Team members’ emotional displays as indicators of team functioning

REFERENCES

• Abelson, R. P., Dasgupta, N., Park, J., & Banaji, M. R. (1998). Perceptions of the collective other. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 243–250. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0204_2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Asch, S. (1952). Social psychology Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Barsade, S. G., & Gibson, D. E. (2012). Group affect its influence on individual and group outcomes. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21, 119–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumeister, R. F., Stillwell, A. M., & Heatherton, T. F. (1994). Guilt: An interpersonal approach. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 243–267.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campion, M. A., Medsker, G. J., & Higgs, A. C. (1993). Relations between work group characteristics and effectiveness: Implications for designing effective work groups. Personnel Psychology, 46, 823–847.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, S., Kamarck, T., & Mermelstein, R. (1983). A global measure of perceived stress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 24, 385–396. doi:10.2307/2136404
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, T. H., Lobel, S. A., & McLeod, P. L. (1991). Effects of ethnic group cultural differences on cooperative and competitive behavior on a group task. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 827–847.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, M. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 113–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, A. H., & Manstead, A. S. R. (in press). Social functions of emotion and emotion regulation. In M. Lewis, J. Haviland, & L. Feldman Barrett (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (4th ed.). New York: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Ford, T. E., & Kruglanski, A. W. (1995). Effects of epistemic motivations on the use of accessible constructs in social judgment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 950–962.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frijda, N. H. (1986). The emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guzzo, R. A., & Dickson, M. W. (1996). Teams in organizations: Recent research on performance and effectiveness. Annual Review of Psychology, 47, 307–338.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton, D. L., & Sherman, S. J. (1996). Perceiving persons and groups. Psychological Review, 103, 336–355.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilgen, D. R. (1999). Teams embedded in organizations: Some implications. American Psychologist, 54, 129–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jehn, K. A. (1995). A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(2), 256–282. doi:10.2307/2393638
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jehn, K. A., & Mannix, E. A. (2001). The dynamic nature of conflict: A longitudinal study of intragroup conflict and group performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 238–251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kashima, Y., Woolcock, J., & Kashima, E. S. (2000). Group impressions as dynamic configurations: The tensor product model of group impression formation and change. Psychological Review, 107, 914–942.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keltner, D., & Buswell, B. N. (1997). Embarrassment: Its distinct form and appeasement functions. Psychological Bulletin, 122, 250–270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keltner, D., & Haidt, J. (1999). Social functions of emotions at four levels of analysis. Cognition and Emotion, 13, 505–521.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerr, N. L., & Tindale, R. S. (2004). Group performance and decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 623–655.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Bell, B. S. (2003). Work groups and teams in organizations. In W. C. Borman & D. R. Ilgen (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 12, pp. 333–375). New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Cognition and motivation in emotion. American Psychologist, 46, 352–367.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Bon, G. (1897). The crowd: A study of the popular mind. New York: MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Lickel, B., Hamilton, D. L., Wieczorkowska, G., Lewis, A., Sherman, S. J., & Uhles, A. N. (2000). Varieties of groups and the perception of group entitativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 223–246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacCann, C., & Roberts, R. D. (2008). New paradigms for assessing emotional intelligence: Theory and data. Emotion, 8, 540–551.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magee, J. C., & Tiedens, L. Z. (2006). Emotional ties that bind: The roles of valence and consistency of group emotion in inferences of cohesiveness and common fate. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1703–1715.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manstead, A. S. (1991). Emotion in social life. Cognition and Emotion, 5, 353–362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manstead, A. S., & Fischer, A. H. (2001). Social appraisal: The social world as object of and influence on appraisal processes. In K. R. Scherer, A. Schorr, & T. Johnstone (Eds.), Appraisal processes in emotion: Theory, methods, research (pp. 221–232). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, J. D., Salovey, P., Caruso, D. R., & Sitarenios, G. (2003). Measuring emotional intelligence with the MSCEIT V2. 0. Emotion, 3, 97–105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDougall, W. (1920). The group mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
   Google Scholar
• Oatley, K., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1987). Towards a cognitive theory of emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 1, 29–50. doi:10.1080/02699938708408362
   Google Scholar
• Olekalns, M., & Smith, P. L. (2005). Moments in time: Metacognition, trust, and outcomes in dyadic negotiations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1696–1707. doi:10.1177/0146167205278306
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parkinson, B. (1995). Ideas and realities of emotion. London: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, L. T., Weisbuch, M., & Ambady, N. (2014). People perception: Social vision of groups and consequences for organizing and interacting. Research in Organizational Behavior, 34, 101–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rink, F., & Ellemers, N. (2010). Benefiting from deep-level diversity: How congruence between knowledge and decision rules improves team decision making and team perceptions. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 13, 345–359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, J. A., & Carroll, J. M. (1999). On the bipolarity of positive and negative affect. Psychological Bulletin, 125(1), 3–30. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.125.1.3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanchez-Burks, J., & Huy, Q. N. (2009). Emotional aperture and strategic change: The accurate recognition of collective emotions. Organization Science, 20(1), 22–34. doi:10.1287/orsc.1070.0347
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serva, M. A., Fuller, M. A., & Mayer, R. C. (2005). The reciprocal nature of trust: A longitudinal study of interacting teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 625–648.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simons, T. L., & Peterson, R. S. (2000). Task conflict and relationship conflict in top management teams: The pivotal role of intragroup trust. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(1), 102–111. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.85.1.102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, C. A., & Ellsworth, P. C. (1985). Patterns of cognitive appraisal in emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 813–838.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spoor, J. R., & Kelly, J. R. (2004). The evolutionary significance of affect in groups: Communication and group bonding. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 7, 398–412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. (1986). The social identity of intergroup behavior. In W. A. S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology and intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Tronick, E. Z. (1989). Emotions and emotional communication in infants. American Psychologist, 44, 112–119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Kleij, R., Lijkwan, J. T., Rasker, P. C., & De Dreu, C. K. W. (2009). Effects of time pressure and communication environment on team processes and outcomes in dyadic planning. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 67, 411–423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Schalk, J., Hawk, S. T., Fischer, A. H., & Doosje, B. (2011). Moving faces, looking places: validation of the Amsterdam Dynamic Facial Expression Set (ADFES). Emotion, 11, 907–920.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Doorn, E. A., Heerdink, M. W., & Van Kleef, G. A. (2012). Emotion and the construal of social situations: Inferences of cooperation versus competition from expressions of anger, happiness, and disappointment. Cognition and Emotion, 12, 442–461. doi:10.1080/02699931.2011.648174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Kleef, G. A. (2009). How emotions regulate social life: The emotions as social information (EASI) model. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 184–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Kleef, G. A., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Manstead, A. S. R. (2004). The interpersonal effects of anger and happiness in negotiations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(1), 57–76. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.86.1.57
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Kleef, G. A., De Dreu, C. K., & Manstead, A. S. (2010). An interpersonal approach to emotion in social decision making: The emotions as social information model. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 45–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Kleef, G. A., Van Doorn, E. A., Heerdink, M. W., & Koning, L. F. (2011). Emotion is for influence. European Review of Social Psychology, 22, 114–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Knippenberg, D., De Dreu, C. K., & Homan, A. C. (2004). Work group diversity and group performance: An integrative model and research agenda. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 1008–1022. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.89.6.1008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, K. D. (2010). Dyads can be groups (and often are). Small Group Research, 41, 268–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, K. Y., & O’Reilly, C. A. (1998). Demography and diversity in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 20, 77–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wojciszke, B., Abele, A. E., & Baryla, W. (2009). Two dimensions of interpersonal attitudes: Liking depends on communion, respect depends on agency. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 973–990.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yammarino, F. J., & Dubinsky, A. J. (1990). Salesperson performance and managerially controllable factors: An investigation of individual and work group effects. Journal of Management, 16, 87–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar