805
Views
40
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

A meta-analysis of the facilitation of arm flexion and extension movements as a function of stimulus valence

, , &
Pages 1069-1090 | Received 18 Mar 2014, Accepted 17 Sep 2014, Published online: 27 Oct 2014

REFERENCES

  • Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (2005). The influence of attitudes on behavior. In D. Albarracin, B. T. Johnson & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), The handbook of attitudes (pp. 173–221). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • *Alexopoulos, T., & Ric, F. (2007). The evaluation-behavior link: Direct and beyond valence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 1010–1016. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2006.10.017
  • Allport, G. W. (1935). Attitudes. In C. Murchinson (Ed.), A handbook of social psychology (pp. 798–844). Worcester, MA: Clark University Press.
  • Allport, G. W. (1968). The historical background of modern social psychology. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (2nd ed.). (Vol. 1, pp. 1–80). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Bamford, S., & Ward, R. (2008). Predispositions to approach and avoid are contextually sensitive and goal dependent. Emotion, 8, 174–183. doi:10.1037/1528-3542.8.2.174
  • Breckler, S. J. (1984). Empirical validation of affect, behavior, and cognition as distinct components of attitude. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1191–1205. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.47.6.1191
  • Breckler, S. J., & Wiggins, E. C. (1989). On defining attitude and attitude theory: Once more with feeling. In A. R. Pratkanis, S. J. Breckler & A. G. Greenwald (Eds.), Attitude structure and function: The third Ohio State University volume on attitudes and persuasion (pp. 407–427). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • *Brouillet, T., Heurley, L., Martin, S., & Brouillet, D. (2010). The embodied cognition theory and the motor component of “yes” and “no” verbal responses. Acta Psychologica, 134, 310–317. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.03.003
  • Cacioppo, J. T., Priester, J. R., & Berntson, G. G. (1993). Rudimentary determinants of attitudes. II: Arm flexion and extension have differential effects on attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(1), 5–17. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.65.1.5
  • Carver, C. S., & Harmon-Jones, E. (2009). Anger is an approach-related affect: Evidence and implications. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 183–204. doi:10.1037/a0013965
  • Centerbar, D. B., & Clore, G. L. (2006). Do approach-avoidance actions create attitudes? Psychological Science, 17(1), 22–29. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01660.x
  • Chajut, E., Mama, Y., Levy, L., & Algom, D. (2010). Avoiding the approach trap: A response bias theory of the emotional stroop effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 1567–1572. doi:10.1037/a0020710
  • *Chen, M., & Bargh, J. A. (1999). Consequences of automatic evaluation: Immediate behavioral predispositions to approach or avoid the stimulus. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 215–224. doi:10.1177/0146167299025002007
  • *Clow, K. A., & Olson, J. M. (2010). Conceptual-motor compatibility and homonegativity: Approaching and avoiding words associated with homosexuality. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 42, 222–233. doi:10.1037/a0020010
  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Darwin, C. (1872/1904). The expression of emotion in man and animals. London: Murray.
  • Dru, V., & Cretenet, J. (2008). Influence of unilateral motor behaviors on the judgment of valenced stimuli. Cortex, 44, 717–727. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2006.11.004
  • *Duckworth, K. L., Bargh, J. A., Garcia, M., & Chaiken, S. (2002). The automatic evaluation of novel stimuli. Psychological Science, 13, 513–519. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00490
  • Dunlap, W. P., Cortina, J. M., Vaslow, J. B., & Burke, M. J. (1996). Meta-analysis of experiments with matched groups or repeated measures designs. Psychological Methods, 1, 170–177. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.170
  • Eder, A. B., & Hommel, B. (2013). Anticipatory control of approach and avoidance: An ideomotor approach. Emotion Review, 5, 275–279. doi:10.1177/1754073913477505
  • *Eder, A. B., & Klauer, K. C. (2009). A common-coding account of the bidirectional evaluation-behavior link. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138, 218–235. doi:10.1037/a0015220
  • *Eder, A. B., & Rothermund, K. (2008). When do motor behaviors (mis)match affective stimuli? An evaluative coding view of approach and avoidance reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137, 262–281. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.137.2.262
  • *Eder, A. B., Rothermund, K., & Proctor, R. W. (2010). The prepared emotional reflex: Intentional preparation of automatic approach and avoidance tendencies as a means to regulate emotional responding. Emotion, 10, 593–598. doi:10.1037/a0019009
  • Egger, M., Smith, G. D., Schneider, M., & Minder, C. (1997). Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. British Medical Journal, 315, 629–634. doi:10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629
  • *Enter, D., Colzato, L. S., & Roelofs, K. (2012). Dopamine transporter polymorphisms affect social approach-avoidance tendencies. Genes, Brain and Behavior, 11, 671–676.
  • *Ernst, L. H., Plichta, M. M., Lutz, E., Zesewitz, A. K., Tupak, S. V., Dresler, T., … , Fallgatter, A. J. (2013). Prefrontal activation patterns of automatic and regulated approach–avoidance reactions – A functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) study. Cortex, 49, 131–142. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2011.09.013
  • *Ernst, L. H., Weidner, A., Ehlis, A.-C., & Fallgatter, A. J. (2012). Controlled attention allocation mediates the relation between goal-oriented pursuit and approach–avoidance reactions to negative stimuli. Biological Psychology, 91, 312–320. doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2012.08.004
  • Fazio, R. H. (1986). How do attitudes guide behavior? In R. M. Sorrentino & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), The handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundation of social behavior (pp. 204–243). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Fazio, R. H. (1989). On the power and functionality of attitudes: The role of attitude accessibility. In A. R. Pratkanis, S. J. Breckler & A. G. Greenwald (Eds.), Attitude sturcture and function, the third Ohio State University volume on attitudes and persuasion (pp. 153–179). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading. Massachusetts, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Förster, J. (2004) How body feedback influences consumers’ evaluation of products. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14, 416–426. doi:10.1207/s15327663jcp1404_10
  • *Freina, L., Baroni, G., Borghi, A. M., & Nicoletti, R. (2009). Emotive concept nouns and motor responses: Attraction or repulsion? Memory & Cognition, 37, 493–499. doi:10.3758/MC.37.4.493
  • *Frey, M. C. M., Weyers, P., Pauli, P., & Muhlberger, A. (2012). Androstadienone in motor reactions of men and women toward angry faces. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 114, 807–825. doi:10.2466/07.16.22.28.PMS.114.3.807-825
  • Galton, F. (1884). Measurement of character. Fortnightly Review, 42, 179–185.
  • Hedges, L. V. (1981). Distribution theory for glass’s estimator of effect size and related estimators. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 6(2), 107–128. doi:10.3102/10769986006002107
  • *Heuer, K., Rinck, M., & Becker, E. S. (2007). Avoidance of emotional facial expressions in social anxiety: The approach–avoidance task. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 45, 2990–3001. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2007.08.010
  • Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Ascherleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The theory of event coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 849–878. doi:10.1017/S0140525X01000103
  • Huijding, J., Field, A. P., De Houwer, J., Vandenbosch, K., Rinck, M., & van Oeveren, M. (2009). A behavioral route to dysfunctional representations: The effects of training approach or avoidance tendencies towards novel animals in children. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 47, 471–477. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2009.02.011
  • *Krieglmeyer, R., & Deutsch, M. (2010). Comparing measures of approach–avoidance behaviour: The manikin task vs. two versions of the joystick task. Cognition and Emotion, 24, 810–828. doi:10.1080/02699930903047298
  • *Krieglmeyer, R., & Deutsch, M., De Houwer, J., & Raedt, R. D. (2010). Being moved: Valence activates approach-avoidance behavior independently of evaluation and approach-avoidance intentions. Psychological Science, 21, 607–613. doi:10.1177/0956797610365131
  • Laham, S. M., Kashima, Y., Dix, J., Wheeler, M., & Levis, B. (2014). Elaborated contextual framing is necessary for action-based attitude acquisition. Cognition and Emotion, 28, 1119–1126.
  • *Lange, W., Keijsers, G., Becker, E. S., & Rinck, M. (2008). Social anxiety and evaluation of social crowds: Explicit and implicit measures. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 46, 932–943. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2008.04.008
  • *Lansu, T. A. M., Cillessen, A. H. N., & Karremans, J. C. (2012). Implicit associations with popularity in early adolescence: An approach-avoidance analysis. Developmental Psychology, 48(1), 65–75. doi:10.1037/a0025681
  • LaPiere, R. T. (1934). Attitudes vs. actions. Social Forces, 13, 230–237. doi:10.2307/2570339
  • *Lavender, T., & Hommel, B. (2007). Affect and action: Towards an event-coding account. Cognition and Emotion, 21, 1270–1296. doi:10.1080/02699930701438152
  • Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • *Markman, A. B., & Brendl, C. M. (2005). Constraining theories of embodied cognition. Psychological Science, 16(1), 6–10. doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.00772.x
  • Marsh, A. A., Ambady, N., & Kleck, R. E. (2005). The effects of fear and anger facial expressions on approach- and avoidance-related behaviors. Emotion, 5(1), 119–124. doi:10.1037/1528-3542.5.1.119
  • Meier, B. P., & Robinson, M. D. (2004). Why the sunny side is up: Associations between affect and vertical position. Psychological Science, 15, 243–247. doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00659.x
  • *Miller, S. L., Zielaskowski, K., Maner, J. K., & Plant, E. A. (2012). Self-protective motivation and avoidance of heuristically threatening outgroups. Evolution and Human Behavior, 33, 726–735. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2012.05.008
  • Morris, S. B., & DeShon, R. P. (2002). Combining effect size estimates in meta-analysis with repeated measures and independent-group designs. Psychological Methods, 7(1), 105–125. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.7.1.105
  • Neumann, R., Förster, J., & Strack, F. (2003). Motor compatibility: The bidirectional link between behavior and evaluation. In J. Musch & K. C. Klauer (Eds.), The Psychology of Evaluation (pp. 371–392). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Niedenthal, P. M., Barsalou, L. W., Winkielman, P., Krauth-Gruber, S., & Ric, F. (2005). Embodiment in attitudes, social perception, and emotion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9, 184–211. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0903_1
  • Nussinson, R., Seibt, B., Häfner, M., & Strack, F. (2010). Come a bit closer: Approach motor actions lead to feeling similar and behavioral assimilation. Social Cognition, 28(1), 40–58. doi:10.1521/soco.2010.28.1.40
  • Öhman, A. (1986). Face the beast and fear the face: Animal and social fears as prototypes for evolutionary analyses of emotion. Psychophysiology, 23, 123–145. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.1986.tb00608.x
  • Öhman, A. & Mineka, S. (2001). Fears, phobias, and preparedness: Toward and evolved module of fear and fear learning. Psychological Review, 108, 483–522. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.108.3.483
  • *Önal-Hartmann, C., Pauli, P., Ocklenburg, S., & Güntürkün, O. (2012). The motor side of emotions: Investigating the relationship between hemispheres, motor reactions and emotional stimuli. Psychological Research, 76, 311–316. doi:10.1007/s00426-011-0337-4
  • *Paladino, M.-P., & Castelli, L. (2008). On the immediate consequences of intergroup categorization: Activation of approach and avoidance motor behavior toward ingroup and outgroup members. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 755–768. doi:10.1177/0146167208315155
  • Phaf, R. H., Mohr, S. E., Rotteveel, M., & Wicherts, J. M. (2014). Approach, avoidance, and affect: a meta-analysis of approach-avoidance tendencies in manual reaction time tasks. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1–16. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00378
  • *Phaf, R. H., & Rotteveel, M. (2009). Looking at the bright side: The affective monitoring of direction. Emotion, 9, 729-733. doi:10.1037/a0016308
  • *Phills, C. E. (2006). Approaching what we like: The impact of implicit attitudes on approach behaviors., York University, Toronto, Canada: Master of Arts.
  • Priester, J. R., Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1996). The influence of motor processes on attitudes toward novel versus familiar semantic stimuli. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 442–447. doi:10.1177/0146167296225002
  • Proctor, R. W., & Vu, K.-P. L. (2006). Stimulus-response compatibility principles: Data, theory, and application. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
  • Rinck, M., & Becker, E. S. (2007). Approach and avoidance in fear of spiders. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 38(2), 105–120. doi:10.1016/j.jbtep.2006.10.001
  • *Roelofs, K., Elzinga, B. M., & Rotteveel, M. (2005). The effects of stress-induced cortisol responses on approach–avoidance behavior. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 30, 665–677. doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2005.02.008
  • Roelofs, K., Putnam, P., Schouten, S., Lange, W. G., Volman, I., & Rinck, M. (2010). Gaze direction differentially affects avoidance tendencies to happy and angry faces in socially anxious individuals. Behavior Research Therapy, 48, 290–294. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2009.11.008
  • Rosenberg, M. J., & Hovland, C. I. (1960). Cognitive, affective, and behavioral components of attitudes. In M. J. Rosenberg, J. Milton, C. I. Hovland, W. J. McGuire, R. P. Abelson & J. W. Brehm (Eds.), Attitude organization and change: An analysis of consistency among attitude components (Vol. 3, pp. 1–14). Oxford, England: Yale University Press.
  • *Rotteveel, M., & Phaf, R. H. (2004). Automatic affective evaluation does not automatically predispose for arm flexion and extension. Emotion, 4, 156–172. doi:10.1037/1528-3542.4.2.156
  • *Seibt, B., Neumann, R., Nussinson, R., & Strack, F. (2008). Movement direction or change in distance? Self- and object-related approach-avoidance motions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 713–720. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2007.04.013
  • *Slepian, M. L., Young, S. G., Rule, N. O., Weisbuch, M., & Ambady, N. (2012). Embodied impression formation: Social judgments and motor cues to approach and avoidance. Social Cognition, 30, 232–240. doi:10.1521/soco.2012.30.2.232
  • *Solarz, A. K. (1960). Latency of instrumental responses as a function of compatibility with the meaning of eliciting verbal signs. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 239–245. doi:10.1037/h0047274
  • Sterne, J. A. C., & Egger, M. (2001). Funnel plots for detecting bias in meta-analysis: Guidelines on choice of axis. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 54, 1046–1055. doi:10.1016/S0895-4356(01)00377-8
  • Strack, F., Martin, L. L., & Stepper, S. (1988). Inhibiting and facilitating conditions of the human smile: A nonobtrusive test of the facial feedback hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 768–777. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.5.768
  • *Theodoridou, A., Penton-Voak, I. S., & Rowe, A. C. (2013). A direct examination of the effect of intranasal administration of oxytocin on approach-avoidance motor responses to emotional stimuli. PLOS One, 8(2), 1–6. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0058113.t001
  • Tom, G., Pettersen, P., Lau, T., Burton, T., & Cook, J. (1991). The role of overt head movement in the formation of affect. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 12, 281–289. doi:10.1207/s15324834basp1203_3
  • Valentine, J. C., Pigott, T. D., & Rothstein, H. R. (2010). How many studies do you need? A primer on statistical power for meta-analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 35, 215–247. doi:10.3102/1076998609346961
  • van Dantzig, S., Zeelenberg, R., & Pecher, D. (2009). Unconstraining theories of embodied cognition. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 345–351. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2008.11.001
  • *van Peer, J. M., Roelofs, K., Rotteveel, M., van Dijk, J. G., Spinhoven, P., & Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2007). The effect of cortisol administration on approach-avoidance behavior: An event-related potential study. Biological Psychology, 76(3), 135–146. doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2007.07.003
  • *von Borries, A. K. L., Volman, I., de Bruijn, E. R. A., Bulton, B. H., Verkes, R. J., & Roelofs, K. (2012). Psychopaths lack the automatic avoidance of social threat: Relation to instrumental aggression. Psychiatry Research, 200, 761–766. doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2012.06.026
  • *Wentura, D., Rothermund, K., & Bak, P. (2000). Automatic vigilance: The attention-grabbing power of approach- and avoidance-related social information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 1024–1037. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.78.6.1024
  • Wicker, A. W. (1969). Attitudes versus actions: The relationship of verbal and overt behavior responses to attitude objects. Journal of Social Issues, 25(4), 41–78. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1969.tb00619.x
  • Wilkowski, B. M., & Meier, B. P. (2010). Bring it on: Angry facial expressions potentiate approach-motivated motor behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 201–210. doi:10.1037/a0017992
  • *Wilkowski, B. M., & Robinson, M. D. (2006). Stopping dead in one’s tracks: Motor inhibition following incidental evaluations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 479–490. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2005.08.007
  • Woud, M. L., Becker, E. S., & Rinck, M. (2008). Implicit evaluation bias induced by approach and avoidance. Cognition and Emotion, 22, 1187–1197. doi:10.1080/02699930801906843

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.