Patients with chronic mild or moderate traumatic brain injury have abnormal brain enlargement

References

• Bigler ED. Structural imaging. In: Silver JM, McAllister TW, Yudofsky SC, editors. Textbook of traumatic brain injury. Washington (DC): American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc.; 2005. p. 79–105.
   Google Scholar
• Bigler ED. Structural imaging. In: Silver JM, McAllister TW, Yudofsky SC, editors. Textbook of traumatic brain injury. Washington (DC): American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc.; 2011. p. 73–90.
   Google Scholar
• Wilde EA, Little D. Clinical imaging. In: Silver JM, McAllister TW, Arciniegas DB, editors. Textbook of traumatic brain injury. Washington (DC): American Psychiatric Association Publishing; 2019. p. 89–126.
   Google Scholar
• Ross DE, Ochs AL, Seabaugh JM, Shrader CR. Man vs. Machine: comparison of radiologists’ interpretations and Neuroquant® volumetric analyses of brain MRIs in patients with traumatic brain injury. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2013;25:1–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross DE, Ochs AL, DeSmit ME, Seabaugh JM, Havranek MD. Man vs. Machine part 2: comparison of radiologists’ interpretations and NeuroQuant® measures of brain asymmetry and progressive atrophy in patients with traumatic brain injury. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2015;27:147–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofman PA, Stapert SZ, van Kroonenburgh MJ, Jolles J, de Kruijk J, Wilmink JT. MR imaging, single-photon emission CT, and neurocognitive performance after mild traumatic brain injury. Am J Neuroradiol. 2001;22:441–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKenzie JD, Siddiqi F, Babb JS, Bagley LJ, Mannon LJ, Sinson GP, Grossman RI.Brain atrophy in mild or moderate traumatic brain injury: a longitudinal quantitative analysis. Am J Neuroradiol. 2002;23(9):1509–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross DE, Ochs AL, Seabaugh JM, DeMark MF, Shrader CR, Marwitz JH, Havranek MD. Progressive brain atrophy in patients with chronic neuropsychiatric symptoms after mild traumatic brain injury: A preliminary study. Brain Inj. 2012;26:1500–09.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou Y, Kierans A, Kenul D, Ge Y, Rath J, Reaume J, Grossman RI, Lui YW.Mild traumatic brain injury: longitudinal regional brain volume changes. Radiology. 2013;267(3):880–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toth A, Kovacs N, Perlaki G, Orsi G, Aradi M, Komaromy H, Ezer E, Bukovics P, Farkas O, Janszky J, et al.Multi-modal magnetic resonance imaging in the acute and sub-acute phase of mild traumatic brain injury: can we see the difference? J Neurotrauma. 2013;30(2):2–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maller JJ, Thomson RH, Pannek K, Bailey N, Lewis PM, Fitzgeral PB. Volumetrics relate to the development of depression after traumatic brain injury. Behav Brain Res. 2014;271:147–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross DE, Ochs AL, Zannoni MD, Seabaugh JM. Back to the future: estimating pre-injury brain volume in patients with traumatic brain injury. NeuroImage. 2014;102:565–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang X, Xie H, Cotton A, Tamburrino M, Brickman K, Lewis T, McLean S, Liberzon I.Early cortical thickness change after mild traumatic brain injury following motor vehicle collision. J Neurotrauma. 2015;32(7):455–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein DJ, Legarreta M, Bueler E, King J, McGlade E, Yurgelun-Todd D. Orbitofrontal cortical thinning and aggression in mild traumatic brain injury patients. Brain Behav. 2016;6(12):1-10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Govindarajan KA, Narayana PA, Hasan KM, Wilde EA, Levin HS, Hunter JV, Miller ER, Patel VK, Robertson CS, McCarthy JJ.Cortical thickness in mild traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 2016;33(20):1809–17. doi:10.1089/neu.2015.4253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross DE, Ochs AL, Zannoni MD, Seabaugh JM. Corrigendum to “back to the future: estimating pre-injury brain volume in patients with traumatic brain injury” [NeuroImage 102 (Part 2) (15 November 2014) 565–578]. NeuroImage. 2016;127:510–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zagorchev L, Meyer C, Stehle T, Wenzel F, Young S, Peters J, Weese J, Paulsen K, Garlinghouse M, Ford J, et al. Differences in regional brain volumes two months and one year after mild traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 2016;33:29–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajesh A, Cooke GE, Monti JM, Jahn A, Daugherty AM, Cohen NJ, Kramer AF.Differences in brain archetecture in remote mild traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 2017;34(23):3280–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ling JM, Klimaj S, Toulouse T, Mayer AR. A prospective study of gray matter abnormalities in mild traumatic brain injury. Neurology. 2013;81:2121-2127.
   Google Scholar
• Ross DE, Graham TJ, Ochs AL. Review of the evidence supporting the medical and forensic use of NeuroQuant® in patients with traumatic brain injury. Psychol Inj Law. 2013;6:75–80.
   Google Scholar
• Ross DE, Seabaugh J, Cooper L, Seabaugh JM. NeuroQuant® and NeuroGage® reveal effects of traumatic brain injury on brain volume. Brain Inj. 2018;32:1437–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menon DK, Schwab K, Wright DW, Maas AI.Position statement: definition of traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91(11):1637–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silver JM, McAllister TW, Yudofsky SC, eds. Textbook of traumatic brain injury. 2 ed. Arlington (VA): American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc.; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Kokmen E, Smith GE, Petersen RC, Tangalos E, Ivnik RC.The short test of mental status. Correlations with standardized psychometric testing. Arch Neurol. 1991;48(7):725–28.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tang-Wai DF, Knopman DS, Geda YE, Edland SD, Smith GE, Ivnik RJ, Tangalos EG, Boeve BF, Petersen RC. Comparison of the short test of mental status and the mini-mental state examination in mild cognitive impairment. Arch Neurol. 2003;60:1777–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson JT, Pettigrew LE, Teasdale GM.Structured interviews for the Glasgow outcome scale and the extended Glasgow outcome scale: guidelines for their use. J Neurotrauma. 1998;15(8):573–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer JB.Fully-automated volumetric MRI with normative ranges: translation to clinical practice. Behav Neurol. 2009;21(1):21–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovacevic S, Rafii MS, Brewer JB.High-throughput, fully automated volumetry for prediction of MMSE and CDR decline in mild cognitive impairment. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2009;23(2):139–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huppertza H, Kröll-Segera J, Klöppelb S, Ganza RE, Kassubekc J. Intra- and interscanner variability of automated voxel-based volumetry based on a 3D probabilistic atlas of human cerebral structures. NeuroImage. 2010;49:2216–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross DE, Graham TJ, Ochs AL. Review of the evidence supporting the medical and forensic use of NeuroQuant® in patients with traumatic brain injury. Psychol Inj Law. 2012;5:1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Ochs AL, Ross DE, Zannoni MD, Abildskov TJ, Bigler ED. Comparison of automated brain volume measures obtained with NeuroQuant and FREESURFER. J Neuroimaging. 2015;25:721–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross DE, Ochs AL, Tate DF, Tokac U, Seabaugh J, Abildskov TJ, Bigler ED. For the Alzheimer’s Disease neuroimaging initiative. High correlations between MRI brain volume measurements based on NeuroQuant® and freesurfer. Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging. 2018;278:69–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reid MW, Hannemann NP, York GE, Ritter JL, Kini JA, Lewis JD, Sherman PM, Velez CS, Drennon AM, Bolzenius JD, et al.Comparing two processing pipelines to measure subcortical and cortical volumes in patients with and without mild traumatic brain injury. J Neuroimaging. 2017;27(4):365–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen J. Statistical power analysis. Erlbaum: Hillsdale; 1988.
   Google Scholar