Emotion effects during reading: Influence of an emotion target word on eye movements and processing

REFERENCES

• Altarriba, J., & Basnight-Brown, D. M. (2011). The representation of emotion vs. emotion-laden words in English and in Spanish in the Affective Simon Task. International Journal of Bilingualism, 15, 310–328. doi:10.1177/1367006910379261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. H., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 390–412. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balota, D. A., Cortese, M. J., Hutchison, K. A., Neely, J. H., Nelson, D., Simpson, G. B., et al. (2002). The English Lexicon Project: A web-based repository of descriptive and behavioral measures for 40,481 English words and non-words. Retrieved from http://elexicon.wustl.edu
   Google Scholar
• Bates, D. M. (2005). Fitting linear mixed models in R. R News, 5, 27–30.
   Google Scholar
• Bates, D. M., Maechler, M., & Bolker, B. (2011). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. R package version 0.999375-42. Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4
   Google Scholar
• Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., & Brown, G. K. (1996). Manual for the Beck Depression Inventory-II. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Bradley, M. M. (2000). Emotion and motivation. In T. J. Cacioppo, L. G. Tassinary, & G. Berntson (Eds.), Handbook of psychophysiology (pp. 602–642). New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bradley, M. M., & Lang, P. J. (1999). Affective Norms for English Words (ANEW). Gainesville, FL: The NIMH Center for the Study of Emotion and Attention, University of Florida.
   Google Scholar
• Brysbaert, M., & New, B. (2009). Moving beyond Kučera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 977–990. doi:10.3758/BRM.41.4.977
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brosch, T., & Sharma, D. (2005). The role of fear-relevant stimuli in visual search: A comparison of phylogenetic and ontogenetic stimuli. Emotion, 5, 360–364. doi:10.1037/1528-3542.5.3.360
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chun, M. M., & Potter, M. C. (1995). A two-stage model for multiple target detection in rapid serial visual presentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 109–127. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.21.1.109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Martino, B., Kalisch, R., Rees, G., & Dolan, R. J. (2009). Enhanced processing of threat stimuli under limited attentional resources. Cerebral Cortex, 19, 127–133. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhn062
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fazio, R. H., Sanbonmatsu, D. M., Powell, M. C., & Kardes, F. R. (1986). On the automatic activation of attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 229–238. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.50.2.229
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frischen, A., Eastwood, J. D., & Smilek, D. (2008). Visual search for faces with emotional expressions. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 662–676. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.134.5.662
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, E., Russo, R., Bowles, R., & Dutton, K. (2001). Do threatening stimuli draw or hold visual attention in subclinical anxiety? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 681–700. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.130.4.681
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gleitman, L., Cassidy, K., Nappa, R., Papafragou, A., & Trueswell, J. C. (2005). Hard words. Language Learning and Development, 1, 23–64. doi:10.1207/s15473341
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, C. H., & Hansen, R. D. (1988). Finding the face in the crowd: An anger superiority effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 917–924. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.917
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hermans, D., De Houwer, J., & Eelen, P. (1994). The affective priming effect: Automatic activation of evaluative information in memory. Cognition & Emotion, 8, 515–533. doi:10.1080/02699939408408957
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaeger, T. F. (2008). Categorical data analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards logit mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 434–446. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. L. (2009). The quiet clam is quite calm: Transposed-letter neighborhood effects on eye movements during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 943–969. doi:10.1037/a0015572
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kakolewski, K. E., Crowson Jr., J. J., Sewell, K. W., & Cromwell, R. L. (1999). Laterality, word valence, and visual attention: A comparison of depressed and non-depressed individuals. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 34, 283–292. doi:10.1016/S0167-8760(99)00085-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanske, P., & Kotz, S. A. (2007). Concreteness in emotional words: ERP evidence from a hemifield study. Brain Research, 1148, 138–148. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2007.02.044
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knickerbocker, H., & Altarriba, J. (2011). Bilingualism and the impact of emotion: The role of experience, memory, and sociolinguistic factors. In V. Cook & B. Bassetti (Eds.), Language and bilingual cognition (pp. 453–477). New York: Psychology Press/Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Knickerbocker, H., & Altarriba, J. (2013). Repetition blindness with emotion and emotion-laden word targets. Visual Cognition, 21, 599–627. doi:10.1080/13506285.2013.815297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koster, E. H. W., Crombez, G., Verschuere, B., & De Houwer, J. (2006). Attention to threat in anxiety-prone individuals: Mechanisms underlying attention bias. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 30, 635–643. doi:10.1007/s10608-006-9042-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kousta, S. T., Vigliocco, G., Vinson, D. P., Andrews, M., & Del Campo, E. (2011). The representation of abstract words: Why emotion matters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140(1), 14–34. doi:10.1037/a0021446
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kousta, S. T., Vinson, D. P., & Vigliocco, G. (2009). Emotion words, regardless of polarity, have a processing advantage over neutral words. Cognition, 112, 473–481. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2009.06.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kučera, H., & Francis, W. N. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day English. Providence, RI: Brown University.
   Google Scholar
• Kuchinke, L., Võ, M. L. H., Hofmann, M., & Jacobs, A. (2007). Pupillary responses during lexical decisions vary with word frequency but not emotional valence. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 65, 132–140. doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2007.04.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuperman, V., Estes, Z., Brysbaert, M., & Warriner, A. B. (2014). Emotion and language: Valence and arousal affect word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 1065–1081. doi:10.1037/a0035669
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M., & Cuthbert, B. N. (1990). Emotion, attention, and the startle reflex. Psychological Review, 97, 377–395. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.97.3.377
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M., & Cuthbert, B. N. (1997). Motivated attention: Affect, activation, and action. In P. J. Lang, R. F. Simons, & M. T. Balaban (Eds.), Attention and orienting: Sensory and motivational processes (pp. 97–135). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Lipp, O. V., & Derakshan, N. (2005). Attentional bias to pictures of fear-relevant animals in a dot probe task. Emotion, 5, 365–369. doi:10.1037/1528-3542.5.3.365
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lund, K., & Burgess, C. (1996). Producing high-dimensional semantic spaces from lexical co-occurrence. Behavior Research Methods, Instrumentation, and Computers, 28, 203–208. doi:10.3758/BF03204766
   Google Scholar
• MacLeod, C., Mathews, A., & Tata, P. (1986). Attentional bias in emotional disorders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 95, 15–20. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.95.1.15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maratos, F. A., Mogg, K. B., & Bradley, B. P. (2008). Identification of angry faces in the attentional blink. Cognition & Emotion, 22, 1340–1352. doi:10.1080/02699930701774218
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenna, F. P. (1986). Effects of unattended emotional stimuli on color-naming performance. Current Psychology, 5(1), 3–9. doi:10.1007/BF02686591
   Google Scholar
• McKenna, F. P., & Sharma, D. (1995). Intrusive cognitions: An investigation of the emotional Stroop task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 1595–1607. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.21.6.1595
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenna, F. P., & Sharma, D. (2004). Reversing the emotional Stroop effect reveals that it is not what it seems: The role of fast and slow components. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 382–392. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.30.2.382
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mogg, K., & Bradley, B. P. (2006). Time course of attentional bias for fear-relevant pictures in spider-fearful individuals. Behavior Research and Therapy, 44, 1241–1250. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2006.05.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakic, M., Smith, B. W., Busis, S., Vythilingam, M., & Blair, R. J. R. (2006). The impact of affect and frequency on lexical decision: The role of the amygdala and inferior frontal cortex. NeuroImage, 31, 1752–1761. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.02.022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Öhman, A., Flykt, A., & Esteves, F. (2001). Emotion drives attention: Detecting the snake in the grass. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 466–478. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.130.3.466
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perea, M., & Pollatsek, A. (1998). The effects of neighborhood frequency in reading and lexical decision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 767–779. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.24.3.767
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratto, F., & John, O. P. (1991). Automatic vigilance: The attention grabbing power of negative social information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 380–391. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.61.3.380
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Development Core Team (2011). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org
   Google Scholar
• Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 372–422. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.124.3.372
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, K. (2009). Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 1457–1506. doi:10.1080/17470210902816461
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schacht, A., & Sommer, W. (2009). Emotions in word and face processing: Early and late cortical responses. Brain and Cognition, 69, 538–550. doi:10.3758/CABN.9.1.28
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, G. G., O'Donnell, P. J., Leuthold, H., & Sereno, S. C. (2009). Early emotion word processing: Evidence from event-related potentials. Biological Psychology, 80, 95–104. doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2008.03.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, G. G., O'Donnell, P. J., & Sereno, S. C. (2012). Emotion words affect eye fixations during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38, 783–792. doi:10.1037/a0027209
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silvert, L., Naveteur, J., Honoré, J., Sequeira, H., & Boucart, M. (2004). Emotional stimuli in rapid serial visual presentation. Visual Cognition, 11, 433–460. doi:10.1080/13506280344000239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutton, T. M., & Altarriba, J. (2011). The automatic activation and perception of emotion in word processing: Evidence from a modified dot probe paradigm. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 23, 736–747. doi:10.1080/20445911.2011.554392
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spielberger, C. D., Gorsuch, R. L., Lushene, R., Vagg, P. R., & Jacobs, G. A. (1983). Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Spruyt, A., Hermans, D., De Houwer, J., & Eelen, P. (2002). On the nature of the affective priming effect: Affective priming of naming responses. Social Cognition, 20, 227–256. doi:10.1521/soco.20.3.227.21106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sylvester, C. M., Corbetta, M., Raichle, M. E., Rodebaugh, T. L., Schlaggar, B. L., Sheline, Y. I., … Lenze, E. J. (2012). Functional network dysfunction in anxiety and anxiety disorders. Trends in Neuroscience, 35, 527–535. doi:10.1016/j.tins.2012.04.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabert, M. H., Borod, J. C., Tang, C. Y., Lange, G., Wei, T. C., Johnson, R., … Buchsbaum, M. S. (2001). Differential amygdala activation during emotional decision and recognition memory tasks using unpleasant words: An fMRI study. Neuropsychologia, 39, 556–573. doi:10.1016/S0028-3932(00)00157-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treisman, A. M., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97–136. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(80)90005-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trippe, R. H., Hewig, J., Heydel, C., Hecht, H., & Miltner, W. H. R. (2007). Attentional blink to emotional and threatening pictures in spider phobics: Electrophysiology and behavior. Brain Research, 1148, 149–160. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2007.02.035
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vigliocco, G., Meteyard, L., Andrews, M., & Kousta, S. (2009). Toward a theory of semantic representation. Language and Cognition, 1, 219–248. doi:10.1515/LANGCOG.2009.011
   Google Scholar
• Windmann, S., Daum, I., & Güntürkün, O. (2002). Dissociating prelexical and postlexical processing of affective information in the two hemispheres: Effects of the stimulus presentation format. Brain and Language, 80, 269–286. doi:10.1006/brln.2001.2586
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar