Phonological neighbourhood effects in Italian speech production: Evidence from healthy and neurologically impaired populations

References

• Alario, F. X., Ferrand, L., Laganaro, M., New, B., Frauenfelder, U. H., & Segui, J. (2004). Predictors of picture naming speed. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36(1), 140–155. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195559
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Arbesman, S., Strogatz, S. H., & Vitevitch, M. S. (2010). Comparative analysis of networks of phonologically similar words in English and Spanish. Entropy, 12(3), 327–337. https://doi.org/10.3390/e12030327
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arutiunian, V., & Lopukhina, A. (2020). The effects of phonological neighborhood density in childhood word production and recognition in Russian are opposite to English. Journal of Child Language, 47(6), 1244–1262. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000920000112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baars, B. J., Motley, M. T., & MacKay, D. G. (1975). Output editing for lexical status in artificially elicited slips of the tongue. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14(4), 382–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(75)80017-X
   Google Scholar
• Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baus, C., Costa, A., & Carreiras, M. (2008). Neighbourhood density and frequency effects in speech production: A case for interactivity. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23(6), 866–888. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960801962372
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, K. Y., & Vitevitch, M. S. (2010). Network structure influences speech production. Cognitive Science, 34(4), 685–697. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01100.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Q., & Mirman, D. (2012). Competition and cooperation among similar representations: Toward a unified account of facilitative and inhibitory effects of lexical neighbors. Psychological Review, 119(2), 417. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027175
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dell, G. S. (1986). A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review, 93(3), 283–321. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.93.3.283
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dell, G. S. (1988). The retrieval of phonological forms in production: Test of predictions from a connectionist model. Journal of Memory and Language, 27(2), 124–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(88)90070-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dell, G. S., & Gordon, J. K. (2003). Neighbors in the lexicon: friends or foes? In N. O Schiller & A. Meyer (Eds.), Phonetics and Phonology in Language Comprehension and Production: Differences and Similarities (pp. 9–37). de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Dell, G. S., Juliano, C., & Govindjee, A. (1993). Structure and content in language production: A theory of frame constraints in phonological speech errors. Cognitive Science, 17(2), 149–195. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1702_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forster, K. I., & Forster, J. C. (2003). DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35(1), 116–124. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195503
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goldrick, M., Folk, J. R., & Rapp, B. (2010). Mrs. Malaprop’s neighborhood: Using word errors to reveal neighborhood structure. Journal of Memory and Language, 62(2), 113–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2009.11.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, J. K. (2002). Phonological neighborhood effects in aphasic speech errors: Spontaneous and structured contexts. Brain and Language, 82(2), 113–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-934X(02)00001-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, J. K., & Kurczek, J. C. (2014). The ageing neighbourhood: Phonological density in naming. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 29(3), 326–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2013.837495
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goslin, J., Galluzzi, C., & Romani, C. (2014). PhonItalia: A phonological lexicon for Italian. Behavior Research Methods, 46(3), 872–886. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-013-0400-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hameau, S., Biedermann, B., Robidoux, S., & Nickels, L. (2021). Effects of phonological neighbourhood density and frequency in picture naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 120, 104248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2021.104248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, D., Nickels, L., Coltheart, M., & Cole-Virtue, J. (2006). Cumulative semantic inhibition in picture naming: Experimental and computational studies. Cognition, 100(3), 464–482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2005.02.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jalbert, A., Neath, I., Bireta, T. J., & Surprenant, A. M. (2011). When does length cause the word length effect? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37(2), 338. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021804
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karimi, H., & Diaz, M. (2020). When phonological neighborhood density both facilitates and impedes: Age of acquisition and name agreement interact with phonological neighborhood during word production. Memory & Cognition, 48(6), 1061–1072. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-020-01042-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kittredge, A. K., Dell, G. S., & Schwartz, M. F. (2006). Aphasic picture-naming errors reveal the influence of lexical variables on production stages. Brain and Language, 99(1–2), 216–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2006.06.116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laganaro, M., Chetelat-Mabillard, D., & Frauenfelder, U. H. (2013). Facilitatory and interfering effects of neighbourhood density on speech production: Evidence from aphasic errors. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 30(3), 127–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643294.2013.831818
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luce, P. A., & Pisoni, D. B. (1998). Recognizing spoken words: The neighborhood activation model. Ear and Hearing, 19(1), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003446-199802000-00001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahon, B. Z., & Navarrete, E. (2016). Modelling lexical access in speech production as a ballistic process. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 31(4), 521–523. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2015.1129060
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88(5), 375. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.88.5.375
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Middleton, E. L., & Schwartz, M. F. (2010). Density pervades: An analysis of phonological neighbourhood density effects in aphasic speakers with different types of naming impairment. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 27(5), 401–427. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643294.2011.570325
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirman, D., Kittredge, A. K., & Dell, G. S. (2010). Effects of near and distant phonological neighbors on picture naming. Proceedings of the annual meeting of the cognitive science society, Portland, USA, (Vol. 32).
   Google Scholar
• Moreno-Martínez, F. J., Montoro, P. R., & Martinez, L. M. (2012). An ecological alternative to Snodgrass & Vanderwart: 360 high quality colour images with norms for seven psycholinguistic variables. PLOS ONE, 7(5), e37527. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0037527
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oppenheim, G. M., Dell, G. S., & Schwartz, M. F. (2010). The dark side of incremental learning: A model of cumulative semantic interference during lexical access in speech production. Cognition, 114(2), 227–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2009.09.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez, M. A. (2007). Age of acquisition persists as the main factor in picture naming when cumulative word frequency and frequency trajectory are controlled. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60(1), 32–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210600577423
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Protopapas, A. (2007). Check vocal: A program to facilitate checking the accuracy and response time of vocal responses from DMDX. Behavior Research Methods, 39(4), 859–862. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03192979
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2022). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.r-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Sadat, J., Martin, C. D., Alario, F.-X., & Costa, A. (2012). Characterizing the bilingual disadvantage in noun phrase production. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 41(3), 159–179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-011-9183-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadat, J., Martin, C. D., Costa, A., & Alario, F. X. (2014). Reconciling phonological neighborhood effects in speech production through single trial analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 68, 33–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2013.10.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Severens, E., Van Lommel, S., Ratinckx, E., & Hartsuiker, R. J. (2005). Timed picture naming norms for 590 pictures in Dutch. Acta Psychologica, 119(2), 159–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2005.01.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stemberger, J. P. (2004). Neighborhood effects on error rates in speech production. Brain and Language, 90(1–3), 413–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00452-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viggiano, M. P., Vannucci, M., & Righi, S. (2004). A new standardized set of ecological pictures for experimental and clinical research on visual object processing. Cortex; a Journal Devoted to the Study of the Nervous System and Behavior, 40(3), 491–509. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70142-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitevitch, M. S. (2002). The influence of phonological similarity neighborhoods on speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28(4), 735. https://doi.org/10.1037//0278-7393.28.4.735
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitevitch, M. S. (2022). What can network science tell us about phonology and language processing? Topics in Cognitive Science, 14(1), 127–142. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12532
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitevitch, M. S., Armbrüster, J., & Chu, S. (2004). Sublexical and lexical representations in speech production: Effects of phonotactic probability and onset density. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30(2), 514. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.30.2.514
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitevitch, M. S., & Luce, P. A. (2016). Phonological neighborhood effects in spoken word perception and production. Annual Review of Linguistics, 2(1), 75–94. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-030514-124832
   Google Scholar
• Vitevitch, M. S., & Sommers, M. S. (2003). The facilitative influence of phonological similarity and neighborhood frequency in speech production in younger and older adults. Memory & Cognition, 31(4), 491–504. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196091
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitevitch, M. S., & Stamer, M. K. (2006). The curious case of competition in Spanish speech production. Language and Cognitive Processes, 21(6), 760–770. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960500287196
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yates, M. (2005). Phonological neighbors speed visual word processing: Evidence from multiple tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31(6), 1385. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.31.6.1385
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, H., Carlson, M. T., & Diaz, M. T. (2020). Investigating the effects of phonological neighbours on word retrieval and phonetic variation in word naming and picture naming paradigms. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 35(8), 980–991. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2019.1686529
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar