Agreements between speech language pathologists and naïve listeners’ judgements of intelligibility in children with cleft palate

References

• Abur, D., Enos, N. M., & Stepp, C. E. (2019). Visual analog scale ratings and orthographic transcription measures of sentence intelligibility in Parkinson’s disease with variable listener exposure. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 28(3), 1222–1232. https://doi.org/10.1044/2019_AJSLP-18-0275
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beukelman, D. R., & Yorkston, K. M. (1980). Influence of passage familiarity on intelligibility estimates of dysarthric speech. Journal of Communication Disorders, 13(1), 33–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borrie, S. A., McAuliffe, M. J., Liss, J. M., Kirk, C., O'Beirne, G. A., & Anderson, T. (2012). Familiarisation conditions and the mechanisms that underlie improved recognition of dysarthric speech. Language and Cognitive Processes, 27(7–8), 1039–1055.
   Google Scholar
• Bradley, J. S., & Sato, H. (2004). Speech intelligibility test results for grades 1, 3 and 6 children in real classrooms. Proceedings of ICA, Kyoto.
   Google Scholar
• Brunnegård, K., Lohmander, A., & van Doorn, J. (2009). Untrained listeners' ratings of speech disorders in a group with cleft palate: A comparison with speech and language pathologists ‚ratings. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 44(5), 656–674
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castick, S., Knight, R., & Sell, D. (2017). Perceptual judgments of resonance, nasal airflow, understandability, and acceptability in speakers with cleft palate: Ordinal versus visual analogue scaling. The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal, 54(1), 19–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman, K. L., Baylis, A., Trost-Cardamone, J., Cordero, K. N., Dixon, A., Dobbelsteyn, C., . . . Sweeney, T. (2016). The americleft speech project: A training and reliability study. The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal, 53(1), 93–108.
   Google Scholar
• D’Innocenzo, J., Tjaden, K., & Greenman, G. (2006). Intelligibility in dysarthria: Effects of listener familiarity and speaking condition. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 20(9), 659–675.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalston, R. M., Warren, D. W., & Dalston, E. T. (1991). Use of nasometry as a diagnostic tool for identifying patients with velopharyngeal impairment. The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal, 28(2), 184–189. https://doi.org/10.1597/1545-1569_1991_028_0184_uonaad_2.3.co_2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle, P. C., Swift, E. R., & Haaf, R. G. (1989). Effects of listener sophistication on judgments of tracheoesophageal talker intelligibility. Journal of Communication Disorders, 22(2), 105–113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eakins, B. W. (1969). Research in slow‐played speech: Listener training, consonant errors, and sex and age differences in speaker intelligibility. Communication Studies, 20(4), 302–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, L. W., & Fucci, D. J. (1992). Effects of listeners’ experience on two measures of intelligibility. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 74(3_suppl), 1099–1104.
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher, S. G. (1978). Diagnosing speech disorders from cleft palate. Saunders.
   Google Scholar
• Hinkle, D. E., Wiersma, W., & Jurs, S. G. (2003). Applied statistics for the behavioral sciences (Vol. 663). Houghton Mifflin College Division.
   Google Scholar
• Hodge, M., & Gotzke, C. L. (2007). Preliminary results of an intelligibility measure for english-speaking children with cleft palate. The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal, 44(2), 163–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hustad, K. C. (2006). Estimating the intelligibility of speakers with dysarthria. Folia Phoniatrica Et Logopaedica, 58(3), 217–228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutters, B., & Henningsson, G. (2004). Speech outcome following treatment in cross-linguistic cleft palate studies: Methodological implications. The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal, 41(5), 544–549.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John, A., Sell, D., Sweeney, T., Harding-Bell, A., & Williams, A. (2006). The cleft audit protocol for speech—augmented: A validated and reliable measure for auditing cleft speech. The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal, 43(3), 272–288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karnell, M. P., Ibuki, K., Morris, H. L., & Van Demark, D. R. (1983). Reliability of the nasopharyngeal fiberscope (NPF) for assessing velopharyngeal function: Analysis by judgment. The Cleft Palate Journal, 20(3), 199–208
   Google Scholar
• Kent, R. D., Miolo, G., & Bloedel, S. (1994). The intelligibility of children’s speech: A review of evaluation procedures. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 3(2), 81–95.
   Google Scholar
• Keuning, K. H., Wieneke, G. H., & Dejonckere, P. H. (1999). The intrajudge reliability of the perceptual rating of cleft palate speech before and after pharyngeal flap surgery: The effect of judges and speech samples. The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal, 36(4), 328–333.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klasner, E. R., & Yorkston, K. M. (2005). Speech intelligibility in ALS and HD dysarthria: The everyday listener’s perspective. Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology, 13(2), 127–140. Retrieved September 20, 2021, from link.gale.com/apps/doc/A133706268/AONE?u=anon~c0c34382&sid=googleScholar&xid=c1b5a8f7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klintö, K., Salameh, E., Svensson, H., & Lohmander, A. (2015). The impact of speech material on speech judgement in children with and without cleft palate. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 46(3), 348–360. https://doi.org/10.3109/13682822.2010.507615
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konst, E. M., Weersink-Braks, H., Rietveld, T., & Peters, H. (2000). An intelligibility assessment of toddlers with cleft lip and palate who received and did not receive presurgical infant orthopedic treatment. Journal of Communication Disorders, 33(6), 483–501. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9924(00)00035-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreiman, J., Gerratt, B. R., & Precoda, K. (1990). Listener experience and perception of voice quality. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 33(1), 103–115. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3301.103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreiman, J., Gerratt, B. R., Precoda, K., & Berke, G. S. (1992). Individual differences in voice quality perception. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 35(3), 512–520. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3503.512
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwiatkowski, J., & Shriberg, L. D. (1992). Intelligibility assessment in developmental phonological disorders: Accuracy of caregiver gloss. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 35(5), 1095–1104. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3505.1095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, A., Whitehill, T. L., & Ciocca, V. (2009). Effect of listener training on perceptual judgement of hypernasality. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 23(5), 319–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699200802688596
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenhardt, M. L., Skellett, R., Wang, P., & Clarke, A. M. (1991). Human ultrasonic speech perception. Science (New York, N.Y.), 253(5015), 82–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, K. E., Watterson, T. L., & Houghton, S. M. (2003). The influence of listener experience and academic training on ratings of nasality. Journal of Communication Disorders, 36(1), 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9924(02)00134-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lohmander, A., & Olsson, M. (2004). Methodology for perceptual assessment of speech in patients with cleft palate: A critical review of the literature. The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal, 41(1), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.1597/02-136
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mangan, K. R. (1961). Speech improvement through articulation testing. American Annals of the Deaf, 391–396. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44394170?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCroskey, R. L., & Mulligan, M. (1963). The relative intelligibility of esophageal speech and artificial-larynx speech. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 28(1), 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshd.2801.37
   Google Scholar
• McGarr, N. S. (1983). The intelligibility of deaf speech to experienced and inexperienced listeners. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 26(3), 451–458. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.2603.451
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McWilliams, B. J. (1954). Some factors in the intelligibility of cleft-palate speech. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 19(4), 524–527. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshd.1904.524
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mencke, E. O., Ochsner, G. J., & Testut, E. W. (1983). Listener judges and the speech intelligibility of deaf children. Journal of Communication Disorders, 16(3), 175–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9924(83)90031-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, N. (2013). Measuring up to speech intelligibility. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 48(6), 601–612. https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12061
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monsen, R. B. (1978). Toward measuring how well hearing-impaired children speak. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 21(2), 197–219. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.2102.197
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nilsson, M., Soli, S. D., & Sullivan, J. A. (1994). Development of the hearing in noise test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 95(2), 1085–1099. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.408469
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orr, D. B., Friedman, H. L., & Williams, J. C. (1965). Trainability of listening comprehension of speeded discourse. Journal of Educational Psychology, 56(3), 148. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0021987
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papso, C. F., & Blood, I. M. (1989). Word recognition skills of children and adults in background noise. Ear and Hearing, 10(4), 235–236.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peirce, J. W. (2007). PsychoPy—psychophysics software in python. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 162(1–2), 8–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2006.11.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, M., & Lerman, J. (1970). A picture identification test for hearing-impaired children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 13(1), 44–53. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.1301.44
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schiavetti, N., & Kent, R. D. (1992). Scaling procedures for the measurement of speech intelligibility. In Intelligibility in speech disorders (pp. 11–34).
   Google Scholar
• Sell, D. (2005). Issues in perceptual speech analysis in cleft palate and related disorders: A review. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 40(2), 103–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/13682820400016522
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starr, C. D., Moller, K. T., Dawson, W., Graham, J., & Skaar, S. (1984). Speech ratings by speech clinicians parents and children. The Cleft Palate Journal, 21(4), 286–292. https://europepmc.org/article/med/6595084
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stipancic, K. L., Tjaden, K., & Wilding, G. (2016). Comparison of intelligibility measures for adults with Parkinson’s disease, adults with multiple sclerosis, and healthy controls. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 59(2), 230–238. https://doi.org/10.1044/2015_JSLHR-S-15-0271
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subtelny, J. D., Van Hattum, R. J., & Myers, B. B. (1972). Ratings and measures of cleft palate speech. The Cleft Palate Journal, 9(1), 18–27.
   Google Scholar
• Tonz, M., Schmid, I., Graf, M., Mischler-Heeb, R., Weissen, J., & Kaiser, G. (2002). Blinded speech evaluation following pharyngeal flap surgery by speech pathologists and lay people in children with cleft palate. Folia Phoniatrica Et Logopaedica: Official Organ of the International Association of Logopedics and Phoniatrics (IALP), 54 (6), 288–295. 66153. https://doi.org/10.1159/000066153
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Utianski, R. L., Lansford, K. L., Liss, J. M., & Azuma, T. (2011). The effects of topic knowledge on intelligibility and lexical segmentation in hypokinetic and ataxic dysarthria. Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology, 19(4), 25. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3738182/
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van Erp, A. J. M. (1991). The phonetic basis of personality ratings: With specific reference to cleft-palate speech [Sl: sn].
   Google Scholar
• Whitehill, T. L. (2002). Assessing intelligibility in speakers with cleft palate: A critical review of the literature. The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal, 39(1), 50–58. https://doi.org/10.1597/1545-1569_2002_039_0050_aiiswc_2.0.co_2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willadsen, E., & Poulsen, M. (2012). A restricted test of single-word intelligibility in 3-year-old children with and without cleft palate. The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal, 49(3), 6–16. https://doi.org/10.1597/10-141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, S. E., & Watson, J. B. (1985). Differences in speaking proficiencies in three laryngectomee groups. Archives of Otolaryngology, 111(4), 216–219. https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.1985.00800060040003
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• World WideOrganization. (2007). ICF-CY, international classification of functioning, disability and health (Children and Youth Version). Geneva: World Heath Organization.
   Google Scholar
• Zajac, D. J., Plante, C., Lloyd, A., & Haley, K. L. (2011). Reliability and validity of a computer-mediated, single-word intelligibility test: Preliminary findings for children with repaired cleft lip and palate. The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal, 48(5), 538–549. https://doi.org/10.1597/09-166
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar