261
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Lexical stress contrast marking in fluent and non-fluent aphasia in Spanish: The relationship between acoustic cues and compensatory strategies

Pages 642-664 | Received 18 Nov 2016, Accepted 08 Mar 2017, Published online: 14 Apr 2017

References

  • Aichert, I., Büchner, M., & Ziegler, W. (2011). Why is [’ju: do] easier than [ju’ve: l]? Perceptual and acoustic analyses of word stress in patients with apraxia of speech. Stem-, Spraak-En Taalpathologie, 17, 15.
  • Aichert, I., & Ziegler, W. (2004). Segmental and metrical encoding in aphasia: Two case reports. Aphasiology, 18(12), 1201–1211.
  • Alcoba Rueda, S. (2013). Cambios de acento en español. Verba. Anuario Galego de Filoloxía, 40, 415–452.
  • Arciuli, J., Monaghan, P., & Seva, N. (2010). Learning to assign lexical stress during reading aloud: Corpus, behavioral, and computational investigations. Journal of Memory and Language, 63(2), 180–196.
  • Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 390–412.
  • Baqué, L. (2015). Velocidad de articulación y estructuración del espacio vocálico en función del acento en la afasia: un estudio preliminar. Normas. Revista de Estudios Lingüísticos Hispánicos, 7, 297–308.
  • Baqué, L., Estrada, M., Le Besnerais, M., Marczyk, A., & Nespoulous, J.-L. (2006). Corpus COGNIFON-Español para el análisis de producciones consonánticas en la afasia. Unpublished internal document, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona..
  • Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. Retrieved from http://cran.r-project.org/package=lme4
  • Baum, S. R. (1992). The influence of word length on syllable duration in aphasia: Acoustic analyses. Aphasiology, 6(5), 501–513.
  • Baum, S. R. (1999). Compensations for jaw fixation by aphasic patients under conditions of increased articulatory demands: A follow-up study. Aphasiology, 13(7), 513–527.
  • Baum, S. R., Kim, J. A., & Katz, W. F. (1997). Compensation for jaw fixation by aphasic patients. Brain and Language, 56(56), 354–376.
  • Beeke, S., Wilkinson, R., & Maxim, J. (2009). Prosody as a compensatory strategy in the conversations of people with agrammatism. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 23(2), 133–155.
  • Bertoni, B., Stoffel, A.-M., & Weniger, D. (1991). Communicating with pictographs: A graphic approach to the improvement of communicative interactions. Aphasiology, 5(4–5), 341–353.
  • Blumstein, S. E., Cooper, W. E., Goodglass, H., Statlender, S., & Gottlieb, J. (1980). Production deficits in aphasia: A voice-onset time analysis. Brain and Language, 9(2), 153–170.
  • Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2014). Praat: doing phonetics by computer. Version 5.3.77. Retrieved from http://www.praat.org/
  • Burani, C., Paizi, D., & Sulpizio, S. (2014). Stress assignment in reading Italian: friendship outweighs dominance. Memory & Cognition, 42(4), 662–675.
  • Butterworth, B. (1992). Disorders of phonological encoding. Cognition, 42, 261–286.
  • Caramazza, A. (1997). How many levels of processing are there in lexical access? Cognitive neuropsychology, 14(1), 177–208.
  • Cappa, S. F., Nespor, M., Ielasi, W., & Miozzo, A. (1997). The representation of stress: Evidence from an aphasic patient. Cognition, 65(1), 1–13.
  • Cho, T. (2005). Prosodic strengthening and featural enhancement: Evidence from acoustic and articulatory realizations of /a,i/in English. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 117(6), 3867–3878.
  • Code, C., & Ball, M. (1982). Fricative production in Broca’s aphasia : A spectrographic analysis. Journal of Phonetics, 10, 325–331.
  • Cole, J., Kim, H., Choi, H., & Hasegawa-Johnson, M. (2007). Prosodic effects on acoustic cues to stop voicing and place of articulation: Evidence from Radio News speech. Journal of Phonetics, 35(2), 180–209.
  • Colombo, L. (1992). Lexical stress effect and its interaction with frequency in word pronunciation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18(4), 987–1003.
  • Daelemans, W., Gillis, S., & Durieux, G. (1994). The acquisition of stress: A data-oriented approach. Computational Linguistics, 20(3), 421–451.
  • Danly, M., & Shapiro, B. (1982). Speech prosody in Broca’s aphasia. Brain and Language, 16, 171–190.
  • Dell, G. S. (1986). A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological review, 93(3), 283–321.
  • Dell, G. S. (1988). The retrieval of phonological forms in production: Tests of predictions from a connectionist model. Journal of Memory and Language, 27(2), 124–142.
  • Dell, G. S., Schwartz, M. F., Martin, N., Saffran, E. M., & Gagnon, D. A. (1997). Lexical access in aphasic and nonaphasic speakers. Psychological Review, 104(4), 801–838.
  • Domahs, U., Plag, I., & Carroll, R. (2014). Word stress assignment in German, English and Dutch: Quantity-sensitivity and extrametricality revisited. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics, 17(1), 59–96.
  • Duffy, J. R. (2013). Motor speech disorders: Substrates, differential diagnosis, and management (3rd ed.). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier Health Sciences.
  • Ellis, A. W., Miller, D., & Sin, G. (1983). Wernicke’s aphasia and normal language processing: A case study in cognitive neuropsychology. Cognition, 15(1–3), 111–144.
  • Emmorey, K. D. (1987). The neurological substrates for prosodic aspects of speech. Brain and Language, 30(2), 305–320.
  • Ferguson, S. H., & Kewley-Port, D. (2007). Talker differences in clear and conversational speech: Acoustic characteristics of vowels. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research : JSLHR, 50(5), 1241–1255.
  • Gandour, J., & Dardarananda, R. (1984). Prosodic disturbance in aphasia: Vowel length in Thai. Brain and Language, 23, 206–224.
  • Gandour, J., Petty, S. H., & Dardarananda, R. (1988). Perception and production of tone in aphasia. Brain and Language, 35, 201–240.
  • Gandour, J., Petty, S. H., & Dardarananda, R. (1989). Dysprosody in Broca’s aphasia: A case study. Brain and Language, 37, 232–257.
  • Garrett, M. F. (1975). The analysis of sentence production. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (pp. 133–177). New York: Academic Press.
  • Goldman, J.-P., & Schwab, S. (2014). EasyAlign Spanish: an (semi-)automatic segmentation tool under Praat. In Y. Congosto, M. L. Montero, & A. Salvador (Eds.), Fonética experimental, Espacio Europeo de Educación Superior e Investigación, (Vol. 1, pp. 629–640). Madrid: Arco/Libros.
  • Goldstein, K. (1939). The organism: A holistic approach to biology derived from pathological data in man. Salt Lake City, UT: American Book Publishing.
  • Grela, B., & Gandour, J. (1999). Case Study Stress shift in aphasia : A multiple case study. Aphasiology, 13(2), 151–166.
  • Guerra, R. (1983). Estudio estadístico de la sílaba en español. Estudios de Fonética, 1, 9–112.
  • Gupta, P., & Touretzky, D. S. (1994). Connectionist models and linguistic theory: Investigations of stress systems in language. Cognitive Science, 18(1), 1–50.
  • Hall, T. A., & Kleinhenz, U. (1999). Studies on the phonological word (Vol. 174). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
  • Harris, J. W. (1983). Syllable structure and stress in Spanish: a nonlinear analysis. Linguistic Inquiry Monographs, 8, 1–158.
  • Harris, J. W. (1995). Projection and edge marking in the computation of stress in Spanish. In J. Goldsmith (Ed.), The handbook of phonological theory (pp. 867–888). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
  • Hayes, B. (1989). The prosodic hierarchy in meter. In P. Kiparsky & G. Youmans (Eds.), Rhythm and meter. Phonetics and phonology. (Vol. 1, pp. 201–260). San Diego: Academic Press.
  • Heeschen, C., & Schegloff, E. A. (1999). Agrammatism, adaptation theory, conversation analysis: On the role of so-called telegraphic style in talk-in-interaction. Aphasiology, 13(4–5), 365–405.
  • Heeschen, C., & Schegloff, E. A. (2003). Aphasic agrammatism as interactional artifact and achievement. In C. Goodwin (Ed.), Conversation and brain damage (pp. 231–282). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Hirst, D. (2011). The analysis by synthesis of speech melody: From data to models. Journal of Speech Sciences, 1(1), 55–83.
  • Holland, A. L. (1977). Some practical considerations in aphasia rehabilitation. In M. Sullivan & M. Kommers (Eds.), Rationale for adult aphasia therapy (pp. 167–180). Omaha, Nebraska: University of Nebraska.
  • Hualde, J. I. (2005). The Sounds of Spanish with Audio CD. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Jacks, A. (2008). Bite block vowel production in Apraxia of Speech. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research : JSLHR, 51(August), 898–913.
  • Katz, W. F., & Baum, S. R. (1987). Compensatory articulation in Broca’s aphasia: The facts aren’t in yet: A reply to Sussman et al. Brain and Language, 30, 367–373.
  • Keating, P., & Shattuck-Hufnagel, S. (2002). A prosodic view of word form encoding for speech production. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics, 101, 112–156.
  • Kent, R. D., & Rosenbek, J. C. (1983). Acoustic patterns of apraxia of speech. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 26, 231–249.
  • Khasanova, A., Cole, J., & Hasegawa-Johnson, M. (2014). Detecting articulatory compensation in acoustic data through linear regression modeling. In Fifteenth Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association (pp. 925–929). Singapore: ISCA.
  • Kim, J. H. (1995). Compensatory articulation in aphasia. McGill University.
  • Kolk, H., & Heeschen, C. (1990). Adaptation symptoms and impairment symptoms in Broca’s aphasia. Aphasiology, 4(3), 221–231.
  • Kolk, H., & Heeschen, G. (1996). The malleability of agrammatic symptoms: A reply to Hesketh and Bishop. Aphasiology, 10(1), 81–96.
  • Laakso, M., & Klippi, A. (1999). A closer look at the “hint and guess” sequences in aphasic conversation. Aphasiology, 13(4–5), 345–363.
  • Labos, E., del Río, M., Zabala, K., & Nespoulous, J. L. (2015). Protocolo Montréal-Toulouse-Buenos Aires de examen lingüístico de la afasia. Buenos Aires: Ediciones Lenguaje y Cognición.
  • Laganaro, M. (2012). Patterns of impairments in AOS and mechanisms of interaction between phonological and phonetic encoding. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 55(5), S1535–S1544.
  • Laganaro, M., Vacheresse, F., & Frauenfelder, U. H. (2002). Selective impairment of lexical stress assignment in an Italian-speaking aphasic patient. Brain and Language, 81(1–3), 601–609.
  • Lashley, K. S. (1929). Brain mechanisms and intelligence: A quantitative study of injuries to the brain. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Lenth, R., & Hervé, M. (2015). lsmeans: Least-Squares Means. R package. Retrieved from http://cran.r-project.org/package=lsmeans
  • Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Levelt, W. J. M. (1992). Accessing words in speech production: stages, processes and representations. Cognition, 42, 1–22.
  • Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(1), 1-38-75.
  • Levelt, W. J. M., & Wheeldon, L. (1994). Do speakers have access to a mental syllabary? Cognition, 50, 239–269.
  • Lindblom, B. (1990). Explaining phonetic variation: A sketch of the H&H theory. In W. J. Hardcastle & A. Marchal (Eds.), Speech production and speech modelling (pp. 403–439). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Llisterri, J., Machuca, M. J., de la Mota, C., Riera, M., & Ríos, A. (2005). La percepción del acento léxico en español. In Filología y Lingüística. Estudios ofrecidos a Antonio Quilis (pp. 271–297). Madrid, Spain: Centro Superior de Investigaciones Científicas - Universidad de Valladolid.
  • Llisterri, J., Machuca, M. J., Ríos, A., & Schwab, S. (2014). El acento léxico en contexto: datos acústicos. In Y. Congosto, M. L. Montero, & A. Salvador (Eds.), Fonética experimental, Espacio Europeo de Educación Superior e Investigación (Vol. 1, pp. 357-376). Madrid: Arco/Libros.
  • Luria, A. R. (1970). Traumatic aphasia: Its syndromes, psychology and treatment (Vol. 5). The Hague, The Netherlands: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Marczyk, A. (2015). Déficits de la composante phonético-phonologique dans l’aphasie et stratégies compensatoires. Analyse acoustique et perceptive de productions consonantiques de sujets hispanophones. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
  • Marczyk, A., & Baqué, L. (2015). Predicting segmental substitution errors in aphasic patients with phonological and phonetic encoding impairments. Loquens, 2(2), e023.
  • Marquardt, T. P., Duffy, G., & Cannito, M. P. (1995). Acoustic analysis of accurate word stress patterning in patients with apraxia of speech and Broca’s aphasia. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 4, 180–185.
  • McNeil, M. R., Robin, D. A., & Schmidt, R. A. (2009). Apraxia of speech: Definition, differentiation, and treatment. In M. R. McNeil (Ed.), Clinical management of sensorimotor speech disorders (2nd ed., pp. 249–268). New York, NY: Thieme.
  • Miceli, G., & Caramazza, A. (1993). The assignment of word stress in oral reading: Evidence from a case of acquired dyslexia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 10(3), 273–295.
  • Mooshammer, C., & Geng, C. (2008). Acoustic and articulatory manifestations of vowel reduction in German. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 38(2), 117–136.
  • Nespor, M., & Vogel, I. (2007). Prosodic phonology: with a new foreword (Vol. 28). Berlin, Germany: Walter de Gruyter.
  • Nespoulous, J.-L., Baqué, L., Rosas, A., Marczyk, A., & Estrada, M. (2013). Aphasia, phonological and phonetic voicing within the consonantal system: Preservation of phonological oppositions and compensatory strategies. Language Sciences, 39, 117–125.
  • Nespoulous, J.-L., & Virbel, J. (2004). Apport de l’étude des handicaps langagiers à la connaissance du langage humain. Revue Parole, 29–30, 5–42.
  • Nickels, L., & Howard, D. (1999). Effects of lexical stress on aphasic word production. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 13(4), 269–294.
  • Oelschlaeger, M. L., & Damico, J. S. (1998). Joint productions as a conversational strategy in aphasia. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 12(6), 459–480.
  • Ogar, J., Slama, H., Dronkers, N., Amici, S., & Gorno-Tempini, M. L. (2005). Apraxia of speech: An overview. Neurocase: Case Studies in Neuropsychology, Neuropsychiatry, and Behavioural Neurology, 11(6), 427–432.
  • Ouellette, G. P., & Baum, S. R. (1994). Acoustic analysis of prosodic cues in left- and right-hemisphere-damaged patients. Aphasiology, 8(3), 257–283.
  • Penn, C. (1987). Compensation and language recovery in the chronic aphasic patient. Aphasiology, 1(3), 235–245.
  • Peperkamp, S. A., & Wiltshire, C. (1999). Prosodic Words. Glot International, 4(4), 15–18.
  • Perkins, M. R. (2007). Pragmatic Impairment. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Quilis, A. (1983). Frecuencia de los esquemas acentuales en español. (Ed.), In AA.VV. Estudios ofrecidos a Emilio Alarcos Llorach (con motivo de sus XXV años de docencia en la Universidad de Oviedo) (Vol. 5, pp. 113–126). Oviedo (Spain): Universidad de Oviedo.
  • Quilis, A. (1981). Fonética acústica de la lengua española. Madrid, Spain: Gredos.
  • R Core Team. (2014). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from http://www.r-project.org/
  • Rao, R. (2010). Final lengthening and pause duration in three dialects of Spanish. Selected Proceedings of the Conference on Laboratory Approaches to Spanish Phonology4th, ( 1986), 69–82.
  • Rhys, C. S., Ulbrich, C., & Ordin, M. (2013). Adaptation to aphasia: Grammar, prosody and interaction. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 27(1), 46–71.
  • Robin, D. A., Bean, C., & Folkins, J. W. (1989). Lip movement in apraxia of speech. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 32, 512–523.
  • Roelofs, A. (1997). The WEAVER model of word-form encoding in speech production. Cognition, 64, 249–284.
  • Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1998). Metrical structure in planning the production of spoken words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24(4), 922–939.
  • Ross, E. D., Shayya, L., & Rousseau, J. F. (2013). Prosodic stress: Acoustic, aphasic, aprosodic and neuroanatomic interactions. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 26(5), 526–551.
  • Ryalls, J. H. (1986). An acoustic study of vowel production in aphasia. Brain and Language, 29(1), 48–67.
  • Sahraoui, H., & Nespoulous, J.-L. (2012). Across-task variability in agrammatic performance. Aphasiology, 26(6), 785–810.
  • Salis, C., & Edwards, S. (2004). Adaptation theory and non-fluent aphasia in English. Aphasiology, 18(12), 1103–1120.
  • Schiller, N. O. (2003, August). Metrical stress in speech production: A time course study. Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS 2003) (pp451–454). Bellaterra, Spain.
  • Schiller, N. O. (2006). Lexical stress encoding in single word production estimated by event-related brain potentials. Brain Research, 1112(1), 201–212.
  • Seddoh, A. S. (2004). Prosodic disturbance in aphasia: Speech timing versus intonation production. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 18(1), 17–38.
  • Selkirk, E. O. (1995). The prosodic structure of function words. Papers in Optimality Theory, 18, 439–469.
  • Sevald, C. A., Dell, G. S., & Cole, J. S. (1995). Syllable structure in speech production: Are syllables chunks or schemas? Journal of Memory and Language, 34(6), 807–820.
  • Shattuck-Hufnagel, S. (1983). Sublexical units and suprasegmental structure in speech production planning. In P. MacNeilage (Ed.), The production of speech (pp. 109–136). New York, NY: Springer.
  • Simmons-Mackie, N. N., & Damico, J. S. (1997). Reformulating the definition of compensatory strategies in aphasia. Aphasiology, 11( 8), 761–781.
  • Simmons-Mackie, N. N., Kearns, K., & Potechin, G. (2005). Treatment of aphasia through family member training. Aphasiology, 19(6), 583–593.
  • Stemberger, J. P. (1984). Structural errors in normal and agrammatic speech. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 1(4), 281–313.
  • Stemberger, J. P. (1990). Wordshape errors in language production. Cognition, 35(2), 123–157.
  • Sussman, H., Marquardt, T., Hutchinson, J., & MacNeilage, P. (1986). Compensatory articulation in Broca’s aphasia. Brain and Language, 27(1), 56–74.
  • Uchanski, R. M. (2005). Clear speech. In D. B. Pisoni & R. E. Remez (Eds.), The handbook of speech perception (pp. 207–235). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
  • Vaissière, J. (1983). Language-independent prosodic features. In A. Cutler & R. D. Ladd (Eds.), Prosody: Models and measurements (pp. 53–66). Berlin, Germany: Springer Verlag.
  • van Son, R. J. J. H., & Pols, L. C. W. (1999). An acoustic description of consonant reduction. Speech Communication, 28, 125–140.
  • Vergis, M. K., Ballard, K. J., Duffy, J. R., McNeil, M. R., Scholl, D., & Layfield, C. (2014). An acoustic measure of lexical stress differentiates aphasia and aphasia plus apraxia of speech after stroke. Aphasiology, 28(5), 1–22.
  • Vijayan, A., & Gandour, J. (1995). On the Notion of a “Subtle Phonetic Deficit” in Fluent/Posterior Aphasia. Brain and Language, 48, 106–119.
  • Waldron, H. (2013). Phonological output impairments in aphasia: different subgroups requiring different therapies? Newcastle: Newcastle University.
  • Walker, J. P., Joseph, L., & Goodman, J. (2009). The production of linguistic prosody in subjects with aphasia. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 23(7), 529–549.
  • Wickham, H. (2009). ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. New York, NY: Springer Verlag. Retrieved from http://ggplot2.org
  • Wilkinson, R., Beeke, S., & Maxim, J. (2003). Adapting to conversation: On the use of linguistic resources by speakers with fluent aphasia in the construction of turns at talk. In C. Goodwin (Ed.), Conversation and brain damage (pp. 59–89). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Wilkinson, R., Gower, M., Beeke, S., & Maxim, J. (2007). Adapting to conversation as a language-impaired speaker: Changes in aphasic turn construction over time. Communication and Medicine, 4(1), 79–97.
  • Ziegler, W., & Aichert, I. (2015). How much is a word? Predicting ease of articulation planning from apraxic speech error patterns. Cortex, 69, 24–39.
  • Ziegler, W., Aichert, I., & Staiger, A. (2012). Apraxia of Speech: Concepts and Controversies. Journal of Speech & Hearing Research, 55(October), 1485–1502.
  • Ziegler, W., Thelen, A., Staiger, A., & Liepold, M. (2008). The domain of phonetic encoding in apraxia of speech: Which sub‐lexical units count? Aphasiology, 22(11), 1230–1247.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.