How parents with aphasia deal with children’s resistance to requests

References

• Anglade, C., Le Dorze, G., & Croteau, C. (2018). Service encounter interactions of people living with moderate-to-severe post-stroke aphasia in their community. Aphasiology, 33(9), 1061–1082. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2018.1532068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anglade, C., Le Dorze, G., & Croteau, C. (2021). How clerks understand the requests of people living with aphasia in service encounters. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 35(1), 84–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699206.2020.1745894
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antaki, C., & Kent, A. (2012). Telling people what to do (and, sometimes, why): Contingency, entitlement and explanation in staff requests to adults with intellectual impairments. Journal of Pragmatics, 44(6–7), 876–889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.03.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aronsson, K., & Cekaite, A. (2011). Activity contracts and directives in everyday family politics. Discourse & Society, 22(2), 137–154. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926510392124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aronsson, K., & Thorell, M. (1999). Family politics in children’s play directives. Journal of Pragmatics, 31(1), 25–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-21669800050-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer, A. (2009). Miteinander im Gespräch bleiben—Partizipation in aphasischen Alltagsgesprächen. University of Freiburg.
   Google Scholar
• Bauer, A., & Auer, P. (2009). Aphasie im Alltag (L. Springer & D. Schrey-Dern, Eds.). Thieme. https://doi.org/10.1055/b-002-40818
   Google Scholar
• Bova, A., & Arcidiacono, F. (2013). Invoking the authority of feelings as a strategic maneuver in family mealtime conversations. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 23(3), 206–224. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, K., Worrall, L., Davidson, B., & Howe, T. (2011). Living successfully with aphasia: Family members share their views. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 18(5), 536–548. https://doi.org/10.1310/tsr1805-536
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron, D. (2001). Working with spoken discourse. SAGE Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Cekaite, A. (2010). Shepherding the child: Embodied directive sequences in parent–child interactions. Text & Talk - an Interdisciplinary Journal of Language, Discourse & Communication Studies, 30(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.2010.001
   Google Scholar
• Cekaite, A. (2015). The coordination of talk and touch in adults’ directives to children: Touch and social control. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 48(2), 152–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2015.1025501
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craven, A., & Potter, J. (2010). Directives: Entitlement and contingency in action. Discourse Studies, 12(4), 419–442. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445610370126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curl, T. S., & Drew, P. (2008). Contingency and action: A comparison of two forms of requesting. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 41(2), 129–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351810802028613
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Firkin. (2017). Open hand. https://openclipart.org/detail/288193/open-hand
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual. Essays on face-to-face behavior. Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C., Goodwin, M. H., & Olsher, D. (2009). Producing sense with nonsense syllables: Turn and sequence in conversations with a man with severe aphasia*. In P. Griffiths, A. J. Merrison, & A. Bloomer (Eds.), Language in use (1st ed., pp. 272–285). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003060994-27
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, M. H. (2006). Participation, affect, and trajectory in family directive/response sequences. Text & Talk-An Interdisciplinary Journal of Language, Discourse Communication Studies, 26(4–5), 515–543. https://doi.org/10.1515/TEXT.2006.021
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, M. H., & Cekaite, A. (2013). Calibration in directive/response sequences in family interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 46(1), 122–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.07.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, M. H., Cekaite, A., & Goodwin, C. (2012). Emotion as stance. In A. Perakyla & M.-L. Sorjonen (Eds.), Emotion in Interaction (pp. 16–41). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grawburg, M., Howe, T., Worrall, L., & Scarinci, N. (2019). Family-centered care in aphasia: Assessment of third-party disability in family members with the family aphasia measure of life impact. Topics in Language Disorders, 39(1), 29–54. https://doi.org/10.1097/TLD.0000000000000176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heller, V. (2011). Die Herstellung kommunikativer Kontexte in familialen Tischgesprächen. In K. Birkner & D. Meer (Eds.), Institutionalisierter Alltag: Mündlichkeit und Schriftlichkeit in unterschiedlichen Praxisfeldern (pp. 92–116). Verlag für Gesprächsforschung.
   Google Scholar
• Huber, W., Poeck, K., Weniger, D., & Willmes, K. (1983). Der Aachener Aphasie Test (AAT). Hogrefe.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchby, I., & Wooffitt, R. (2008). Conversation analysis (2nd ed.). Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kent, A. (2011). Directing dinnertime: Practices and resources used by parents and children to deliver and respond to directive actions. Loughborough University.
   Google Scholar
• Kent, A. (2012). Responding to directives: What can children do when a parent tells them what to do? In S. Danby & M. Theobald (Eds.), Sociological studies of children and youth (Vol. 15, pp. 57–84). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1537-4661(2012)0000015007
   Google Scholar
• Killmer, H., Svennevig, J., & Beeke, S. (2022a). Joint planning in conversations with a person with aphasia. Journal of Pragmatics, 187, 72–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.10.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Killmer, H., Svennevig, J., & Beeke, S. (2022b). Requests to children by parents with aphasia. Aphasiology, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2022.2094335
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laakso, M., & Godt, S. (2016). Recipient participation in conversations involving participants with fluent or non-fluent aphasia. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 30(10), 770–789. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699206.2016.1221997
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levinson, S. C. (2013). Action formation and ascription. In The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 103–130). Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118325001.ch6
   Google Scholar
• Luckmann, T. (1995). Interaction planning and intersubjective adjustment of perspectives by communicative genres. In E. N. Goody (Ed.), Social Intelligence and Interaction (1st ed., pp. 175–186). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621710.011
   Google Scholar
• Manning, M., MacFarlane, A., Hickey, A., Galvin, R., & Franklin, S. (2021). ‘I hated being ghosted’ – The relevance of social participation for living well with post‐stroke aphasia: Qualitative interviews with working aged adults. Health Expectations, 24(4), 1504–1515. https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.13291
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondada, L. (2006). Video recording as the reflexive preservation and configuration of phenomenal features for analysis. In H. Knoblauch, J. Raab, H.-G. Soeffner, & B. Schnettler (Eds.), Video analysis (pp. 51–68). Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Ochs, E., & Taylor, C. (1992). Family narrative as political activity. Discourse & Society, 3(3), 301–340. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926592003003003
   Google Scholar
• Pomerantz, A. (1984). Pursuing a response. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action (pp. 152–166). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rossi, G. (2015). The request system in Italian interaction. Radboud University Nijmegen.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, B., & Pitt, R. (2018). “It took the spark from him for a little while”: A case study on the psychological impact of parental stroke and aphasia on a young boy. Aphasiology, 32(sup1), 189–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2018.1485858
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Selting, M., Auer, P., Barden, B., Bergmann, J., Couper-Kuhlen, E., Günthner, S., Meier, C., Quasthoff, U., Schlobinski, P., & Uhmann, S. (1998). Gesprächsanalytisches Transkriptionssystem (GAT). Linguistische Berichte, 91–122.
   Google Scholar
• Selting, M., Auer, P., Barth-Weingarten, D., Bergmann, J., Bergmann, P., Birkner, K., Couper-Kuhlen, E., Deppermann, A., Gilles, P., Günthner, S., Hartung, M., Kern, F., Mertzlufft, C., Meyer, C., Morek, M., Oberzaucher, F., Peters, J., Quasthoff, U., Schütte, W., & Uhmann, S. (2011). A system for transcribing talk-in-interaction: GAT 2 translated and adapted for English by Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen and Dagmar Barth-Weingarten. Gesprächsforschung - Online- Zeitschrift Zur Verbalen Interaktion, 12, 1–51.
   Google Scholar
• Stevanovic, M., & Peräkylä, A. (2012). Deontic authority in interaction: The right to announce, propose, and decide. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 45(3), 297–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2012.699260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svennevig, J. (2012). ”og jeg bare hallo liksom” Diskursmarkøren hallo i samtale. Språk och interaktion, 3, 157–174.
   Google Scholar
• Ten Have, P. (1999). Doing conversation analysis: A practical guide. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Tse Crepaldi, Y. (2017). Requests for actions and their responses in caregiver-child interactions: A conversation analytic approach. Nanyang Technological University. https://doi.org/10.32657/10356/72525
   Google Scholar
• Zinken, J., Rossi, G., & Reddy, V. (2020). Chapter 10. Doing more than expected: Thanking recognizes another’s agency in providing assistance. In C. Taleghani-Nikazm, E. Betz, & P. Golato (Eds.), Studies in language and social interaction (Vol. 33, pp. 253–278). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/slsi.33.10zin
   Google Scholar