References
- Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2006). Language spoken at home (full classification list) by sex, Australia, 2006. Data cube: Excel spreadsheet. Retrieved from http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/[email protected]/Lookup/2900.0main+features100622016
- Berwick, G., & Thorne, S. (2011). Timesaver photocopiable: Picture prompts (Elementary - intermediate). London, UK: Scholastic.
- Bochner, J. H., Christie, K., Hauser, P. C., & Searls, J. M. (2011). When is a difference really different? Learners’ discrimination of linguistic contrasts in American sign language. Language Learning, 61, 1302–1327. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2011.00671.x
- Bornstein, H., & Jordan, I. K. (1984). Functional signs: A new approach from simple to complex. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
- Convertino, C., Borgna, G., Marschark, M., & Durkin, A. (2014). Word and world knowledge among deaf learners with and without cochlear implants. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 19(4), 471–483. doi:10.1093/deafed/enu024
- De Bodt, M. S., Hernández-Dı́az Huici, M. E., & Van De Heyning, P. H. (2002). Intelligibility as a linear combination of dimensions in dysarthric speech. Journal of Communication Disorders, 35(3), 283–292. doi:10.1016/S0021-9924(02)00065-5
- Forli, F., Giuntini, G., Ciabotti, A., Bruschini, L., Löfkvist, U., & Berrettini, S. (2018). How does a bilingual environment affect the results in children with cochlear implants compared to monolingual-matched children? An Italian follow-up study. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 105, 56–62. doi:10.1016/j.ijporl.2017.12.006
- Guiberson, M. (2014). Bilingual skills of deaf/hard of hearing children from Spain. Cochlear Implants International, 15(2), 87–92. doi:10.1179/1754762813Y.0000000058
- Hopf, S. C., McLeod, S., & McDonagh, S. H. (2017). Validation of the Intelligibility in Context Scale for school students in Fiji. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 31(7–9), 487–502. doi:10.1080/02699206.2016.1268208
- Johnston, T., & Schembri, A. (2007). Australian sign language: An introduction to sign language linguistics. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
- Kang, O., Thomson, R. I., & Moran, M. (2018). Empirical approaches to measuring the intelligibility of different varieties of English in predicting listener comprehension. Language Learning, 68(1), 115–146. doi:10.1111/lang.12270
- Kent, R. D., Miolo, G., & Bloedel, S. (1994). The intelligibility of childrens speech: A review of evaluation procedures. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 3(2), 81–95. doi:10.1044/1058-0360.0302.81
- Klopfenstein, M. (2009). Interaction between prosody and intelligibility. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 11(4), 326–331. doi:10.1080/17549500903003094
- Kruger, J., & Dunning, D. (1999). Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one’s own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1121–1134.
- Lagerberg, T. B., Åsberg, J., Hartelius, L., & Persson, C. (2014). Assessment of intelligibility using children’s spontaneous speech: Methodological aspects. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 49(2), 228–239. doi:10.1111/1460-6984.12067
- Landa, S., Pennington, L., Miller, N., Robson, S., Thompson, V., & Steen, N. (2014). Association between objective measurement of the speech intelligibility of young people with dysarthria and listener ratings of ease of understanding. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 16(4), 408–416. doi:10.3109/17549507.2014.927922
- Lousada, M., Jesus, L. M. T., Hall, A., & Joffe, V. (2014). Intelligibility as a clinical outcome measure following intervention with children with phonologically based speech-sound disorders. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 49(5), 584–601. doi:10.1111/1460-6984.12095
- Mann, W., Marshall, C. R., Mason, K., & Morgan, G. (2010). The acquisition of sign language: The impact of phonetic complexity on phonology. Language Learning and Development, 6(1), 60–86. doi:10.1080/15475440903245951
- Marschark, M., Machmer, E., Spencer, L. J., Borgna, G., Durkin, A., & Convertino, C. (2018). Language and psychosocial functioning among deaf learners with and without cochlear implants. The Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 23(1), 28–40. doi:10.1093/deafed/enx035
- McGarr, N. S. (1981). The effect of context on the intelligibility of hearing and deaf childrens speech. Language and Speech, 24(3), 255–264. doi:10.1177/002383098102400305
- McLeod, S., & Crowe, K. (2018). Children’s consonant acquisition in 27 languages: A cross-linguistic review. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 27(4), 1546–1571. doi:10.1044/2018_AJSLP-17-0100
- McLeod, S., Crowe, K., & Shahaeian, A. (2015). Intelligibility in Context Scale: Normative and validation data for english-speaking preschoolers. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 46(3), 266–276. doi:10.1044/2015_LSHSS-14-0120
- McLeod, S., Harrison, L. J., & McCormack, J. (2012a). Intelligibility in Context Scale. Bathurst, Australia: Charles Sturt University. Retrieved from http://www.csu.edu.au/research/multilingual-speech/ics
- McLeod, S., Harrison, L. J., & McCormack, J. (2012b). Intelligibility in Context Scale: American Sign Language (K. Crowe, Trans.). Bathurst, Australia: Charles Sturt University. Retrieved from http://www.csu.edu.au/research/multilingual-speech/ics
- McLeod, S., Harrison, L. J., & McCormack, J. (2012c). The Intelligibility in Context Scale: Validity and reliability of a subjective rating measure. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 55(2), 648–656. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2011/10-0130)
- Miller, G. A., Heise, G. A., & Lichten, W. (1951). The intelligibility of speech as a function of the context of the test materials. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41(5), 329. doi:10.1037/h0062491
- Miller, N. (2013). Measuring up to speech intelligibility. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 48(6), 601–612. doi:10.1111/1460-6984.12061
- Mitchell, R. E., & Karchmer, M. A. (2004). Chasing the mythical ten percent: Parental hearing status of deaf and hard of hearing students in the United States. Sign Language Studies, 4(2), 138–163. doi:10.1353/sls.2004.0005
- Montebello Unified School District Instructional Division. (1978). Student oral language observation matrix (SOLOM). Montabello, CA: Author. Retrieved from http://www.cal.org/twi/EvalToolkit/appendix/solom.pdf
- Neumann, S., Rietz, C., & Stenneken, P. (2017). The German Intelligibility in Context Scale (ICS-G): Reliability and validity evidence. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 52(5), 585–594. doi:10.1111/1460-6984.12303
- Newell, W., Stinson, M., Castle, D., Mallery-Ruganis, D., & Holcomb, B. R. (1990). Simultaneous communication: A description by deaf professionals working in an educational setting. Sign Language Studies, 69, 391–414. doi:10.1353/sls.1990.0023
- Ortega, G., & Morgan, G. (2015). Phonological development in hearing learners of a sign language: The influence of phonological parameters, sign complexity, and iconicity. Language Learning, 65(3), 660–688. doi:10.1111/lang.12123
- Phạm, B., McLeod, S., & Harrison, L. J. (2017). Validation and norming of the Intelligibility in Context Scale in Northern Vietnam. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 31(7–9), 665–681. doi:10.1080/02699206.2017.1306110
- Sarchet, T., Marschark, M., Borgna, G., Convertino, C., Sapere, P., & Dirmyer, R. (2014). Vocabulary knowledge of deaf and hearing postsecondary students. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 27(2), 161–178.
- Shire, S. Y., & Jones, N. (2015). Communication partners supporting children with complex communication needs who use AAC: A systematic review. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 37(1), 3–15. doi:10.1177/1525740114558254
- Spencer, L. J., Marschark, M., Machmer, E., Durkin, A., Borgna, G., & Convertino, C. (2018). Communication skills of deaf and hard-of-hearing college students: Objective measures and self-assessment. Journal of Communication Disorders, 75, 13–24. doi:10.1016/j.jcomdis.2018.06.002
- van Doornik, A., Gerrits, E., McLeod, S., & Terband, H. (2018). Impact of listener familiarity and speech competence on parent ratings using the Intelligibility in Context Scale: Dutch. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 20(3), 350–360. doi:10.1080/17549507.2018.1472808
- Walton, D., Borgna, G., Marschark, M., Crowe, K., & Trussell, J. (2019). I am not unskilled and unaware: Deaf and hearing learners’ self-assessments of linguistic and nonlinguistic skills. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 34(1), 20–34. doi:10.1080/08856257.2018.1435010
- Washington, K. N., McDonald, M. M., McLeod, S., Crowe, K., & Devonish, H. (2017). Validation of the Intelligibility in Context Scale for Jamaican Creole-speaking preschoolers. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 26, 750–761. doi:10.1044/2016_AJSLP-15-0103
- Weismer, G. (2008). Speech intelligibility. In M. J. Ball, M. R. Perkins, N. Müller, & S. Howard (Eds.), The handbook of clinical linguistics (pp. 568–582). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
- Yoshinaga-Itano, C., & Sedey, A. (1998). Early speech development in children who are deaf or hard of hearing: Interrelationships with language and hearing. Volta Review, 100(5), 181–211.