3,439
Views
36
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

A Bayesian hierarchical diffusion model decomposition of performance in Approach–Avoidance Tasks

, , &
Pages 1424-1444 | Received 27 May 2014, Accepted 04 Nov 2014, Published online: 09 Dec 2014

REFERENCES

  • Adams, R. B., Ambady, N., Macrae, C. N., & Kleck, R. E. (2006). Emotional expressions forecast approach-avoidance behavior. Motivation and Emotion, 30, 177–186. doi:10.1007/s11031-006-9020-2
  • Batchelder, W. H. (1998). Multinomial processing tree models and psychological assessment. Psychological Assessment, 10, 331–344. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.10.4.331
  • Bouton, M. E. (1993). Context, time, and memory retrieval in the interference paradigms of Pavlovian learning. Psychological Bulletin, 114(1), 80–99. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.114.1.80
  • Bradley, M. M., & Lang, P. J. (2007). Emotion and motivation. Handbook of Psychophysiology, 3, 587–589.
  • Chance, P. (1999). Thorndike's puzzle boxes and the origins of the experimental analysis of behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 72, 433–440. doi:10.1901/jeab.1999.72-433
  • Chen, M., & Bargh, J. A. (1999). Consequences of automatic evaluation: Immediate behavioral predispositions to approach or avoid the stimulus. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 215–224. doi:10.1177/0146167299025002007
  • Cousijn, J., Goudriaan, A. E., & Wiers, R. W. (2011). Reaching out towards cannabis: Approach-bias in heavy cannabis users predicts changes in cannabis use. Addiction, 106, 1667–1674. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03475.x
  • De Houwer, J., Crombez, G., Baeyens, F., & Hermans, D. (2001). On the generality of the affective Simon effect. Cognition & Emotion, 15, 189–206. doi:10.1080/02699930125883
  • Dienes, Z. (2011). Bayesian versus orthodox statistics: Which side are you on? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 274–290. doi:10.1177/1745691611406920
  • Dutilh, G., Krypotos, A.-M., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2011). Task-related versus stimulus-specific practice: A diffusion model account. Experimental Psychology, 58, 434–442. doi:10.1027/1618-3169/a000111
  • Dyjas, O., Grasman, R. P., Wetzels, R., van der Maas, H. L., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2012). What's in a name: A Bayesian hierarchical analysis of the name-letter effect. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 334.
  • Eberl, C., Wiers, R. W., Pawelczack, S., Rinck, M., Becker, E. S., & Lindenmeyer, J. (2013). Implementation of approach bias re-training in alcoholism: How many sessions are needed? Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 38, 587–594. doi:10.1111/acer.12281
  • Edwards, W., Lindman, H., & Savage, L. J. (1963). Bayesian statistical inference for psychological research. Psychological Review, 70, 193–242. doi:10.1037/h0044139
  • Effting, M., & Kindt, M. (2007). Contextual control of human fear associations in a renewal paradigm. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 45, 2002–2018. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2007.02.011
  • Efron, B., & Morris, C. (1977). Stein's paradox in statistics. Scientific American, 236(5), 119–127. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0577-119
  • Frijda, N. H. (1988). The laws of emotion. American Psychologist, 43, 349–358. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.43.5.349
  • Gelman, A., & Hill, J. (2007). Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464–1480. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464
  • Hays, W. L. (1973). Statistics for the social sciences (Vol. 410). New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
  • Heathcote, A., Brown, S., & Mewhort, D. (2000). The power law repealed: The case for an exponential law of practice. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7, 185–207. doi:10.3758/BF03212979
  • Heathcote, A., Brown, S. D., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (in press). An introduction to good practices in cognitive modeling. In B. U. Forstmann & E.-J. Wagenmakers (Eds.), An introduction to model-based cognitive neuroscience. New York, NY: Springer.
  • Heathcote, A., Popiel, S. J., & Mewhort, D. J. (1991). Analysis of response time distributions: An example using the Stroop task. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 340–347. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.109.2.340
  • Heuer, K., Rinck, M., & Becker, E. S. (2007). Avoidance of emotional facial expressions in social anxiety: The Approach-Avoidance Task. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 45, 2990–3001. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2007.08.010
  • Ho, T. C., Yang, G., Wu, J., Cassey, P., Brown, S. D., Hoang, N., … Yang, T. T. (2014). Functional connectivity of negative emotional processing in adolescent depression. Journal of Affective Disorders, 155, 65–74. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2013.10.025
  • Jeffreys, H. (1961). Theory of probability (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Klein, A. M., Becker, E. S., & Rinck, M. (2011). Approach and avoidance tendencies in spider fearful children: The Approach-Avoidance Task. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 20, 224–231. doi:10.1007/s10826-010-9402-7
  • Krieglmeyer, R., & Deutsch, R. (2010). Comparing measures of approach–avoidance behaviour: The manikin task vs. two versions of the joystick task. Cognition and Emotion, 24, 810–828. doi:10.1080/02699930903047298
  • Kristjansson, S. D., Kircher, J. C., & Webb, A. K. (2007). Multilevel models for repeated measures research designs in psychophysiology: An introduction to growth curve modeling. Psychophysiology, 44, 728–736. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00544.x
  • Krypotos, A.-M., Effting, M., Arnaudova, I., Kindt, M., & Beckers, T. (2014). Avoided by association: Acquisition, extinction, and renewal of avoidance tendencies towards conditioned fear stimuli. Clinical Psychological Science, 2, 336–343. doi:10.1177/2167702613503139
  • Lang, P. J. (1985). The cognitive psychophysiology of emotion: Fear and anxiety. In H. Tuma & J. Maser (Eds.), Anxiety and the anxiety disorders (pp. 131–170). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Lang, P. J., & Bradley, M. M. (2008). Appetitive and defensive motivation is the substrate of emotion. In A. J. Elliot (Ed.), Handbook of approach and avoidance motivation (pp. 51–65). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
  • Lee, M. D. (2011). How cognitive modeling can benefit from hierarchical Bayesian models. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 55(1), 1–7. doi:10.1016/jjmp.2010.08.013
  • Lee, M. D., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2013). Bayesian modeling for cognitive science: A practical course. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Leite, F. P., & Ratcliff, R. (2011). What cognitive processes drive response biases? A diffusion model analysis. Judgment and Decision Making, 6, 651–687.
  • Lewandowsky, S., & Farrell, S. (2010). Computational modeling in cognition: Principles and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Luce, R. (1986). Response times: Their role in inferring elementary mental organization. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Lynch, S. M. (2007). Introduction to applied Bayesian statistics and estimation for social scientists. New York, NY: Springer.
  • MacLeod, C., Mathews, A., Tata, P. (1986). Attentional bias in emotional disorders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 95(1), 15–20. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.95.1.15
  • Matzke, D., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2009). Psychological interpretation of the ex-Gaussian and shifted Wald parameters: A diffusion model analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 798–817. doi:10.3758/PBR.16.5.798
  • McAuley, T., Yap, M., Christ, S. E., & White, D. A. (2006). Revisiting inhibitory control across the life span: Insights from the ex-Gaussian distribution. Developmental Neuropsychology, 29, 447–458. doi:10.1207/s15326942dn2903_4
  • Mead, R. (1990). The design of experiments: Statistical principles for practical applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Miller, J. (1988). A warning about median reaction time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 539–543. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.14.3.539
  • Morey, R. D., Pratte, M. S., & Rouder, J. N. (2008). Problematic effects of aggregation in zROC analysis and a hierarchical modeling solution. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 52, 376–388. doi:10.1016/j.jmp.2008.02.001
  • Mulder, M. J., Wagenmakers, E.-J., Ratcliff, R., Boekel, W., & Forstmann, B. U. (2012). Bias in the brain: A diffusion model analysis of prior probability and potential payoff. The Journal of Neuroscience, 32, 2335–2343. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4156-11.2012
  • Neumann, R., Hülsenbeck, K., & Seibt, B. (2004). Attitudes towards people with AIDS and avoidance behavior: Automatic and reflective bases of behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 543–550. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2003.10.006
  • Nilsson, H., Rieskamp, J., & Wagenmakers, E. (2011). Hierarchical Bayesian parameter estimation for cumulative prospect theory. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 55(1), 84–93. doi:10.1016/j.jmp.2010.08.006
  • Pachella, R. G. (1974). The interpretation of reaction time in information-processing research. In B. H. Kantowitz (Ed.), Human information processing: Tutorials in performance and cognition (pp. 41–82). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Pe, M. L., Vandekerckhove, J., & Kuppens, P. (2013). A diffusion model account of the relationship between the emotional flanker task and rumination and depression. Emotion, 13, 739–747. doi:10.1037/a0031628
  • Ratcliff, R. (1978). A theory of memory retrieval. Psychological Review, 85, 59–108. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.85.2.59
  • Ratcliff, R. (1979). Group reaction time distributions and an analysis of distribution statistics. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 446–461. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.446
  • Ratcliff, R. (1993). Methods for dealing with reaction time outliers. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 510–532. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.114.3.510
  • Ratcliff, R. (2002). A diffusion model account of response time and accuracy in a brightness discrimination task: Fitting real data and failing to fit fake but plausible data. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 278–291. doi:10.3758/BF03196283
  • Ratcliff, R., & McKoon, G. (2008). The diffusion decision model: Theory and data for two–choice decision tasks. Neural Computation, 20, 873–922. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3733-05.2006
  • Ratcliff, R., & Tuerlinckx, F. (2002). Estimating parameters of the diffusion model: Approaches to dealing with contaminant reaction times and parameter variability. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 438–481. doi:10.3758/BF03196302
  • Rinck, M., & Becker, E. S. (2007). Approach and avoidance in fear of spiders. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 38(2), 105–120. doi:10.1016/j.jbtep.2006.10.001
  • Rouder, J. N., & Lu, J. (2005). An introduction to Bayesian hierarchical models with an application in the theory of signal detection. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 573–604. doi:10.3758/BF03196750
  • Rouder, J. N., & Morey, R. D. (2012). Default Bayes factors for model selection in regression. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 47, 877–903. doi:10.1080/00273171.2012.734737
  • Rouder, J. N., Morey, R. D., Speckman, P. L., & Province, J. M. (2012). Default Bayes factors for ANOVA designs. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 56, 356–374. doi:10.1016/j.jmp.2012.08.001
  • Rouder, J. N., Speckman, P. L., Sun, D., Morey, R. D., & Iverson, G. (2009). Bayesian t tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 225–237. doi:10.3758/PBR.16.2.225
  • Rutherford, H. J. V., & Lindell, A. K. (2011). Thriving and surviving: Approach and avoidance motivation and lateralization. Emotion Review, 3, 333–343. doi:10.1177/1754073911402392
  • Salemink, E., van den Hout, M. A., & Kindt, M. (2007). Selective attention and threat: Quick orienting versus slow disengagement and two versions of the dot probe task. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 45, 607–615. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2006.04.004
  • Schouten, J. F., & Bekker, J. A. M. (1967). Reaction time and accuracy. Acta Psychologica, 27, 143–153. doi:10.1016/0001-6918(67)90054-6
  • Sellke, T., Bayarri, M., & Berger, J. O. (2001). Calibration of ρ values for testing precise null hypotheses. The American Statistician, 55(1), 62–71. doi:10.1198/000313001300339950
  • Shiffrin, R., Lee, M., Kim, W., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2008). A survey of model evaluation approaches with a tutorial on hierarchical Bayesian methods. Cognitive Science, 32, 1248–1284. doi:10.1080/03640210802414826
  • Smith, P. L., & Ratcliff, R. (in press). A tutorial on the diffusion model of decision making. In B. U. Forstmann & E.-J. Wagenmakers (Eds.), An introduction to modelbased cognitive neuroscience. New York, NY: Springer.
  • Spruyt, A., De Houwer, J., Tibboel, H., Verschuere, B., Crombez, G., Verbanck, P., … Noël, X. (2013). On the predictive validity of automatically activated approach/avoidance tendencies in abstaining alcohol-dependent patients. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 127(1–3), 81–86. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2012.06.019
  • Strauss, G. P., Frank, M. J., Waltz, J. A., Kasanova, Z., Herbener, E. S., & Gold, J. M. (2011). Deficits in positive reinforcement learning and uncertainty-driven exploration are associated with distinct aspects of negative symptoms in schizophrenia. Biological Psychiatry, 69, 424–431. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.10.015
  • Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643–662. doi:10.1037/h0054651
  • Vandekerckhove, J., Tuerlinckx, F., & Lee, M. D. (2011). Hierarchical diffusion models for two-choice response times. Psychological Methods, 16(1), 44–62. doi:10.1037/a0021765
  • Van Gucht, D., Vansteenwegen, D., Van den Bergh, O., & Beckers, T. (2008). Conditioned craving cues elicit an automatic approach tendency. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 46, 1160–1169. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2008.05.010
  • van Ravenzwaaij, D., Dutilh, G., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2012). A diffusion model decomposition of the effects of alcohol on perceptual decision making. Psychopharmacology, 219, 1017–1025. doi:10.1007/s00213-011-2435-9
  • Vansteenwegen, D., Hermans, D., Vervliet, B., Francken, G., Beckers, T., Baeyens, F., Eelen, P. (2005). Return of fear in a human differential conditioning paradigm caused by a return to the original acquistion context. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 43, 323–336. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2004.01.001
  • Voncken, M., Rinck, M., Deckers, A., & Lange, W.-G. (2011). Anticipation of social interaction changes implicit approach-avoidance behavior of socially anxious individuals. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 36, 1–10.
  • Vrijsen, J. N., van Oostrom, I., Speckens, A., Becker, E. S., & Rinck, M. (2013). Approach and avoidance of emotional faces in happy and sad mood. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 37(1), 1–6. doi:10.1007/s10608-012-9436-9
  • Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2007). A practical solution to the pervasive problems of p values. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 779–804. doi:10.3758/BF03194105
  • Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2009). Methodological and empirical developments for the Ratcliff diffusion model of response times and accuracy. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 21, 641–671. doi:10.1080/09541440802205067
  • Wagenmakers, E.-J., & Brown, S. (2007). On the linear relation between the mean and the standard deviation of a response time distribution. Psychological Review, 114, 830–841. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.114.3.830
  • Wagenmakers, E.-J., van der Maas, H. L. J., & Grasman, R. P. P. P. (2007). An EZ–diffusion model for response time and accuracy. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(1), 3–22. doi:10.3758/BF03194023
  • Wetzels, R., Grasman, R. P. P. P., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2012). A default Bayesian hypothesis test for ANOVA designs. The American Statistician, 66(2), 104–111. doi:10.1080/00031305.2012.695956
  • Wetzels, R., Raaijmakers, J. G. W., Jakab, E., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2009). How to quantify support for and against the null hypothesis: A flexible WinBUGS implementation of a default Bayesian t–test. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 752–760. doi:10.3758/PBR.16.4.752
  • Wetzels, R., van Ravenzwaaij, D., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (in press). Bayesian analysis. In R. Cautin & S. Lilienfeld (Eds.), The Encyclopedia of Clinical Psychology. Wiley-Blackwell.
  • White, C. N., Ratcliff, R., Vasey, M. W., & McKoon, G. (2010a). Anxiety enhances threat processing without competition among multiple inputs: A diffusion model analysis. Emotion, 10, 662–677. doi:10.1037/a0019474
  • White, C. N., Ratcliff, R., Vasey, M. W., & McKoon, G. (2010b). Using diffusion models to understand clinical disorders. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 54(1), 39–52. doi:10.1016/j.jmp.2010.01.004
  • Wiecki, T., Poland, J. S., & Frank, M. J. (in press). Model-based cognitive neuroscience approaches to computational psychiatry: Clustering and classification. Clinical Psychological Science.
  • Wiecki, T. V., Sofer, I., & Frank, M. J. (2013). HDDM: Hierarchical Bayesian estimation of the drift–diffusion model in Python. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, 7, 14. doi:10.3389/fninf.2013.00014
  • Wiers, R. W., Eberl, C., Rinck, M., Becker, E., & Lindenmeyer, J. (2011). Retraining automatic action tendencies changes alcoholic patients approach bias for alcohol and improves treatment outcome. Psychological Science, 22, 490–497. doi:10.1177/0956797611400615
  • Wiers, R. W., Rinck, M., Dictus, M., & Van den Wildenberg, E. (2009). Relatively strong automatic appetitive action-tendencies in male carriers of the OPRM1 G-allele. Genes, Brain and Behavior, 8(1), 101–106. doi:10.1111/j.1601-183X.2008.00454.x
  • Wiers, R. W., Rinck, M., Kordts, R., Houben, K., & Strack, F. (2010). Retraining automatic action-tendencies to approach alcohol in hazardous drinkers. Addiction, 105, 279–287. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02775.x
  • Williams, J. M., Mathews, A., MacLeod, C. (1996). The emotional Stroop task and psychopathology. Psychological Bulletin, 120(1), 3–24. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.120.1.3