Verb morphology in Turkish-speaking children with and without DLD: the role of morphophonology

References

• Acarlar, F., & Johnston, J. R. (2006). Computer-based analysis of Turkish child language: Clinical and research applications. Journal of Multilingual Communication Disorders, 4(2), 78–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/14769670600704821
   Google Scholar
• Acarlar, F., & Johnston, J. R. (2011). Acquisition of Turkish grammatical morphology by children with developmental disorders. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 46(6), 728–738. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-6984.2011.00035.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aksan, Y., Aksan, M., Mersinli, Ü., & Demirhan, U. U. (2017). A frequency dictionary of Turkish: Core vocabulary for learners. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Aksu-Koç, A. (2010). The course of normal language development in Turkish. In S. Topbas & M. Yavas (Eds.), Communication disorders in Turkish (pp. 65–104). Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847692474-009
   Google Scholar
• Aksu-Koç, A., Ketrez, F. N., Laalo, K., Pfeiler, B., Laaha, S., & Gillis, S. (2007). Agglutinating languages: Turkish, Finnish, and Yucatec Maya. In Typological perspectives on the acquisition of noun and verb morphology (series no. 112, pp. 47–57). Antwerp Papers in Linguistics. ISBN: 0776-3859.
   Google Scholar
• Aksu-Koc, A., & Slobin, D. I. (1985). The acquisition of Turkish. In D. I. Slobin (Ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition (Vol. 1, pp. 839–878). Erlbaum. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315802541
   Google Scholar
• Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2014). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. arXiv preprint arXiv:1406.5823. Cornell University.
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, L., Lifter, K., & Hafitz, J. (1980). Semantics of verbs and the development of verb inflection in child language. Language, 56(2), 386–412. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1980.0001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bortolini, U., Caselli, M. C., Deevy, P., & Leonard, L. B. (2002). Specific language impairment in Italian: The first steps in the search for a clinical marker. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 37(2), 77–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/13682820110116758
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bortolini, U., & Leonard, L. B. (1996). Phonology and grammatical morphology in specific language impairment: Accounting for individual variation in English and Italian. Applied Psycholinguistics, 17(1), 85–104. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716400009474
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bottari, P., Cipriana, P., Chilosi, A. M., & Pfanner, L. (1998). The determiner system in a group of Italian children with SLI. Language Acquisition, 7(2–4), 285–315. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327817la0702–4_7
   Google Scholar
• Çavuş, N. (2009). In search of clinical markers in Turkish SLI; An analysis of the nominal morphology in Turkish bilingual children [Master’s thesis]. General Linguistics, Faculty of Humanities,University of Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed. ed.). Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, J. R., & Howell, D. C. (1998). Comparing an individual’s test score against norms derived from small samples. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 12(4), 482–486. https://doi.org/10.1076/clin.12.4.482.7241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Jong, J., Çavus, N., & Baker, A. (2010). Language impairment in Turkish-Dutch bilingual children. In S. Topbas, & M. Yavas (Eds.), Hgg. Communication disorders in Turkish (pp. 288–300). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Göksel, A., & Kerslake, C. (2004). Turkish: A comprehensive grammar. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Good, J., & Yu, A. C. (2005). Morphosyntax of two Turkish subject pronominal paradigms. In L. Heggie & F. Ordonez (Eds.), Clitic and affix combinations: Theoretical perspectives (Vol. 74, pp. 315–374). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. ISBN: 9027227985.
   Google Scholar
• Güven, S. (2015). Diagnostic accuracy of two language development tests in Turkish. Doctoral dissertation, Anadolu University.
   Google Scholar
• Güven, S., & Leonard, L. B. (2020). Production of noun suffixes by Turkish–speaking children with developmental language disorder and their typically developing peers. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 55(3), 387–400. https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12525
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hohenberger, A., Altan, A., Kaya, U., Tuncer, Ö. K., & Avcu, E. (2016). Sensitivity of Turkish infants to vowel harmony. In B. Haznedar & F. N. Ketrez (Eds.), The acquisition of Turkish in childhood (Vol. 20, pp. 29–56). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. ISBN: 9789027244109.
   Google Scholar
• Kauschke, C., Renner, L., & Domahs, U. (2013). Prosodic constraints of inflected words: An area of difficulty for German-speaking children with Specific Language Impairment? Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 27(8), 574–593. https://doi.org/10.3109/02699206.2013.798033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerkhoff, A., & De Bree, E. (2004). Acquisition of morpho-phonology in children with specific language impairment and typically developing children. In UiL-OTS yearbook (pp. 37–51). Utrecht University.
   Google Scholar
• Kornfilt, J. (2018). Some remarks on the interaction of case and word order in Turkish: Implications for acquisition. In B. Lust, M. Suner, J. Whitmann, & S. Flynn (Eds.), Heads, projections, and learnability (pp. 171–199). Psychology Press. ISBN: 9781315789217.
   Google Scholar
• Kornfilt, J. (1997). Turkish (1st ed.). Routledge https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315823652
   Google Scholar
• Kornfilt, J. (1990). Turkish and the Turkic languages. The world’s major languages (pp. 619–644). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kunnari, S., Savinainen-Makkonen, T., Leonard, L. B., Mäkinen, L., Tolonen, A. K., Luotonen, M., & Leinonen, E. (2011). Children with specific language impairment in Finnish: The use of tense and agreement inflections. Journal of Child Language, 38(5), p. 999. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000910000528
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Küntay, A., & Slobin, D. I. (1995). Nouns and verbs in Turkish child directed speech. In Proceedings of the 19th annual Boston University conference on language development, Boston University (Vol. 1, pp. 323–334). Cascadilla Press.
   Google Scholar
• Küntay, A., & Slobin, D. I. (2002). Putting interaction back into child language: Examples from Turkish. Psychology of Language and Communication, 6(1), 5–14.
   Google Scholar
• Leonard, L. B., Deevy, P., Kurtz, R., Krantz Chorev, L., Owen, A., Polite, E., Elam, D., & Finneran, D. (2007). Lexical aspect and the use of verb morphology by children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50(3), 759–777. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2007/053)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonard, L. B., Kunnari, S., Savinainen-Makkonen, T., Tolonen, A. K., Mäkinen, L., Luotonen, M., & Leinonen, E. (2014). Noun case suffix use by children with specific language impairment: An examination of Finnish. Applied Psycholinguistics, 35(4), 833. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716412000598
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonard, L. B. (2014). Children with specific language impairment. MIT press.
   Google Scholar
• Lukács, Á., Leonard, L. B., Kas, B., & Pléh, C. (2009). The use of tense and agreement by Hungarian-speaking children with language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 52(1), 98–117. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2008/07-0183)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyons, J. (1968). Introduction to theoretical linguistics (Vol. 510). Cambridge university press.
   Google Scholar
• MacWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES project: Tools for analyzing talk. Third Ed. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Nakipoğlu, M., & Ketrez, N. (2006). Children’s overregularizations and irregularizations of the Turkish aorist. In BUCLD 30: Proceedings of the Boston University conference on language development (pp. 399–410). Cascadilla Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ozturk, O., & Papafragou, A. (2016). The acquisition of evidentiality and source monitoring. Language Learning and Development, 12(2), 199–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/15475441.2015.1024834
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinker, S. (1984). Language learnability and language development. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2020). RStudio: Integrated development environment for R (Version 1.3.959) [Computer software]. Retrieved March 10, 2021, from http://www.rstudio.org/
   Google Scholar
• Rothweiler, M., Chilla, S., & Babur, E. (2010). Specific language impairment in Turkish: Evidence from case morphology in Turkish–German successive bilinguals. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 24(7), 540–555. https://doi.org/10.3109/02699200903545328
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sak, H., Güngör, T., & Saraçlar, M. (2008, August). Turkish language resources: Morphological parser, morphological disambiguator and web corpus. In International Conference on Natural Language Processing (pp. 417–427). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
   Google Scholar
• San, A. (2011). 3-6 yaş arası özgül dil bozukluğu olan çocuklarla normal gelişim gösteren çocukların dil özelliklerinin analizi ve karşılaştırılması. Anadolu University. Retrieved September 5, 2021, from https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezDetay.jsp?id=u_JP244fbFWBUuhRaLeHvw&no=29XTk6XOVh42AGLgtbOUGA
   Google Scholar
• Saygın, A. P., & Wilson, S. (2002). Paradigm reanalysis and the representation of morphologically complex words in Turkish. In Proceedings of the Chicago Linguistic Society (Vol. 38, pp. 286–298). University of Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Schafer, J. L. (1999). Multiple imputation: A primer. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 8(1), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/096228029900800102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• St Louis, K. O., & Ruscello, D. M. (1981). The oral speech mechanism screening examination (OSMSE) 300 North Charles St. University Park Press. 21201.
   Google Scholar
• Tomas, E., Demuth, K., & Petocz, P. (2017). The role of frequency in learning morphophonological alternations: Implications for children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 60(5), 1316–1329. https://doi.org/10.1044/2016_JSLHR-L-16-0138
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomas, E., Demuth, K., Smith‐Lock, K. M., & Petocz, P. (2015). Phonological and morphophonological effects on grammatical development in children with specific language impairment. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 50(4), 516–528. https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12152
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topbaş, S., Güven, S., Uysal, A. A., & Kazanoğlu, D. (2016). Language impairment in Turkish-speaking children. In B. Haznedar & F. N. Ketrez (Eds.), The acquisition of Turkish in childhood (pp. 295–324). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. ISBN: 9789027266200.
   Google Scholar
• Topbaş, S., & Güven, S. (2011). Test of early language development. Detay Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Topbaş, S., Maviş, I., & Başal, M. (1997, August). Acquisition of bound morphemes: Nominal case morphology in Turkish. In Proceedings of the VIIIth International Conference on Turkish Linguistics (pp. 22–36). Ankara: Ankara University Press.
   Google Scholar
• van Buuren, S., & Groothuis-Oudshoorn, K. (2011). Mice: Multivariate imputation by chained equations in R. Journal of Statistical Software, 45(3), 1–67. https://www.jstatsoft.org/v45/i03/
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xanthos, A., Laaha, S., Gillis, S., Stephany, U., Aksu-Koç, A., Christofidou, A., Gagarina, N., Hrzica, G., Ketrez, F. N., Kilani-Schoch, M., Korecky-Kröll, K., Kovacˇevic´, M., Laalo, K., Palmovic´, M., Pfeiler, B., Voeikova, M. D., & Dressler, W. U. (2011). On the role of morphological richness in the early development of noun and verb inflection. First Language, 31(4), 461–479. https://doi.org/10.1177/0142723711409976
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yarbay Duman, T., & Topbaş, S. (2016). Epistemic uncertainty: Turkish children with specific language impairment and their comprehension of tense and aspect. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 51(6), 732–744. https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12244
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, A. C., & Good, J. C. (2000). Morphosyntax of two Turkish subject pronominal paradigms. North East Linguistics Society, 30(2), 24. https://scholarworks.umass.edu/nels/vol30/iss2/24
   Google Scholar