–24. doi:10.1310/tsr1504-307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunner M, Palmer S, Togher L, Hemsley B. ‘I kind of figured it out’: the views and experiences of people with traumatic brain injury (TBI) in using social media – self‐determination for participation and inclusion online. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2019;54(2):221–33. doi:10.1111/1460-6984.12405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker-Sparr C, Hart T, Bergquist T, Bogner J, Dreer L, Juengst S, et al. Internet and social media use after traumatic brain injury: a traumatic brain injury model systems study. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2018;33(1):E9–E17. doi:10.1097/HTR.0000000000000305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsaousides T, Matsuzawa Y, Lebowitz M. Familiarity and prevalence of Facebook use for social networking among individuals with traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 2011;25(12):1155–62. doi:10.3109/02699052.2011.613086.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunner M, Hemsley B, Palmer S, Dann S, Togher L. Review of the literature on the use of social media by people with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(17):1511–21. doi:10.3109/09638288.2015.1045992.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egan J, Worrall L, Oxenham D. An Internet training intervention for people with traumatic brain injury: barriers and outcomes. Brain Inj. 2005;19(8):555–68. doi:10.1080/02699050400013659.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malec JF, Brown AW, Leibson CL, Flaada JT, Mandrekar JN, Diehl NN, et al. The mayo classification system for traumatic brain injury severity. J Neurotrauma. 2007;24(9):1417–24. doi:10.1089/neu.2006.0245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kertesz A. Western aphasia battery. Revised ed. San Antonia, TX: Pearson Assessment; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Rigon A, Turkstra L, Mutlu B, Duff M. The female advantage: sex as a possible protective factor against emotion recognition impairment following traumatic brain injury. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2016;16(5):866–75. doi:10.3758/s13415-016-0437-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Despins EH, Turkstra LS, Struchen MA, Clark AN. Sex-based differences in perceived pragmatic communication ability of adults with traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016;97(2 Suppl):S26–32. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2014.06.023.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whiteneck GG, Dijkers MP, Heinemann AW, Bogner JA, Bushnik T, Cicerone KD, et al. Development of the participation assessment with recombined tools – objective for use after traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;92(4):542–51. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2010.08.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilde EA, Whiteneck GG, Bogner J, Bushnik T, Cifu DX, Dikmen S, et al. Recommendations for the use of common outcome measures in traumatic brain injury research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91(11):1650–60.e17. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2010.06.033.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delis DC, Kramer JH, Kaplan E, Ober BA. California Verbal Learning Test – adult version (CVLT-II). Second ed. Austin, TX: The Psychological Corporation; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Wechsler D. Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale. Fourth ed. San Antonio: Pearson; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Tombaugh TN. Trail Making Test A and B: normative data stratified by age and education. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2004;19(2):203–14. doi:10.1016/S0887-6177(03)00039-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duggan M, Rainie L. Cell phone activities 2013. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center’s Internet & American Life Project; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Finset A, Dyrnes S, Krogstad JM, Berstad J. Self-reported social networks and interpersonal support 2 years after severe traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 1995;9(2):141–50. doi:10.3109/02699059509008187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goverover Y, Genova H, Smith A, Chiaravalloti N, Lengenfelder J. Changes in activity participation following traumatic brain injury. In: Neuropsychological rehabilitation. London: Routledge; 2016. p. 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Bogner JA, Whiteneck GG, Corrigan JD, Lai JS, Dijkers MP, Heinemann AW. Comparison of scoring methods for the participation assessment with recombined tools-objective. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;92(4):552–63. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2010.11.014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corrigan JD, Cuthbert JP, Harrison-Felix C, Whiteneck GG, Bell JM, Miller AC, et al. US population estimates of health and social outcomes 5 years after rehabilitation for traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2014;29(6):E1–9. doi:10.1097/HTR.0000000000000020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Temkin NR, Corrigan JD, Dikmen SS, Machamer J. Social functioning after traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2009;24(6):460–67. doi:10.1097/HTR.0b013e3181c13413.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doctor JN, Castro J, Temkin NR, Fraser RT, Machamer JE, Dikmen SS. Workers’ risk of unemployment after traumatic brain injury: a normed comparison. Jins. 2005;11(6):747–52. doi:10.1017/S1355617705050836.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oswald DL, Clark EM. Best friends forever?: high school best friendships and the transition to college. Pers Relatsh. 2003;10(2):187–96. doi:10.1111/pere.2003.10.issue-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgoon JK, Guerrero LK, Manusov V. Nonverbal signals. The SAGE Handbook of Interpersonal Communication. London: SAGE; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Choi M, Toma CL. Social sharing through interpersonal media: patterns and effects on emotional well-being. Comput Human Behav. 2014;36:530–41. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.04.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu D, Yang C-C. Media niche of electronic communication channels in friendship: a meta-analysis. J Comput Mediat Commun. 2016;21(6):451–66. doi:10.1111/jcc4.2016.21.issue-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eden J, Veksler AE. Relational maintenance in the digital age: implicit rules and multiple modalities. Commun Q. 2016;64(2):119–44. doi:10.1080/01463373.2015.1103279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bazarova NN, Choi YH, Schwanda Sosik V, Cosley D, Whitlock J, editors. Social sharing of emotions on Facebook: channel differences, satisfaction, and replies. Proceedings of the 18th ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work & social computing; 2015 March 14-18; Vancouver, Canada. New York: ACM; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Hogan B. Pseudonyms and the rise of the real-name web2012.
   Google Scholar
• Haythornthwaite C. Strong, weak, and latent ties and the impact of new media. Inf Soc. 2002;18(5):385–401. doi:10.1080/01972240290108195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar