Effects of processing style on responsiveness to affective stimuli and processing fluency

REFERENCES

• Bechara, A., Damasio, H., Tranel, D., & Damasio, A. R. (1997). Deciding advantageously before knowing the advantageous strategy. Science, 275(5304), 1293–1295. doi:10.1126/science.275.5304.1293
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Checkosky, S. F., & Whitlock, D. (1973). The effects of pattern goodness on recognition time in a memory search task. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 100(2), 341–348. doi:10.1037/h0035692
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• De Houwer, J., Thomas, S., & Baeyens, F. (2001). Associative learning of likes and dislikes: A review of 25 years of research on human evaluative conditioning. Psychological Bulletin, 127(6), 853–869. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.127.6.853
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijkstra, K. A., Van der Pligt, J., Van Kleef, G. A., & Kerstholt, J. H. (2012). Deliberation versus intuition: Global versus local processing in judgment and choice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(5), 1156–1161. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2012.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein, S. (1990). Cognitive-experiential self-theory. In L. Pervin (Ed.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 165–192). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Förster, J. (2009). Relations between perceptual and conceptual scope: How global versus local processing fits a focus on similarity versus dissimilarity search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138(1), 88–111. doi:10.1037/a0014484
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Förster, J., & Dannenberg, L. (2010). GLOMO sys: A systems account of global versus local processing. Psychological Inquiry, 21, 175–197. doi:10.1080/1047840X.2010.487849
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Förster, J., & Higgins, E. T. (2005). How global versus local perception fits regulatory focus. Psychological Science, 16(8), 631–636. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01586.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu, Q., Dienes, Z., & Fu, X. (2010). The distinction between intuition and guessing in the SRT task generation: A reply to Norman and Price. Consciousness and Cognition, 19(1), 478–480. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2009.12.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gasper, K., & Clore, G. (2002). Attending to the big picture: Mood and global versus local processing of visual information. Psychological Science, 13, 34–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gombrich, E. H. (1995). The story of art (16th ed.). London: Phaidon.
   Google Scholar
• Hammerl, M., & Grabitz, H.-J. (1993). Human evaluative conditioning: Order of stimulus presentation. Integrative Physiological and Behavioral Science, 28(2), 191–194. doi:10.1007/BF02691227
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horstmann, N., Hausmann, D., & Ryf, S. (2010). Methods for inducing intuitive and deliberate processing modes. In A. Glöckner & C. L. M. Witteman (Eds.), Foundations for tracing intuition: Challenges and methods (pp. 219–237). London: Psychology Press/Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. (2003). A perspective on judgment and choice: Mapping bounded rationality. American Psychologist, 58(9), 697–720. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.58.9.697
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinder, A., Shanks, D. R., Cock, J., & Tunney, R. J. (2003). Recollection, fluency, and the explicit/implicit distinction in artificial grammar learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132(4), 551–565. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.132.4.551
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M., & Cuthbert, B. N. (2005). International affective picture system (IAPS): Instruction manual and affective ratings ( Technical Report No. A-6). Gainesville, FL: The Center for Research in Psychophysiology, University of Florida.
   Google Scholar
• Navon, D. (1977). Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognitive Psychology, 9(3), 353–383. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(77)90012-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nisbett, R. E., Peng, K., Choi, I., & Norenzayan, A. (2001). Culture and systems of thought: Holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychological Review, 108(2), 291–310. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.108.2.291
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pothos, E. M. (2007). Theories of artificial grammar learning. Psychological Bulletin, 133(2), 227–244. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.133.2.227
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reber, A. S. (1967). Implicit learning of artificial grammars. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 6(6), 855–863. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(67)80149-X
   Google Scholar
• Reber, A. S. (1993). Implicit learning and tacit knowledge. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reber, R., & Schwarz, N. (2002). The hot fringes of consciousness: Perceptual fluency and affect. Consciousness and Emotion, 2(2), 223–231. doi:10.1075/ce.2.2.03reb
   Google Scholar
• Reber, R., Winkielman, P., & Schwarz, N. (1998). Effects of perceptual fluency on affective judgments. Psychological Science, 9(1), 45–48. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reber, R., Wurtz, P., & Zimmermann, T. D. (2004). Exploring ‘fringe’ consciousness: The subjective experience of perceptual fluency and its objective bases. Consciousness and Cognition, 13, 47–60. doi:10.1016/S1053-8100(03)00049-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schooler, J. W. (2002). Verbalization produces a transfer inappropriate processing shift. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16, 989–997.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, S., & Spence, M. T. (1997). Managerial intuition: A conceptual and operational framework. Business Horizons, 40(1), 63–68. doi:10.1016/S0007-6813(97)90027-6
   Google Scholar
• Slovic, P., Finucane, M., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D. G. (2002). Rational actors or rational fools: Implications of the affect heuristic for behavioral economics. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 31(4), 329–342. doi:10.1016/S1053-5357(02)00174-9
   Google Scholar
• Solso, R. L. (1997). Cognition and the visual arts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stanislaw, H., & Todorov, N. (1999). Calculation of signal detection theory measures. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 31(1), 137–149. doi:10.3758/BF03207704
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stuart, E. W., Shimp, T. A., & Engle, R. W. (1987). Classical conditioning of consumer attitudes: Four experiments in an advertising context. Journal of Consumer Research, 14(3), 334–349. doi:10.1086/209117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topolinski, S., & Strack, F. (2009a). The analysis of intuition: Processing fluency and affect in judgments of semantic coherence. Cognition and Emotion, 23(8), 1465–1503. doi:10.1080/02699930802420745
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topolinski, S., & Strack, F. (2009b). The architecture of intuition: Fluency and affect determine intuitive judgments of semantic and visual coherence and judgments of grammaticality in artificial grammar learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138(1), 39–63. doi:10.1037/a0014678
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topolinski, S., & Strack, F. (2009c). Scanning the ‘fringe’ of consciousness: What is felt and what is not felt in intuitions about semantic coherence. Consciousness and Cognition, 18(3), 608–618. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2008.06.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tordesillas, R. S., & Chaiken, S. (1999). Thinking too much of too little? The effects of introspection on the decision-making process. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(5), 625–631. doi:10.1177/0146167299025005007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vokey, J. R., & Brooks, L. R. (1992). Salience of item knowledge in artificial grammar learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18(2), 328–344. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.18.2.328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whittlesea, B. W. A., Jacoby, L. L., & Girard, K. (1990). Illusions of immediate memory: Evidence of an attributional basis for feelings of familiarity and perceptual quality. Journal of Memory and Language, 29(6), 716–732. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(90)90045-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, T. D., Hodges, S. D., & LaFleur, S. J. (1995). Effects of introspecting about reasons: Inferring attitudes from accessible thoughts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(1), 16–28. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.69.1.16
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Winkielman, P., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2001). Mind at ease puts a smile on the face: Psychophysiological evidence that processing facilitation increases positive affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(6), 989–1000. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.81.6.989
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winkielman, P., Schwarz, N., Fazendeiro, T., & Reber, R. (2003). The hedonic marking of processing fluency: Implications for evaluative judgment. In J. Musch & K. C. Klauer (Eds.), The psychology of evaluation. Affective processes in cognition and emotion (pp. 189–217). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Wippich, W. (1994). Intuition in the context of implicit memory. Psychological Research, 56(2), 104–109. doi:10.1007/BF00419717
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar