A qualitative investigation of mock-jurors' theories of emotion and reason

References

• Blue, J. C. (1990) Defining extreme emotional disturbance. Connecticut Bar Journal, 63, pp. 473-482.
   Google Scholar
• Bornstein, B. H. (1999) The ecological validity of jury simulations: Is the jury still out?. Law and Human Behavior, 23, pp. 75-91.
   Google Scholar
• Chieveley, L. G. (1987) The mental element in the crime of murder. Israel Law Review, 22, pp. 1-36.
   Google Scholar
• Churchland, P. M. (1993) Eliminative materialism and propositional attitudes. Folk psychology and the philosophy of mind, pp. (pp. 42-62).
   Google Scholar
• Churchland, P. M. (1993) Folk psychology and the explanation of behavior. Folk psychology and the philosophy of mind, pp. (pp. 247-262).
   Google Scholar
• Churchland, P. M. and Churchland, P. S. (1998) On the contrary: Critical essays, 1987-1997.
   Google Scholar
• Coke, E. (1979) Institutes of the Laws of England.
   Google Scholar
• Diamond, S. (1993) Instructing on death: Psychologists, juries, and judges. American Psychologist, 48, pp. 423-434.
   Google Scholar
• Diamond, S. (1997) Illuminations and shadows from jury simulations. Law and Human Behavior, 21, pp. 561-571.
   Google Scholar
• Dressler, J. (1982) Rethinking heat of passion: A defense in search of a rationale. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 73, pp. 421-470.
   Google Scholar
• Ekman, P. and Davidson, R. (1994) The nature of emotion.
   Google Scholar
• English, P. (1997) A ceiling or consistency effect for the comprehension of jury instructions. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 3, pp. 381-401.
   Google Scholar
• Finkel, N. J. (1989) The Insanity Defense Reform Act of 1984: Much ado about nothing. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 7, pp. 403-419.
   Google Scholar
• Finkel, N. J. (1995) Achilles fuming, Odysseus stewing, and Hamlet brooding: On the story of the murder/manslaughter distinction. Nebraska Law Review, 74, pp. 742-803.
   Google Scholar
• Finkel, N. J. (1995) Commonsense Justice: Jurors' notions of the law.
   Google Scholar
• Finkel, N. J. and Handel, S. F. (1989) How jurors construe “insanity”. Law and Human Behavior, 13, pp. 41-59.
   Google Scholar
• Follingstad, D. R. , Shillinglaw, R. D. , DeHart, D. D. and Kleinfelter, K. J. (1997) The impact of elements of self-defense and objective versus subjective instructions on jurors' verdicts for battered women defendants. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 12, pp. 729-747.
   Google Scholar
• Frijda, N. (1986) The emotions.
   Google Scholar
• Gappmaier, M. (2000) Participatory interaction analysis: Video-supported methods for holistic business process management.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1971) Relations in public: Microstudies of the public order.
   Google Scholar
• Haney, C. (1984) On the selection of capital juries: The biasing effects of the death-qualification process. Law and Human Behavior, 8, pp. 121-132.
   Google Scholar
• Haney, C. , Hurtado, A. and Vega, L. (1994) “Modern” death qualification: New data on its biasing effects. Law and Human Behavior, 18, pp. 619-633.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, K. , Schaefer, E. and Lawless, J. (1993) Temporal patterns of normative, informational, and procedural-legal discussion in jury deliberations. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 14, pp. 33-46.
   Google Scholar
• Harre, R. (1986) The social construction of emotions.
   Google Scholar
• Hastie, R. , Schkade, D. A. and Payne, J. W. (1998) A study of juror and jury judgments in civil cases: Deciding liability for punitive damages. Law and Human Behavior, 22, pp. 287-314.
   Google Scholar
• Heuer, L. and Penrod, S. (1989) Instructing jurors: A field experiment with wreitten and preliminary instructions. Law and Human Behavior, 13, pp. 409-430.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, B. (1994) Ethnographic workplace studies and computer supported cooperative work.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, B. and Henderson, A. (1994) Interaction analysis: Foundations and practice.
   Google Scholar
• Kahan, D. M. and Nussbaum, M. C. (1996) Two conceptions of emotion in criminal law. Columbia Law Review, 96, pp. 270-374.
   Google Scholar
• Kalven, H. and Zeisel, H. (1971) The American jury.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, M. (1984) How do people influence in jury deliberation? A social psychological view. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 2, pp. 407-412.
   Google Scholar
• Kerr, N. and MacCoun, R. (1985) The effects of jury size and polling method on the process and product of jury deliberation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, pp. 349-363.
   Google Scholar
• Kittichaisaree, K. (2001) International criminal law.
   Google Scholar
• Kovecses, Z. (2000) Metaphor and emotion: Language, culture, and body in human feeling.
   Google Scholar
• Lazarus, R. (1984) On the primacy of cognition. American Psychologist, 46, pp. 352-367.
   Google Scholar
• Lazarus, R. (1991) Emotion and adaptation.
   Google Scholar
• Lazarus, R. (1999) The cognition-emotion debate: A bit of history. Handbook of cognition and emotion, pp. (pp. 3-19).
   Google Scholar
• LeDoux, J. E. (1995) In search of an emotional system in the brain: Leaping from fear to emotion and consciousness. The cognitive neurosciences, pp. (pp. 1049-1061).
   Google Scholar
• LeDoux, J. E. (1996) The emotional brain.
   Google Scholar
• Niederhoffer, K. G. and Pennebaker, J. W. (2002) Sharing one's story: On the benefits of writing or talking about emotional experiences. Handbook of positive psychology, pp. (pp. 573-583).
   Google Scholar
• Nietzel, M. T. , McCarthy, D. M. and Kern, M. J. (1999) Juries: The current state of the empirical literature. Psychology and law: The state of the discipline, pp. (pp. 23-52).
   Google Scholar
• Oatley, K. and Jenkins, J. M. (1996) Understanding emotions.
   Google Scholar
• Pennebaker, J. W. (2003) The social, linguistic, and health consequences of emotional disclosure. Social psychological foundations of health and illness, pp. (pp. 288-313).
   Google Scholar
• Pennebaker, J. W. (2003) Writing about emotional experiences as a therapeutic process. Social psychology of health, pp. (pp. 362-368).
   Google Scholar
• Pennington, N. and Hastie, R. (1981) Jurur decision-making models: The generalization gap. Psychological Bulletin, 89, pp. 246-287.
   Google Scholar
• Pennington, N. and Hastie, R. (1986) Evidence evaluation in complex decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, pp. 242-258.
   Google Scholar
• Pennington, N. and Hastie, R. (1988) Explanation-based decision making: The effects of memory structure on judgment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, pp. 521-533.
   Google Scholar
• Pennington, N. and Hastie, R. (1992) Explaining evidence: Tests of the story model for juror decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, pp. 189-206.
   Google Scholar
• Pettus, A. (1993) The verdict is. Communication Quarterly, 38, pp. 83-97.
   Google Scholar
• Reifman, A. , Gusick, S. and Ellsworth, P. (1992) Real jurors' understanding of the law in real cases. Law and Human Behavior, 16, pp. 539-554.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, D. N. (1996) Wild beasts and idle humours: The insanity defense from antiquity to the present.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, P. and Darley, J. (1995) Justice, liability, and blame.
   Google Scholar
• Scherer, K. (1984) On the nature and function of emotion: A component process approach. Approaches to emotion, pp. (pp. 293-317).
   Google Scholar
• Scherer, K. (2001) Appraisal considered as a process of multilevel sequential checking. Appraisal processes in emotion: Theory, methods, research, pp. (pp. 92-120).
   Google Scholar
• Singer, R. (1986) The resurgence of mens rea: I. provocation, emotional disturbance, and the Model Penal Code. Boston College Law Review, 27, pp. 243-322.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, V. (1991) Prototypes in the courtroom: Lay representations of legal concepts'. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, pp. 857-872.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, V. (1993) When prior knowledge and law collide. Law and Human Behavior, 17, pp. 507-536.
   Google Scholar
• Spackman, M. P. , Belcher, J. , Calapp, J. and Taylor, A. (2002) An analysis of the effects of subjective and objective instruction forms on mock-juries' murder/manslaughter distinctions. Law and Human Behavior, 26, pp. 605-623.
   Google Scholar
• Spackman, M. P. , Belcher, J. C. and Hansen, A. S. (2002) Effects of perceived emotional intensity on mock-jurors' murder/manslaughter distinctions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology: Biobehavioral Research, 7, pp. 87-113.
   Google Scholar
• Spackman, M. P. and Parrott, W. G. (2001) Emotionology in prose: A study of descriptions of emotion from three literary periods. Cognition and Emotion, 15, pp. 553-574.
   Google Scholar
• Suchman, L. and Jordan, B. (1990) Interactional troubles in face-to-face survey interviews. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 85, pp. 232-241.
   Google Scholar
• Tanford, S. and Penrod, S. (1986) Jury deliberations: Discussion content and influence in jury decision making. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 16, pp. 322-347.
   Google Scholar
• Terrance, C. A. , Matheson, K. and Spanos, N. P. (2000) Effects of judicial instructions and case characteristics in a mock jury trial of battered women who kill. Law and Human Behavior, 24, pp. 207-229.
   Google Scholar
• Zajonc, R. B. (1980) Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist, 35, pp. 151-175.
   Google Scholar
• Zajonc, R. B. (1984) On the primacy of affect. American Psychologist, 39, pp. 117-123.
   Google Scholar