N400 and short speech stimuli

References

• Arbel, Y., Spencer, K. M., & Donchin, E. (2011). The N400 and the P300 are not all that independent. Psychophysiology, 48, 861–875. doi:10.1111/psyp.2011.48.issue-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archbold, S., Harris, M., O‘Donoghue, G., Nikolopoulos, T., White, A., & Richmond, H. L. (2008). Reading abilities after cochlear implantation: The effect of age at implantation on outcomes at 5 and 7 years after implantation. Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 72, 1471–1478. doi:10.1016/j.ijporl.2008.06.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishop, D. V. M., Hardiman, M., Uwer, R., & von Suchodoletz, W. (2007). Atypical long-latency auditory event-related potentials in a subset of children with specific language impairment. Developmental Science, 10(5), 576–587. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00620.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishop, D. V. M., & McArthur, M. C. (2004). Immature cortical responses to auditory stimuli in specific language impairment: Evidence from ERPs to rapid tone sequences. Developmental Science, 7(4), F11–F18. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2004.00356.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan, C. C., Barry, R. J., Connolly, J. F., Fischer, C., Michie, P. T., Näätänen, R., … Van Petten, C. (2009). Event-related potentials in clinical research: Guidelines for eliciting, recording, and quantifying mismatch negativity, P300, and N400. Clinical Neurophysiology, 120, 1883–1908. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2009.07.045
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guberina, P., & Asp, C. W. (1981). The verbo-tonal method for rehabilitating people with communication problems. New York: World Rehabilitation Fund.
   Google Scholar
• Henkin, Y., Kileny, P. R., Hildesheimer, M., & Kishon-Rabin, L. (2008). Phonetic processing in children with cochlear implants: An auditory event-related potentials study. Ear and Hearing, 29(2), 239–249. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181824d15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henkin, Y., Tetin-Schneider, S., Hildesheimer, M., & Kishon-Rabin, L. (2009). Cortical neural activity underlying speech perception in postlingual adult cochlear implant recipients. Audiology and Neuro-Otology, 14(1), 39–53. doi:10.1159/000153434
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2000). Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 463–470. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01560-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mijić-Munivrana, V. (1994). Utjecaj funkcije vestibularnog osjetila na uspjeh rehabilitacije sluha i govora u gluhih [The influence of vestibular function on the outcome of rehabilitation of speech and language in the deaf] ( Unpublished master’s thesis). University of Zagreb.
   Google Scholar
• Munivrana, B. (2011). Kognitivni slušni evocirani potencijali (CAEP) u djece s UMP-om [Cognitive auditory evoked potentials in children with cochlear implants] ( Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Zagreb.
   Google Scholar
• Munivrana, B., & Mildner, V. (2013). Cortical auditory evoked potentials in unsuccessful cochlear implant users. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 27(6–7), 472–483. doi:10.3109/02699206.2013.771214
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paškvalin, M., Dulčić, A., Pansini, M., Vlahović, S., Dabić-Munk, D., Klier, B., … Kekić, B. (2005). Umjetna pužnica – Verbotonalni pristup [Cochlear implants: The verbotonal approach]. Zagreb: Poliklinika SUVAG.
   Google Scholar
• Polich, J. (2007). Updating P300: An integrative theory of P3a and P3b. Clinical Neurophysiology, 118(10), 2128–2148. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2007.04.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, A., Dorman, M. F., & Kral, A. (2005). The influence of a sensitive period on central auditory development in children with bilateral and unilateral cochlear implants. Hearing Research, 203, 134–143. doi:10.1016/j.heares.2004.12.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, A., Dorman, M. F., & Spahr, A. J. (2002a). Rapid development of cortical auditory evoked potentials after early cochlear implantation. Neuroreport, 13, 1365–1368. doi:10.1097/00001756-200207190-00030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, A., Dorman, M. F., & Spahr, A. J. (2002b). A sensitive period for the development of the central auditory system in children with cochlear implants: Implications for age of implantation. Ear & Hearing, 23(6), 523–539. doi:10.1097/00003446-200212000-00004
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, A., Gilley, P. M., Dorman, M. F., & Baldwin, R. (2007). Deprivation-induced cortical reorganization in children with cochlear implants. International Journal of Audiology, 46, 494–499. doi:10.1080/14992020701524836
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, A., Kraus, N., McGee, T. J., & Nicol, T. G. (1997). Developmental changes in P1 and N1 central auditory responses elicited by consonant-vowel syllables. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 104, 540–545. doi:10.1016/S0168-5597(97)00050-6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stevens, C., Fanning, J., Coch, D., Sanders, L., & Neville, H. (2008). Neural mechanisms of selective auditory attention are enhanced by computerized training: Electrophysiological evidence from language-impaired and typically developing children. Brain Research, 1205, 55–69. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2007.10.108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Berkum, J. J., Hagoort, P., & Brown, C. M. (1999). Semantic integration in sentences and discourse: Evidence from the N400. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11(6), 657–671. doi:10.1162/089892999563724
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vlahović, S., & Šindija, B. (2004). The influence of potentially limiting factors on paediatric outcome following cochlear implantation. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 68, 1167–1174. doi:10.1016/j.ijporl.2004.03.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar