Friendships after severe traumatic brain injury: a survey of current speech pathology practice

References

• Hyder AA, Wunderlich CA, Puvanachandra P, Gururaj G, Kobusingye OC. The impact of traumatic brain injuries: A global perspective. NeuroRehabili Interdiscipl J. 2007;22(5):341–53. doi:10.3233/NRE-2007-22502.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langlois J, Rutland-Brown W, Wald M. The Epidemiology and Impact of Traumatic Brain Injury: A Brief Overview. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2006;21(5):375–78. Highlights From the 2nd Federal TBI Interagency Conference September/October. doi:10.1097/00001199-200609000-00001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snow P, Douglas J. Psychosocial aspects of pragmatic disorders, in Research in Clinical Pragmatics, Series: perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, L. Cummings, Editor. Switzerland: Springer-Verlag; 2017. p. 617–49.
   Google Scholar
• Togher L, Hand L, Code C. Analysing discourse in the traumatic brain injury population: telephone interactions with different communication partners. Brain Injury. 1997;11(3):169–89. doi:10.1080/026990597123629.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Togher L, Hand L, Code C. A new perspective on the relationship between communication impairment and disempowerment following head injury in information exchanges. Disabil Rehabil. 1996;18(11):559–66. doi:10.3109/09638289609166317.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cools C, Manders E. Analysis of language and communication function in traumatic brain injured patients. Int J Rehabil Res. 1998;21(3):323–29. doi:10.1097/00004356-199809000-00007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogart E, Togher L, Power E, Docking K. Casual conversations between individuals with traumatic brain injury and their friends. Brain Injury. 2012;26(3):221–33. doi:10.3109/02699052.2011.648711.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finset A, Dyrnes S, Krogstad JM, Berstad J. Self-reported social networks and interpersonal support 2 years after severe traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury. 1995;9(2):141–50. doi:10.3109/02699059509008187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elsass L, Kinsella G. Social interaction following severe closed head injury. Psychol Med. 1987;17(1):67–78. doi:10.1017/S003329170001299X.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinsella G, Ford B, Moran C. Survival of social relationships following head injury. Int Disabil Stud. 1989;11(1):9–14. doi:10.3109/02599148909166369.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shorland J, Douglas JM. Understanding the role of communication in maintaining and forming friendships following traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury. 2010;24(4):569–80. doi:10.3109/02699051003610441.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tate R, Kennedy M, Ponsford J, Douglas J, Velikonja D, Bayley M, Stergiou-Kita M. INCOG Recommendations for Management of Cognition Following Traumatic Brain Injury, Part III: executive Function and Self-Awareness. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2014;29(4):338–52. doi:10.1097/HTR.0000000000000068.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowlands A. Understanding social support and friendship: implications for intervention after acquired brain injury. Brain Impairment. 2000;1(2):151–64. doi:10.1375/brim.1.2.151.
   Google Scholar
• Togher L, McDonald S, Tate R, Power E, Rietdijk R. Training communication partners of people with severe traumatic brain injury improves everyday conversations: A multicenter single blind clinical trial. J Rehabil Med. 2013;45(7):637–45. doi:10.2340/16501977-1173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Togher L,, Power E, Tate R, McDonald S, Rietdijk R. Measuring the social interactions of people with traumatic brain injury and their communication partners: the adapted Kagan scales. Aphasiology. 2010;24(6):914–27. doi:10.1080/02687030903422478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Togher L, Power E, Rietdijk R, McDonald S, Tate R. An exploration of participant experience of a communication training program for people with traumatic brain injury and their communication partners. Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34(18):1562–74. doi:10.3109/09638288.2012.656788.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown K, Worrall L, Davidson B, Howe T. Exploring speech-language pathologists’ perspectives about living successfully with aphasia. Int J Lang Commun Dis 2011;46:300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson B, Howe T, Worrall L, Hickson L, Togher L. Social participation for older people with aphasia: the impact of communication disability on friendships. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2008;15(4):325–40. doi:10.1310/tsr1504-325.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loverso FL, Young-Charles H, Tonkovich JD. The application of a process evaluation form for aphasic individuals in a small group setting.Clin Aphasiology. 1982. http://aphasiology.pitt.edu/id/eprint/705
   Google Scholar
• Lee D. Survey Research: reliability and Validity. Chicago: American Library Association; 2004. p. 211.
   Google Scholar
• Kelley K, Clark B, Brown V, Sitzia J. Good practice in the conduct and reporting of survey research. Int J Qua Health Care. 2003;15(3):261–66. doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzg031.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krosnick JA. Survey research. Annu Rev Psychol. 1999;50(1):537–67. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.50.1.537.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gideon L. Handbook of survey methodology for the social sciences. Dordrecht: Springer; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell JW. Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Portney LG, Watkins MP. Foundations of clinical research: applications to practice. Upper Saddle River, NJ; London: Prentice Hall; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Elo S, Kyngäs H. The qualitative content analysis process. J Adv Nurs. 2008;62(1):107–15. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHO. ICF: international classification of functioning, disability and health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Rose M, Ferguson A, Power E, Togher L, Worrall L. Aphasia rehabilitation in Australia: current practices, challenges and future directions. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2014;16(2):169–80. doi:10.3109/17549507.2013.794474.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tempest S, McIntyre A. Using the ICF to clarify team roles and demonstrate clinical reasoning in stroke rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil. 2006;28(10):663–67. doi:10.1080/09638280500276992.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ay F, Gençtürk N, Turan Miral M. Barriers that prevent implementation of research findings in nursing: education-research hospitals case. Int J Nurs Pract. 2014;20(6):646–54. doi:10.1111/ijn.12226.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster A, O’Halloran R, Rose M, Worrall L. “Communication is taking a back seat”: speech pathologists’ perceptions of aphasia management in acute hospital settings. Aphasiology. 2016;30(5):585–608. doi:10.1080/02687038.2014.985185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke DJ, Forster A. Improving post-stroke recovery: the role of the multidisciplinary health care team. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2015;8:433–42. doi:10.2147/JMDH.S68764.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar