Native and non-native listeners’ judgements on the overall speech quality of hearing-impaired children

References

• Abercrombie, D. (1967). Elements of general phonetics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• AlSanosi, A., & Hassan, S. M. (2014). The effect of age at cochlear implantation outcomes in Saudi children. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 78(2), 272–276. doi:10.1016/j.ijporl.2013.11.021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baayen, H. (2008). Analyzing linguistic data. A practical introduction to statistics using R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bakhshaee, M., Ghasemi, M. M., Shakeri, M. T., Razmara, N., Tayarani, H., & Tale, M. R. (2007). Speech development in children after cochlear implantation. European Archives of Oto-rhino-laryngology, 264(11), 1263–1266. doi:10.1007/s00405-007-0358-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baudonck, N., Dhooge, I., D’haeseleer, E., & Van Lierde, K. (2010a). A comparison of the consonant production between Dutch children using cochlear implants and children using hearing aids. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 74(4), 416–421. doi:10.1016/j.ijporl.2010.01.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baudonck, N., Dhooge, I., & Van Lierde, K. (2010b). Intelligibility of hearing impaired children as judged by their parents: A comparison between children using cochlear implants and children using hearing aids. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 74(11), 1310–1315. doi:10.1016/j.ijporl.2010.08.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bejar, I. I. (2012). Rater cognition: Implications for validity. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 31(3), 2–9. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3992.2012.00238.x
   Google Scholar
• Boonen, N., Kloots, H., & Gillis, S. (2020). Rating the overall speech quality of hearing-impaired children by means of comparative judgements. Journal of Communication Disorders, 83, 105969. doi:10.1016/j.jcomdis.2019.105969
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boonen, N., Kloots, H., Verhoeven, J., & Gillis, S. (2019). Can listeners hear the difference between children with normal hearing and children with a hearing impairment? Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 33(4), 316–333. doi:10.1080/02699206.2018.1513564
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradley, R. A., & Terry, M. E. (1952). Rank analysis of incomplete block designs. Biometrika, 39(3–4), 324–345. doi:10.1093/biomet/39.3-4.324
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin, S. B., & Kuhns, M. J. (2014). Proximate factors associated with speech intelligibility in children with cochlear implants: A preliminary study. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 28(7–8), 532–542. doi:10.3109/02699206.2014.926997
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ching, T. Y. C., Rattanasone, N. X., Macdonald, G., Zhang, V. W., Button, L., & Demuth, K. (2015). Intelligibility of speech produced by children with hearing loss: Conventional amplification versus nonlinear frequency compression in hearing aids. Journal of Communication Disorders, Deaf Studies & Hearing Aids, 3, 135. doi:10.4172/2375-4427.1000135
   Google Scholar
• Colman, A. M. (2009). A dictionary of psychology (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dalby, A. (2006). Dictionary of languages: The definitive reference to more than 400 languages. London, UK: A&C Black.
   Google Scholar
• De Raeve, L. (2010). A longitudinal study on auditory perception and speech intelligibility in deaf children implanted younger than 18 months in comparison to those implanted at later ages. Otology & Neurotology, 31(8), 1261–1267. doi:10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181f1cde3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, L. W., & Beltyukova, S. A. (2008). Effects of training on naive listeners’ judgments of the speech intelligibility of children with severe-to-profound hearing loss. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 51(5), 1114–1123. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2008/06-0217)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elmentaler, M. (2009). Deutsch und seine Nachbarn. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Ertmer, D. J. (2007). Speech intelligibility in young cochlear implant recipients: Gains during year three. The Volta Review, 107(2), 85–99.
   Google Scholar
• Escudero, P., Benders, T., & Lipski, S. C. (2009). Native, non-native and L2 perceptual cue weighting for Dutch vowels: The case of Dutch, German, and Spanish listeners. Journal of Phonetics, 37(4), 452–465. doi:10.1016/j.wocn.2009.07.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escudero, P., Sisinni, B., & Grimaldi, M. (2014). The effect of vowel inventory and acoustic properties in Salento Italian learners of Southern British English vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 135(3), 1577–1584. doi:10.1121/1.4864477
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang, H. Y., Ko, H. C., Wang, N. M., Fang, T. J., Chao, W. C., Tsou, Y. T., & Wu, C. M. (2014). Auditory performance and speech intelligibility of Mandarin-speaking children implanted before age 5. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 78(5), 799–803. doi:10.1016/j.ijporl.2014.02.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flege, J. E., Bohn, O. S., & Jang, S. (1997). Effects of experience on non-native speakers’ production and perception of English vowels. Journal of Phonetics, 25(4), 437–470. doi:10.1006/jpho.1997.0052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, V., Pisoni, D. B., Kronenberger, W. G., & Castellanos, I. (2017). Speech intelligibility and psychosocial functioning in deaf children and teens with cochlear implants. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 22(3), 278–289. doi:10.1093/deafed/enx001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gandour, J., Wong, D., Hsieh, L., Weinzapfel, B., Van Lancker, D., & Hutchins, G. D. (2000). A crosslinguistic PET study of tone perception. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12(1), 207–222. doi:10.1162/089892900561841
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geers, A. E., & Nicholas, J. G. (2013). Enduring advantages of early cochlear implantation for spoken language development. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 56(2), 643–655. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2012/11-0347)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillis, S. (2017). Speech and language in congenitally deaf children with a cochlear implant. In A. Bar-On & D. Ravid (Eds.), Handbook of communication disorders: Theoretical, empirical, and applied linguistic perspectives (pp. 763–790). Berlin, Germany: Mouton De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Gooskens, C., van Bezooijen, R., & van Heuven, V. J. (2015). Mutual intelligibility of Dutch-German cognates by children: The devil is in the detail. Linguistics, 53(2), 255–283. doi:10.1515/ling-2015-0002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gooskens, C., van Heuven, V. J., Golubović, J., Schüppert, A., Swarte, F., & Voigt, S. (2018). Mutual intelligibility between closely related languages in Europe. International Journal of Multilingualism, 15(2), 169–193. doi:10.1080/14790718.2017.1350185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottfried, T. L., & Beddor, P. S. (1988). Perception of temporal and spectral information in French vowels. Language and Speech, 31(1), 57–75. doi:10.1177/002383098803100103
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grondelaers, S., & Lybaert, C. (2017). Bepaalt wat we denken en voelen over taal ook wat we doen in taal? In G. De Sutter (Ed.), De vele gezichten van het Nederlands in Vlaanderen (pp. 163–181). Leuven, Belgium: Acco.
   Google Scholar
• Grondelaers, S., van Hout, R., & Speelman, D. (2011). A perceptual typology of standard language situations in the low countries. In T. Kristiansen & N. Coupland (Eds.), Standard languages and language standards in a changing Europe (pp. 199–222). Oslo, Norway: Novus Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hide, Ø. (2013). Acoustic features of speech by young cochlear implant users. A comparison with normal-hearing and hearing-aided age mates ( Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
   Google Scholar
• Holden, K. T., & Nearey, T. M. (1986). A preliminary report on three Russian dialects: Vowel perception and production. Russian Language Journal, 40(136/137), 3–21.
   Google Scholar
• Impe, L. (2010). Mutual intelligibility of national and regional varieties of Dutch in the Low Countries ( Unpublished doctoral dissertation). KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
   Google Scholar
• Jarvis, S., & Pavlenko, A. (2008). Crosslinguistic influence in language and cognition. London, UK: Routledge Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Kloiber, D. T., & Ertmer, D. J. (2015). Can children substitute for adult listeners in judging the intelligibility of the speech of children who are deaf or hard of hearing? Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 46, 56–63. doi:10.1044/2014_lshss-13-0043
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kondo, K. (2012). Subjective quality measurement of speech. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Korver, A. M., Smith, R. J., Van Camp, G., Schleiss, M. R., Bitner-Glindzicz, M. A., Lustig, L. R., … Boudewyns, A. N. (2017). Congenital hearing loss. Nature Reviews Disease Primers, 3, 16094. doi:10.1038/nrdp.2016.94
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lejeune, B., & Demanez, L. (2006). Speech discrimination and intelligibility: Outcome of deaf children fitted with hearing aids or cochlear implants. B-ENT, 2(2), 63–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lesterhuis, M., Verhavert, S., Coertjens, L., Donche, V., & De Maeyer, S. (2017). Comparative judgment as a promising alternative to score competences. In E. Cano & G. Ion (Eds.), Innovative practices for higher education assessment and measurement (pp. 119–138). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Loizou, P. C. (2011). Speech quality assessment. In W. Lin, D. Tao, J. Kacprzyk, Z. Li, E. Izquierdo, & H. Wang (Eds.), Multimedia analysis, processing and communications (Vol. 346, pp. 623–654). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lybaert, C., & Delarue, S. (2017). ‘k Spreek ekik ver altijd zo. Over de opmars van tussentaal in Vlaanderen. In G. De Sutter (Ed.), De vele gezichten van het Nederlands in Vlaanderen (pp. 142–162). Leuven, Belgium: Acco.
   Google Scholar
• Montag, J. L., AuBuchon, A. M., Pisoni, D. B., & Kronenberger, W. G. (2014). Speech intelligibility in deaf children after long-term cochlear implant use. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 57(6), 2332–2343. doi:10.1044/2014_JSLHR-H-14-0190
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munson, B., Johnson, J. M., & Edwards, J. (2012). The role of experience in the perception of phonetic detail in children’s speech: A comparison between speech-language pathologists and clinically untrained listeners. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 21(2), 124–139. doi:10.1044/1058-0360(2011/11-0009)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osberger, M. J., & McGarr, N. S. (1982). Speech production characteristics of the hearing impaired. In N. Lass (Ed.), Speech and language: Advances in basic research and practice (Vol. 8, pp. 221–283). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peng, S.-C., Spencer, L. J., & Tomblin, J. B. (2004). Speech intelligibility of pediatric cochlear implant recipients with 7 years of device experience. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47(6), 1227–1236. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2004/092)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2016). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Retrieved from www.R-project.org
   Google Scholar
• Schiavetti, N. (1992). Scaling procedures for the measurement of speech intelligibility. In R. D. Kent (Ed.), Intelligibility in speech disorders: Theory, measurement and management (pp. 11–34). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Spencer, L. J., Tye-Murray, N., & Tomblin, J. B. (1998). The production of English inflectional morphology, speech production and listening performance in children with cochlear implants. Ear & Hearing, 19(4), 310–318. doi:10.1097/00003446-199808000-00006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, C. (2009). Mutual intelligibility of Chinese dialects ( Doctoral dissertation). University of Leiden, Leiden, The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Tobey, E. A., Rekart, D., Buckley, K., & Geers, A. E. (2004). Mode of communication and classroom placement impact on speech intelligibility. Archives of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 130(5), 639–643. doi:10.1001/archotol.130.5.639
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomblin, J. B., Harrison, M., Ambrose, S. E., Walker, E. A., Oleson, J. J., & Moeller, M. P. (2015). Language outcomes in young children with mild to severe hearing loss. Ear and Hearing, 36, 76S–91S. doi:10.1097/aud.0000000000000219
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tomblin, J. B., Spencer, L., Flock, S., Tyler, R., & Gantz, B. (1999). A comparison of language achievement in children with cochlear implants and children using hearing aids. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 42(2), 497–509. doi:10.1044/jslhr.4202.497
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Heuven, V. J. (2008). Making sense of strange sounds: (Mutual) intelligibility of related language varieties. A review. International Journal of Humanities and Arts Computing, 2(1–2), 39–62. doi:10.3366/e1753854809000305
   Google Scholar
• Van Lierde, K. M., Vinck, B. M., Baudonck, N., De Vel, E., & Dhooge, I. (2005). Comparison of the overall intelligibility, articulation, resonance, and voice characteristics between children using cochlear implants and those using bilateral hearing aids: A pilot study. International Journal of Audiology, 44(8), 452–465. doi:10.1080/14992020500189146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhavert, S. (2018). Beyond a mere rank order: The method, the reliability and the efficiency of comparative judgment ( Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
   Google Scholar
• Verhavert, S., De Maeyer, S., Donche, V., & Coertjens, L. (2018). Scale separation reliability: What does it mean in the context of comparative judgment? Applied Psychological Measurement, 42(6), 428–445. doi:10.1177/0146621617748321
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhoeven, J., Hide, Ø., De Maeyer, S., Gillis, S., & Gillis, S. (2016). Hearing impairment and vowel production. A comparison between normally hearing, hearing-aided and cochlear implanted Dutch children. Journal of Communication Disorders, 59, 24–39. doi:10.1016/j.jcomdis.2015.10.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, H., & van Heuven, V. J. (2004). Cross-linguistic confusion of vowels produced and perceived by Chinese, Dutch and American speakers of English. Linguistics in the Netherlands, 21, 205–216. doi:10.1075/avt.21.22wan
   Google Scholar
• Williams, D., & Escudero, P. (2014). Native and non-native speech perception. Acoustics Australia, 42(2), 79–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshinaga-Itano, C., Baca, R. L., & Sedey, A. L. (2010). Describing the trajectory of language development in the presence of severe-to-profound hearing loss: A closer look at children with cochlear implants versus hearing aids. Otology & Neurotology, 31(8), 1268–1274. doi:10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181f1ce07
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar