Collaborative participation in aphasic conversation before and after intensive language-action therapy

References

• Basso, A. (2010). “Natural” conversation: A treatment for severe aphasia. Aphasiology, 24, 466–479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beeke, S., Beckley, F., Johnson, F., Heilemann, C., Edwards, S., Maxim, J., & Best, W. (2015). Conversation focused aphasia therapy: Investigating the adoption of strategies by people with agrammatism. Aphasiology, 29 (3), 355–377.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berthier, M. L., & Pulvermüller, F. (2011). Neuroscience insights improve neurorehabilitation of poststroke aphasia. Nature Reviews Neurology, 7 (2), 86–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best, W., Grassly, J., Greenwood, A., Herbert, R., Hickin, J., & Howard, D. (2011). A controlled study of changes in conversation following aphasia therapy for anomia. Disability and Rehabilitation, 33, 229–242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boo, M., & Rose, M. L. (2011). The efficacy of repetition, semantic, and gesture treatments for verb retrieval and use in Broca’s aphasia. Aphasiology, 25 (2), 154–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyle, M. (2011). Discourse treatment for word retrieval impairment in aphasia: The story so far. Aphasiology, 25 (11), 1308–1326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carragher, M., Conroy, P., Sage, K., & Wilkinson, R. (2012). Can impairment-focused therapy change the everyday conversations of people with aphasia? A review of the literature and future directions. Aphasiology, 26 (7), 895–916.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carragher, M., Sage, K., & Conroy, P. (2013). The effects of verb retrieval therapy for people with non-fluent aphasia: Evidence from assessment tasks and conversation. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 23 (6), 846–887.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carragher, M., Sage, K., & Conroy, P. (2015). Outcomes of treatment targeting syntax production in people with Broca’s-type aphasia: Evidence from psycholinguistic assessment tasks and everyday conversation. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 50 (3), 322–336.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damico, J., Tetnowski, J., Lynch, K., Hartwell, J., Weill, C., Heels, J., & Simmons-Mackie, N. (2015). Facilitating authentic conversation: An intervention employing principles of constructivism and conversation analysis. Aphasiology, 29 (3), 400–421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Renzi, E., & Faglioni, P. (1978). Normative data and screening power of a shortened version of the Token test. Cortex, 14, 41–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Difrancesco, S., Pulvermüller, F., & Mohr, B. (2012). Intensive language-action therapy (ILAT): The methods. Aphasiology, 26 (11), 1317–1351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drew, P. (1998). An exercise in the comparative analysis of talk-in-interaction in different (institutional) settings: The case of ‘formulations’. In H. Lehti-Eklund (Ed.), Samtalsstudier [Studies in conversation]. Meddelanden från Institutionen för nordiska språk vid HU B:19 (pp. 29–42). Helsingfors: Universitetstrycket.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, A. (1994). The influence on aphasia, familiarity and activity on conversational repair. Aphasiology, 8 (2), 143–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, M. H., & Goodwin, C. (1986). Gesture and coparticipation in the activity of searching for a word. Semiotica, 62, 51–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helasvuo, M., Laakso, M., & Sorjonen, M. (2004). Searching for words: Syntactic and sequential construction of word search in conversations of Finnish speakers with aphasia. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 37 (1), 1–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herbert, R., Best, W., Hickin, J., & Howard, D. (2012). POWERS Profile of word errors and retrieval in speech. Guildford, Surrey, UK: J&R Press.
   Google Scholar
• Herbert, R., Best, W., Hickin, J., Howard, D., & Osborne, F. (2003). Combining lexical and interactional approaches to therapy for word finding deficits in aphasia. Aphasiology, 17 (12), 1163–1186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herbert, R., Gregory, E., & Best, W. (2014). Syntactic versus lexical therapy for anomia in acquired aphasia: Differential effects on narrative and conversation. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 49 (2), 162–173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herbert, R., Hickin, J., Howard, D., Osborne, F., & Best, W. (2008). Do picture-naming tests provide a valid assessment of lexical retrieval in conversation in aphasia? Aphasiology, 22 (2), 184–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heritage, J. (1985). Analyzing news interviews: Aspects of the production of talk for an overhearing audience. In T. A. van Dijk (Ed.), Handbook of discourse analysis. Vol 3. (pp. 95–117). London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holland, A. L. (1991). Pragmatic aspects of intervention in aphasia. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 6, 197–211.
   Google Scholar
• ISK = Iso suomen kielioppi [Finnish grammar]. (2004). Hakulinen, A., Vilkuna, M., Korhonen, R., Koivisto, V., Heinonen, T., & Alho, I., (Eds.), Helsinki: SKS.
   Google Scholar
• Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In G. H. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation analysis. Studies from the first generation (pp. 13–31). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, R. C., & Wertz, R. T. (1997). The efficacy of computer-provided reading treatment of chronic aphasic adults. Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research, 40 (3), 493.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitzinger, C. (2013). Repair. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 229–256). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Klippi, A. (1996). Conversation as an achievement in aphasics. Studia Fennica Linguistica 6. Helsinki: SKS.
   Google Scholar
• Klippi, A. (2015). Pointing as an embodied practice in aphasic interaction. Aphasiology, 29 (3), 337–354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klippi, A., & Ahopalo, L. (2008). The interplay between verbal and nonverbal behaviors in aphasic word search in conversation. In A. Klippi & K. Launonen (Eds.), Research in logopedics. Speech and language therapy in Finland. (M. Müller and M.J. Ball, serial eds. Communication disorders across languages.) (pp. 146–174). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Koshik, I. (2005). Alternative questions used in conversational repair. Discourse Studies, 7 (2), 193–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristensson, J., Behrns, I., & Saldert, C. (2015). Effects on communication from intensive treatment with semantic feature analysis in aphasia. Aphasiology, 29 (4), 466–487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurhila, S. (2003). Co-constructing understanding in second language conversation. (Doctoral dissertation). Department of Finnish language, University of Helsinki.
   Google Scholar
• Kurhila, S. (2006). Second language interaction. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Laakso, M. (1997). Self-initiated repair by fluent aphasic speakers in conversation. Studia Fennica Linguistic 8. Helsinki: SKS.
   Google Scholar
• Laakso, M. (2015). Collaborative participation in aphasic word searching: Comparison between significant others and speech and language therapists. Aphasiology, 29 (3), 269–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laakso, M., & Klippi, A. (1999). A closer look at the ‘hint and guess’ sequences in aphasic conversation. Aphasiology, 13 (4), 345–363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laakso, M., & Lehtola, M. (2003). Sanojen hakeminen afaattisen henkilön ja hänen läheisen keskustelussa. Puhe ja kieli, 23, 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Laine, M., Koivuselkä-Sallinen, P., Hänninen, R., & Niemi, J. (1997). Bostonin nimentätesti [The Finnish version of the Boston naming test]. Helsinki: Psykologien kustannus.
   Google Scholar
• Laine, M., & Neitola, T. (2005). Action naming test - ANT [Unpublished Finnish version].
   Google Scholar
• Ledford, J. R., Wolery, M., & Gast, D. L. (2014). Controversial and critical issues in single case research. In D. L. Gast & J. R. Ledford (Eds.), Single case research methodology (2nd ed., pp. 378–378–396). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lerner, G. H. (1996). On the “semi-permeable” character of grammatical units in conversation: Conditional entry into the turn space of another speaker. In E. Ochs, E. A. Schegloff & S. Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and grammar (pp. 238–276). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lilja, N. (2010). Ongelmista oppimiseen. Toisen aloittamat korjausjaksot kakkoskielisessä keskustelussa (Doctoral dissertation). Jyväskylä studies in humanities 146. Jyväskylä: The university of Jyväskylä.
   Google Scholar
• Lindsay, J., & Wilkinson, R. (1999). Repair sequences in aphasic talk: A comparison of aphasic-speech and language therapist and aphasic-spouse conversations. Aphasiology, 13, 305–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meinzer, M., Rodriguez, A. D., & Gonzalez Rothi, L. J. (2012). First decade of research on constrained-induced treatment approaches for aphasia rehabilitation. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 93 (1), S35–S45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milroy, L., & Perkins, L. (1992). Repair strategies in aphasic discourse; towards a collaborative model. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 6 (1&2), 27–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkins, L., Crisp, J., & Walshaw, D. (1999). Exploring conversation analysis as an assessment tool for aphasia: The issue of reliability. Aphasiology, 13 (4), 259–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pietilä, M., Lehtihalmes, M., Klippi, A., & Lempinen, M. (2005). Western aphasia battery [Finnish version]. Helsinki: Psykologien kustannus.
   Google Scholar
• Pulvermüller, F., & Berthier, M. L. (2008). Aphasia therapy on a neuroscience basis. Aphasiology, 22 (6), 563–599.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pulvermüller, F., Neininger, B., Elbert, T., Mohr, B., Rockstroh, B., Koebbel, P., & Taub, E. (2001). Constraint-induced therapy of chronic aphasia after stroke. Stroke, 32 (7), 1621–1626.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, M., Douglas, J., & Matyas, T. (2002). The comparative effectiveness of gesture and verbal treatments for a specific phonologic naming impairment. Aphasiology, 16 (10), 1001–1030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (1993). Reflection on quantification in the study of conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 26 (1), 99–128.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (2000). When ‘others’ initiate repair. Applied Linguistics, 21 (2), 205–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53 (2), 361–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidnell, J., & Stivers, T. (Eds.). (2013). The handbook of conversation analysis. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Simmons-Mackie, N., Raymer, A., Armstrong, E., Holland, A., & Cherney, L. R. (2010). Communication partner training in aphasia: A systematic review. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 91, 1814–1837.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons-Mackie, N., Savage, M. S., & Worrall, L. (2014). Conversation therapy for aphasia: A qualitative review of the literature. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 49, 511–526.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ten Have, P. (2007). Doing conversation analysis (2nd ed.). London: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, R. (1999). Introduction. Aphasiology, 13 (4), 251–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, R. (2015). Conversation and aphasia: Advances in analysis and intervention. Aphasiology, 29 (3), 257–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar